Michigan lawmakers are considering legislation to discourage futile recount efforts by candidates who lose their election bids by an incontestable amount, forcing the candidate to foot the bill for the recount.
Introduced by Republican state Sen. Lisa Lyons (R-Alto) last week, the bill, H.B. 6097, would make a candidate who lost by more than 5 percent pay for the full cost of the recount for each precinct referred to (there are 6,300 precincts in Michigan) in his or her petition. The bill passed on a 5-3 vote in the House Elections committee Tuesday, and now moves to the state’s full House of Representatives for consideration.
Green Party candidate Jill Stein filed for a hand recount of all 4.8 million votes in Michigan (among others) in the Nov. 8 presidential election, citing unreliable voting machines and supposed irregularities.
According to the Detroit Free Press, current state law requires candidates who lose their race by greater than 0.5 percent to pay $125 per precinct for the recount, while the state pays for the rest. For Jill Stein, that meant a $973,750 check written to the state of Michigan. But the Great Lakes State is by no means coming out in the black on the deal, as the cost is expected to be as much as $12 million.
That leaves Michigan taxpayers on the hook for Stein’s political sideshow — a recount many feel she is not entitled to, given the margin of her defeat. Stein won a meager 1.1 percent of the vote in Michigan, finishing in fourth place — more than 2.2 million behind Donald Trump.
“Our current state law is more focused at a local level and we’ve found that it’s working well at that level,” said state Rep. Lyons, per Kathleen Gray and the Free Press. “This would protect our taxpayers for footing the bill for a frivolous recount where the outcome is highly unlikely or nearly impossible to change.”
Jill Stein, of course, does not expect to change the results of the election. She launched her laughable recount effort in a vainglorious attempt to raise money. As Conservative Review’s Rob Eno explained: “Stein did this to increase her donor file. Many politicians ‘buy’ their donor files from their campaigns. It is a valuable source of income for the candidate. In a report on Ben Carson’s donor list an expert told NBC News that each email address of an active donor is worth $5-$6 on the open rental market over a three year period. Stein is looking to cash in.”
Should Lisa Lyons’ bill pass in Michigan, it would be retroactive to Jan. 1, 2016, forcing Jill Stein to pay for her own demands. It would justifiably save the state’s taxpayers millions, and stick it to the Green Party con artist.
Chris Pandolfo is a staff writer and type-shouter for Conservative Review. He holds a B.A. in Politics and Economics from Hillsdale College. His interests are Conservative Political Philosophy, the American Founding, and Progressive Rock. Follow him on Twitter for doom-saying and great album recommendations: @ChrisCPandolfo
Share
Michigan lawmakers strike back: Jill Stein may be forced to pay for her ‘frivolous’ recount
By: Chris Pandolfo | December 07, 2016
Mark Lennihan | AP Photo
Share
-
Font Size
-
A
-
A
-
A
Print Images PrintMichigan lawmakers are considering legislation to discourage futile recount efforts by candidates who lose their election bids by an incontestable amount, forcing the candidate to foot the bill for the recount.
Introduced by Republican state Sen. Lisa Lyons (R-Alto) last week, the bill, H.B. 6097, would make a candidate who lost by more than 5 percent pay for the full cost of the recount for each precinct referred to (there are 6,300 precincts in Michigan) in his or her petition. The bill passed on a 5-3 vote in the House Elections committee Tuesday, and now moves to the state’s full House of Representatives for consideration.
Green Party candidate Jill Stein filed for a hand recount of all 4.8 million votes in Michigan (among others) in the Nov. 8 presidential election, citing unreliable voting machines and supposed irregularities.
According to the Detroit Free Press, current state law requires candidates who lose their race by greater than 0.5 percent to pay $125 per precinct for the recount, while the state pays for the rest. For Jill Stein, that meant a $973,750 check written to the state of Michigan. But the Great Lakes State is by no means coming out in the black on the deal, as the cost is expected to be as much as $12 million.
That leaves Michigan taxpayers on the hook for Stein’s political sideshow — a recount many feel she is not entitled to, given the margin of her defeat. Stein won a meager 1.1 percent of the vote in Michigan, finishing in fourth place — more than 2.2 million behind Donald Trump.
“Our current state law is more focused at a local level and we’ve found that it’s working well at that level,” said state Rep. Lyons, per Kathleen Gray and the Free Press. “This would protect our taxpayers for footing the bill for a frivolous recount where the outcome is highly unlikely or nearly impossible to change.”
Jill Stein, of course, does not expect to change the results of the election. She launched her laughable recount effort in a vainglorious attempt to raise money. As Conservative Review’s Rob Eno explained: “Stein did this to increase her donor file. Many politicians ‘buy’ their donor files from their campaigns. It is a valuable source of income for the candidate. In a report on Ben Carson’s donor list an expert told NBC News that each email address of an active donor is worth $5-$6 on the open rental market over a three year period. Stein is looking to cash in.”
Should Lisa Lyons’ bill pass in Michigan, it would be retroactive to Jan. 1, 2016, forcing Jill Stein to pay for her own demands. It would justifiably save the state’s taxpayers millions, and stick it to the Green Party con artist.
Don’t Miss:
Chris Pandolfo is a staff writer and type-shouter for Conservative Review. He holds a B.A. in Politics and Economics from Hillsdale College. His interests are Conservative Political Philosophy, the American Founding, and Progressive Rock. Follow him on Twitter for doom-saying and great album recommendations: @ChrisCPandolfo
Share
Share
NEWSLETTER SIGNUP
Sign up for vote alerts and commentary from Conservative Review with our weekly newsletter!
By: Chris Pandolfo | 03/17/2017
By: Daniel Horowitz | 03/17/2017
By: Nate Madden | 03/17/2017
By: Benjamin Weingarten | 03/17/2017
By: Dan Bongino | 03/17/2017
Tweets
RECENT POSTS
7-week losing streak: CNN ratings come in behind MSNBC ... again!
Chris Pandolfo | 03/17/2017Weak!
Levin calls out statist media again
Nate Madden | 03/15/2017“It’s not just what they report … it’s what they choose NOT to investigate.”
Are 75 pct of the Canadians who favor vetting 'FASCIST' too?
Nate Madden | 03/15/2017Multiculturalism no more? Great majority of Canadians want to screen migrants for 'anti-Canadian values.'
Terrorism on campus: Let’s call Middlebury’s mob what it IS
Nate Madden | 03/15/2017Trump Derangement Syndrome has given the Left a growing violence problem.
5 reasons Maddow's tax 'bombshell' story deserves a gift-basket from Trump
Chris Pandolfo | 03/15/2017Her left-wing hysterics scored points for the president.
Paul Ryan ditched Trump. So why is the president going all-in on RINOcare?
Chris Pandolfo | 03/14/2017Obamacare repeal requires leadership Mr. President.
Texas redistricting case makes it official: Courts are rigging the game ... and it's entirely legal
Nate Madden | 03/13/2017This is how Democrats pick the lock on elections.
Levin: Open letter to Associated Press reporter Jonathan Lemire
Mark Levin | 03/11/2017Media hacks still don't understand plain language.
Orrin Hatch is a lying Beltway clinger who deserves to be kicked to the curb
Chris Pandolfo | 03/11/2017Go home, senator.
Levin: The media are caught red-handed in their propaganda, and they are FREAKING out!
Phil Shiver | 03/10/2017They're backed into a corner and all they can do is try and flip the story.