Is Trump’s ban on entry of aliens from seven majority Muslim countries based in legal authority? That is the subject of a Congressional Research Service report written three days after Donald Trump took office. The report lays out the history, since Reagan, of barring admission via presidential action. Barack Obama used this authority more than any president of the last three and a half decades.
Rich Lowry over at National Review linked to the report in a blog post earlier this morning. Lowry highlighted the pertinent section of the report (embedded below). Here’s the most important part of what CRS found.
Over the years, Presidents have relied upon Section 212(f) to suspend or otherwise restrict the entry of individual aliens and classes of aliens, often (although not always) in conjunction with the imposition of financial sanctions upon these aliens. Among those so excluded have been aliens whose actions “threaten the peace, security, or stability of Libya”; officials of the North Korean government; and aliens responsible for “serious human rights violations.”
Neither the text of Section 212(f) nor the case law to date suggests any firm legal limits upon the President’s exercise of his authority to exclude aliens under this provision.
NRO’s Andy McCarthy, a former Justice Department official, also laid out the legal basis for the executive action in more detail.
Here’s the report in full. Of particular note is the comprehensive list of every time since Ronald Reagan that the president has barred individuals from entering the country.
According to the report, here are the number of times each president, since Reagan, has limited immigration to specific groups of people:
Ronald Reagan - Five times
George H. W Bush - One time
Bill Clinton - 12 times
George W. Bush - Six times
Barack Obama - 19 times
Not included in the CRS report is that Hillary Clinton's State Department, without a presidential action, suspended all refugee applications from Iraq for six months in 2011.
As a result of the Kentucky case, the State Department stopped processing Iraq refugees for six months in 2011, federal officials told ABC News – even for many who had heroically helped U.S. forces as interpreters and intelligence assets. One Iraqi who had aided American troops was assassinated before his refugee application could be processed, because of the immigration delays, two U.S. officials said. In 2011, fewer than 10,000 Iraqis were resettled as refugees in the U.S., half the number from the year before, State Department statistics show.
While one can disagree with the policy, it seems that Trump is well within his rights to issue this order.
Barack Obama far and away used the power to limit immigration more than any other president in recent memory. Perhaps this is why the mainstream media is predicting that Trump’s orders will withstand legal scrutiny. Politico reported, that “Early wins against [the] Trump immigration order may not last.”
One Muslim-rights group, the Council on American Islamic Relations, said it planned a new federal lawsuit Monday charging that Trump’s order is unconstitutional because it amounts to thinly veiled discrimination against Muslims.
That suit could face an uphill battle because courts have rarely accorded constitutional rights to foreigners outside the U.S. However, foreign citizens who are permanent U.S. residents generally have a stronger claim to recourse in the courts. In addition, legal experts say U.S. citizen relatives of foreigners could have legal standing to pursue a case charging religious discrimination.
Still, presidents have broad discretion over the nation's immigration and refugee policy. A 1952 immigration law gives the chief executive the power to bar "any class" of immigrants from the country if allowing them is deemed "detrimental to the interests of the United States."
The media fueled hysteria over the weekend, pushing the narrative that Trump’s executive order was “illegal” and “unconstitutional.” While one can disagree with the policy, it seems that Trump is well within his rights to issue this order.
Editor's note: This article has been updated to clarify that in 2011 the State Department, under Hillary Clinton, suspended all refugee applications from Iraq.
Trump should work with House conservatives to bolster his immigration agenda against the courts, instead of fighting them to enshrine Obamacare into law.
Share
Is Trump's 'immigration ban' illegal? Ask the last FIVE presidents
By: Robert Eno | January 30, 2017
Casper1774 Studio | Shutterstock
Share
-
Font Size
-
A
-
A
-
A
Print Images PrintIs Trump’s ban on entry of aliens from seven majority Muslim countries based in legal authority? That is the subject of a Congressional Research Service report written three days after Donald Trump took office. The report lays out the history, since Reagan, of barring admission via presidential action. Barack Obama used this authority more than any president of the last three and a half decades.
Rich Lowry over at National Review linked to the report in a blog post earlier this morning. Lowry highlighted the pertinent section of the report (embedded below). Here’s the most important part of what CRS found.
Over the years, Presidents have relied upon Section 212(f) to suspend or otherwise restrict the entry of individual aliens and classes of aliens, often (although not always) in conjunction with the imposition of financial sanctions upon these aliens. Among those so excluded have been aliens whose actions “threaten the peace, security, or stability of Libya”; officials of the North Korean government; and aliens responsible for “serious human rights violations.”
Neither the text of Section 212(f) nor the case law to date suggests any firm legal limits upon the President’s exercise of his authority to exclude aliens under this provision.
NRO’s Andy McCarthy, a former Justice Department official, also laid out the legal basis for the executive action in more detail.
Here’s the report in full. Of particular note is the comprehensive list of every time since Ronald Reagan that the president has barred individuals from entering the country.
Congressional Research Service: "Executive Authority to Exclude Aliens: In Brief" by Conservative Review on Scribd.
According to the report, here are the number of times each president, since Reagan, has limited immigration to specific groups of people:
Not included in the CRS report is that Hillary Clinton's State Department, without a presidential action, suspended all refugee applications from Iraq for six months in 2011.
ABC News reported, on the de facto ban of Iraqis in 2013:
While one can disagree with the policy, it seems that Trump is well within his rights to issue this order.
Barack Obama far and away used the power to limit immigration more than any other president in recent memory. Perhaps this is why the mainstream media is predicting that Trump’s orders will withstand legal scrutiny. Politico reported, that “Early wins against [the] Trump immigration order may not last.”
One Muslim-rights group, the Council on American Islamic Relations, said it planned a new federal lawsuit Monday charging that Trump’s order is unconstitutional because it amounts to thinly veiled discrimination against Muslims.
That suit could face an uphill battle because courts have rarely accorded constitutional rights to foreigners outside the U.S. However, foreign citizens who are permanent U.S. residents generally have a stronger claim to recourse in the courts. In addition, legal experts say U.S. citizen relatives of foreigners could have legal standing to pursue a case charging religious discrimination.
Still, presidents have broad discretion over the nation's immigration and refugee policy. A 1952 immigration law gives the chief executive the power to bar "any class" of immigrants from the country if allowing them is deemed "detrimental to the interests of the United States."
The media fueled hysteria over the weekend, pushing the narrative that Trump’s executive order was “illegal” and “unconstitutional.” While one can disagree with the policy, it seems that Trump is well within his rights to issue this order.
Editor's note: This article has been updated to clarify that in 2011 the State Department, under Hillary Clinton, suspended all refugee applications from Iraq.
Don’t Miss:
Share
Share
NEWSLETTER SIGNUP
Sign up for vote alerts and commentary from Conservative Review with our weekly newsletter!
By: Nate Madden | 03/15/2017
By: Jeffrey Lord | 03/15/2017
By: Dan Bongino | 03/15/2017
By: Nate Madden | 03/15/2017
By: Chris Pandolfo | 03/15/2017
Tweets
RECENT POSTS
Are 75 pct of the Canadians who favor vetting 'FASCIST' too?
Nate Madden | 03/15/2017Multiculturalism no more? Great majority of Canadians want to screen migrants for 'anti-Canadian values.'
Trump busts Russian collusion myth; DOJ targets top Russian spies
Jordan Schachtel | 03/15/2017Two FSB officials indicted in connection with 2014 Yahoo hack.
6 unsettling ways Trump's foreign policy is headed toward disaster
Daniel Horowitz | 03/15/2017Will Trump follow through on foreign policy promises of his campaign?
Hawaii sues Trump admin for discrimination … but have they checked the mirror?
Hans von Spakovsky | 03/15/2017The Aloha state appears to be engaged in its own blatant racial and ethnic discrimination.
Creeping on your kids: What you don't know about the slimy, slithering tentacles of Big Government
Robert Eno | 03/15/2017Are we going to accept this Soviet-style violation of privacy and individual liberty?
The agony of a conservative soul trapped in a Republican body – The Conservative Conscience Ep98
Daniel Horowitz | 03/14/2017We are fighting with the media (and even CBO) over policies that aren’t even conservative.
Trump admin making a BIG mistake in thinking Palestinian leader Abbas is a peace broker
Jordan Schachtel | 03/14/2017Abbas has long been a terrorist supporter and inciter.
Iran deal architect is now running Tehran policy at the State Department
Jordan Schachtel | 03/14/2017Sahar Nowrouzzadeh is now ‘burrowed in’ to State.
No sovereignty allowed. Rogue judges give legal standing to future, HYPOTHETICAL immigrants
Daniel Horowitz | 03/14/2017Trump should work with House conservatives to bolster his immigration agenda against the courts, instead of fighting them to enshrine Obamacare into law.
Trump has a chance to shake up the US-Saudi relationship: Will he?
Jordan Schachtel | 03/13/2017President to meet with Saudi Arabia's second in line to the throne.