© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
The following is an excerpt from Blaze Media’s daily Capitol Hill Brief email newsletter:
There’s a lot of buzz about the announced Thursday vote on new House Judiciary Committee procedures related to the committee’s impeachment probe into President Donald Trump, but how much of that buzz is warranted?
While committee chair Jerry Nadler calls this a “next step” in the impeachment process, the committee’s top Republican says that panel Democrats are “trying to pull a fast one” on voters by making the probe look more formal than it actually is. LevinTV host Mark Levin, a former chief of staff to a U.S. attorney general, says that Democrats are “trying to adopt committee rules to govern an ‘impeachment investigation’ the House hasn’t even authorized.”
As a 2019 Congressional Research Service report summarizes, the formal impeachment process actually begins with the vote of the full House chamber, which then sends the matter to the Judiciary Committee. However, the report continues, “standing committees, under their general investigatory authority, can seek information and research charges against officers prior to the approval of a resolution to authorize an impeachment investigation.” For example, when the House formally kicked off impeachment proceedings against President Bill Clinton in 1998, it did so via a resolution that was reported out of the Judiciary Committee based on preliminary evidence gathered by independent counsel Ken Starr’s investigation.
While a majority of Democrats may be on board with impeachment, a majority of the chamber still is not; without a majority of the chamber, a floor vote would do nothing more than split the majority and embarrass Democratic leadership.
So, despite all the noise currently being made, this resolution merely sets up a new set of rules for a preliminary investigation that will remain a preliminary investigation unless the full House says otherwise. Furthermore, whether or not the other two branches of the federal government decide to concede the level of deference that the legislative branch committee is asking for with these new procedures still remains to be seen.
#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px}
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */
Want to leave a tip?
We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?
Nate Madden
Nate is a former Congressional Correspondent at Blaze Media. Follow him on Twitter @NateOnTheHill.
more stories
Sign up for the Blaze newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Get the stories that matter most delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.