© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
The Supreme Court issued a decision Tuesday to temporarily uphold President Trump’s immigration moratorium on six mostly-Muslim countries. But it should not be considered a victory, as the courts should never have been involved in this issue in the first place, said Conservative Review Editor-in-chief Mark Levin.
"Pop the champagne bottles, I guess, because the Supreme Court didn't do any damage," Levin said, sarcastically. "The fact it's in the courts is damage enough."
"[The] radical leftists, mostly appointed by Barack Millhouse Benito Obama, to the federal courts, who are now appointed for life ... do not conduct themselves as judges, objective when it comes to the law,” Levin explained.
"But they view themselves as masterminds in black robes. That’s what judicial activists are.”
The president of the United States is granted plenary power to control immigration policy, and judges shouldn’t have a say in the matter, Levin added.
Want to leave a tip?
We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?
more stories
Sign up for the Blaze newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.
© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
Get the stories that matter most delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time.