What Are The Odds? Census Mistakes Overwhelmingly Benefit Democrats

A recent bombshell report reveals that U.S. census errors could provide significant and unfair advantages for Democrats in future elections, so naturally America’s corporate media have chosen to let those errors quietly slide. Back in May, the U.S. Census Bureau released findings from its 2020 Post-Enumeration Survey (PES), a survey in which “the Census Bureau […]

'Serious errors' in 2020 Census data could impact future elections after some red states under-counted, some blue states over-counted



A new report from the Census Bureau shows that errors in the 2020 Census may have helped some Democrat-controlled states while hurting some Republican-controlled states.

What are the details?

Last month, the Census Bureau released a report showing the populations of 14 states were miscounted in a statistically significant way.

The over-counted states include Hawaii (+6.8%), Delaware (+5.5%), Rhode Island (+5.1%), Minnesota (+3.8%), New York (+3.4%), Utah (+2.6%), Massachusetts (+2.2%), and Ohio (+1.5%). The under-counted states include Arkansas (-5%), Tennessee (-4.8%), Mississippi (-4.1%), Florida (-3.5%), Illinois (-2%), and Texas (-1.9%).

What that means, for example, is that Texas was under-counted by approximately 570,000 people, while New York was over-counted by about 695,000 people.

The report, which found no statistically significant errors in the 2010 Census, blamed the errors on "challenges" including the COVID-19 pandemic and the citizenship question that former President Donald Trump fought to include in the census questionnaire. The controversial question did not appear on the 2020 Census.

Why is this important?

Gathering accurate census data is important for two reasons. First, census data is used for the disbursement of federal funds. Second, census data is used for congressional apportionment. Inaccurate data, therefore, could prevent states from receiving the appropriate number of congressional representatives.

In the case of the 2020 census, seven states lost one seat in Congress: California, New York, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. On the other hand, five states gained one seat: Colorado, Florida, Montana, North Carolina, and Oregon. Texas was the only state to gain two seats.

However, losses for blue states and gains for red states could have been bigger had the results been more accurate.

"The inaccuracies may have cost Florida and Texas an additional House seat and given Rhode Island and Minnesota one they shouldn’t have received. New York might have also lost another House seat if the Census were more accurate," the Wall Street Journal editorial board explained.

The Journal also explained how the inaccuracies arose, in part:

This week’s report notes that over-counts were partly due to people or census workers filling out duplicate surveys. For households that didn’t respond to the survey, bureaucrats inputed how many people live at an address using other government data such as welfare benefits or literally their best hunch. Surprise—they often guessed wrong.

Unfortunately, the census blunders cannot be fixed in time for the midterm elections or 2024 presidential election. The Supreme Court already settled that issue more than 20 years ago.

Writing at The Hill, Kristin Tate importantly noted that the "serious errors" could pay a play a role in future elections under certain circumstances.

"Given the nature of the mistakes, Democrats could hang onto the presidency under particularly controversial circumstances due to publicly-acknowledged errors," Tate wrote.

"The consequences of the Census Bureau’s errors will further erode the public’s trust in our electoral system. And if we thought 2000 or 2020 were contentious elections, just wait until a candidate realizes that he or she could have won the White House if the national headcount were done correctly," Tate observed.

Director of Census Bureau Steven Dillingham Resigns

Director of the Census Bureau Steven Dillingham announced his resignation Monday, according to a statement.  “Effective January 20, 2021, I will be retiring from my position as director of the U.S. Census Bureau. I have a smile on my face and gratitude in my heart for all you have done for our Nation,” Dillingham wrote […]

New York Could Lose A House Seat After Large Exodus From The State

'The Empire State lost the most residents of any state'

Supreme Court Sides With Trump, Temporarily Halts Census Count

'Meeting the deadline at the expense of the accuracy of the census is not a cost worth paying'

Bush, Obama-Appointed Judges Rule Illegal Aliens Must Be Counted in Congressional Apportionment

Three federal judges have ruled that illegal aliens must be counted in congressional apportionment, a setback for President Trump's administration that had sought to level the playing field in congress for states with few illegal aliens.

House Republicans urge administration to add citizenship question to census

Eighteen House Republicans urged the Trump administration to move forward with adding a question about citizenship to the 2020 census in a letter sent to Attorney General William Barr late Wednesday afternoon.

"As members of Congress we can say say unequivocally that we support inclusion of such a question and that it is critical that the President do so as quickly as possible as we prepare for the coming census," the signatories write.

"From our vantage point in Congress, there are numerous important reasons to include the question on the census, of which the President clearly is aware," the letter adds. "Those reasons range from determining appropriations levels for states and localities and having data for states to make decisions on ballot box placement, to collection of data for purposes of understanding the impact of immigration (legal and illegal) on communities, as well as obviously impacting apportionment and re-districting."

The 18 signatories to Wednesday's letters include prominent House conservatives like Reps. Jim Jordan, Ohio; Jody Hice, Georgia; Chip Roy, Texas; Louie Gohmert, Texas; and Andy Biggs, Arizona.

Whether or not the 2020 census will have a question about participants' citizenship remains to be seen. The Supreme Court said the administration has the right to ask the question but also remanded the case down to the lower courts. Meanwhile, the administration has been looking at options to get around the ruling, and Barr recently told reporters that his team has found a legal workaround but didn't go into details.

Congressional Democrats have voiced outspoken opposition to the idea of a citizenship question. For example, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., recently said that the question was part of an effort to "make America white again," despite the fact that race has nothing to do with American citizenship.

"Despite claims to the contrary, citizenship is unquestionably germane to carrying out our duty to apportion representatives," the congressmen continue. They also contend that "the 14th Amendment demands that we take into account citizenship in allocation of representation" and, as a result, "the administration arguably is required to capture the citizenship information."

"The question should be included," the letter concludes, "a majority of Americans agree, and the President would be correct to include the question with a new rationale in light of the Supreme Court’s decision."

Keep reading...Show less