Allie Beth Stuckey: Demi Lovato needs Jesus



If Demi Lovato releasing a song celebrating abortion was on your bingo card for 2023, you can cross it off now.

Lovato’s new song “Swine” protests the one-year anniversary of the overturning of Roe v. Wade and features vulgar lyrics like, “God forbid, I wanna suck whatever the f**k I wanna / God forbid, I wanna f**k whoever the f**k I wanna.”

Lovato has also recently changed her pronouns back to she/her, as she claims it was too exhausting having to correct people as a “they.” Allie Beth Stuckey thinks Lovato desperately needs to find Jesus.

In a tweet, Lovato explained that “Swine” was meant to “empower not only the birthing people of this country, but everyone who stands up for equality, to embrace their agency and fight for a world where every person’s right to make decisions about their own body is honored.”

“I want to empower you right now, Demi Lovato,” Stuckey responds, “you do not have to have unprotected sex. That is a choice that you can make.”

In cases of rape, which many abortion activists cling to as why abortion is necessary, Stuckey believes that “we should give the death penalty to the rapist and not the child.”

However, Lovato doesn’t quite make that argument in her song. Rather, her lyrics show a much more vain reason for not wanting to give the child a life.

Toward the end of the song, she sings, “We gotta’ grow and we gotta’ raise them / We gotta’ feed and bathe them / And if you won’t they call you a witch to burn at the stake in Salem.”

“It’s just completely – not just morally bankrupt – but intellectually bankrupt, like she doesn’t know what she’s talking about,” Stuckey says.

“In all 50 states, abortion is legal to a certain extent. In a lot of states it is legal through all nine months with very few stipulations,” she continues, “so, like, what exactly is she talking about here?”

Stuckey answers that question herself.

Lovato isn’t quite talking about any issues that she’s particularly knowledgeable on, but rather “glorifying selfishness” and a “crass, promiscuous lifestyle.”

“I think that there’s something very deep that she’s fighting, very demonic that she’s fighting,” Stuckey reasons.

While Stuckey believes the song is abhorrent, she isn’t concerned.

“It's not going to change anyone’s mind; it’s not going to turn anyone from pro-life to being pro-choice. I don’t even think it’s going to encourage anyone to, you know, abort their child. It’s just adding to the noise, and it really kind of makes me sad for her.”

“I just pray that Demi Lovato, that God works on her heart,” she adds.


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Allie Beth Stuckey called hateful for response to Obama tweet, but she REFUSES to budge



Allie Beth Stuckey says that it’s getting hot in Texas where she lives, with temperatures already climbing into the triple digits.

But that’s not the only thing that’s getting hot.

Twitter is also heating up, specifically in regard to Barack Obama’s recent tweet about the anniversary of the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

On June 24, the former president tweeted:

Stuckey responded with the following:


Her response triggered several people, some of whom found her reply “hateful.”

But Allie isn’t budging. On her show, she responds to these critics:

“Yeah. Regarding as holy, sacred, hopeful – a right – the brutal killing of innocent, defenseless human beings simply because of the location in which they reside, their age, their size, their stage of development, and their inability to fight back is evil.”

“Christians should not vote for the party that celebrates dismembering children and chemically castrating preteens. It’s just, like, not really a tough one for me,” she continues.

However, Stuckey also says that “voting Democrat in itself is not an indication of someone’s salvation” because Christians “will all go to Heaven being wrong about lots and lots of things.”

Listen to her full response here:


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Are Doctors Denying Miscarriage Care? | Guest: Alexandra DeSanctis | Ep 655

Are Doctors Denying Miscarriage Care? | Guest: Alexandra DeSanctis | Ep 655

Pro-abortion protesters pledge 'summer of rage' during nationwide Saturday protests



Thousands of pro-abortion advocates rallied across the country on Saturday to express their anger over the U.S. Supreme Court’s potential repeal of Roe v. Wade.

The demonstrations come in response to the leak of a draft majority opinion, which has since been authenticated by Chief Justice John Roberts, indicating that the Supreme Court is prepared to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Reuters reported that the mass demonstration’s organizers are saying these gatherings mark the start of a potential “summer of rage” if the Supreme Court moves forward with repealing Roe.

The “Bans Off Our Bodies” gatherings were planned by Planned Parenthood, Women’s March, and other pro-abortion organizations. The groups organized more than 400 protests for Saturday.

If Roe is repealed, several states are expected to implement additional restrictions on abortion while others are expected to vastly expand abortion access. A repeal of Roe would not result in a federal ban on abortion. It would, however, allow each state to establish its own legislative approach to the matter.

On Saturday, there were large gatherings in New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington, D.C., and more. There were also accompanying counterprotests led by pro-life groups.

At the protests in Washington, D.C., protestors gathered around the Washington Monument at the National Mall where they waved placards with messages condemning the Supreme Court and expressing solidarity with the pro-abortion movement.

In downtown Brooklyn, thousands of pro-abortion advocates crossed the Brooklyn Bridge into Manhattan.

Elizabeth Holtzman, an 80-year-old attendee of the protest who represented New York in Congress from 1973 to 1981, said that the leaked majority opinion “treats women as objects, as less than full human beings.”

In Los Angeles, outside of Los Angeles City Hall, Malcolm DeCesare, a 34-year-old intensive care unit nurse, said that making abortion illegal could put the lives of women who seek alternatives at risk.

At a pro-abortion protest in Atlanta, Georgia, more than 400 people assembled in a small park in front of the state’s capitol while a much smaller group of counter protestors peacefully demonstrated on a nearby sidewalk.

One 23-year-old counter protestor held a sign that read “Stop Child Sacrifice.”

This counter protestor said, “Jesus had just a small group, but his message was more powerful. I’m hoping to plant some seeds in their hearts to change minds.”

Despite the sizable protests, recent polling suggests that overturning Roe stands to benefit Republicans in the upcoming 2022 midterm elections.

Poll: SCOTUS Overturning 'Roe v. Wade' galvanizes Republican voters for the 2022 midterm election



The U.S. Supreme Court potentially overturning Roe v. Wade may galvanize Republican voters and discourage Democrats in the upcoming 2022 midterm elections according to recent findings from a CNN poll.

According to the poll’s results, Republicans may be more likely to turn out for the upcoming midterm elections than they were earlier in the year whereas Democratic voters have displayed less interest in voting since this past November.

The poll asked, “If the elections for Congress were being held today, which party’s candidate would you vote for in your Congressional district?” 42% of respondents indicated they would lean towards supporting candidates belonging to the Democratic Party and 49% of respondents said they would support Republican Party candidates.

The poll asked respondents who said they would vote for the Democratic Party’s candidate for Congress whether that vote was “For the Democrat” or “Against the Republican.” 59% said they would cast their vote “For the Democrat” while 41% said they would vote “Against the Republican.”

Similarly, the inverse was asked of respondents who said they would cast their vote for the Republican Party’s candidates. 65% of these respondents said they would vote “For the Republican” and 35% said they were voting “Against the Democrat.”

Rates of enthusiasm for voting in the upcoming midterm elections are also lower for Democrats than they are for Republicans.

56% of Republican respondents said they were “extremely/very enthusiastic” about the upcoming election cycle while only 43% of Democrats said they felt similarly.

Additionally, 28% of Democrats said they felt “not too/not at all enthusiastic” about the elections while 13% of Republicans said they felt the same.

Among registered voters who lean Republican, 52% said they felt “extremely/vert enthusiastic” about the election while 42% of voters who lean Democrat felt similarly inclined.

The results of this poll came after the May 2 leak of a draft decision from the U.S. Supreme Court indicating that the nation’s highest court may be preparing to overrule Roe v. Wade which created the legal right for an abortion at the national level in 1973.

CNBC reported that the Democratic Party and nonprofit groups affiliated with the party were able to raise more than $7 million just hours after the draft opinion leaked. This enthusiasm for donating to Leftwing causes suggested that Democrats had new waves of enthusiasm motivating their base to turn out, but, as CNN’s poll shows, this is not the case.

Pro-abortion protest in Los Angeles turns violent, at least one police officer injured



A pro-abortion protest in downtown Los Angeles turned into a violent clash with law enforcement after officers were called to disperse the increasingly disruptive crowds, resulting in the injury of at least one officer Tuesday night.

Fox News reported that the police officers were mostly monitoring the crowd, which started as a smaller gathering of around 30 outside the city’s federal courthouse building. As the night went on, the protest grew increasingly rowdy and disruptive. The crowd grew in size and had more than 250 people flooding Los Angeles’ streets and blocking pedestrian traffic.

The protest occurred despite state officials and lawmakers in the state of California vowing to codify the ability of Californians to access abortion in state law.

As the gathering grew in size, its attendees grew increasingly hostile and began throwing objects at the police officers present. The crowd’s violence prompted the Los Angeles Police Department to issue a citywide tactical alert during the heat of the conflict.

Los Angeles Police Department Chief Michel Moore said, “We attempted to communicate, clear, and provide dispersal orders to the group.”

The police chief added that the “crowd began to throw rocks and bottles at the officers" when they were told to disperse.

Moore said that at least one officer from the Los Angeles Police Department was injured by members of the crowd.

At one point, members of the crowd even swarmed the police officers while the officers were in their vehicles.

A few protestors are tapping on the hoods of police cars as they attempt to clear the intersection.pic.twitter.com/40uCwwvgsD
— Andrew J. Campa (@Andrew J. Campa) 1651635823

On Monday, a leaked draft of a Supreme Court decision indicated that the Supreme Court is poised to overturn Roe v. Wade, the controversial case that led to the proliferation of legalized abortion throughout the U.S.

After the draft leaked, protests were held in major cities throughout the country, seemingly following the lead of pro-abortion advocates who gathered outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday.

After the leak, California’s Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom issued a statement decrying the decision as an “appalling attack on the rights of women.”

Newsom said, “This draft opinion is an appalling attack on the rights of women across this country and if it stands, it will destroy lives and put countless women in danger. It will be the end of fundamental constitutional rights that American women have had for nearly 50 years.”

Newsom continued, “We have a Supreme Court that does not value the rights of women, and a political minority, that will stop at nothing to take those rights away. This won’t stop with choice and the right to privacy. They are undermining progress, and erasing the civil protections and rights so many have fought for over the last half-century.”

Oklahoma will now prosecute abortionists performing non-medically necessary abortions



On Tuesday, Oklahoma’s Republican Governor Kevin Stitt signed a bill into law that bans abortion in nearly all cases.

The legislation, SB612, which passed the Oklahoma House of Representatives last week and the Oklahoma Senate last year, makes performing an abortion a felony.

NBC News reported Stitt signing the bill into law as “part of an aggressive push in Republican-led states across the country to scale back abortion rights.”

The Oklahoma House voted to pass the bill 70-14, and it passed in the Senate 38-9.

Any individual convicted for carrying out or attempting to carry out an abortion would face up to 10 years in prison and up to a $100,000 fine.

At the time, Republican State Rep. Jim Olsen noted that the legislation is focused on punishing medical professionals who perform abortions and not the women who receive them.

He said, “The penalties are for the doctor, not for the woman.”

The bill specifically states that it does not “authorize the charging or conviction of a woman with any criminal offense in the death of her own unborn child.”

However, Olsen noted that the legislation would allow doctors to perform abortive procedures should it be necessary to save the life of an expectant mother.

“Obviously, I’m thrilled because we have the potential of seeing many lives of babies saved — part of that depends on future court rulings.”

Gov. Stitt announced via Twitter that he would sign SB612 into law.

He said, “I intend to make Oklahoma the most-pro life state in the country.”

I intend to make Oklahoma the most-pro life state in the country.\n\nThis morning I will sign SB612 into law. \n\nTune in live at 9:00am CT here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0gVm9l2Z-M\u00a0\u2026
— Governor Kevin Stitt (@Governor Kevin Stitt) 1649770007

Stitt said, “As Governor, I promised to sign every piece of pro-life legislation that hit my desk. Today I kept that promise by signing SB612 into law, once again showing the world that Oklahoma is the most pro-life state in the country.”

Pro-abortion political figures were quick to reprimand Oklahoma for the steps it took to protect life.

California’s Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom criticized Oklahoma for protecting the life of an unborn child who was conceived in rape and inaccurately said that the law makes it so that “doctors performing reproductive care should be bounty-hunted.”

Now law in Oklahoma:\n\n- A woman who is a victim of rape or incest must give birth to a child.\n\n- Doctors performing reproductive care should be bounty-hunted.\n\nShameful.https://apnews.com/article/abortion-oklahoma-law-87880e9f3c7bde2ae634cb2f02839e6e\u00a0\u2026
— Gavin Newsom (@Gavin Newsom) 1649812782

Molly Jong-Fast, a leftist author at the Atlantic, lamented that SB612 marks an end to easy abortion access. She said, “This is not a drill. This is the end of Roe [v. Wade].”

Oklahoma banned abortion today if left in place, Women will no longer be able to get abortions in the state of Oklahoma starting in August. This is not a drill. This is the end of Roe.pic.twitter.com/PDAGnldwKL
— Molly Jong-Fast (@Molly Jong-Fast) 1649778650

Planned Parenthood Action — a political advocacy group affiliated with the country’s largest abortion provider — referred to pro-life members of the Oklahoma legislature as “extremist politicians” who are “willing to turn their own constituents into medical refugees.”

JUST NOW: Oklahoma lawmakers passed a total abortion ban, pending the Governor\u2019s signature.\n\nThese extremist politicians are willing to turn their own constituents into medical refugees. \n\nAbortion is health care. And we'll keep fighting for your care, no matter what.pic.twitter.com/tRNgH9O89z
— Planned Parenthood Action (@Planned Parenthood Action) 1649179906

JD Vance receives endorsement from Ohio Right to Life in Senate GOP primary



Ohio Right to Life, a pro-life grassroots organization in the state of Ohio, endorsed J.D. Vance in the state’s increasing contentious and rapidly approaching election to see who will replace retiring Senator Rob Portman.

According to its website, the organization works to “promote and defend the right of life of all innocent human beings, from the time of fertilization until natural death.”

Ohio Right to Life announced its endorsement of Vance this past Wednesday via press release which acknowledged the commitment of all of the Republican candidates' to the pro-life cause.

“The US Senate primary consists of four leading candidates all of which scored 100% on their Ohio Right to Life Survey,” the release said. “During this campaign, each of these four candidates have demonstrated tremendous pro-life leadership during their respective outreach at various townhalls, debates and church gatherings.”

“The state of Ohio is fortunate to have four strong pro-life candidates to choose from to serve as our next United States Senator,” the organization added.

Despite the crowded field of candidates being passionately pro-life, the organization opted to endorse Vance for Portman’s soon to be vacant seat citing his “exemplary pro-life service and statesmanship.”

“Ohio Right to Life believes JD Vance is the best candidate to continue the exemplary pro-life service and statesmanship currently demonstrated by Senator Rob Portman,” the press release stated. “JD Vance is 100% pro-life and we are confident that he will not only advance the cause of life but defend the unborn from Planned Parenthood and their allies in our nation’s capital. JD Vance will be a great US Senator.”

Vance said that he was “just thrilled” to receive Ohio Right to Life’s endorsement.

Just thrilled to have this endorsement. Ohio Right to Life is a great organization. (Also we have a very cute two year old. Love that kid.)https://twitter.com/jdvancepress/status/1512091005725646848\u00a0\u2026
— J.D. Vance (@J.D. Vance) 1649351582

“I’m so honored to have Ohio Right to Life’s endorsement and support in this race,” Vance told TheBlaze. “For many years, Ohio Right to Life has been an incredible advocate for the unborn, for the elderly and for those who love the most vulnerable members of our community here in Ohio.”

Vance continued, “I’ll be an advocate for all of those people in the US Senate and an ally of Ohio Right to Life as we fight for a day when our law and culture protects innocents as much as we know they should.”

The Republican primary to determine who will run in the November general election will be held on May 3. A recently conducted statewide survey conducted by the pro-Vance super PAC Protect Ohio Values shows businessman Mike Gibbons, Josh Mandel Ohio’s former state treasurer, and Vance in a three-way tie polling at 18%.