Megan Rapinoe, WNBA players attack veteran sportswriter over her Caitlin Clark coverage, claiming it fuels racism, homophobia



USA Today's Christine Brennan — a respected veteran sports columnist — is feeling the wrath not only from the WNBA players union but also from outspoken former women's soccer star Megan Rapinoe.

Brennan's sin? Asking questions they don't like about Indiana Fever sensation — and nearly unanimous WNBA rookie of the year — Caitlin Clark.

'Hearing it initially, my visceral reaction was, "That’s not good, that doesn't feel good, that feels racist, to be honest."'

See, Rapinoe and the union are vexed by a particular set of questions Brennan recently directed to another player who gave Clark a black eye. Rapinoe called Brennan's line of questioning "racist"; the players union said Brennan's questions "fuel racist, homophobic, and misogynistic vitriol on social media."

Believe it or not, the players union wants Brennan's press credentials revoked over her questions.

What were the questions?

DiJonai Carrington, a guard for the Connecticut Sun, hit Clark in the eye during a recent playoff game, leaving Clark with a black eye. Brennan asked Carrington if she hit Clark in the eye on purpose; Carrington said no.

Brennan then asked Carrington if she was laughing about it later in the game, the Washington Post reported. Carrington replied, “I just told you I didn’t even know I hit her."

Soon the Sun’s DeWanna Bonner called out Brennan in person and asked her to treat her teammates like humans, the paper added.

More from the Post:

Brennan, who is working on a book about Clark and routinely appears on TV, approached the other reporters and remarked that something like that wouldn’t happen in the NFL. She asked why the WNBA was so sensitive and told multiple reporters that if anyone had questions about her awareness of the racial dynamics at play, they should read her coverage of former NFL quarterback and activist Colin Kaepernick, among other work stretching back decades. (Brennan is White; Carrington is Black.)

Three days later, the Women’s National Basketball Players Association issued a statement calling for the league to revoke the credential of Brennan, one of the most recognizable sports journalists in the country.

The statement reads: “To unprofessional members of the media like Christine Brennan: You are not fooling anyone. That so-called interview in the name of journalism was a blatant attempt to bait a professional athlete into participating into a narrative that is false and designed to fuel racist, homophobic, and misogynistic vitriol on social media. You cannot hide behind your tenure. You have abused your privileges and do not deserve the credentials issued to you.”

Megan Rapinoe rips Brennan, too

During a Wednesday episode of her podcast "A Touch More with Sue Bird and Megan Rapinoe," the former soccer star said Brennan's line of questioning with Carrington was "loaded" and "feels racist," Fox News reported.

"Hearing it initially, my visceral reaction was, ‘That’s not good, that doesn't feel good, that feels racist, to be honest. That feels like you're putting DiJonai in an impossible situation,'" Rapinoe said, according to the cable network.

She added, "I think it is so disingenuous for Christine Brennan and other media members to say, ‘I’m just asking the question,' but really what's happening is your natural instinct to protect and narrate white players versus go after and narrate black players. That to me is really the issue."

Rapinoe dismissed the notion that Carrington could have intentionally hit Clark in the eye: "The premise of the question relies on the belief that DiJonai is targeting, that DiJonai specifically swatted or swiped into Caitlin's eyeball. First of all, the square-footage of her eyeball is very small. Do you know how hard it is to poke someone in the eye?"

'The WNBA and its players keep fumbling their golden opportunity with a string of ill-advised decisions and PR gaffes exposing them as not being ready for prime time.'

Bird and Rapinoe also said it's "disingenuous" to claim opposing players have been targeting Clark this season.

More from Fox News:

Many of Clark's fans have expressed outrage in her rookie year over instances in which she was physically handled by opposing players.

Clark took an illegal hip check from Chicago Sky forward Chennedy Carter on June 1 when the Sky player charged right into the Fever rookie and knocked her down during a stoppage in play. Clark said after the game that Carter's hit 'was not a basketball play.'

Sky rookie and Clark's longtime rival, Angel Reese, slammed her arm onto Clark's head while trying to block a layup in a game between the two teams on June 16. Then in August, Sky player Diamond DeShields sent Clark flying and then sliding across the hardwood on a play that was later upgraded to a flagrant-1 foul.

Anything else?

Brennan in an interview called her questions “journalism 101," the Post reported.

“It’s something that I have done in the entirety of my career,” she said, “and I think every other journalist has done the entirety of his or her career.”

USA Today executive sports editor Roxanna Scott said in a statement regarding Brennan's questions, “We reject the notion that the interview perpetuated any narrative other than to get the player’s perspective directly."

Boston Globe columnist Tara Sullivan wrote that "the WNBA and its players keep fumbling their golden opportunity with a string of ill-advised decisions and PR gaffes exposing them as not being ready for prime time,” the Post said.

The paper added that Michael Rosenberg — a Sports Illustrated columnist who has covered the WNBA — said in an interview, “Decline to answer someone’s questions, complain to them privately, or rip them publicly. That’s all fair. But I think credentials should only be pulled for clear violations of professional ethics.”

The Post also said anger over Brennan’s questions is mostly rooted in the climate in which they were asked.

More from the paper:

Carrington has been the subject of intense social media harassment. She posted a screenshot of an email she received in which she was called a racial slur and threatened with sexual violence. Someone else posted a picture of a police officer kneeling on George Floyd’s neck with a picture of Carrington superimposed over Floyd’s face and Clark’s superimposed on the officer’s.

According to a report in Andscape, the crowd in Connecticut during the playoff series was trafficking in racially coded trash talk, too. One fan’s shirt read 'Ban Nails,' and one fan shouted at Carrington when she fell, 'What, did you trip on your eyelashes?'

“In my 11-year career I never experienced the racial comments like from the Indiana Fever fan base,” Sun forward Alyssa Thomas said after the series, according to the Post.

“We certainly know that there are many people who are racist who attack black people on Twitter,” Brennan said, according to the paper. “That is a fact. It is horrible. ... In the case of asking the follow-up I did, it was giving ... DiJonai Carrington the chance to address an issue that was already on Twitter and being discussed by, what? Tens of thousands of people? Hundreds of thousands? Millions of people?”

Brennan said USA Today is planning to request a credential so she can cover the WNBA Finals, the Post added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'As empty gestures go, impressive': WaPo's Jennifer Rubin mocks Pope Francis' visit to Russian embassy over Ukraine invasion — and gets torched for it



Pope Francis visited the Russian embassy to the Holy See on Friday to express concern over Russia's invasion of Ukraine — a move that Reuters characterized as an "unprecedented departure from diplomatic protocol."

The outlet said Moscow's ambassador, Aleksandr Avdeyev, told the RIA Novosti news agency that during the 40-minute meeting, Francis expressed "great concern" about Ukraine's humanitarian situation and quoted the pontiff as calling "for the protection of children, the protection of the sick and suffering, and the protection of people."

But formerly conservative Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin wasn't impressed.

What did she say?

Replying to a tweet from NBC News' chief foreign correspondent Richard Engel on the pope's appeal, Rubin remarked, "As empty gestures go, impressive."

as empty gestures go, impressive
— Jennifer 'I stand with Ukraine' Rubin \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6 (@Jennifer 'I stand with Ukraine' Rubin \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6) 1645794255

How are folks reacting?

As you might imagine, a number of Twitter users who caught wind of Rubin's five-word dismissal of Pope Francis' rare act were equally dismissive of Rubin and her words:

  • "Yeah Jen, there definitely aren’t over a billion Catholics to be spoken for, and the Holy Father has never played a role in liberating Eastern Europe, definitely not a thing that happened 30-40 years ago," one commenter noted.
  • "Like changing your Twitter name to 'I stand with Ukraine.' What does that even mean?" another user wondered. "Did you fly to the Ukraine, take up arms, and are right now helping them defend their country?"
  • "She's literally saved 40 billion lives by changing her Twitter name to include 'I stand with Ukraine,'" another user mocked in reference to Rubin.
  • "God you are an awful human being," another commenter declared. "What has your god, Joe Biden, done for the people of Ukraine other than get them killed? Burn in hell, witch."
  • "Really Jennifer?!! An empty gesture!! Pope Francis and his words, thoughts, and actions, have significant influence around the world!" another user said. "His words have way more significance than yours! So why don’t you take your empty gesture words and go to Kyiv and stand with Ukraine and fight!"
pic.twitter.com/66OcC5LDga
— Drew Holden (@Drew Holden) 1645805303

Anything else?

Reuters noted that a pope visiting an embassy to talk to an ambassador in a time of conflict "is unprecedented in living memory," adding that the Vatican's secretary of state usually summons foreign envoys to meet with the pope in the Apostolic Palace.

The outlet also said that prior to Russia's invasion, Andriy Yurash — Ukraine's ambassador to the Vatican — told Reuters that Kyiv would be open to a Vatican mediation of the conflict.

WaPo columnist connects Joe Rogan's podcast to COVID death of her former co-worker — even though she has 'no idea' if he even listened to Rogan



A Washington Post columnist has come under fire for her Sunday piece that connects Joe Rogan's podcast to the COVID-related death of her former colleague — even though writer Margaret Sullivan admitted in her column that she has "no idea" if her former co-worker even listened to Rogan.

What are the details?

Sullivan began her column slamming Rogan's video address late last month in the wake of musicians like Neil Young leaving Spotify in protest of Rogan's podcast being on the platform when they insist it's full of COVID-19 and vaccine "misinformation."

Then she said Rogan "offered the worst kind of non-apology: 'If I pissed you off, I’m sorry.'”

"What I didn’t hear from Rogan was any remorse that he might have done harm when he held forth about his own bogus belief that healthy young people don’t need to get vaccinated, or when he failed to challenge a guest who promised that the drug ivermectin would extinguish the virus altogether, or when he allowed another guest to spout theories about how Americans are essentially being hypnotized about covid by the media, and comparing the situation to Nazi Germany," she added.

With that, Sullivan soon shifted to last week's COVID-related death of her former colleague, Miguel Rodriguez, a 47-year-old sports reporter for the Buffalo News.

"He was overweight and asthmatic; in other words, very much at risk. And he was unvaccinated," Sullivan wrote.

Then she added this tidbit: "I don’t know for sure whether getting vaccination and booster shots would have saved Miggy’s life. And I have no idea whether he had ever listened to Joe Rogan’s podcast, or what his precise reasons were for not being vaccinated."

Sullivan then explained that her understanding is that Rodriguez was being pushed to get the shots but that he and his family were hesitant and skeptical. She finished off her piece imagining if Rogan "were to use his incredibly powerful voice" to "counter some of the destructive bilge" about COVID and vaccines "instead of adding to it."

"One thing that requires no imagination is that Miguel’s funeral is Tuesday morning," Sullivan concluded. "His younger sister misses him, her father told me, and doesn’t yet realize that her big brother is never coming back."

Backlash

As of late Monday afternoon, Sullivan's tweet about her piece was getting massively ratioed — nearly 7,000 comments compared to just over 2,000 likes — and notable individuals took to Twitter to rip the thrust of her column:

  • Ben Shapiro of the Daily Wire tweeted, "So her friend dies, and she immediately starts standing on his grave to smash Joe Rogan, who she has no evidence has anything to do with his death. Disgusting. And predictable."
  • Steve Krakauer, executive producer of "The Megyn Kelly Show," called Sullivan's column "morally bankrupt" and added, "co-opting the death of a 'beloved' colleague to spread pro-censorship misinformation — because if he HAD listened to Joe Rogan, he’[d] have been urged to get vaccinated, as Rogan has said many times for someone who is 'overweight and asthmatic.'"
  • Dana Loesch tweeted, "Blaming your friend’s death on a podcast you admit he may not have listened to doesn’t sound like grief, it sounds like convenient exploitation."
  • Reason associate editor Liz Wolfe added, "It's obviously incredibly disrespectful of Sullivan to trot out a colleague's death like this, but that grossness aside...at what point do we say: People have made their choices. They're not mindlessly manipulated by Rogan, they have access to ALL kinds of information out there."
  • Joe Borelli, New York City Council minority leader, ripped Sullivan for taking "8 paragraphs before even mentioning your former colleague, and only so you can tell us that you have no idea whether he listened to Rogan at all ... I’m glad I don’t have 'friends' like you in my life."
  • Javier E. David, a finance editor for Yahoo, offered a blunt observation: "Imagine thinking this was a good way to honor a colleague. Shameful."

Chicago cops called out by columnist for letting women twerk on top of police vehicle, encouraging 'mayhem' in the streets



A Chicago Sun-Times columnist called out city police for letting a trio of women twerk on top of a police vehicle as seen in a viral cellphone video — and for encouraging "mayhem" in the streets.

Looks like the Chicago Police Department's emphasis on "positive community interactions" is taking off! Great to se… https://t.co/2Nwz35vO5u

— CWBChicago (@CWBChicago) 1622922467.0

What are the details?

Mary Mitchell indicated in her piece that the notorious clip has received more than a million views and that it seems to be part of "some trend."

She recalled another viral moment a few years back when a pair of women were caught on video twerking atop a police car in Rochester, New York.

Rochester. NY. Let's get it. 🌚 https://t.co/bsty28lYL5

— Chris Barber (@FollowZeLeader) 1488033674.0

Rochester Police Chief Michael L. Ciminelli told TheBlaze in a statement after the 2017 incident that the clip portrayed "an inappropriate and unacceptable image for the Rochester Police Department" and that the issue was "addressed."

Late last month, St. Louis officials and residents were left disgusted by videos showing a group of late-night revelers jumping on top of a police car with an officer inside.

Videos show people dancing on top of St. Louis police car on Washington Avenueyoutu.be

Mitchell indeed noted that twerking on top of police vehicles has happened in Jackson, Mississippi, St. Louis, Seattle, and Miami Beach — "and is largely viewed as an offensive act against police."

More from her piece:

What makes the Chicago incident so interesting is the police SUV was slowly rolling down the street as if whoever was driving was in a parade.

A spokesman for the Chicago Police Department said the incident is under investigation.

Frankly, if allowing young women to climb onto a police cruiser and gyrate is part of the new community policing strategy, the police must go back to the drawing board.

Because if one of the women had fallen off the SUV and been run over, not only would the city be facing a huge lawsuit, but there is a real possibility that the partiers would have turned violent.

It is also disconcerting that residents in some neighborhoods, like Park Manor on the South Side, have been recently under siege by noise, loud music and inappropriate behavior.

A Chicago resident told Mitchell in an email that "hundreds of cars, trucks and motor vehicles" had been "parading down our streets until 4 a.m. playing loud music, using profanity, and displaying all types of anti-social behavior such as urinating in bushes ..."

"I hope we can get some attention brought to this situation that is affecting the quality of life of our residents," resident Niena Feme added to Mitchell. "We are stakeholders; we pay mortgages, taxes and are expected to maintain our properties. Yet we cannot enjoy a level of peace that any community would desire."

Mitchell agreed, noting that "Chicagoans, especially those living on the South and West sides, live with more lawless behavior than I've ever seen."

But she added that it's no help when police seem to "facilitate the mayhem."

Anything else?

TheBlaze has frequently reported on what does indeed appear to be a trend regarding police across America enduring a growing level of bolder and bolder abuse from citizens.

Such as the viral clip of people dumping buckets of water on New York City police officers — and cops having little choice but to simply walk away as they're doused over and over:

Cuomo And NYPD's War Of Words Over Water Bucket Incidentsyoutu.be

In April an anti-cop protester recording himself walking along a row of Portland officers, flipping off each one of them as he bellowed, "F*** you! Quit your f***in' job!"

Content warning: Profanity:

What it must be like to be this loser... I don’t wish it on anyone. https://t.co/kVDvXrahAM

— (((Jason Rantz))) on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz) 1618613670.0

Sure, the aforementioned incidents may not include much if any physical harm, but when people realize there are little if any consequences for abusing police in other ways, how long will it be before it gets boring and they resort to real violence?