SCOTUS temporarily blocks Texas immigration bill. Here’s what COULD happen after the final ruling on March 13.



Just as Texas reached its limit with Biden’s open border policies and proposed Texas Senate Bill 4, which would allow the state to arrest illegal immigrants, the Supreme Court stepped in and halted progression.

Now, Texas once again has its hands tied with the invasion at the border — at least until March 13, when SCOTUS will make a final ruling.

“We can't enforce our laws; we can't keep our border sovereign,” sighs Sara Gonzales.

To make matters worse, “We're finding out there was a FOIA lawsuit from the Center of Immigration Studies that revealed that the Biden administration has been coordinating flights for approximately 320,000 illegal immigrants to 43 different cities across the country.”

“You don't even have to walk these days,” says Sara. “You can just get a free flight, free money, free debit card, free phone — free everything, but if you're an American citizen, no. If you’re a homeless veteran, stay on the streets.”

“It's so blatant, and you may see the Supreme Court end up taking the position of the Federal Government because I do not think that they want freer states,” adds Eric July of Rippaverse Comics.

How Texas would respond to such an unfavorable ruling poses some serious implications.

According to Eric, if SCOTUS blocks SB4 and prevents Texas from protecting its borders, the state must take the position of “we don’t care” and decide to protect the border anyway, regardless of what that means on a national level.

Sara agrees — “What are they going to do? You already have Border Patrol who is calling out Joe Biden and saying he is doing a horrible job ... and they have already come out and said we respect the Texas National Guard.”

“Maybe violence breaks out, but maybe that’s what it has to come to.”


Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Find out where illegal immigrants are allowed to vote



According to the mainstream media and its loyal leftist followers, the great replacement theory is just another extremist, right-wing, MAGA, conspiracy theory.

But with everything happening because of our open border, Sara Gonzales is fairly confident that they’re wrong.

“It’s just that places like New York are already doing this in local elections. They are allowing non-citizens to vote in local elections,” Gonzales says.

Now, experts are warning that a loophole in Arizona’s election procedures may allow non-citizens to cast federal election ballots in the 2024 presidential election.

Arizona’s secretary of state, Adrien Fontes, crafted the election procedures manual to permit individuals with unverifiable citizenship to register as “federal only voters” in order to participate in federal elections.

Fontes, of course, happens to be a Democrat.

“This is happening,” Gonzales says angrily. “As much as they want to claim this is not happening, this absolutely is happening.”

“They are literally trying to create loopholes so that illegal immigrants can vote in federal elections,” she continues. “We’re talking about the Presidential Election. If you don’t think that this is what the whole master plan has been, I don’t know what to tell you at this point.”


Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Here's Where Illegal Immigrants Can Vote

Here's Where Illegal Immigrants Can Vote

50 Cent Blasts NYC Mayor’s Migrant Policy, Softens On Trump

50 Cent said the GOP frontrunner may be 'the answer'
They're PUNISHING Good Credit Scores!

They're PUNISHING Good Credit Scores!

George Santos Denies Allegation He Masterminded Credit Card Skimming Scheme

On Friday, Congressman George Santos said he was “innocent” after a Brazilian man accused Santos of overseeing a 2017 credit card skimming operation that led to his deportation. Gustavo Ribeiro Trehla, identified as a former roommate of Santos, submitted a sworn statement to the FBI and other law enforcement officials that accused Santos of orchestrating […]

’Stop This Abuse’: Two Dozen State AGs Blast Credit Card Companies For Tracking Gun Purchases

'Be advised that we will marshal the full scope of our lawful authority'

Credit Card Giants Conspire With Democrats To Monitor Consumer Gun Purchases

Visa, Mastercard, and AmEx all adopted the new standards that will be used to surveil law-abiding gun sellers and buyers.

Biden Takes A Blowtorch To The Truth With Household Debt And Savings Claim

'Families are carrying less debt; their average savings are up'

Dog muzzle sent to TN vaccine official as alleged threat before her controversial firing was purchased with her credit card — but she denies buying it



A week before the state of Tennessee fired Dr. Michelle Fiscus as its vaccine chief after Republican lawmakers complained about her push to get teens vaccinated against COVID-19 without parental permission, she said a dog muzzle was sent to her.

Image source: YouTube screenshot

"At first, I thought that was a joke and contacted a few friends, and then, when no one claimed it, I realized that that was something that was sent to me as some kind of a message," Fiscus told CNN's Anderson Cooper last month.

Fiscus also told Cooper that "they obviously didn't know me because they sent me a size three, which is for beagles, and I'm obviously a pit bull, which requires a size six."

Following the the anonymous dog muzzle delivery to her state office, Fiscus contacted the Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security, which launched an investigation, the cable network reported.

What did the investigation find?

Well, Homeland Security discovered through a subpoena that the Amazon package containing the muzzle was traced to a credit card in Fiscus' name, Axios first reported.

The outlet said Fiscus gave investigators information for an Amazon account in her name, which was a different account than the one used to purchase the muzzle.

Homeland Security's investigation concluded that "purchases from both Amazon accounts were charged to the same American Express credit card in the name of Dr. Michelle D. Fiscus," Axios reported.

Fiscus denies sending the muzzle to herself

Fiscus denied sending the muzzle to herself.

Regarding the muzzle: I ASKED Homeland Security to investigate the origin. Just provided a redacted HS report by Ax… https://t.co/Y5WvOOd1Jy

— Michelle Fiscus MD,FAAP (@drfixus) 1629144801.0

What else do we know?

The anonymous package containing the muzzle lacked a return address or any data indicating who sent it, WTVF-TV reported, adding that the investigation also found that "there is no evidence to indicate that the dog muzzle was intended to threaten Dr. Fiscus."

The Amazon account used to send the muzzle was created in March, the station added.

'I can't tell you how this happened'

Fiscus sent WTVF the following statement:

I was just made aware of the report from Homeland Security today when it was shared with me by Axios Nashville. I had requested that Homeland Security obtain a subpoena as Amazon refused to release details of the account that ordered the muzzle that was delivered to my office on July 3, 2021. We have now learned that a second Amazon account had been established under my name using what appears to be a temporary phone, possibly in Washington state. I have asked Homeland Security for the unredacted report so that I can investigate further and am awaiting their response.

And in a Monday interview with the station, Fiscus acknowledged the charge for the muzzle did show up on her American Express statement, but she repeatedly denied purchasing it.

Image source: YouTube screenshot

"I can't tell you how that happened except that I have used that credit card to purchase travel and to register for conferences and other things that have been reimbursed by the state of Tennessee," Fiscus told WTVF.

More from the station:

She added she felt the state's report was filled with inconsistencies. She said a second Amazon account in her name was set up using a burner phone with T-Mobile service, and she doesn't use that provider. In addition, the Amazon account listed her office as the billing address, which she said isn't the address associated with her credit card.

She said she doesn't know who was responsible for buying the muzzle, but wouldn't rule out someone who works for state government.

"I think there's enough information at the state if they wanted to fabricate this," Fiscus also told WTVF. "They have access to my credit card. They know my office address. It could be done."

Investigation: Muzzle sent to fired vaccine official Dr. Fiscus was sent from her Amazon accountyoutu.be