Biden Claims Hunter Was ‘Unfairly Prosecuted’ While His DOJ Persecutes Political Opponents
Joe Biden claims his son Hunter was 'unfairly prosecuted' while ignoring the political persecution his own DOJ has unleashed on his opponents.
Earlier this week, I wrote a column exposing the cancer metastasizing within America’s body politic — a malignancy created and nurtured by the progressive project over the last century. I focused on how this cancer had infected the “eyes and ears” of our nation: the media. From Big Tech suppressing dissent to mass media corrupting public discourse, the disease has eaten away at our ability to pursue the common good through civil disagreement and the free flow of information.
But this cancer has deeper roots, spreading into the very organs meant to protect and nourish our republic: our immune system.
The 2024 election isn’t just a mandate. It’s a diagnosis.
The Department of Health and Human Services, specifically the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Food and Drug Administration, once acted as the body’s natural defenses. Today, the agencies resemble a compromised immune system — infested with power-hungry elites and corrupted by self-interest.
This failure was laid bare during the COVID-19 pandemic, which shredded the last vestiges of trust Americans had in their government. At the center of this catastrophe stood Dr. Anthony Fauci, the epitome of progressive rot — a man who turned his government post into an untouchable kingdom.
Fauci’s career should serve as a cautionary tale. As the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, he wielded unparalleled influence, setting pandemic policies that devastated lives and businesses. Behind the scenes, his agency funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology — the likely source of the COVID-19 outbreak.
Even when confronted with this inconvenient truth, Fauci sidestepped accountability. In 2021, Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) exposed his agency’s involvement in funding this dangerous research. Months later, an NIH official confirmed it. Yet Fauci remains unscathed, unaccountable, and celebrated by the elites.
When retiring in 2022, Fauci boasted the highest salary of any federal employee — over $400,000 annually. His golden parachute includes a taxpayer-funded security detail at a cost of $15 million and, as revealed by watchdog group Open the Books, hidden royalties from pharmaceutical companies. These revelations paint a damning picture of a man — and a system — that enriches itself at the expense of the American people.
When Fauci infamously claimed, “If you’re attacking me, you’re attacking science,” he wasn’t just defending his actions; he was embodying the progressive vision of government: a pantheon of unelected “experts” ruling unchallenged over the masses. Agencies like the NIH, CDC, and FDA, once meant to serve the public, now tower over us like Greek temples, demanding faith while suppressing dissent.
This progressive model — centralized control under the guise of expertise — is the cancer undermining our republic. It prioritizes bureaucratic power over individual freedom and accountability. Trump’s election represents a rejection of this model. But a rebellion is meaningless without action.
The 2024 election isn’t just a mandate. It’s a diagnosis. Americans are demanding bold action to excise the rot. The federal health bureaucracy must be among Trump’s top priorities. His administration must:
This is the next step in America’s surgery — a treatment that targets not just the tumor but the system enabling its growth.
We can no longer allow unelected officials to wield unchecked power. Agencies like the NIH, CDC, and FDA must return to their rightful role: serving the people, not ruling over them. Trump’s presidency offers a rare opportunity to reclaim government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
The cancer is deep, but it’s not untreatable. It will take bold leadership in the Trump administration and the courage to challenge the progressive elites who have corrupted our system.
Want more from Glenn Beck? Get Glenn's FREE email newsletter with his latest insights, top stories, show prep, and more delivered to your inbox.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) ratified a law in September increasing the hourly minimum wage for fast-food restaurant employees from $16 to $20 per hour, effective April 1, 2024. This legal requirement was not, however, imposed equally.
Insiders recently revealed to Bloomberg that Newsom personally fought for an exemption that would ultimately benefit his longtime donor and billionaire pal Greg Flynn, one of America's largest restaurant operators.
Assembly Bill 1228 defines "fast food restaurant" as a "limited-service restaurant in the state that is part of a national fast food chain."
While Flynn's two dozen Panera Bread locations in California — which serve soups, pizza, salad, sandwiches, milkshakes, desserts, and other meal items — would ostensibly satisfy this definition, Newsom apparently secured an exception to the rule for "an establishment that on September 15, 2023, operates a bakery that produces for sale on the establishment's premises bread" as a stand-alone menu item.
When a KCRA-TV reporter pressed Newsom on the apparent carve-out for Panera on Sept. 28, the Democratic governor said, "That's part of the sausage-making that was part of 257, the original bill, and we went back and forth and [it] was part of the negotiation. It's the nature of negotiation."
Newsom stressed further that it was the decision was the result of "give and take."
Flynn, who also owns thousands of Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, Applebee's, and Wendy's locations, reportedly opposed AB 257, the so-called "California Fast Food Restaurant Minimum Wage and Labor Regulations Referendum" in 2022, which included the bread exemption but would have increased the minimum wage to $22.
Flynn evidently got his way. AB 257 was repealed and replaced with AB 1228, which still contains the favorable exemption benefitting Panera Bread.
Flynn told Bloomberg he did not play a role in crafting the bread exemption and declined to comment on his connections to the governor.
The duo went to the same high school and apparently did some business together. Bloomberg highlighted that Newsom even drew an undisclosed amount of income from Flynn's company while California's lieutenant governor.
Flynn has donated a great deal to Newsom in the years since.
For instance, he donated $50,000 in April 2017 in support of Newsom's gubernatorial bid the next year. In 2018, Flynn kept shelling out cash in support of Newsom's race for the governor's mansion.
In 2021, Flynn donated $100,000 to Newsom's campaign to stave off a Republican recall effort. He also threw $64,800 Newsom's way in 2022 in support of his re-election.
The billionaire's donations to Newsom pale in comparison to the amount of money restaurants exempted from the new wage hike could potentially save. In the hypothetical case of a full-time employee paid the straight hourly for 52 40-hour weeks, the delta is over $8,000.
Bloomberg noted that McDonald's Corporation franchisees are expecting an additional annual cost of $250,000 due to the law, which some have deemed a "devastating financial blow." Businesses unwilling to eat the the whole of the cost will offload it onto customers. Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc., for instance, is reportedly considering increasing prices to offset the boosted expense.
Despite the potential savings, some of Flynn's Panera establishments have reportedly advertised that they will pay $20 hourly wages for select non-management roles. However, the Flynn-owned Panera near the California capitol in Sacramento still appears to be advertising $16 and $18 hourly wages.
Bloomberg indicated that neither Newsom nor Panera Bread representatives responded to their requests for comment.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
California's public schools aren't just run by some of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's staunchest allies and beneficiaries, but also serve as theaters for his wife's leftist propaganda, allegedly paid for in part at taxpayer expense.
A new report from the Illinois-based transparency watchdog OpenTheBooks.com has revealed that Jennifer Siebel Newsom's nonprofit, the Representation Project, has garnered nearly $1.5 million screening four films she is credited for having either written or directed. American public schools are believed to have coughed up the majority of the funds to screen these films, two of which feature Mrs. Newsom and her husband.
Adam Andrzejewski, founder and CEO of OpenTheBooks.com, remarked on these and the related findings, "The Representation Project not only solicits donors from big-money political supporters of Gavin Newsom, but also receives public tax dollars through schools to create a new generation of supporters and activists in the state’s—and country’s—schoolchildren."
The Representation Project is a nonprofit that claims to "fight sexism through films, education, research, and activism." It was founded by Mrs. Newsom in 2011 after the debut of her premier agitprop piece "Miss Representation," which enjoyed moderate success.
In addition to attempting to use media to manufacture or augment public opinion, the group admits to utilizing "the collective pressure of social activism" to make content creators conform to their thinking on sex, race, and on other issues. Mrs. Newsom and her acolytes have previously sought to financially ruin those who haven't ideologically conformed, going after publications' advertisers when they wouldn't play ball.
"Miss Representation" is one of the four propaganda pieces Newsom's nonprofit has licensed out to schools across California and throughout the United States.
The film presumes at the outset that "boys learn that their success is tired to dominance, power, and aggression," whereas girls are led to believe that their "value lies in their youth, beauty, and sexuality and not in their capacity as leaders."
According to IMDB, "The Great American Lie," also written and directed by Mrs. Newsom, "examines how a US value system built on the extreme masculine ideals of money, power and control has glorified individualism, institutionalized inequality, and undermined the ability of most Americans to achieve the American Dream." It appears to neglect recognition that the director's husband is a state governor in and amongst said value system.
Newsom's "The Mask You Live In" suggests that masculinity has been too narrowly defined in America and maintains that this has had a negative impact on the nation and its boys.
This film not only contains website addresses of porn sites with images tagged with descriptions like "face f***" and "kinky couples," but also includes partially blurred images of sexual violence against women from pornographic videos, which Andrzejewski stressed were "graphic even when blurred."
The Representation Project framed the fourth film, "Fair Play," as an attempt to press the issue of "gender inequality at home."
Newsom co-wrote this film with Eve Rodsky, who has intimated that a mother who says at home to raise her children is "doing unpaid labor, staying quiet and small."
According to a 2011-2021 impact report issued by Newsom's nonprofit, these four propaganda films — designed in part by those with an apparent disdain for stay-at-home mothers — have been played in over 5,000 schools before over 2.6 million children in the United States.
OpenTheBooks.com indicated that schools must pay between $49 and $599 to expose kids to these films, and have done so willingly.
Since 2012, the Representation Project has reportedly taken in $1,483,001 in screening revenue. It is unclear how much of this was generated in California alone.
The films are not the only thing Newsom's nonprofit is trafficking in. Accompanying each piece of agitprop is curricula students must engage with.
For instance, after subjecting students to "Miss Representation," Newsom's curricula has kids: "understand how gender representations influence the ways that we see each other and ourselves"; "critique media images as they begin to recognize the qualities that make for good leadership and uncover ways that they can act as allies for each other to support an end to stereotyping"; and "create their own media images to respond to the dearth of positive representations of women and girls."
After watching Newsom's "The Great American Lie," students are reportedly prompted to do a so-called privilege walk, whereby classrooms temporarily segregate more and more on the basis of immutable characteristics, socioeconomic status, and deeply personal information.
According the Representation Project's impact report, its efforts have been consequential. Students who endure their curricula report a significant increase in knowledge of feminism, racial justice, and a desire to engage in activism.
After pushing similar messaging at its youth media summit, the Representation Project claimed that afterward, 33.3% of enrollees indicated they planned to organize "a protest for social change" and 60% planned to "use social media for social change."
The benefit may not only be monetary but electoral.
Gov. Newsom appears in two of his wife's films, the purpose of which Andrzejewski suggested is clear: "Jennifer Siebel Newsom makes a movie portraying Gavin Newsom as a politician that supports certain policies, and then in the movie’s curriculum advises students to vote and campaign for politicians that support those policies."
The schools receive taxpayer money and effectively use those funds or the resources those funds secure (e.g., class time) to foist the Newsoms' messaging on American youths.
While Mrs. Newsom's Representation Project may be a nonprofit, she has a for-profit company that appears to have done well as a result of at least one of her films.
Newsom's Girls Club Entertainment has taken in over $1.6 million from her nonprofit since 2012.
Mrs. Newsom has also reportedly collected $1,501,727 in salary from her nonprofit since its founding.
The Free Beacon reported that extra to promoting her husband's policies and building her brand with taxpayer-funded school resources, Newsom's nonprofit may have yet more uses, which may ultimately trip up Gov. Newsom should he run for president.
Between 2011 and 2018, the Representation Project took $358,000 from the Pacific Gas and Electric Company — the same utility linked by state investigations to fires that claimed at least 85 lives and destroyed hundreds of acres of land. The utility's philanthropic arm also cut a sizable check to Newsom's sister Hilary.
This utility was also reportedly listed as an associate producer on two of Mrs. Newsom's pieces of agitprop, going so far as to host the screening of "Miss Representation" in 2011.
When the state House came down on DNA-sampling firms, Newsom reportedly found his way to veto the legislation in 2020. It turns out, Anne Wojcicki, founder of one such firm called 23andMe, was another donor to Mrs. Newsom's Representation Project.
Jeff Hauser of the government watchdog Revolving Door Project told the Free Beacon, "We're going to need a rethink of ethics laws that allow people to work without making political officeholders easy to bribe via their partners."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
China's biggest law firm is partnering with a top Democratic lobbying practice, which has sent at least 11 alumni to senior positions in the Biden administration.
The post Biden-Connected Lobbying Outfit Teams Up with Leading Chinese Law Firm appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.