Colorado terminates tax on tampons, other feminine hygiene and diaper products



Colorado has now joined the long list of states which no longer tax feminine hygiene products in an effort to save women money and combat the "stigma" of hygiene products in general.

In June, Governor Jared Polis signed HB 1055 which not only eliminated the tax on all feminine hygiene products and adult and child diapers but that also expedited the date that the exemption would go into effect. The original bill called for the state sales tax exemption to begin some time in 2023, but the new version begins the exemption on August 10, 2022.

“From now on in Colorado, there will no longer be state sales tax on diapers and feminine hygiene products,” Gov. Polis said in a press release. “This new bipartisan law finally ends the sales tax on diapers and feminine hygiene products permanently and starts saving people money on these necessary products."

The bill covers the state sales tax on products including tampons, feminine napkins, liners, menstrual cups, sponges, and diapers for infants and incontinence products for adults. The Gazette claims that the average Colorado woman spends approximately $180 per year on menstrual products, while diapers often run about $75 per month per child.

“Too many Coloradans and their families are going without necessary hygiene products, and this law eliminates the state sales tax on these essential products, making them more affordable," said bill co-sponsor Democratic Rep. Leslie Herod. “Eliminating the sales and use tax on period products, diapers, and incontinence products makes these essential products more accessible and saves Coloradans money when they need it the most.

"Our law also paves the way towards destigmatizing hygiene products that millions of people rely on every day,” she added.

According to the Denver Post, women and families had been using makeshift products such as grocery bags and toilet paper to avoid having to purchase more feminine items and diapers, a manifestation of what some have dubbed "period poverty."

"This is actually one of the bills that’s been most requested by my constituents,” said Sen. Faith Winter of Westminster. “Especially young women across my district are seeing this as an equity piece and as a really important way to reduce stigma.”

The bill is expected to save Coloradans $9.1 million a year and deny the state about $4.3 million in tax revenue.

The Colorado bill does not preclude municipal taxes on feminine and incontinence products, although the cities of Denver and Aurora have already eliminated those taxes.

'Menstrual equity' bill would require California public colleges to provide period products for 'transgender men, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming people who may also menstruate'



A bill in the California Legislature would require public universities, community colleges, and secondary schools in the state to provide free menstrual products on campus. The bill notes that the complimentary period products are not only for girls and women, but also intended to be used by biological males, including "transgender men, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming people who may also menstruate."

Assemblymember Cristina Garcia, a Democrat representing the 58th Assembly District, introduced AB-367, theMenstrual Equity for All Act of 2021.

The Menstrual Equity Act of 2021 would require "all public schools serving students in grades 6 to 12, the California State University (CSU) and each California Community College (CCC) district, and public agencies that maintain restrooms facilities for the public and for employees, to stock at least 50% of restrooms with feminine hygiene products at all times and requests the Regents of the University of California (UC) and private higher education institutions to do the same."

"California recognizes that access to menstrual products is a basic human right and is vital for ensuring the health, dignity, and full participation of all Californians in public life," the bill states. "Inadequate menstrual support is associated with both health and psychosocial issues, particularly among low-income people. A lack of access to menstrual products can cause emotional distress, physical infection, and disease."

The bill makes it known that the menstrual products are not only for females, but also for biological males.

"California has an interest in promoting gender equity, not only for women and girls, but also for transgender men, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming people who may also menstruate and experience inequities resulting from lack of access to menstrual products," the bill reads.

"The provision of menstrual products in schools helps ensure California provides equal access to education and enables students to reach their full potential, irrespective of gender," AB-367 claims.

The bill will attempt to "normalize menstruation among all genders."

"It is the intent of the Legislature that this act provide for the health, dignity, and safety of menstruating students at every socioeconomic level, normalize menstruation among all genders, and foster gender competency in California schools, colleges, and universities," the bills reads.

The bill also encourages institutions of higher education to "post a notice regarding these provisions in a prominent and conspicuous location in all women's restrooms and all-gender restrooms and in at least one men's restroom."

If passed, schools would be forced to provide free menstrual products on or before the start of the 2022–23 school year.

According to Senate Appropriations:

This bill could result in one-time Proposition 98 General Fund costs of approximately $2 million for school districts to install or modify menstrual product dispensers, and additional ongoing Proposition 98 General Fund costs of about $1.3 million each year to provide free menstrual products. School districts may also incur additional, unknown costs to comply with the bill's restroom noticing requirements. These costs are likely to be deemed reimbursable by the Commission on State Mandates. The Chancellor's Office estimates Proposition 98 General Fund costs of between $57,500 and $115,000 annually to provide free menstrual products at a centralized location on the 115 community college campuses. There could also be additional one-time costs, likely to be minor, for campuses to comply with the bill's noticing requirements. The UC estimates General Fund costs in the low tens of thousands of dollars annually to comply with the bill's requirements, while the CSU indicates General Fund costs of between $750,000 to $800,000 each year to provide additional menstrual products for its health centers.

This isn't the first time Garcia attempted to require California colleges to provide free menstrual products. In 2017 she introduced another bill requiring colleges to provide free period products, but that was reportedly cut due to budget concerns, Campus Reform reported.