Oregon School superintendent reportedly canned for enforcing statewide mask mandate



An Oregon superintendent is out of a job after he reportedly refused to ignore the governor's statewide mask mandate, the Daily Mail reports.

What are the details?

The Adrian School Board fired former Superintendent Kevin Purnell on Monday for his decision to uphold Democratic Gov. Kate Brown's statewide mask mandate in public K-12 schools.

Board Chair Eddie Kincaid said after the meeting that the "decision was due to Purnell's failure to follow board directive," but did not specifically mention masks. According to a report from the Oregonian, both Purnell's supporters and critics said that his stance put him at odds with the school board.

Purnell tearfully told board members and the rest of his community that he is "tired of disappointing" his colleagues by enforcing the statewide mask mandates despite what the outlet says is his "personal opposition to them."

The Oregonian added that he said he had, at times, "failed to communicate well and that board members had at times failed to communicate in a civil manner."

"Ultimately, I feel that I have lost my way, and it began to consume me," he said in an emotional speech. "I have become tired. Tired of disappointing myself, my family, my friends, my colleagues."

Purnell worked as superintendent for three years and spent the last 14 working for the district.

He concluded his emotional speech with a push for unity and quoted Ephesians 6:12, which reads, "For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms."

What else?

The Daily Mail reported that Oregon's deputy superintendent of public instruction, Colt Gill, said that school administrators have a duty to uphold the governor's mask mandate.

"We have a shared priority to reliably return students to a full-time, in-person school this year," he said. "Face coverings are proven to slow the spread of COVID-19. I say this knowing that face coverings aren't the argument. Personal freedom is the argument. But, with personal freedom comes responsibility, not only for ourselves, but for our neighbors."

Brown announced the implementation of the mask mandate earlier in August, telling administrators that the "highly contagious Delta variant has changed everything," and warned that "flouting mask requirements will put everything we have worked toward in the last year at risk."

An interim superintendent has not been named at the time of this reporting.

Pushback

Several community members came to Purnell's defense during the Monday night meeting.

Nickie Shira, Malheur Education Service District STEM coordinator, said, "I know firsthand that Mr. Purnell is one of the best superintendents in the county, and it breaks my heart that we are in this position. It's sad that it has come to this. But beyond mask mandates, there's a lot to running the school, to leading the staff, and being an administrator. And Mr. Purnell is a man of integrity and ethical leadership."

Local businessman Eric Ellis added, "We say that an outcome of education at Adrian is to produce good citizens. To achieve that, our children must be led by honorable and moral leaders. Dismissing Mr. Purnell would send the exact opposite message — that we want only educational leaders who lead when it is convenient and non-controversial, and in accordance with the short-term passions of the vocal minority."

Jake Speelmon, former Adrian School Board member, said that Purnell was "going to protect the district by protecting its employees, and a lot of the community would say, 'I think that the superintendent needs to protect the kids, and protect the education the school gives by protecting the kids."

He added, "They see those things as opposing. Before, you could do both. Now, with the political nature of vaccines, masks, government threats, and that stuff, I think you've got to pick a side. You'll toe the line, or you'll stand on your beliefs."

Oregon Gov. Brown refuses to talk about bill she signed in secret allowing students to graduate without being able to read or do math



Kate Brown, the far-left Democratic governor of Oregon, quietly signed a bill into law last month that will allow high schoolers to graduate without proving they can read, write, or do math — and told no one about it.

And now, when pressed on it just days ago, she still won't talk about the new law, the Oregonian reported.

What was the bill?

The Beaver State's Democrat-dominated legislature passed a bill in mid-June, SB 744, dropping requirements that would-be graduates demonstrate they have achieved essential high school-level reading, writing, and math skills for the next five years, the paper said. The move was an extension of the suspension of skills requirements that had been enacted last year in response to the pandemic.

Oregon, unlike other states, did not require standardized tests — which are often regarded as being unfair to minority communities — to show proficiency. Students had a number of options to show subject proficiency: They could choose from a number of different tests or complete classroom projects judged by their own teachers, the Oregonian added.

Backers of the legislation said the bill would benefit minority students by changing the graduation standards and advocated expanding learning support and opportunities; however, the state assembly did not bother to pass any learning opportunity expansions for minority students.

In fact, according to the paper, workshop programs many high schools had created to help students meet the previous requirements have been scrapped now that the state government has killed the standards for graduation.

What is Brown (not) saying?

As recently as Friday, the governor was still refusing to talk about it when pressed by the Oregonian.

The outlet reported that for a month after the assembly passed the bill, Brown refused to indicate whether or not she supported the plan. But then on July 14, she quietly signed it into law.

Brown's decision wasn't public until more than two weeks later. She didn't have a signing ceremony. She didn't even issue a press release.

And the state's legislative database wasn't updated with information about her signing until July 29 — a major deviation from the usual practice of updating the site on the day the governor signs a bill, the paper said.

The staff at the state Senate office charged with updating the site claimed that the signing update was delayed because "a key staffer who deals with the governor's office was experiencing medical issues," the paper reported. However, several bills that Brown signed during that same time period were all updated on the website the day the governor signed them, and email notifications were sent out to people who were tracking the bills.

No email notifications were sent when the website was updated to reflect the fact that Brown had signed the controversial bill. Legislative sources told the Oregonian that the notifications were not sent because of a "system malfunction."

Leftist host tries to get Oregon governor to condemn 'death squad-style assassination' of Antifa thug who gunned down pro-cop activist in 2020. Nope.



A host for far-left news show Democracy Now! did her darnedest to get Oregon Gov. Kate Brown, a staunch Democrat, to condemn the "death squad-style assassination by U.S. marshals" of Michael Reinoehl — a self-proclaimed "100% Antifa" militant who gunned down a pro-cop activist last summer after a Portland rally in support of then-President Donald Trump.

But for some reason Brown didn't take Amy Goodman's bait.

What are the details?

As part of a larger interview Friday, Goodman asked Brown to talk about Portland's "hundred-day protest ... against ... racism and police brutality that culminated in a death squad-style assassination by U.S. marshals of the anti-fascist activist Michael Reinoehl."

Brown was happy to talk about a number of things: how much she despised the Trump administration's actions, her support of peaceful protests, her efforts to get rid of racism — just not about what happened to Reinoehl.

"The actions of the Trump administration were abysmal and absolutely abhorrent in this state," the governor responded. "And we worked with our local law enforcement to eradicate these forces from our state. We want to make sure that Oregonians can continue to peacefully protest, to uphold those voices that ask for change. And we will continue to support those efforts to eradicate racism from our institutions, from our structures and from our systems."

Goodman — perhaps expecting a direct, supportive reply from Brown — pressed the governor.

"And do you condemn that death squad-style assassination of this man?" Goodman asked. "And have you called for an investigation?"

But Brown didn't give her what she wanted.

"Look, what happened last summer was abhorrent," the governor answered, again stopping short of addressing Reinoehl. "We are continuing to work to hold federal officials accountable. I expect you will see changes in leadership of local federal officials here in the state of Oregon. That is appropriate. And we are glad to be rid of Donald Trump's corruption, chaos, and, frankly, incompetent governance."

Oregon Governor Kate Brown Pushes Expanding Vote-by-Mail to Counter GOP Voter Suppression Effortsyoutu.be

What's the background?

Reinoehl — a self-proclaimed "100% Antifa" militant — fatally shot pro-police activist and Patriot Prayer supporter Aaron "Jay" Danielson in an apparent ambush Aug. 29 after a Portland pro-Trump rally that attracted a heavy Antifa presence.

While the likes of then-Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden floated the possibility that Danielson was killed because his fellow Trump supporters were "inciting responses," the Multnomah County district attorney's office released unsealed court documents suggesting Reinoehl targeted Danielson before shots were fired.

Newly released stills of CCTV footage shows Michael Forest Reinoehl lying in wait for Aaron J. Daniels on and his f… https://t.co/i2J7cp39j3
— Mike H. (@Mike H.)1599274400.0

Reinoehl said he believed he killed Danielson in self-defense because he and his friend were about to be attacked.

Law enforcement agents fatally shot Reinoehl on Sept. 3 after they said he pulled a gun when they came to arrest him in Washington state.

'He was a f***ing Nazi'

Immediately after Danielson was killed, a group of Antifa militants celebrated his death in the street. (Content warning: Language):

“He was a f—ing Nazi! Our community held its own.”Antifa & BLM in Portland celebrate the homicide of a purported… https://t.co/VmAHFWs4mi
— Andy Ngô (@Andy Ngô)1598769715.0

"And tonight I just got word, the person who died was a Patriot Prayer person," one woman said to the black-clad crowd. "He was a f***ing Nazi. Our community held its own and took out the trash. I'm not going to shed any tears over a Nazi."

She added, "If ya'll are not angry, you're not paying attention. If ya'll are not angry, you're not with me! Everybody needs to realize what's going on in the community. Our community can hold its own without the police. We can take out the trash on our own. I am not sad that a f***ing fascist died tonight!"

Salon owner sues Oregon Gov. Kate Brown, accusing Democrat of retaliating over lockdown defiance



Oregon salon owner Lindsey Graham has filed a lawsuit against her state, its Democratic Gov. Kate Brown, and a number of agency officials, seeking $100,000 in damages after being hit with fines and even a visit from child welfare workers after Graham defied COVID-19 lockdown orders.

What are the details?

Graham says Brown retaliated against her, her business, and her family for reopening her Glamour salon in May, violating the state's stay-at-home order. After reopening, Oregon's Occupational Safety and Health Division hit her with a $14,000 fine and the state's Child Welfare Division sent workers to search her home, questioning her, her husband, and one of her kids.

"I've never expected such a violent, aggressive, vindictive thing could have ever been done to me or my family," the business owner of 15 years said at the time.

Graham filed a lawsuit Dec. 18 against a slew of state officials including Brown herself, alleging that the defendants violated Graham's U.S. and state constitutional rights, intentionally inflicted emotional distress on the salon owner, and abused processes in order to target Graham in retaliation.

The lawsuit states:

"While individuals and businesses such as Graham and Glamour struggled to make ends meet for nearly six (6) weeks, government employees like Defendant Kate Brown and the other individual named defendants did not have to worry about where their next paycheck would come from."

The suit also claims:

"Defendant Kate Brown grew increasingly frustrated with the fact that Graham and Glamour refused to bow down to her authority. Defendant Kate Brown publicly called Graham and Glamour's 're-opening' 'unfortunate' and 'irresponsible' — only further making Graham and Glamour a target by the government."

'She came at me with the full weight of the state'

"As soon as I tried to open my doors against the governor's mandate back in May, she came at me with the full weight of the state," Graham told Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle" with Laura Ingraham on Monday. "She terrorized myself, she terrorized my stylists, and she terrorized my family. She took every government agency she could, and she put her full weight into intimidating me into closing, including sending Child Protective Services to my home and threatening the removal of my children."

Graham noted that CPS showed up on her doorstep just a few days after her salon reopening, claiming they were acting on an anonymous call.

"[They] opened a full-blown case against me which was completely bogus and unwarranted, and it didn't come until I shot back at them with a threat of the lawsuit" that they closed the case, she told Fox News.

KATU-TV reached out to Gov. Brown's office last week seeking comment on the lawsuit, but has not yet received a response.