How To Dispel The Lies Most Americans Believe About Abortion
Shawn Carney and Steve Karlen’s guide is a clear and concise roadmap for pro-lifers looking to defend their stance and win hearts for good.
A Florida man is accused of setting a car on fire belonging to his girlfriend – who is also his cousin.
Melvin Alain Cintron, 37, was arrested by officers with the Miami-Dade Police Department on Wednesday for allegedly torching a car belonging to his cousin/lover.
Cintron was caught on a surveillance camera setting fire to a Jaguar XE sedan belonging to his cousin turned girlfriend parked in front of a residence in North Miami on April 29, according to the arrest report obtained by WPLG. Investigators claim Cintron left a cell phone behind at the alleged crime scene.
However, detectives reportedly were having difficulty interviewing the woman about the car set ablaze.
The woman purportedly misled investigators initially by saying her car caught fire while she was driving home because she feared retribution by Cintron. The woman allegedly told investigators at a later time that whenever they called, Cintron made her put the phone on speaker.
When the woman was finally able to speak freely with investigators, she told them that she feared for her life because Cintron owns a fully automatic gun with a double-drum high-capacity magazine.
She accused Cintron of stealing her purse, which had multiple valuables, including $1,200 in cash.
The woman said she was abandoned by Cintron at a Miami shopping center because he reportedly got enraged when he suspected a bartender of flirting with his cousin.
Officers with the Miami-Dade Police Department obtained a warrant and arrested Cintron at gunpoint outside a business in Hialeah.
Cintron, of Hollywood, Florida, faces charges of second-degree arson and third-degree grand theft.
Cintron remained in custody at the Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center as of Thursday afternoon. He is being held on a $12,500 bond.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
A 31-year-old woman who admitted to having sex with a 13-year-old boy and later became pregnant will not face any additional jail time.
Andrea Serrano, 31, was arrested by Fountain Police Department officers on July 5, 2022. According to the Fountain Police Department, she was accused of raping a 13-year-old child and booked on charges of sexual assault on a child by one in position of trust and sexual assault on a child.
True Crime reported that Serrano was a "mother figure" to the child, and she told detectives that he called her "mom."
The 13-year-old allegedly slept over at Serrano's house on multiple occasions. Serrano became pregnant from one of the sexual encounters with the child. Serrano has since given birth to the baby.
Serrano was arrested but was released from jail only days later after posting $70,000 bond.
During the trial, the boy's mother claimed that Serrano was not being punished enough and there was a double standard because she is a woman.
"She (Serrano) sexually assaulted my 13-year-old son ... She introduced him to drugs, she needs to be in jail," the mother told Judge William Moller, according to the Colorado Springs Gazette. "It's a double standard. If she was a man, and my son was a girl she (Serrano) would be behind bars right now."
Despite the mother's petition, Serrano won’t face any jail time under a plea deal with prosecutors. Serrano pleaded guilty to incest. Under the plea deal, Serrano must register as a sex offender for life and faces 10 years to life on sex offender probation. However, Serrano will serve no additional jail time for her child sex abuse crimes.
Serrano is allegedly caring for the baby right now. The boy's family will reportedly ask the courts to give them custody of the infant.
Custody and visitation of the baby was not determined during the hearing. Judge Moller said that situation would need to be resolved by the Department of Human Services.
The victim's mother told KKTV, "I feel like my son is robbed of his childhood. Now he’s having to be a father. He’s a victim, and he’s going to have to live with that for the rest of his life."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Advocates for the legalization of consensual incest are using a recent New York lawsuit demanding the state allow a parent to marry their adult child to further their agenda, the New York Post reported over the weekend.
An anonymous New Yorker filed a lawsuit this month to overturn the Empire State's laws outlawing incestuous marriages because they want to marry their adult offspring.
Under New York law, incest is a third-degree felony punishable by up to four years in jail. According to the New York code, someone "is guilty of incest in the third degree when he or she marries or engages in sexual intercourse, oral sexual conduct or anal sexual conduct with a person whom he or she knows to be related to him or her ... as an ancestor, descendant, brother or sister of either the whole or the half blood, uncle, aunt, nephew or niece."
Incestuous marriages are null in New York, and spouses in such marriages are subject to fines and jail time, as is anyone who "knowingly and willfully" solemnizes such a marriage.
The parent behind the lawsuit — who has remained unnamed because their request is, as they admit in their filing, "an action that a large segment of society views as morally, socially and biologically repugnant" — is unhappy that the state would dare to "diminish their humanity" in an issue that is a matter of "individual autonomy."
Now advocates for legalizing incest are jumping at the chance to support the suit and use it to advance their agenda.
Pro-incest advocate Richard Morris of Australia told the Post that he backs the suit, saying that sex between consenting adults "should not be criminalized."
Though he and his fellow incest advocates have been working to change laws in some 60 countries, "We haven't moved any mountains yet," he told the paper.
Morris is using the familiar mantra of fighting for real "marriage equality," saying to the Post that it's "the right thing to do, isn't it?"
"It seems to be as unjust as the law that used to imprison gay people, and the law that used to stop people of different races marrying," he said.
The Post said another incest advocate, Keith Pullman of the Full Marriage Equality site, is enthused by the New York lawsuit.
He told the Post:
It is absurd to say that an adult can't consent to marry their parent. That same adult can be sent to war, take on six or seven figures of debt, operate heavy machinery, be sentenced to death by a federal court, and consent to sex with five strangers (and marriage with one of them) but can't consent to marry someone they love? In some of these cases, the genetic parent didn't raise them and they met for the first time two years ago. Allegations of "grooming" are laughable attempts to deny someone their rights even though it will have no impact on the person objecting.
Pullman's website advocates "for the right of consenting adults to share and enjoy love, sex, residence, and marriage without limits on the gender, number, or relation of participants" and claims that "full marriage equality is a basic human right."
He published a long list of characteristics that detail exactly for whom the site was designed, including:
● I am attracted to or want to have sex with a family member or close relative (an in-law, step-relation, adopted relation, half-blood relative, full-blood relative, cousin).
● I am in a sexual relationship with or want a sexual relationship with a family member or close relative.
● I want to marry a family member or close relative, or have our existing marriage legally recognized.
● I have experienced Genetic Sexual Attraction or a strong attraction to a close genetic relative I was not raised with or I didn't raise or who didn't raise me.
● I am in or want a consensual incestuous relationship with another adult.
Those "feelings" and "experiences," Pullman's site says, "are not necessarily wrong or impossible."
"Not everyone is going to want to accept who you are or who you love or how you love," the site continues. "That's okay, as long as they don't try to control you. Sexual, relationship, and marriage rights are arriving for all adults, and as that happens, anyone who hates you or is prejudiced against you will have less and less ability to hurt you. That is why this blog exists; we promote relationship rights, including full marriage equality" (emphasis in original).