'No more low blows': How the Trump campaign can DEFEAT Kamala Harris



Donald Trump’s heroic behavior immediately following the assassination attempt against him understandably had the Democrat Party doubting Joe Biden’s ability to come out on top in the coming 2024 election.

Which is why he’s finally been forced out and replaced with Kamala Harris.

“So now it’s Kamala Harris, who is a foot soldier of every far-left progressive cause. She is beholden, not, I don’t think, to her own party, or even her own belief system, or even her own personal ideology,” Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” explains.

“She’s certainly not beholden to the Constitution or to the country. She is beholden only to power. She has shown that throughout her career. She is beholden to Planned Parenthood in the abortion lobby, she is beholden to the so-called Human Rights Campaign and the LGBTQ lobby,” Stuckey continues.

While conservatives have been pointing out that her record as a prosecutor flies in direct opposition to the liberals' anti-police message, Stuckey doesn’t believe that’s the angle to attack her from.

“We have to attack her from the left, not the right. What I mean by that is stop calling her ‘Kamala the cop,’ that she put too many people in jail for marijuana. Stop talking about the fact that oh, in a speech a few months ago she called 18- to 24-year-olds stupid,” she explains.

“Those are literally the best things that she has done,” Stuckey adds.

“Let’s stay above board. Let’s call it what it is. She is a radical communist-leaning tyrant who is bloodthirsty and the most pro-abortion politician that we’ve got. She has been in charge of the border for the last four years, and every single murder by an illegal alien happened on her watch,” she continues.

Rather than calling Harris a “ho” and pointing out her past relationships with men like Willie Brown, Stuckey believes we must attack her on policy.

“We can attack her on policy, and we can, Trump campaign, paint a positive vision of the United States while also contrasting that with the dark reality of an anti-fracking, anti-energy-independence, pro-inflation, pro-nine-month-abortion future with Kamala Harris.”

“You can do that without name-calling, without doing the low blows. Because every time you do that, you are garnering sympathy for Harris and Joe Biden,” she says.


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Did Democrats stage a COUP to remove Biden?



President Joe Biden has been AWOL for days, dropping out of the race via a statement posted to social media rather than physically addressing the American people.

Proof of life would seem to be required in a situation where the president’s health has been a notorious point of contention over the past four years — but that’s one thing the American people aren’t getting.

Even stranger is that the signature on the statement doesn’t appear to match Biden’s most recent signatures, which Sara Gonzales of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” believes might mean something more sinister.

“These are very recent signatures but now all of a sudden, it’s a completely different signature. Very curious. They all match up except the dropout,” Gonzales says conspiratorially.

And that’s not all.

“Kamala Harris dutifully played her role in this entire bait and switch,” Gonzales comments. “They were in a free fall. The campaign donations were plummeting. This was post Trump assassination attempt, the momentum had clearly shifted. We heard that Harris spoke with 300 high level Democrat donors on a phone call just two days before Joe Biden bowed out of the campaign.”

Harris then went on to raise $50 million in campaign donations after Biden dropped out.

Then, there’s the fact that Biden’s schedule appears to be non-existent.

“All we’ve seen is he broke up with his campaign by text and promised some sort of upcoming speech,” Gonzales says. “In his statement he said ‘I will speak to the nation later in this week about my decision.’”

“Isn’t it strange that Joe Biden would make the decision to drop out of the presidential race on a Sunday by a statement posted on Twitter with a signature that doesn’t match up claiming that he was going to address the nation later this week, but there’s no plan to do so yet,” she continues.

“If they overthrow their elected nominee, do you trust them to have a truly open convention?” Gonzales asks. “I guess we shouldn’t be surprised if they’ve proven already that they would fortify an election.”


Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Joe Biden’s debate disaster sparks Joy Reid and Rachel Maddow MELTDOWNS



Conservatives may acknowledge the stark differences between men and women, but liberals are doing the best job of demonstrating it — especially in the aftermath of President Joe Biden’s disastrous performance on the debate stage.

While liberal men’s responses have been mostly based on logic, their female counterparts have responded illogically and emotionally.

Rachel Maddow’s most recent meltdown is a prime example.

“I really did not expect that they would do this, and they, you know, Donald Trump and his council asked for this 100% absolute immunity thing which was insane, I would say they got 105% of what they were asking for. They got immunity from this court,” Maddow said, before going entirely off the rails on “hypotheticals.”

“Can the president assassinate a rival? I think we have to look at the Supreme Court’s affirmative to that, yes, you can,” she remarked. “I mean, this is a death squad ruling.”

“This is a president who has activated pro-Trump military groups, that you know, wear insignia and T-shirts and hold placards celebrating literally right-wing death squads. This is a president who has talked about absolutely using the Department of Justice to go after his rivals. This explicitly immunizes anything the president wants to do through the justice department.”

Jason Whitlock is well aware that what Maddow just asserted is ridiculous.

“Women bow to logic and reason just the same way as men,” Whitlock mocks. “No, they don’t.”

“Nor should they,” he continues. “It’s not what they were built for. They get pregnant and carry another human being in their womb for 9 months at a time. Once a month, they have a menstrual cycle that really messes with their hormones and emotions and we think, ‘Oh yeah, let’s put them on equal political footing with men, let’s install them on every TV show and every talk show in America. Let’s completely feminize the situation.”

Maddow isn’t alone in her delusion, as Joy Reid has also responded with a clear lack of logic to the events of the past couple of weeks.

“Donald John Trump cannot be allowed back into the White House,” Reid said in a selfie video posted to social media. “If you combine that mad man with this court, two of whose members are insurrectionists, one of whom flew an upside down flag at his home and blamed it on his wife, who’s also crazy.”

“The other of whom’s wife literally was part of the insurrection,” she continued. “They ruled on this with no shame.”

“They are kings and Trump is king. You put him in the White House, combined with this court and a Republican House and Senate, we’re done, y’all. All the rights that were won in the 20th century, the hard-earned rights of women, laborers, workers, the rights of children,” she said but didn’t stop there.

“They are trying to repeal the entire 20th century,” she continued, “If you don’t think they’re coming for all these rights, then you are delusional.”

“This is a nut job,” Whitlock responds, shocked.


Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

China provides rhetorical cover for Russia and their 'new model of international relations'



In recent days, China has amped up its rhetorical support for Russia in a direct slight to the U.S. and other nations who had hoped that Beijing would opt to condemn Moscow for Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

Zhao Lijian, a spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said, “An important takeaway from the success of China-Russia relations is that the two sides rise above the model of military and political alliance in the Cold War era.”

Zhao suggested that China and Russia are able to collaborate so effectively because the countries and their leadership “commit themselves to developing a new model of international relations.”

Bloomberg reported that Zhao made this statement during a briefing Friday in Beijing.

Zhao emphasized that the “model” relationship between China and Russia is predicated on the two countries’ hesitance to cause confrontation between other nations and respecting the sovereignty of other states.

He added that this relationship broke with the “Cold War mentality” displayed by countries allied with the U.S. through geographic blocs like the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

President Joe Biden warned Chinese President Xi Jinping in March that there would be “implications and consequences” if the Chinese government provided any form of material support to their Russian counterparts over the invasion of Ukraine.

To date there has been no indication that China has supported the Russian invasion or helped the country skirt the Western sanctions that torpedoed its economy, but the Chinese government has provided “rhetorical support” for Russia by repeating its propaganda.

The Chinese government also repeatedly states that it will stand by the “no limits” relationship agreement that Presidents Putin and Xi agreed to at a private meeting between the two heads-of-staet before the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing.

During this meeting, Xi and Putin agreed to support each other in their respective efforts to expand their borders to include the independent nations of Taiwan and Ukraine, respectively.

The very existence and basis of this dynamic calls into question the validity of claims recently made by Zhao that Russia and China avoid confrontation with other nations on the international stage.

The reality is that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the Chinese government’s blatant hostility towards Taiwan indicate that both nations are, in fact, dedicated to the military conquest of sovereign nations while meddling in their affairs.