JPMorgan Chase’s CEO: Trump ‘grew the economy’ and was ‘right’ on critical issues​



Big finance is giving off some interesting signals as the 2024 election draws closer, including JPMorgan Chase’s longtime CEO Jamie Dimon, when he sang the praises of former President Donald Trump on CNBC.

“You have all these very powerful forces that are going to be affecting us in ‘24 and ‘25, so if I was the government, I would be preparing for what I’m going to do about that, assuming things aren’t good,” Dimon told the reporter.

“I wish the Democrats would think a little more carefully when they talk about MAGA, you know, and if you travel this country,” Dimon continued, “I don’t think they’re voting for Trump because of his family values.”

“If you take a step back, be honest, he was kind of right about NATO, kind of right about immigration. He grew the economy quite well, tax reform worked, he was right about some of China,” he said, adding, “He wasn’t wrong about some of these critical issues.”

Jill Savage of “Blaze News Tonight” is curious as to whether or not Dimon’s sentiments reflect his colleagues.

“Who would you say big finance is backing at this election?” Savage asks Ten31 managing partner Marty Bent.

“I think it’s pretty clear it's got to be Donald Trump,” Bent tells Savage and Matthew Peterson.

“If you’re looking for some certainty in terms of economic policy in the next administration, like you mentioned, it doesn’t seem like Kamala has a policy at all.”

Peterson points out that there’s one issue with this prediction.

“We have a little problem in the last couple decades, which is that big finance, and big money in general, is not allowed to say that they support anyone other than sort of the Borg, and that’s the Democrats now,” Peterson says.

“So it’s an interesting predicament,” he adds.


Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

'Say hi to Snow White': Jeffrey Epstein offered 'Disney princesses' to top JPMorgan exec, trafficking victims paid over $1 million from accounts at megabank, unsealed docs say



Newly unsealed court documents show Jeffrey Epstein had a very chummy relationship with a former top JPMorgan Chase executive and would email photos of young girls. The U.S. Virgin Islands' lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase also said that at least 20 trafficking victims of Epstein were paid more than $1 million through accounts at the megabank.

JPMorgan flags Jeffrey Epstein as a 'high-risk' client

In 2006, JPMorgan Chase flagged Epstein as a "high-risk" client after he was being investigated by the Palm Beach Police Department and the FBI over sex assault accusations by at least 40 victims, including 34 confirmed minors and a girl as young as 14.

According to the lawsuit, JPMorgan's Global Corporate Security Division flagged “several newspaper articles ... that detail the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein in Florida on felony charges of soliciting underage prostitutes."

In 2011, Epstein confidante Ghislaine Maxwell was also flagged by the bank.

Court documents say, "Maxwell wanted to set up an account for her ‘personal recruitment consulting business.'"

A JPMorgan director with the bank's anti-money-laundering program reportedly asked in an email, "What does she mean by personal recruitment?? Are you sure this will have nothing to do with Jeffrey? If you want to proceed, I suggest that we flag this as a High-Risk Client."

Epstein reportedly used JPMorgan accounts to pay trafficking victims

Despite being flagged as a "high-risk" client, Epstein was reportedly able to pay trafficking victims through JPMorgan Chase accounts.

"These women were trafficked and abused during different intervals between at least 2003 and July 2019, when Epstein was arrested and jailed, and these women received payments, typically multiple payments, between 2003 and 2013 in excess of $1 million collectively," court documents stated. "Epstein also withdrew more than $775,000 in cash over that time frame from JPMorgan accounts, especially significant as Epstein was known to pay for 'massages,' or sexual encounters, in cash."

The lawsuit claims that Epstein sent money to the MC2 Modeling Company – a French modeling agency owned by Jean Luc Brunel. Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre claimed that Brunel procured women – including minors – for the disgraced financier.

According to court documents, "Financial information also reflects payments drawn from JP Morgan accounts of nearly $1.5 million to known recruiters, including to the MC2 modeling agency, and another $150,000 to a private investigative firm."

Brunel was arrested in December 2020 at Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris as he was attempting to board a flight to Dakar, Senegal.

Paris Prosecutor Remy Heitz said Brunel was "suspected of having committed acts of rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment on various minor or major victims and of having, in particular, organized the transport and accommodation of young girls or young women on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein."

Brunel committed suicide in a French prison cell while awaiting trial in February 2022.

Epstein allegedly offered 'Disney princesses' to top JPMorgan exec

Epstein was also apparently close friends with a top JPMorgan executive. Jes Staley worked at JPMorgan Chase for more than 30 years until he left the financial institution in 2013. Staley was named the chief executive of the investment bank in 2009. Staley became the CEO of Barclays. However, he stepped down from the position in 2021 following a probe into his ties with Epstein.

In August 2009, Staley emailed the convicted pedophile to let him know that he'd be in London in a week. Epstein allegedly asked Staley if he needed anything, and the banking exec replied, "Yep."

Staley told Epstein in December 2009, "I realize the danger in sending this email. But it was great to be able, today, to give you, in New York City, a long heartfelt, hug."

Court docs alleged that Epstein "emailed Staley photos of young women in seductive poses."

Staley sailed his yacht to Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands in January 2010, according to the lawsuit.

Staley allegedly said to Epstein, "Arrived at your harbor. Someday, we have to do this together."

In a memorandum filed on Wednesday, attorneys for the Virgin Islands said Staley’s JPMorgan email account contained messages about "women who they referred to by the names of Disney princesses that Epstein procured for Staley" and "discussions of sex with young women."

The lawsuit says Staley emailed Epstein in July 2010: "Maybe they’re tracking u? That was fun. Say hi to Snow White."

Epstein reportedly replied, "What character would you like next?"

Staley responded by naming the Disney princess movie "Beauty and the Beast."

Epstein allegedly replied, "Well one side is available."

The lawsuit claims, "Between 2008 and 2012, Staley exchanged approximately 1,200 emails with Epstein from his JP Morgan email account. These communications show a close personal relationship and ‘profound’ friendship between the two men and even suggest that Staley may have been involved in Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation."

The lawsuit hints that JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon knew about Epstein's involvement with the megabank.

"JP Morgan's banking relationship with Epstein was known at the highest levels of the bank," the lawsuit states. "For instance, an August 2008 internal email states, 'I would count Epstein's assets as a probable outflow for '08 ($120mm or so?) as I can't imagine it will stay (pending Dimon review).'"

JPMorgan calls Virgin Islands lawsuit 'meritless'

The documents were revealed in the U.S. Virgin Islands government lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase that was filed in December. The lawsuit accuses JPMorgan Chase of "complicity" in Epstein's crimes.

JPMorgan Chase called the lawsuit "meritless."

"Having sought and obtained more than $100 million from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate and businesses for damages caused by his sex-trafficking crimes, the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) now casts farther afield for deeper pockets," JPMorgan declared.

"USVI’s lawsuit is a masterclass in deflection that seeks to hold JPMC responsible for not sleuthing out Epstein’s crimes over a decade ago," attorneys for the bank said. "Yet USVI had access at the time to the same information, allegations, and rumors about Epstein on which it alleges JPMC should have acted. Indeed, as a law-enforcement agency, USVI had access to much more, along with the investigative advantage of physical proximity to Epstein’s crimes."

"To the contrary, during the same period, USVI granted Epstein and his businesses lucrative privileges and massive tax incentives," the bank proclaimed. "Nonetheless, USVI’s suit proceeds on the untenable theory that JPMC was a participant in an Epstein sex-trafficking venture and was somehow uniquely situated to bring it to a halt."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up!

JPMorgan CEO rejects Rep. Rashida Tlaib's far-left demand: 'That would be the road to hell for America'



Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Minn.) demanded Wednesday that the CEOs of America's largest banks commit to stop financing fossil fuel companies.

But she received more than she bargained for when she called on Jamie Dimon, chairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chase & Co., to answer her woke demand.

What happened?

During a House Financial Services Committee hearing, Tlaib demanded the bank CEOs make a pledge against fossil fuels.

The CEOs represented the seven largest banks in the U.S.: JPMorgan Chase & Co, U.S. Bancorp, PNC Financial Services, Citigroup, Bank of America, Truist Financial Corporation, and Wells Fargo & Co.

"You have all committed, as you all know, to transition the emissions from lending and investment activities to align with pathways to net-zero in 2050," she said. "Do you know what the International Energy Agency has said is required to meet our global 2050 net-sterile targets of limiting global temperature rise to 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit or 1.5 degrees Celsius? So no new fossil fuel production starting today. So that’s like zero."

"Please answer with a simple yes or no: Does your bank have a policy against funding new oil and gas products?" Tlaib asked.

The first executive she called on, Dimon, made it clear he was not engaging Tlaib's far-left games.

"Absolutely not — and that would be the road to hell for America," he told Tlaib.

Tlaib then got personal, suggesting that Americans who benefit from President Joe Biden's controversial policies should cease doing business with Dimon's bank.

"Yeah, that’s fine," she snarked. "That’s why, sir, you know what, everybody that got relief from student loan [who] has a bank account with your bank should probably take out their account and close their account. The fact that you’re not even there to help relieve many of the folks that are in debt, extreme debt because of student loan debt, and you’re out there criticizing it."

Tlaib was referring to Dimon's earlier criticism of Biden's student loan forgiveness plan.

What did the other CEOs say?

The CEOs of Citigroup, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo each said they will continue working with fossil fuel companies and investing in clean energy.

Tlaib then returned to Dimon, claiming without basis that he does not care about common Americans.

"You obviously don't care about working-class people and front-line communities," she claimed, "that are facing huge amounts of high rates of asthma, respiratory issues, and so much more, cancer rates are so high among my communities that I represent."

\u201cRep. @RashidaTlaib challenges bank CEOs to agree to stop funding fossil fuels, is rejected by every single one \n\nJamie Dimon: "That would be the road to Hell for America"\u201d
— Tom Elliott (@Tom Elliott) 1663791810

The fallacy of Tlaib's question is obvious.

The commitment to clean energy requires working with oil and gas companies because they are the only energy businesses with the resources required to invest heavily in "clean energy." And those companies are already making such investments because, after all, they want to make money, and developing sources of clean energy will lead to massive financial benefits in the future.