Harrison Butker Is Right. We’ve Been Duped Into Sacrificing Womanhood For The Workplace

As a young, college-educated woman, I wish someone had given me Harrison Butker's message on womanhood years ago.

James Carville in doghouse for claiming Democratic Party culture is dominated by 'too many preachy females'



Democratic strategist James Carville has been puzzling over why President Joe Biden is hemorrhaging support among voters, black men in particular. The conclusion he drew over the weekend has ruffled some feathers.

In an interview published Saturday in the New York Times, the 79-year-old partisan told opinion columnist Maureen Dowd that when looking at Biden's approval ratings, "It's like walking in on your grandma naked. You can't get the image out of your mind."

According to the latest Gallup poll, Biden's job approval rating is 40% and his disapproval rating is 55%. The Economist/YouGov and Rasmussen Reports polls put the geriatric Democrat's disapproval rating one and two points higher, respectively.

Former President Donald Trump appears to have an edge on Biden in numerous swing states — such as Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan — as well as nationally.

Dowd suggested that Carville, who previously advised failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and managed Bill Clinton's first presidential campaign, has been "obsessed with Biden bleeding Black male voters."

CNN elections analyst Harry Enten recently indicated that Biden's lead over Trump among black voters has "been sliced by a third," from a 62-point advantage four years ago to a 21-point advantage this month.

"This decline in support for Joe Biden among voters of color in Michigan is something we've been seeing in state after state after state and nationally as well, where he's got some big problems," said Enten. "This is a historic low amount of support for a Democratic presidential candidate among voters of color. And it seems to be happening across the board."

Carville appears to have zeroed in on at least one reason for the drop in support, telling Dowd, "A suspicion of mine is that there are too many preachy females" dominating the culture of the Democratic Party.

"'Don't drink beer. Don't watch football. Don't eat hamburgers. This is not good for you,'" continued Carville. "The message is too feminine: 'Everything you're doing is destroying the planet. You've got to eat your peas.'"

"If you listen to Democratic elites — NPR is my go-to place for that — the whole talk is about how women, and women of color, are going to decide this election," added Carville. "I'm like: 'Well, 48 percent of the people that vote are males. Do you mind if they have some consideration?'"

The strategist suggested that all of the "feminine" browbeating, micromanagement, and alarmism is helping to turn off voters along with the left's elitist "faculty lounge" attitudes and "woke stuff."

"There are a lot of people on the left that would rather lose and be pure because it makes them feel good, it makes them feel superior," said Carville.

While Carville clearly wants Democrats to succeed in November — even though readily admitting Biden lacks Trump's energy and cognition — his constructive criticism was not well-received by all on the left.

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) tweeted, "Maybe he should start a podcast about it. I hear men are really underrepresented in that space."

The titular host of MSNBC's freshly cancelled "The Mehdi Hasan show," who once likened non-Muslims to "cattle," said Carville "is beyond parody."

Shannon Watts, founder of the gun-grab group Moms Demand Action, tweeted, "Starting to see some of the Boomer and Gen X men who pretended to be progressive out themselves as sexists as women actually attain power."

Deborah Jenkins, a newly minted member of Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul's new reparations commission, responded to Carville, writing, "Wow, why don't you tell us how you really feel!"

Marianne Williamson, the long-shot Democratic Biden challenger who recently "unsuspend[ed]" her campaign, tweeted, "The problem isn't that there are too many 'preachy women' in that space; the problem is that they're simply repeating what men have already said."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Pulitzer Prizes blasted over conferring once-prestigious award upon porn-obsessed transvestite whose 2019 thesis was that 'getting f***** makes you female'



The Pulitzer Prize administered by Columbia University was once a prestigious award handed out for meaningful achievements in the media and the arts. This year, a pornography-obsessed transvestite who recently advanced the thesis that womanhood is a matter of sexual penetration received the award for "distinguished criticism, using any available journalistic tool."

What are the details?

Andrew Long Chu, who calls himself Andrea, will receive $15,000 along with the accolade for five book reviews in New York magazine wherein he allegedly employed "multiple cultural lenses to explore some of society's most fraught topics."

\u201cso am i really the first trans person to win a pulitzer? can we fact check this?\u201d
— wife of the mind (@wife of the mind) 1683575232

In one review, Chu discussed a short story about "a shut-in feudal lord who spends his days easing foreign objects into his rectum" and drew the conclusion that "this is why we all sh**: to be renewed. Everything else — money, political ideology, institutions of all kinds — is a distraction from the fundamental unity of sh** and spirit."

Another book review found partially deserving of the Pulitzer concerned the missteps of a suicidal gay person.

Chu, who admitted in a 2013 article that he was a racist, navigated his hang-ups on the subject in a review entitled, "The Mixed Metaphor[:] Why does the half-Asian, half-white protagonist make us so anxious?"

Vox Media commended the Pulitzer Awards' decision, claiming Chu "has made an indelible mark on readers and the industry as a whole" and further alleging that he "articulates fundamental truths" about the subject matter he scrutinizes.

It is unclear whether Vox Media and other leftist supporters reckon Chu's recent remarks about women constitute articulations of fundamental truths.

Award-winning dehumanization

Reduxx reported that Chu's first book, "Females," published by Verso Press, served as a 94-page screed advancing the notion "that anyone can become female, and that being penetrated during sex defines womanhood."

In the book, the transvestic author wrote, "Getting f***ed makes you female because f***ed is what a female is," describing himself as once being "a sad, pretentious boy, furious about rape, hopelessly addicted to pornography."

Chu also wrote that the "barest essentials" of femaleness are "an open mouth, an expectant ***hole, blank, blank eyes."

The Pulitzer awardee has admitted that a porn obsession is what first prompted him to masquerade as a woman.

"Almost every night, for at least a year before I transitioned, I would wait till my girlfriend had fallen asleep and slip out of bed for the bathroom with my phone. I was going on Tumblr to look at something called sissy porn. I’d discovered it by accident one night, scrolling lazily down a pornographic rabbit hole," he wrote.

The variety of porn in question concerns degenerate acts involving feminized men.

Chu admitted, "Sissy porn did make me trans. … At the center of sissy porn lies the ***hole, a kind of universal vagina through which femaleness can always be accessed."

Elements of the literary world began to celebrate him after his so-called transition and apparent desperate need to speak about it at length.

According to Reduxx, after Andrew started calling himself Andrea, he was invited to speak at various universities, frequently speaking on the topic of his porn-exacerbated gender dysphoria.

He was also named as a finalist for the Lambda Literary Award in Transgender Nonfiction for his 2019 book dehumanizing women.

Chu's dehumanization has not been limited to adult women.

He tweeted in 2019, "are there republican lawmakers less developed than a 6 week old fetus? yes. but do i think we should abort those lawmakers? also yes."

On Jan. 28, 2019, he wrote, "thinking about getting a uterus transplant just to have an abortion."

Backlash

A number of feminists have spoken out in response to the news that Chu won the Pulitzer.

Feminist novelist Christina Dalcher tweeted, "No, really, @PulitzerPrizes and anyone else celebrating this: F*** you. Sincerely, A Woman (the one and only kind)."

Kara Dansky, the president of the American chapter of Women's Declaration International, referenced one of Chu's more egregious anti-woman barbs and wrote, "Shame on you, @PulitzerPrizes."

Award-winning New Yorker cartoonist Lisa Rothstein called the conference of the award upon Chu "revolting."

Retired doctor and gender ideology critic Isidora Sanger said of Chu's award, "Mediocrity of male supremacy waves its male genitals in women's faces yet again."

Jeremy Carl, a senior fellow at the Claremont Institution, wrote, "Thank you for demonstrating more powerfully than I ever could how the Pulitzer Prizes have become a complete joke."

Here is Andrew Long Chu discussing "trans identity" back in December:

Andrea Long Chu | High Low with EmRata youtu.be

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!