Nancy Pelosi LIED about January 6, and her own words PROVE it



Nancy Pelosi has remained adamant that the events of January 6 were the fault of former President Donald Trump — but recently uncovered video shows her singing a different tune.

In the video — which was captured during the filming of a documentary — Pelosi claims full responsibility for the January 6 Capitol riot for her refusal to send in the National Guard.

“They caught some pretty interesting details of the mindset of Nancy Pelosi,” investigative reporter Steve Baker tells Jill Savage and Matthew Peterson of “Blaze News Tonight.”

“At one point, she tried to take the blame for not having the National Guard out there, and then she immediately turned on a dime and then started blaming former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund for not having the National Guard there,” he explains, noting that three days before the riot, Sun had asked for permission to deploy the National Guard.

“Not only did he request for it three days in advance and was denied by the house sergeant at arms, Paul Irving, because he said that Pelosi would never go for it,” Baker says, “the day itself, the reason why it took so long for that deployment, is because this was actually sent all the way up to the DOD.”

In addition, Baker notes that he has testimony from an individual who will go on record and explain what had happened during a teleconference call inside the Pentagon that day.

That teleconference is where the phrase, “we don’t like the optics,” was hatched.

“Meaning, we don’t like the optics of the National Guard being at the Capitol,” Baker says.

“We’re going to reveal that there was a coalition of generals that were on this call, three or four of them. In fact, we have their names, and on that call, they were answering to and following the orders of ... Mark Milley, who was, of course, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,” he adds.


Want more from Blaze News Tonight?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

New Footage Shows Pelosi Admitting Dem Leadership ‘Totally Failed’ On Jan. 6

Nancy Pelosi demanded congressional leadership "take some responsibility" over the Capitol security failures.

J6 Footage Shows Pelosi Expressing Regret Over National Guard Failure: ‘I Take Responsibility’

Pelosi's failure to preemptively deploy the National Guard was at the center of a minority report published by House Republicans in 2022.

Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund Says J6 Committee Interviewed Him Only Once

Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said the Jan. 6 committee interviewed him only once during Democrats' two-year investigation.

Capitol Police officer turned whistleblower calls for investigation into USCP's former head of intelligence; claims she may have sat on actionable Jan. 6 intel for promotion, cushy job



Former U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Tarik Johnson has long indicated that the failure to contain the Jan. 6, 2021, protests may have had something to do with more than mere incompetence.

In conversation with nationally syndicated radio host Glenn Beck on Monday, Johnson called for the USPC's former head of intelligence to be investigated over the possibility that she may have sat on actionable information, possibly putting the Capitol at risk for personal gain and advantage.

What's the background?

Johnson initiated the evacuations of the Senate and the House on Jan. 6, defused a number of tense situations that could easily have escalated into bloodlettings, and sought to ensure the safety of his officers, all while many of his radio requests for assistance went unheeded.

Despite overwhelming evidence of his bravery and quick thinking, this former Democrat was suspended for 17 months, demoted, and denied help accessing psychological counseling.

Blaze Media contributor Steve Baker, the investigative journalist whom the Biden Department of Justice appears keen to silence, noted that Johnson's disciplinary report "only begins at 3 o'clock. It never addresses his heroics earlier in the day, never addresses anything he did to protect the officers, to decontaminate the officers, to bring the M4 units in so they weren't stolen. It never addresses his heroic actions in taking command on his own recognizance in evacuating both the Senate and the House."

NBC News indicated the reason Johnson was given for his suspension was "donning the MAGA hat," which he admittedly put on to better navigate the crowd without resistance and to more rapidly reach beleaguered USCP officers.

Baker suggested that Johnson was "ultimately disciplined because he took initiatives when he was begging for help from command and he did it himself anyway, embarrassing leadership. They needed to shut him up and shut him out."

"From what I’ve seen on social media video of T.K. Johnson and what I heard on the radio that day, T.K. should have been ‎promoted after Jan 6, not demoted," said Gus Papathanasiou, chairman of the U.S. Capitol Police Labor Committee, stressing that Johnson's treatment was a "travesty."

Papathanasiou stressed that USCP officers should not have been disciplined for their actions, especially because their leaders largely went unscathed.

One of the leaders who got out unscathed was Yogananda Pittman.

Unscathed and rewarded

Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund recently told Tucker Carlson that he requested federal assistance, particularly in the form of National Guard troops, ahead of the Jan. 6 protests, but was repeatedly denied by the Capitol Police Board. The board, whose critical voting members answered to Sen. Mitch McConnell and then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, allegedly suggested that Sund lacked intelligence to substantiate the request at the time.

Johnson told Beck that Yogananda Pittman, assistant chief of Capitol Police responsible for protective and intelligence operations at the time, was possibly in the possession of intelligence that would have provided Sund with what he needed to secure that assistance — materiel and manpower that would likely have prevented a breach of the Capitol.

The former USCP officer speculated that Pittman stood to gain personally if Sund were seen to fail in his duties on Jan. 6.

Pittman was after all promoted following Sund's resignation to acting chief and kept on in that role for several months, even after the supermajority of the force indicated they had no confidence in her.

She was then reinstated to her old position by USCP Chief J. Thomas Manger — a reinstatement Johnson suggested was a means to deter prospective whistleblowers and clean out dissenters.

Finally, Pittman secured a cushy job at the University of California, Berkeley, as campus police chief.

Johnson suggested it's high time to investigate Pittman for possible wrongdoing.

"January 6 cannot happen without her permission," said Johnson. "It cannot. It's impossible. She's the alpha and omega of what happened on January 6, and the world needs to know that."

— (@)

While there presently appears to be no hard evidence that Pittman withheld evidence from Sund, there are substantial indicators that the USCP was nevertheless poised to fail.

US Capitol mouse trap

Baker expounded on Johnson's sense that the Capitol Police were set up to fail, telling TheBlaze that the force was woefully under-deployed.

Baker indicated that ahead of a high-profile protest day with six permits issued, policy for Capitol Police would normally have dictated that those on graveyard shifts would stay on for 16-hour stretches. Instead, they were sent home at 7 a.m., while additional forces on administrative leave weren't called in.

Forbes reported that of the over 1,800 sworn officers in the USCP as of September 2020, a "congressional inquiry forced USCP to admit that on January 6th, only 195 officers were deployed to interior or exterior posts at the U.S. Capitol and 276 more were assigned to the Department’s seven civil disturbance unit platoons."

Whereas USCP documents indicated 1,214 officers were "on site" across the Capitol complex of buildings, congressional investigators determined the force could only "account for 417 officers and could not account for the whereabouts of the remaining 797 officers."

Johnson previously told Baker that the suggestion that the whereabouts of officers could not be accounted for was "a bald-faced lie," given that all USCP officers are tracked during their tour of duty and must both electronically "clock in" and "clock out."

"They don't want to tell you where they [USCP officers] were, or what they were doing," said Johnson. "They don't want anyone to know how many of our officers were on administrative leave that day."

Compounding the problem of an inadequate police presence at the Capitol was the discovery of pipe bombs at the Republican National Committee and Democratic National Committee headquarters, both under the purview of the USCP. This drew some potential reinforcements away from the Capitol, again thinning the defense at a critical juncture.

The forces that the USCP could muster also happened to be ill equipped and in the dark about possible threats.

Not only were a number of badly needed riot shields later found to have been locked away in a bus, Baker noted numerous USCP officers were left without helmets owing to an uncustomary equipment exchange days earlier, when officers reportedly turned in their protective helmets per an alleged order from Cpt. Ben Smith, but were not provided with replacements.

In addition to this greater exposure to bodily risk, Baker noted officers have testified that they were not briefed on possible concerns over the protest.

"It's one thing to have gross incompetence," said Baker. "And of course, you always have to go there first when you're talking about a government agency. ... But in this particular case, there are just too many of these incidents that happened for anybody to sit back and go, 'Okay, they were just that grossly incompetent.'"

If the cascade of failures that appears to have predisposed the USCP to failure on Jan. 6 was not a matter of gross incompetence but instead a nefarious scheme, Baker speculated the strategy appears to have been a "rope-a-dope" — to draw in protesters for a finishing blow, resulting in "the biggest narrative victory for the American left."

Johnson previously agreed with Baker's sense that the Capitol Police were set up to be sacrificial pawns to this end, adding, "They didn't give a sh** what happened to them that day."

TheBlaze reached out to Yogananda Pittman for comment, but she did not respond.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

EXCLUSIVE: Former Capitol Police officer claims January 6 'COULD NOT HAPPEN' without THIS personwww.youtube.com

7 Revelations From Ex-Capitol Police Chief That Explode Democrats’ Jan. 6 Narrative

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund made explosive allegations of federal misconduct related to the Capitol chaos, raising more questions than answers.

Fox News never aired Tucker Carlson's interview with former Capitol Police chief, so Carlson did the interview again — and it's damning



Tucker Carlson's original interview with former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund has been kept under wraps at Fox News, notwithstanding recent footage leaks.

Certain that the American public ought to hear Sund's insights into the Jan. 6, 2021, protest at the U.S. Capitol, Carlson decided to interview him again, publishing the result Thursday on Twitter.

In the interview, Sund indicated critical intelligence pertaining to possible threats ahead of the Jan. 6 protest was withheld from the Capitol Police and that the absence of such intelligence was cited by the congressional sergeants at arms — who were reporting to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell at the time — as cause not to reinforce the Capitol in advance with the National Guard and federal assets.

Between the "intelligence failure" and the waylaying of the National Guard, Carlson speculated that the U.S. Capitol Police may have been "set up."

Dammed intelligence

Sund, a police officer for over 30 years, was head of the U.S. Capitol Police from 2019 through the protests, but resigned Jan. 7 amid claims by Pelosi (D-Calif.) and others that "there was a failure of leadership at the top."

Speaking to Carlson, he once again detailed the apparent disparity between what was known in the days leading up to the Jan. 6 protests by various U.S. intelligence agencies about possible threats and what was ultimately shared with the Capitol Police, stressing the delta was "night and day."

Sund said the intelligence his team was left with suggested that "this was going to be just like the previous MAGA rallies, the November and December rallies that we had," but provided "absolutely zero" indication of possible threats against Capitol Police officers, the Capitol, and/or members of Congress.

"None of that was included in the intelligence" that the Capitol Police and its internal intel agency received, he said.

According to the former chief, "We now know FBI [and] DHS was swimming in that intelligence. We also know now that the military seemed to have some very concerning intelligence as well," adding that the FBI field office in Washington and other outfits "didn't put out a single official document specific to January 6. That's very unusual."

During a conference call on Jan. 5, 2021, with the leaders of the Metropolitan Police Department and the FBI Washington field office along with National Guard, military officials, and others, "not one person on that call talked about any concerns from the intelligence ... that was out there."

"This was handled differently. ... It's almost like they wanted it to be watered down, the intelligence to be watered down for some reason," said Sund. "It wasn't right the way the intelligence was handled and the way we were set up on the Hill."

Carlson highlighted that Sund has previously characterized this as an "intelligence failure," but noted that a "failure is something that happens accidentally, and I don't see how this could be accidental," adding later, "This sounds like a setup to me."

Handicapping the National Guard

Casting additional doubt on the accidental nature of the supposed "intelligence failure," Sund noted that then-acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley had "both discussed locking down the city of Washington, D.C., because they were so worried about violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6."

"On Sunday and Monday, they had been discussing locking down the city, revoking permits on Capitol hill because of the concern for violence," continued Sund. "You know who issues the permits on Capitol Hill for demonstrations? I do. You know who wasn't told? Me."

Sund indicated that Miller did not reach out to him but instead issued a memo on Jan. 4 "restricting the National Guard from carrying various weapons, any weapons, any civil disobedience equipment" that would likely have been appropriate in terms of dealing with the threats the military had allegedly been worried about.

— (@)

This memo handcuffed the National Guard from responding when the Capitol Police later begged for the Guard's assistance, suggested Sund.

Extra to being effectively disarmed, the National Guard were apparently waylaid by decisions made in Congress, specifically by the Capitol Police Board, which has since been overhauled.

Sund said that on Jan. 3 he went to then-House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving and then-Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger, voting members on the Capitol Police Board, requesting approval, as was required by law, to bring in "federal assistance in advance," namely the National Guard.

At the time, these individuals reported to Pelosi and McConnell, respectively.

"I was denied twice because of optics and because the intelligence didn't support it," said Sund.

Concerning optics, Miller indicated "there was absolutely no way" he was going to put military personnel on the Capitol for fear of fueling suspicion he was aiding in a coup, reported the New York Times.

On Jan. 6, as soon as protesters "started attacking" on the west front of the Capitol, Sund said he called Irving again, at 12:58 a.m., asking for assistance and federal resources.

"I'm told by Paul Irving, 'I'm going to run it up the chain and I'll get back to you.' ... The chain would be up to Nancy Pelosi. He didn't have to do that. But he wouldn't give me authorization," said Sund.

When asked, Stenger, who passed away last summer, allegedly deferred to Irving's decision, which was to effectively wait for Pelosi's input, according to Sund.

Approval didn't come until over 71 minutes later.

"I just want to pause on this for a minute," responded Carlson. "So this is an event that Pelosi herself has likened to Pearl Harbor and 9/11 — you know, the worst thing that's ever happened on American soil — and she's in charge of allowing the National Guard to come in and respond but she doesn't for 71 minutes? What is that?"

— (@)

"If you were conspiracy-minded, you might think that certain agencies concluded there was likely to be chaos at the Capitol and that served their political purposes, and so they let it happened and they prevented you from stopping it," said Carlson.

Watch the full interview here:
— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'I'm a little p***ed off': Former Capitol Police chief tells Tucker Carlson in leaked Fox interview that Jan. 6 events were a 'cover-up'



Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund told Tucker Carlson in a controversial interview that "everything appears to be a cover-up" as it pertains to the Jan. 6, 2021, protests at the U.S. Capitol.

Although Fox News kept that interview under wraps, the National Pulse has begun releasing segments wherein Sund provides critical insights into an event that has been used to great effect by Democrats and other forces antipathetic to former President Donald Trump.

When speaking to Russell Brand in early July, Carlson said he had initially taken an interest in the Jan. 6 protests due to all the "lying about it."

"So, the more time has passed … it becomes really obvious that core claims they made about January 6 were lies," said Carlson. "The amount of lying around January 6, and it was obvious in the tapes that I showed, is really distressing."

Prior to his ouster at Fox, Carlson had aired previously unreleased footage of the protests that appeared to contradict the narrative that had been carefully constructed by the media and the Jan. 6 committee.

When speaking to Brand, Carlson referenced an eye-opening interview he had conducted with Sund while still at Fox News, saying, "I never thought it was a false flag or anything like that. I'm not a conspiracist by temperament. I never thought that. ... And then I interviewed the chief of the Capitol Police, Steven Sund, in an interview that was never aired on Fox, by the way — I was fired before it could air."

Sund, a police officer for over 30 years, had been head of the U.S. Capitol Police from 2019 through the protests, but resigned Jan. 7 amid claims by then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and others that "there was a failure of leadership at the top."

In February 2021, Sund penned a letter to Pelosi and other congressional leaders, noting, "Perfect hindsight does not change the fact that nothing in our collective experience or our intelligence – including intelligence provided by FBI, Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and D.C. Metropolitan Police (MPD) – indicated that a well-coordinated, armed assault on the Capitol might occur on Jan. 6."

Sund further noted that during a meeting with "a dozen of the top law enforcement and military officials from D.C., including the FBI, U.S. Secret Service and the National Guard," no entity "provided any intelligence indicating that there would be a coordinated attack on the United States Capitol."

"The entire intelligence community seems to have missed this," he wrote.

Sund also intimated that the Capitol Police had been set up to fail.

Sund told WTTG-TV that he had asked House and Senate security officials for their permission to bring in the National Guard days ahead of the protests, but was denied. He also indicated he had asked for the National Guard several more times during the protests, but was repeatedly denied until their ultimate arrival at 5:40 p.m. on Jan. 6.

Around 19 minutes into the "Tucker Carlson Tonight" interview, which is being released by the National Pulse piecemeal, Sund says, "If people were reporting the intelligence correctly, if I was allowed to do my job as the chief ... we wouldn't be here. This didn't have to happen," stressing, "I'm a little pissed off."

"Everything appears to be a cover-up," continued Sund. "Like I said, I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but when you look at the information and intelligence they had, the military had, it’s all watered down. ... I’m not getting intelligence, I’m denied any support from National Guard in advance. I’m denied National Guard while we’re under attack for 71 minutes."

"You describe this as a failure to get intelligence to people who needed it, but it sounds like ... they were hiding the intelligence," said Carlson.

"That's what I'm getting at," said Sund. "Could there possibly be actually … they kind of wanted something to happen? It’s not a far stretch to begin to think that. You know, it's sad when you start putting everything together and thinking about the way this played out. ... What was their end goal? You look at what's happening. Was that their end goal?"

Carlson responded, "There's no question that what happened on January 6 has really helped the Democratic Party. It's gravely politicized the U.S. military and the intelligence agencies and the FBI. And those are all, I think, bad for America and violations of the Constitution, but they're all good for the Democratic Party. That's the facts."

Sund agreed, adding that in the wake of Jan. 6, the establishment has seen fit to strip the blindfold of neutrality from Lady Justice.

Raheem Kassam, editor in chief of the National Pulse, noted on Twitter that the Sund interview is "absolutely extraordinary" and emphasized that "none of us are suicidal, for the record."

The next interview excerpt will reportedly broach the subject of Ray Epps and his involvement in the Jan. 6 protests.

Carlson previously indicated Sund had told him, "'That crowd was filled with federal agents.'"

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Only 10 Percent Of J6 Committee Subpoenas Relate To The Capitol Riot

The House Select Committee established to probe the Capitol riot is not interested in probing the Capitol riot.

Senate Hearing On The Capitol Riot Exonerated Trump

Tuesday's testimony made perfectly clear that Donald Trump did not incite the Capitol riot.