Exclusive: Nevada women's volleyball captain doubles down on team's refusal to play transgender opponent



The captain of the University of Nevada women's volleyball team told Blaze News in an exclusive interview that she's disappointed her school decided not to support the team's decision to forfeit a game against a squad with a transgender player.

"Unfortunately our university decided not to back us, and they decided they're going to have the match as scheduled," Nevada Wolf Pack captain Sia Liilii said.

'No student athlete should ever be pressured to play a game where they don’t feel safe — period.'

As Blaze News previously reported, San Jose State University's women's volleyball team features a 6'1" male athlete named Blaire Fleming, born Brayden.

Fleming's presence on the SJSU squad has been the unofficial reason behind four forfeitures by teams at Boise State, Southern Utah, Utah State, and Wyoming.

Even Fleming's own teammate has spoken out about the unfair advantage the male athlete has over female players.

Nevada was next in line to withdraw from a match against SJSU after the Wolf Pack players released a statement announcing their refusal to participate in a match that would jeopardize their safety.

However, school officials decided to override the will of the players and declare that the match against SJSU would proceed as scheduled.

The University of Nevada claimed the players made their decision and statement "independently" and "without consultation with the University or the athletic department."

However, Liilii said she and her teammates tried to go through the proper channels and inform school administrators how they felt, but the university still decided to push forward with the scheduled match.

"The vast majority of us decided that this isn't right, [that] we need to protect women's sports, and we're going to forfeit," the team captain explained.

She added, "To know that the university didn't acknowledge the fact that we're the team that is going to play against [Fleming] was really frustrating, and the way they went about it was not OK."

Liilii said administrators later scheduled a meeting with the team to apologize and let players know the school would not be punishing them if they choose to sit out against SJSU on Oct. 26.

When asked about the contradiction between the school not punishing players while publicly refusing to back their decision to forfeit, Liilii told Blaze News she felt the school was finding a way to distance itself from the players' stance while still following state and NCAA rules surrounding gender diversity.

But Liilii added that she's received a lot of support, particularly from politicians such as Tulsi Gabbard and U.S. Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), both of whom recently attended a Nevada women's volleyball game.

"Thank you Sam Brown, Tulsi Gabbard, and Mark Wayne Mullin [sic] for showing your support at our match against Utah State tonight!" Liilii wrote on X.

— (@)

"Although our university hasn't supported us in this decision, our governor ... [Joe] Lombardo came out with a statement which was really reassuring, too," LiiLiii noted.

Lombardo issued a statement on X about the ordeal, saying in part, "No student athlete should ever be pressured to play a game where they don’t feel safe — period."

"I wholeheartedly respect the decision of the players," the governor added.

— (@)

"We do have people behind us that are supporting us, and that is really important," Liilii said.

The Nevada captain added that she hopes she will soon "see the light at the end of the tunnel" regarding this controversy.

Regarding whether or not the Nevada volleyball players will protest, participate, or sit out during the SJSU match, Liilii said, "you'll just have to see."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Tennis legend Martina Navratilova wipes floor with male reporter who called her 'transphobic'



Tennis legend Martina Navratilova blasted a male reporter who called her "transphobic" in connection with her stance against the inclusion of biological males who identify as female in female sports.

It began with a Friday report on X from writer Mitchell Northam about vandalization of the "Take Back Title IX" tour bus after its event in Chapel Hill. Northam's report said eggs were thrown at the bus and messages were written on it. One of the messages read, "Transphobic pu**ies."

'You can just go away now. Hope I see your nasty self at Wimbledon — if you are there.'

With that, another writer — Ben Rothenberg — jumped in and ripped the tennis great: "Martina Navratilova turning this anti-trans crusade into her life's obsession in recent years remains dispiriting! And she turns it into way more transphobic vitriol than just discussing sports fairness, as I've covered before, just being nasty and cruel and dehumanizing. Boo."

Navratilova caught wind of Rothenberg's critique and returned the favor: "Yet another man telling women what they should care about. And who are you exactly? Oh yeah, the reporter who tells tennis players it's off the record and then prints what they said anyway. Good to know you care about women’s sports and women’s sex-based spaces. I care."

Rothenberg wrote back to Navratilova, disputing her claims: "I’ve never done that. But I care also, about someone who was a beacon of freedom and inclusion in the sport I’ve covered sadly choosing to erode the platform she built with cyberbullying campaigns aimed at obscure, low-level amateur athletes. I wish you were better than that."

Not to be outdone, Navratilova dropped the big one on Rothenberg: "Cyberbullying — wow. I am blocking you once and for all. For your information, I am doing a whole lot more than just tweeting. You can just go away now. Hope I see your nasty self at Wimbledon — if you are there."

Rothenberg wasn't through, either: "(Been wild to see when these folks have swarmed my mentions how for so many of them, this issue has become their entire personality on this website. Fighting this trans boogeyman by trawling super obscure amateur sports events for examples becomes an obsession, a lifestyle.)"

Rothenberg's initial post on X was in ratio-land as of Monday afternoon — nearing a thousand comments compared to 630 likes.

Back in 2019, after Navratilova penned an op-ed saying that transgender females competing against biological women is "insane and cheating," an advocacy group for LGBTQ athletes — Athlete Ally — kicked Navratilova off its advisory board over her "transphobic" comments.

(H/T: Outkick reported)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'We shouldn't allow this type of abuse': Biological female skateboarder speaks out after transgender female skateboarder wins female event, bests girls



Biological female competitive skateboarder Taylor Silverman spoke out Friday on Fox News after a transgender female skateboarder made headlines winning a female event and beating girls in the process.

What are the details?

Ricci Tres — a 29-year-old biologically male skateboarder who identifies as female — took first place at the Boardr Open women's finals in New York City late last month, besting 13-year-old Shiloh Catori, who came in second place. At least three other girls finished in the top five but weren't able to defeat Tres.

In regard to the apparent incongruence of the competition, Tres added to the Daily Mail, "I’m not going to go and be easy on them because they’re kids," according to Fox News.

Silverman told the cable network it's unfair, and everybody should speak out against transgender females competing against biological females — especially girls.

"We shouldn’t allow this type of abuse," she added to Fox News. "This should be ... normal to stand up for your kids when they're being abused in situations like this. And we shouldn’t be sitting in silence and fear."

Silverman also told host Dana Perino that she's been forced to compete against three different transgender females on three separate occasions and placed second in two of them.

"I lost out on some money because of it, and so did everybody else," she told Fox News. "We all got pushed back in our podium spots."

Silverman added to Fox News that after one of the events in which she lost to a trans skateboarder, she emailed sponsor Red Bull in the hopes of figuring out an "appropriate" solution.

"My email was completely ignored," she told the cable network.

Silverman told Fox News she decided to take her case to social media and share her story. The result? Silverman revealed to the cable network that she receives hundreds of messages of support "every single day" from athletes representing many sports.

"I am sick of being bullied into silence," Silverman noted at the time.

She added to Perino that some of her backers are afraid to speak out over the possibility of backlash.

"People are staying silent or acting like they're okay with it when people are actually incredibly upset," Silverman added.

Most Americans opposed to transgender women, girls competing against biological female athletes at HS, college, pro levels: Poll



A majority of Americans are opposed to transgender women and girls competing against biological females in high school, college, and professional sports, a recent poll found.

What are the details?

The Washington Post said a poll it conducted with the University of Maryland last month found that 55% of Americans are opposed to transgender women and girls competing with "other women and girls" in high school sports, and 58% are opposed to the athletic matchup in college and professional sports.

About 3 in 10 Americans said transgender women and girls should be allowed to compete at each of those levels, the paper said, adding that 15% have no opinion.

But at the youth level, 49%are opposed to transgender girls competing with "other girls," the Post reported, while 33% said trans girls should be allowed to compete and 17% have no opinion.

More from the paper:

Among athletes, the controversy has centered on transgender females, in particular. Critics say they have an unfair physical advantage against cisgender females because of factors such as generally having a greater muscle mass and larger skeletal frame, bone density and testosterone levels, which can help boost athletic performance.

Critics of the bans say they deny transgender athletes’ right to compete in a space that aligns with their gender, further stigmatizing children who are at greater risk of mental health problems. Critics also say the bans overestimate the extent of trans girls’ and women’s participation in athletics.

The Post added that its poll with UMD finds more than two-thirds of Americans — 68% — say transgender girls would have a competitive advantage over "other girls" if they were allowed to compete with them in youth sports; 30% say neither would have an advantage, and 2% say "other girls" would have an advantage.

The case of Lia Thomas

Teammates of Lia Thomas — the University of Pennsylvania transgender female swimmer who won a national championship — voiced reservations about Thomas' presence on the women's swim team, Mark Hyman, director of UMD’s Shirley Povich Center for Sports Journalism, told the paper.

“They were totally supportive of her surgery and her path but opposed to her competing on the women’s team, so from a practical standpoint this is more evidence that there is considerable pushback,” Hyman added to the Post. “There is significant momentum against transgender athletes competing. ... The survey results point to me that that’s a factor in how people are reacting to this.”

A teammate of Thomas said Penn officials warned women swimmers they'd face consequences for speaking out against Thomas' presence on the team.

“They’ve made it pretty clear if you speak up about it, your life will be over in some way, you’ll be blasted all over the Internet as a transphobe … you’ll never be able to get a job,” the teammate told Matt Walsh as part of his just-released "What Is a Woman?" documentary, according to the Daily Wire.

Anything else?

The poll was conducted online May 4-17, 2022, using a random national sample of 1,503 adults, by the Washington Post and the University of Maryland’s Shirley Povich Center for Sports Journalism and Center for Democracy and Civic Engagement, the Post said, adding that results have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points.