Crossing the line from non-interventionist to foreign propagandist

· April 17, 2018  
    Font Size A A A
Assad and Putin
Kremlin.ru

There’s a big difference between advocating for a restraint-minded foreign policy and acting as an apologist for a genocidal maniac.

The United States may indeed be better served with a smaller footprint in Syria, given the current strategy on the ground. It’s fair to call on the administration to focus more on protecting U.S. interests at home than abroad. But that doesn’t mean we should ever speak without moral clarity or pretend that brutal dictators are instead misunderstood peacemakers.

Advocacy for restraint should never turn into apologia for dictators. Syria’s Bashar al-Assad is a genocidal maniac who is responsible for the vast majority of deaths that have occurred over the course of the Syrian civil war. He has also committed countless chemical attacks on innocent civilians, taking thousands of lives.

Propping up Assad serves to advance the interests of our foreign adversaries in Russia and Iran.

Following the Assad regime’s chemical weapons attack on civilians and rebels in Douma, Defense Secretary James Mattis and U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley predicted that Russia and Iran would mount a major disinformation campaign to protect their client in Syria.

“We can all see that a Russian disinformation campaign is in full force this morning,” Ambassador Haley said over the weekend. “But Russia’s desperate attempts at deflection cannot change the facts.”

The Trump administration has maintained that there is a “very high level of confidence” that the Syrian regime did indeed carry out a chemical weapons attack in Douma. “We can say that the Syrian government was behind the attack,” State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said at a press briefing this weekend.

And following Friday’s U.S. and coalition missile strikes on Syrian regime chemical weapons research and development facilities, the foreign disinformation campaign has indeed accelerated on all fronts.

Russia, which uses its English-language networks RT and Sputnik to prop up Assad as a legitimate president, has blamed the U.K. for the attack.

The U.S.-based website One American News has acted as a propagandist for the Assad regime, claiming the Syrian dictator is a man of peace.

Another major Russian propaganda campaign has resurfaced, spreading debunked allegations that the U.S.-funded White Helmets, a humanitarian rescue group in Syria, is a terrorist organization.

The Kremlin is also claiming that Syria has no chemical weapons left, which is another easily debunked lie, according to western governments and opposition groups.

Restraint-minded American influencers, politicians, and leaders should try their best to inform themselves about the unfolding Russian and Iranian disinformation operations that seek to empower the global position of Moscow and Tehran. By all means, demand transparency in foreign engagements, but don’t become a sucker for adversarial propaganda campaigns.

 


Find out what’s really going on in the national security world.

Sign up to get The Dossier in your inbox twice a week.




 

Author: Jordan Schachtel

Jordan Schachtel is the national security correspondent for Conservative Review and editor of The Dossier for CRTV. Follow him on Twitter @JordanSchachtel.