Get ready for another 50-year abortion fight



Following the Supreme Court’s decision last year in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which happily overturned Roe v. Wade, the pro-life movement went on to suffer significant defeats in six different ballot initiatives to regulate abortion — even in deep red states like Kansas and Montana.

On Tuesday, Ohio became the seventh such loss. There, by a margin of 53% to 46%, voters approved an amendment to the state’s constitution establishing a right to abortion.

If the first six post-Dobbs losses weren’t clear enough, surely the seventh conveys the message clearly: The pro-life movement has an abortion problem.

And the first step to solving a problem is admitting that you have one.

How we ended up here is fairly easily diagnosed. The pro-life movement understandably spent the past 50 years primarily making the case against Roe, which involved focusing most of its efforts on embracing tactics and messaging that would be most effective at overturning it, but not necessarily for life — at least, not enough.

We believed it was enough to “abort” Roe and that by doing so, the problem of abortion would essentially solve itself. But we didn’t build alternative structures to welcome those who had found refuge under Casey’s wings, nor did we think deeply enough about what lessons we would offer to replace the ones that Roe had hammered into our souls.

In short, we assumed the pre-Roe American people were still there, dormant, waiting to be freed from Roe’s oppressive yoke if we could just marshal the courage to jettison that awful Supreme Court ruling. What we learned instead was that, broadly speaking, Americans are quite fond of their chains, despite the fact that they’re forged from the blood of innocent children and a myopic desire for a higher GDP.

Like the ancient Israelites, we prefer the slavery under which we were raised to the hard freedom of the desert.

One of the most consistent refrains in Western political philosophy is that the law acts as a teacher, instructing us in what is good and bad, noble and ignoble, just and unjust. Since 1973, Roe’s lessons — lessons that Casey reinforced and entrenched a generation later — have sunk deep into the public’s soul and corrupted its moral sense about precisely what we owe the unborn.

For nearly half a century, the American people were taught that the baby in the womb is not human, a clump of cells, of no essential worth, and that the shallow, not to mention fleeting and ill-considered, desires of adults trump their sacred duties to their progeny.

Of course, throwing off Roe didn’t instantaneously reset the country’s moral compass to postwar America. The rot has done its work. We are a different country now.

Think of Roe like a termite infestation. Dobbs was like an exterminator, and the American soul is the building in which they wage war. Unfortunately, the exterminator arrived too late to remove the termites and leave a healthy, intact building. The damage has been done.

Because of the extent of the damage, the task now is to rebuild the entire house, from the foundations upward. That challenge will occupy the next two generations or more.

We’d better get started.

Yelp steers women away from crisis pregnancy centers, claims they give 'misleading information' to prevent abortion



Yelp is now the latest Big Tech company to shore up access to abortion in the wake of the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Yelp has now decided to flag crisis pregnancy centers to dissuade women from using their services rather than those provided at abortion clinics.

Beginning on Tuesday, Yelp, a website and app that purports to connect "people with great local businesses," will begin flagging both faith-based and non-faith-based CPCs with a "consumer notice" regarding the limited medical services CPCs usually provide.

"This is a Crisis Pregnancy Center," reads the notice posted with most CPC organizations listed on Yelp. "Crisis Pregnancy Centers typically provide limited medical services and may not have licensed medical professionals onsite."

Yelp has openly admitted that it hopes to prevent unsuspecting pregnant women who may be seeking abortions from utilizing the services offered by CPCs instead.

"It's been well-reported that crisis pregnancy centers often attempt to provide misleading information to people seeking abortion care to steer them to other options," a company statement says, "– with this new notification we're aiming to further protect consumers from the potential of being misled or confused."

Noorie Malik, Yelp’s VP of user operations, agreed.

"After learning about the misleading nature of crisis pregnancy centers back in 2018, I’m grateful Yelp stands behind these efforts to provide consumers with access to reliable information about reproductive health services," Malik told Axios in an email.

"It has always felt unjust to me," Malik continued, "that there are clinics in the U.S. that provide misleading information or conduct deceptive tactics to steer pregnant people away from abortion care if that’s the path they choose to take."

Malik stated that, with the new CPC notice, Yelp hopes to "better match" women seeking an abortion with licensed providers and lessen the chances that such women will be directed toward CPCs instead.

It is unclear whether women seeking pregnancy support services who mistakenly select an abortion provider on Yelp will be redirected toward businesses that better match their search needs.

Many CPCs were "review bombed" on Yelp after the Dobbs decision from SCOTUS earlier this year, prompting Yelp to prevent commenters, who were mostly abortion-rights activists, from adding poor reviews, according to Business Insider.

Other Big Tech firms have likewise attempted to adjust some of their policies to protect abortion after Roe. On Tuesday, the Alphabet Workers Union petitioned Google to address several abortion-related issues, including "misleading search results related to abortion services."

Yelp announced earlier this year that it would provide full financial support to any employee or employee spouse seeking an abortion out of state.

H/T: Daily Wire

Louisiana Supreme Court rejects appeal in abortion case, letting state ban take effect



The Louisiana Supreme Court on Friday denied an appeal from plaintiffs challenging the state's abortion ban, allowing the ban to remain in effect.

According to a statement from Pro-Life Louisiana, the court denied an appeal filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights on behalf of June Medical Services, which operates Hope Medical Group for Women, an abortion provider located in Shreveport.

“We are thankful that babies in Louisiana will continue to be protected from abortion while the abortion industry’s frivolous lawsuit plays out in court," Executive Director of Louisiana Right to Life Benjamin Clapper said. "Their lawsuit is disrespectful to our citizens and legislators who have made it clear for decades that we value life in the womb. “

Pro-choice advocates and abortion providers were hardest hit by the court's decision, as the state's three abortion clinics will not be allowed to continue operations so long as they perform abortions.

“While it is disappointing that four of the seven justices, without any written explanation, issued a ruling that will effectively deny critical care to women throughout Louisiana, the litigation continues and we are confident we can affect (sic) meaningful change,” attorney for the plaintiffs Joanna Wright said in a statement after the ruling, according to the Associated Press.

The ruling was celebrated by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, a defendant in the case, who promised in a tweet to "continue fighting to end this legal circus."

\u201cThe LA Supreme Court has denied June Medical\u2019s writ. Abortion remains illegal in Louisiana. I\u2019m pleased with the Court\u2019s decision and will continue fighting to end this legal circus. #lagov #lalege\u201d
— AG Jeff Landry (@AG Jeff Landry) 1660326561

Louisiana's abortion "trigger law" took a tumultuous journey through state courts before going into effect. The law does not provide an exception for rape or incest but does include exceptions for medical emergencies threatening the life of the mother.

After the U.S. Supreme Court ended constitutional protections for abortion rights in June, Louisiana abortion clinics sued to continue their operations, arguing the law was vague and violates the state constitution.

A New Orleans judge blocked the law from taking effect on June 17, but it went back into effect on July 8 when a different judge transferred the case to Baton Rouge.

Then on July 21, state Judge Donald Johnson blocked enforcement of the abortion ban while the case played out in court. However, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry appealed Johnson's ruling eight days later, winning in appeals court and putting the law back into effect.

Now, the abortion clinics have had their appeal rejected by the Louisiana Supreme Court, permitting the law to remain in effect.

Biden makes an extreme abortion demand, but there are two problems



The answer is still no, Joe.

Democratic Senators Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona remain opposed to nuking the Senate filibuster, even as President Joe Biden is demanding that Democrats pass a law making abortions legal nationwide.

Following the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization — which overturned Roe v. Wade and revoked the constitutional right to abortion — Biden on Thursday demanded that the Senate create an exception to its 60-vote filibuster threshold to pass abortion legislation.

“We have to codify Roe v. Wade in the law, and the way to do that is to make sure the Congress votes to do that,” Biden said during a news conference in Spain. "And if the filibuster gets in the way, it’s like voting rights, it should be we provide an exception for this, we require an exception to the filibuster for this action.”

\u201cJoe Biden calls for eliminating the filibuster to legalize abortion nationwide until the moment of birth.\u201d
— RNC Research (@RNC Research) 1656595653

“It is a mistake, in my view, for the Supreme Court to do what it did,” the president said. "I feel extremely strongly that I’m going to do everything in my power, which I legally can do in terms of executive orders, as well as push the Congress and the public.”

The end of Roe was a significant victory for the pro-life movement in America. Republican-led states with abortion restrictions on the books acted swiftly to put those laws into effect, while other states with Democratic majorities announced new proposals to create "safe havens" for abortions.

The White House announced several executive actions on abortion last week that aim to protect the right of women to travel to another state for the procedure, as well as guarantee access to abortion-inducing drugs. Biden and Democratic leaders in Congress have also renewed calls to pass the Women's Health Protection Act — extreme legislation that would not just codify abortion rights but would invalidate hundreds of health and safety regulations on abortion clinics, as well as unconstitutionally micromanage state policy from the federal level.

Previous attempts to pass the WHPA have not earned enough support in the Senate to overcome the 60-vote filibuster threshold — hence Biden's demand that the Senate create an exception for it this time.

But Manchin and Sinema remain opposed to any attempt to change or circumvent the filibuster, according to the Daily Mail.

"Manchin's office told DailyMail.com that the West Virginia Democrat's position had not changed in light of the president's new comments, and Sinema's office referred DailyMail.com to a statement the Arizona Democrat made after the leaked Supreme Court decision," the outlet reported.

Sinema's statement said: "Protections in the Senate safeguarding against the erosion of women's access to health care have been used half-a-dozen times in the past ten years, and are more important now than ever."

Their joint opposition to nuking the filibuster leaves Democrats with just one option: Win more Senate races in the midterm elections this November.

Pelosi blasts 'extremist' Supreme Court in letter outlining next steps for House Democrats on abortion



House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Monday sent a seething letter to her Democratic colleagues railing against the "extremist" U.S. Supreme Court's abortion decision and vowing to revive failed legislation that would create federal protections for abortion.

In a dear colleague letter dated Jun. 27, Pelosi outlined several abortion bills House Democrats will take up before the upcoming elections in November. Among them is another version of the Women's Health Protection Act, a bill that would create a federal right to abortion and drastically roll back state abortion restrictions — restrictions that are now legal since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in a landmark decision on Friday.

Legislation to codify Roe has passed the House before but failed to win enough support in the Senate to overcome a filibuster by pro-life Republicans. It has virtually no chance of passing under the current makeup of Congress.

Two other bills House Democrats will advance include legislation protecting the right to travel out of state for an abortion and a privacy bill that would prevent prosecutors in pro-life states from accessing data stored in reproductive health apps to enforce abortion restrictions.

In her letter, Pelosi blasted the "extremist Supreme Court" and accused the court of attempting to "punish and control the American people."

"Democrats must continue our fight to expand freedom in America. Doing so is foundational to our oath of office and our fidelity to the Constitution," Pelosi said.

Her letter singled out Justice Clarence Thomas' concurring opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, in which Thomas wrote that the Supreme Court should go farther than overturning Roe and "reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell." Those are several highly controversial cases dealing with contraception, sodomy laws, and gay marriage, respectively.

"Because any substantive due process decision is ‘demonstrably erroneous,’ […] we have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents," Thomas wrote.

Pelosi called Thomas' opinion "disturbing" and promised federal legislation to codify the rights to contraception, homosexual sex, and gay marriage.

"Justice Clarence Thomas confirmed many of our deepest fears about where this decision may lead: taking aim at additional long-standing precedent and cherished privacy rights, from access to contraception and in-vitro fertilization to marriage equality," she wrote. "Legislation is being introduced to further codify freedoms which Americans currently enjoy. More information to follow."

Thomas' opinion was not shared by the other justices in the majority. In the opinion authored by Justice Samuel Alito, the court explicitly rejected the proposition that Dobbs should be used to question the court's rulings on issues not related to abortion.

“And to ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right,” Alito wrote. “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.”

But Pelosi's letter does not address the substance of the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs. The final paragraph reveals that Pelosi's outrage is directed at motivating voters to the polls in November to protect Democratic majorities in Congress.

"It is clear from how Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell stacked the Supreme Court that elections have ramifications," Pelosi wrote. "It is essential that we protect and expand our pro-choice Majorities in the House and Senate in November so that we can eliminate the filibuster so that we can restore women’s fundamental rights – and freedom for every American."

Abortion clinics shutter in pro-life states following Supreme Court decision



Abortion clinics in multiple states where pro-life laws are now, or will soon be, in effect ceased operations Friday after the Supreme Court overturned its Roe v. Wade decision.

In a 6-3 decision for Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the court upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion procedures after 15 weeks or pregnancy, ruling that the Constitution does not protect a woman's right to kill her unborn child. The ruling lets states individually decide how they will regulate abortion, if at all, opening the door for at least 26 states with pro-life governments to enact new limits on abortion.

In some states that already have pro-life laws on the books, including so-called trigger laws that will now go into effect after the court's decision, abortion clinics have already halted scheduled abortion procedures and closed their doors.

Texas, for example, has a law that will ban most abortions from the moment of conception forward, excepting medical emergencies where the life of the mother is at risk. State Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) announced Friday that the law will go into effect in 30 days after the court issues its judgement in Dobbs — a judgement is a legal document to be issued by the court that is separate from its opinion, which was released Friday.

In response, Whole Woman’s Health, an abortion provider that operates four clinics in Texas, announced it will stop providing abortions while it reviews the Supreme Court's decision, the Texas Tribune reported.

Abortion clinics in other states are following suit, according to Axios.

In Alabama, state Attorney General Steve Marshall announced that pro-life laws "that have not been enjoined by a court are in full effect," and that his office will sue to dismiss court orders blocking a statewide abortion ban. He advised any abortionist or abortion clinics operating in the state of Alabama in violation of the law to "immediately cease and desist operations." Abortion services at the West Alabama Women’s Center in Tuscaloosa ceased after the attorney general's directive, the Montgomery Advertiser reported.

Planned Parenthood Great Plains announced Friday that abortion services at its clinic in Little Rock, Arkansas, have been paused, while abortions at its Oklahoma clinics had been canceled last month after the state enacted a total ban on abortions.

“State by state, we have seen access to abortion virtually eliminated. Oklahoma recently enacted the first total abortion ban most Americans have seen in their lifetime. Even while reproductive rights were being taken away before our very eyes, many people still doubted Roe could ever fall. Today this creeping march to crush fundamental freedoms has reached its awful conclusion: your body is not your own," said Emily Wales, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Plains.

Elsewhere, Louisiana Democratic state Rep. Mandie Landry tweeted that all three of her state's abortion clinics are now closed.

\u201cAll three abortion clinics in Louisiana are now CLOSED. \n\n#louisiana #roe\u201d
— Mandie Landry (@Mandie Landry) 1656085782

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem (R) said last week that the Plains state's sole abortion clinic in Sioux Falls shuttered its doors as she issued a call for pro-life lawmakers to "redouble our focus on taking care of mothers in crisis." Noem's administration launched a new website Friday that directs expecting mothers to crisis pregnancy resources, financial assistance, and adoption services for unwanted children.

Lastly for now, Planned Parenthood in Wisconsin has halted all scheduled abortions at its clinics in Madison and Milawaukee following the Supreme Court's ruling, per the Associated Press.

The end of abortion services in several states marks a significant victory for the pro-life movement, which now proceeds to fight for laws that support women through the entirety of their pregnancy and help mothers raise their children.

Biden denounces planned violence by pro-abortion terrorists: ‘Threats and intimidation are not speech’



President Joe Biden on Friday called for peaceful protests of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, denouncing planned violence by radical pro-abortion groups.

"I call on everyone, no matter how deeply they care about this decision, to keep all protests peaceful. Peaceful. Peaceful. Peaceful," Biden said in an address on the court's 6-3 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. "No intimidation; violence is never acceptable."

"Threats and intimidation are not speech," the president continued. "We must stand against violence in any form, regardless of your rationale."

\u201cBiden: "Keep all protests peaceful, peaceful, peaceful."\u201d
— Greg Price (@Greg Price) 1656089761

The president's comments follow threats from the terrorist pro-abortion group Jane's Revenge, which has distributed flyers around Washington, D.C., calling for a "night of rage" against the Supreme Court's decision. This group has previously taken credit for firebombings and acts of vandalism committed against pro-life organizations and churches all over the country in the past two months.

"THE NIGHT SCOTUS OVERTURNS ROE V. WADE HIT THE STREETS," the fliers read. "YOU SAID YOU'D RIOT."

"TO OUR OPPRESSORS: IF ABORTIONS AREN'T SAFE, YOU'RE NOT EITHER," Jane's Revenge said.

\u201cJane\u2019s Revenge plans \u2018Night of Rage\u2019 in DC\u201d
— No Roe Poso \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@No Roe Poso \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1655502944

The calls for violence prompted Republican lawmakers to urge the Biden administration to protect churches and pro-life pregnancy centers in the coming days.

"President Biden has a Constitutional duty to keep Americans safe—he must direct the Justice Department to deter and prevent violence against Supreme Court Justices, churches, and pro-life pregnancy centers. Now. Before it's too late," House Republican Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said Friday.

\u201cPresident Biden has a Constitutional duty to keep Americans safe\u2014he must direct the Justice Department to deter and prevent violence against Supreme Court Justices, churches, and pro-life pregnancy centers. Now. Before it's too late.\u201d
— Kevin McCarthy (@Kevin McCarthy) 1656083699

Earlier this week, the White House denounced the threats from Jane's Revenge.

"Violence and destruction of property have no place in our country under any circumstance. And the president denounces this action," press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters Wednesday.

“Actions like this are completely unacceptable regardless of our politics,” Jean-Pierre added. “So we have denounced that and we will continue to denounce any violence or threats.”

Anything Else?

President Biden called the court's ruling a "tragic error" in his address and blasted the Republican-appointed justices in the majority as extreme.

He promised that if Democrats prevail in the upcoming midterm elections, they will take federal action to secure the right to abortion.

"Let me be very clear and unambiguous. The only way we can secure a woman's right to choose, the balance that existed, is for Congress to restore the protections of Roe v. Wade as federal law. No executive action from the president can do that," Biden said.

The president urged voters to "make their voices heard" in the upcoming midterm elections, asking for Democrats to be given expanded majorities to codify abortion protections in federal law.

"This fall Roe is on the ballot," Biden said.

In the meantime, the president announced several executive actions he will take to protect abortion access nationwide, including access to abortion-inducing drugs and contraceptives. Biden will direct the Department of Health and Human Services to increase the availability of so-called medication abortions to the "fullest extent possible," but he was vague on specifics.

He also said the federal government will defend the "bedrock right" of women in pro-life states to travel out of state to seek abortions.

“If any state or local official, high or low, tries to interfere with a woman exercising her basic right to travel, I will do everything in my power to fight that deeply un-American attack,” Biden said.

Maxine Waters vows to 'defy' Supreme Court after Roe v. Wade is overturned



U.S. Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) joined an abortion-rights protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court building Friday, where she said that women will "defy" the court after it overturned its landmark Roe v. Wade decision.

"You see this turnout here? You ain't seen nothing yet," Waters told Reuters journalists who were livestreaming from the protest. "Women are going to control their bodies no matter how they try and stop us."

"The hell with the Supreme Court! We will defy them!" she declared.

"Women will be in control of their bodies, and if they think black women are intimidated or afraid, they got another thought coming. Black women will be out in droves! We will be out by the thousands! We will be out by the millions! We're going to make sure we fight for the right to control our own bodies!"

\u201cMaxine Waters and Al Green among members of Congress who've shown up outside the Supreme Court to denounce the end of Roe. "Women are going to control their bodies, no matter how they try and stop us," Waters says. "The hell with the Supreme Court, we will defy them."\u201d
— Alejandro Alvarez (@Alejandro Alvarez) 1656081831

In a historic 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court overturned its previous decisions in Roe and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, ending all federal protections for abortion.

"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives," Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority.

The consequence of this decision is that all 50 states will individually decide how to regulate abortions. In pro-life states under Republican leadership, abortion is likely to be heavily restricted or outright banned. Indeed, thirteen GOP-led states have so-called trigger laws banning all or most abortions, which can now go into effect. Missouri was the first state to do so Friday.

Democrat-led states, like Waters' home state of California, are more than likely to take the reverse course of action and dramatically expand abortion access. In May, after a draft version of Alito's opinion was leaked to the media, California and New York advanced legislation to expand abortion access and even fund abortions with taxpayer dollars.

Waters vowed that Democrats would take more steps to protect abortion after the court's ruling.

"We're going to take every effort and try everything we can to overcome what they have done to us today," she said.

Earlier at the protest, she said the left would rally women to turn out in the upcoming midterm elections and promised legislation would be forthcoming to protect abortion rights.

"We're not intimidated. We're going to fight. We're not going backwards, we're going forward. I don't care what that vote is today, they cannot stop us. We're going to control our lives," Waters said.

"We're going to do everything that we can possibly do. We gonna continue to organize. We're going to turn out a huge vote of women. We're going to see if we can get something on the ballot real soon."

Breaking: Life wins as Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade



In a historic decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has overturned its controversial Roe v. Wade opinion, which had established a constitutional right to abortion in 1973.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, a case concerning a Mississippi law that, with few exceptions, banned abortions after 15 weeks.

The court upheld the Mississippi law, which was challenged as unconstitutional under the Supreme Court precedents established in Roe and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992).

Emphasizing that abortion "presents a profound moral question," Alito's opinion finds that the Constitution "does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating and prohibiting abortion."

“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division," Alito wrote.

"It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives," he added.

His words were unchanged from a draft of this opinion that was leaked to Politico in May. That unprecedented leak sent shockwaves through the nation and prompted an investigation ordered by Chief Justice John Roberts.

Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh filed concurring opinions. Roberts filed an opinion concurring in the judgement. The three liberal justices dissented.

Abortion rights activists rallied against the draft opinion throughout May and June, even protesting outside of the homes of Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices in an effort to get them to back down and change their votes.

Acts of violence were also committed against pro-life ministries and organizations in the name of protecting abortion rights. An anarchist group called Jane's Revenge firebombed at least two pro-life pregnancy centers, claimed responsibility for the vandalism of several more, and made terrorist threats of more violence to come. The FBI has opened an investigation into these threats and others.

It is nearly impossible to overstate the importance of the court's landmark decision in Dobbs.

Where previously state regulations on abortion had been ruled unconstitutional under Roe and Casey's precedents, now state legislatures are free to enact limits or even outright bans on abortion according to the will of the people.

Thirteen states have so-called trigger laws that will now go into effect that will criminalize abortion procedures.

Supreme Court leakers could face 10 years in prison under GOP bill



Republican lawmakers want future Supreme Court leakers to face up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine for releasing confidential court information without authorization.

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) has introduced legislation along with Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) that would create new criminal penalties for individuals who leak information about impending cases from the Supreme Court. Their bill, the Stop Supreme Court Leakers Act, is a response to the unprecedented leak of a draft opinion in May that suggested the court had voted to overturn Roe v. Wade.

“The recent leak was an attempt to publicly intimidate justices and undermine the integrity of the Court — all while putting lives at risk,” Cassidy said in a statement. “My bill holds leakers accountable and takes away any hopes of profiting off their crimes.”

The Stop Supreme Court Leakers Act would impose a $10, 000 fine and up to a 10-year prison sentence for those convicted of leaking confidential information from the Supreme Court. It would also seize any profits derived from the leak, including book deals or cable television contributor contracts.

Cassidy's press statement provided a list of information it would be illegal to leak from the court, including:

  • Internal notes on cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States.
  • Any communication between the chief justice of the United States or an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States and an employee or officer of the Supreme Court on a matter pending before the Supreme Court.
  • A communication between officers and employees of the Supreme Court of the United States on a matter pending before the Supreme Court.
  • A draft opinion or a final opinion prior to the date on which such opinion is released to the public.
  • Personal information of the chief justice of the United States or an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States that is not otherwise legally available to the public.
  • Any other information designated to be confidential by the chief justice of the United States.

Rubio said that Supreme Court leakers should "face serious penalties."

"The leak of a draft opinion of Dobbs not only undermined the integrity of our judicial system, but also continues to spur threats of violence against Supreme Court Justices and crisis pregnancy centers. This bill would ensure that leaked confidential information from the Supreme Court is a criminal offense,” he said.

“The egregious leak of a draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health harmed the Supreme Court as an institution, particularly if that betrayal was done to intimidate justices or influence the outcome of the case,” Hyde-Smith added. “Anyone who chooses to leak confidential information from the highest court in our land should be held accountable, and that’s precisely what this bill seeks to accomplish.”

The draft Supreme Court opinion leak promoted widespread protests by abortion rights activists against the court's purported decision, which would uphold Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban. Violence broke out as well, with a pro-abortion group called Jane's Revenge making terrorist threats against pro-life organizations and the court.

Two weeks ago a man was arrested outside Justice Brett Kavanaugh's house and charged with attempting to murder Kavanaugh. He has plead not guilty.