Gay Dad’s Disturbing Diary Illuminates Dysfunctions Of Buying Babies
The diary's author has told us exactly what the modern family prioritizes: adult appetite over child need. We should believe him.The diary's author has told us exactly what the modern family prioritizes: adult appetite over child need. We should believe him.Why Americans Are Falling Out Of Love With LGBT ‘Pride’
We cannot restore a right understanding of marriage while pretending that sex, in every sense, is irrelevant to it.No Andrew Sullivan, You Can’t Separate LGB From TQ Just Because It’s Backfiring
Longtime gay rights activist Andrew Sullivan is now confessing that the slope is greasier and nastier than he’s comfortable with.Republicans Supported Gay Marriage ‘Rights’ Until They Saw It Destroy Children’s Rights
The law cannot simultaneously uphold same-sex marriage and a child's right to his mother and father.In Its Hit Piece On Me, The Seattle Times Proves I’m Right About Obergefell
The Seattle Times 'reporter' spent thousands of words examining the dissenter while refusing to examine the dissent.Gay Marriage Is On A Collision Course With Children’s Rights
Two viral videos this week made visible what gay marriage proponents have worked for more than a decade to keep out of view.Successful Lawsuit Over Transgender Surgery Ends A Decades-Long Horror Story
The trans lie is imploding under the pressure of reality.Media’s Fawning Obergefell Coverage Is Further Proof It Was Wrong
ABC News' positive spin on Justice Kennedy's Obergefell ruling isn't a tribute to his decision, but an indictment of it.Supreme Court punts on revisiting landmark gay marriage decision
The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal that was thought to be the only case that had standing to challenge the landmark 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges that legalized so-called same-sex marriage.
On Monday, Supreme Court justices denied a petition for a writ of certiorari for the case Kim Davis v. David Ermold, et al., according to court documents.
'If ever a case deserved review, the first individual who was thrown in jail post-Obergefell for seeking accommodation for her religious beliefs should be it.'
There were no notable dissents in the order, and no justices recused themselves.
The appeal was brought by Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk who was briefly jailed after refusing to issue marriage licenses for a homosexual couple who are party to the suit.
Davis was also ordered to pay $100,000 in damages plus another $260,000 in legal fees, according to her attorneys.
Her refusal to issue the marriage license was on religious grounds, raising serious First Amendment questions.
Davis' appeal opens: "If ever a case deserved review, the first individual who was thrown in jail post-Obergefell for seeking accommodation for her religious beliefs should be it."
Of the three questions presented in the petition, the last reads: "Whether Obergefell v. Hodges ... and the legal fiction of substantive due process, should be overturned."
Although Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas have previously indicated a willingness to reconsider Obergefell, Davis' case was always considered to be an uphill battle since four justices would need to assent to hearing it.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Gay Marriage Harms Kids. It’s Time To End It (And Here’s How)
For the sake of the least of these, we must either restore the heavens or answer for the hell we’ve unleashed on children.Today's top stories
www.theblaze.com