Glenn Beck predicts JAIL TIME is coming for Democrats — including COVID liars



After years of unceasing Democrat lawfare, the Trump administration is setting its sights on potentially illegal activity that occurred under the Biden administration — and there's a lot of it.

Top officials within the Democrat fundraising platform ActBlue are in danger of being subpoenaed if they refuse to interviews with House committees investigating allegations that the platform accepted fraudulent and foreign donations during the 2024 presidential campaign.

"Democrats are just, I mean, they are really floundering," Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck says on "The Glenn Beck Program." "And maybe we're going to see some more justice here. ActBlue officials, they have been asked to come testify in front of Congress because Congress is doing a foreign donations probe."


“Foreign donations, that would be like if Trump was being funded by the Russians. That’s a pretty big deal," Glenn continues. "Now, the ActBlue people are refusing to testify, and Congress is like, 'That's fine, we'll subpoena you.' So there might be some people going to jail there."

And Glenn believes this is only the beginning.

“I’m telling you, handcuffs are coming. Handcuffs are coming over the next couple of months. I think we’re going to see lots of handcuffs coming out. We’re going to see handcuffs on the people of COVID, the COVID fraud, the cover-up,” Glenn says.

“It’s going to be the people that knew that there were really dangerous side effects and then tried to cover that up and keep that out of the press and keep people from knowing about those side effects,” he continues.

“Those people, you’re going to see them in handcuffs, I think, very soon,” he adds.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

RFK Jr. drops COVID bombshell — and liberals are in meltdown



After years of the Biden administration’s attempts to convince the American public that COVID vaccines were safe and effective for pregnant women and children, RFK Jr. has announced they’re no longer being recommended to society’s most vulnerable.

“I couldn’t be more pleased to announce that as of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule,” RFK Jr. said alongside NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary.

“Last year, the Biden administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot, despite the lack of any clinical data to support the repeat booster strategy in children. That ends today,” he continued, adding, “We’re now one step closer to realizing President Trump’s promise to Make America Healthy Again.”


BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales is thrilled with the development but wishes it had come sooner.

“It should never have been recommended to children from the beginning. It should have never been recommended to pregnant women in the beginning. There were no reliable studies showing that this was not harmful to pregnant women,” Gonzales says on “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered.”

However, the left-leaning mainstream media are up in arms over the announcement out of fear that the move will end up harming women and children more than it helps.

“RFK Jr. announces vaccine bombshell as he restricts access for millions of Americans,” one Daily Mail headline reads.

“The idea that, I don’t know, RFK is now killing people because they’re removing it from the actual CDC recommended schedule is just complete and total hogwash. You are talking about children, pregnant women. I mean, these are the most vulnerable,” Gonzales says.

“You can’t just play guinea pig with these people,” she continues, adding, “They either are the next generation or carrying the next generation, and yet the prior administration was completely willing to not only do that but threaten your livelihood if you did not go along with this.”

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

BOMBSHELL: Senator PROVES Biden administration’s loyalty to pharma



Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson (R) dropped a bombshell report about the Biden administration’s knowledge of the COVID-19 vaccine side effects — and what officials didn’t do to fix the problem.

“After facing four years of the Biden administration’s efforts to undermine the public’s access to information, my oversight work, I immediately issued a subpoena to HHS when I became chairman of this committee,” Johnson said.

“The subpoena records I’m releasing today, which are discussed in the interim report, do not contain FOIA redactions and will finally provide the public a more complete understanding of the Biden administration’s awareness of the risks of myocarditis following COVID-19 injection,” he continued.


According to his records, Israeli health officials notified the CDC on February 28, 2021, of “large reports of myocarditis particularly in young people following the administration of the Pfizer vaccine.”

Then, on April 12, 2021, a DOD consultant raised concerns to the CDC and FDA officials about their “ability to monitor and track cardiac-related adverse events.” Around the same time, Johnson reported that “CDC officials discussed safety signals for myocarditis” with mRNA vaccines based on DOD and Israeli data.

The response from the government was to do nothing.

“By the end of April 2021, just four months into COVID injection, Vaers was already reporting 2,926 deaths worldwide within 30 days of injection, with 46% of those deaths occurring on day zero, one, or two following injection,” Johnson explained.

Johnson went on to explain that he was being censored when he attempted to talk about it, and when he finally had a meeting with the head of the NIH, Dr. Francis Collins, he asked about the deaths.

Collins reportedly admitted that six deaths were caused by the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, but then told Johnson of the other few thousand, “Senator, people die.”

BlazeTV host Steve Deace is horrified.

“If you were given complete choice and autonomy in this transaction,” Deace says, “you could just look at it that way and say, ‘Well, hey, I’m in a high-risk group for COVID, 92% chance, and within that, I won’t have any adverse event.’ Then you can look at the individual strata and say, ‘Well, how many people died, how many people were hospitalized, how many people had a debilitating condition that has continued on?’”

“But were we treated that way? Were we treated as individuals so we can make such decisions and calculations?” Deace asks, answering, “We were not treated that way. We were treated like numbers.”

Want more from Steve Deace?

To enjoy more of Steve's take on national politics, Christian worldview, and principled conservatism with a snarky twist, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The EXPLOSION of myocarditis: Dr. Peter McCullough’s bombshell vaccine testimony



In a Senate hearing this week about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine, Dr. Peter McCullough detailed his experience as a cardiologist — and after the shots, it’s not a good one.

“The topic today is myocarditis or heart damage from the COVID-19 vaccines. I’m a cardiologist. I know the topic well. I’ve examined thousands of patients with this problem — thousands. Before the pandemic, I had two patients ever with this problem,” McCullough testified.

“There’s 1,065 papers in the peer-reviewed literature on COVID vaccine myocarditis, so let me summarize them for you,” McCullough continued. “The first author is Verma and colleagues. New England Journal of Medicine. Forty-two-year-old man comes into Washington University Hospital with vaccine myocarditis.”


“The infection is ruled out; it’s the vaccine. He’s in the hospital. This is one of the best hospitals in the United States. He died three days after taking Moderna. They can’t save him in the hospital,” he explains.

McCullough went on to tell of another, younger man who died within eight hours of being in the hospital after his COVID-19 shot.

“I can tell you, I’m a cardiologist — that doesn’t even happen with heart attacks. He dies within eight hours. I examined all of the slides,” he says, “It looked like somebody took a blowtorch to that heart, it was so completely fried with inflammation.”

“These cases, which were widely known at the time, should have gotten everyone’s attention. Everyone should have been laser-focused on this. We should never have someone die after taking a vaccine,” he added.

“Well, you’re not supposed to ask yourself, ‘What is going on?’” BlazeTV host Pat Gray comments on “Pat Gray Unleashed.”

“You’re not supposed to,” he adds.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

RFK Jr.’s big announcement on autism rates — and why the scientific community doesn't want the truth



Autism rates have skyrocketed in the past couple of decades — and to the dismay of those who profit from it, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made it clear that he’s intent on figuring out why.

In an announcement this week, RFK Jr. brought a study to light that found that the cost of treating autism in the United States by 2035 will be $1 trillion.

“This is added to already astronomical health care costs. And then there is individual injury,” RFK said. “This is a preventable disease. We know it’s an environmental exposure. It has to be. Genes do not cause epidemics. They can provide a vulnerability.”


RFK also noted that “the amount of money and resources put into studying genetic causes, which is a dead end, has been historically 10 to 20 times the amount spent by the NIH and other agencies to study environmental factors.”

“That’s where we’re going to find the answer,” he concluded.

Liz Wheeler of “The Liz Wheeler Show” is thrilled to hear it.

“Even the scientific community is so captured by autism being a profitable business that they are in a sense willing to waste money on studying your genetic predisposition to this and ignoring the environmental factors, because they don’t want to know the answer,” she says.

“They don’t want to know if it’s the food. They don’t want to know if it’s the shots. They don’t want to know if it’s the chemicals that we put on our food. They don’t want to know if it’s fertilizers and weed killers and GMO and whatever else, stuff in our water, fluoride in our water. They don’t want to know any of that,” she continues.

“The money to study the root cause was never an honest, authentic, investigation, because they don’t want to know the answer,” she adds.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Trump’s gone silent on the COVID vax — and singer John Rich knows why



President Donald Trump has faced serious criticism from the right over Operation Warp Speed, which oversaw the expedited creation of the COVID-19 vaccine to combat the pandemic.

The criticism hasn’t stopped, as Trump continued to champion his creation despite the outrage against it. However, Trump has gone eerily silent on the matter in recent months — and singer John Rich knows why.

“We’re sitting there, and everybody’s eating their food, and President Trump is not president at this time, and he’s talking to the senators and talking about really important stuff and I’m just minding my own business, going, ‘I don’t know how I got in this room,’” Rich said on the “Try That in a Small Town Podcast.”

That’s when Trump turned to Rich and asked him an important question.


“‘You play for really big crowds?’ I go, ‘I do play for really big crowds, for a long time.’ He goes, ‘Have you seen these rallies I’m doing, it’s 30,000-40,000 people.’ I said, ‘Yeah, it’s unbelievable.’ He goes, ‘So here’s the question. Why are people booing me at my rallies when I bring up the vaccine?’” Rich explained.

“I said, ‘Let me start off by saying this, we the American people do not trust the people that you were forced to trust at the time when this was happening,’” he continued. “And I said, ‘By the people we don’t trust, here’s who I mean: the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, the WHO, Fauci, and all the rest of them.’ I said, ‘Mr. President, we consider them to be a bunch of murderous depopulationist psychopaths.’”

“I said, ‘Now let me tell you why they’re booing you,’” he says. “‘Because every human being out in that rally, either themselves, or they know someone directly, who has been harmed by the vaccine or has even died from it, including me.’ I said, ‘I got members of my own family who were forced to take it against their will to keep their jobs, and now they’ve got all kinds of problems.’”

According to Rich, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was also sitting at the table and told Trump not to listen to “conspiracy theorists like John Rich.”

But he clearly didn’t listen to Graham, as when Rich was finished, he claims Trump said, “Well, I guess no more vaccine talk.”

Liz Wheeler of “The Liz Wheeler Show” is impressed, not just with John Rich, but Trump’s reaction.

“One of Trump’s greatest strengths that he gets no credit for," she says, "is that he listens."

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

VAIDS no longer a myth? Yale study unmasks dangers of the vaccine



Unfortunately, for those who took the COVID vaccine, Americans who were skeptical of the shot are now being vindicated.

A new Yale study reveals that many of those who listened to the vaccine mandate are still suffering side effects as a result. And while Big Pharma is afraid to say it, the vaccines might be giving people something called Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency.

“I was like the OG conspiracy theorist,” Sara Gonzales of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” comments. “I was only reading scientific documentation, but you were not allowed to read any scientific documentation if it was not from Anthony Fauci.”

“I got the whole BlazeTV YouTube channel demonetized for like 30 days because I literally read a study that made them look bad, not the Blaze of course, but the science,” she adds.


According to the new Yale study, when the researchers measured levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, they found “that some individuals with PVS, even those without evidence for infection, had higher levels of spike protein than controls.”

“Some participants with PVS had detectable levels more than 700 days after their last vaccination,” the study reported.

PVS stands for “post-vaccination syndrome.”

“Post-vaccination syndrome participants exhibited differences in immune profile including reduced circulating memory and effector CD4 T cells, so the T cells are getting exhausted,” Gonzales explains.

“That’s AIDS, basically,” Gonzales’ husband, Stephen Smith, comments.

“So it turns out that there is VAIDS,” Gonzales says. “But hold on, don’t worry, because Yale did make sure to say at the very top of their study that COVID-19 vaccines have been instrumental in reducing the impact of the pandemic, preventing severe illness and death, and they appear to protect against long COVID.”

“I mean, you might develop long COVID after you get the vaccine, but hey, still, don’t worry,” she adds.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Vaccines and autism: What deal did RFK Jr. have to make to get confirmed at HHS?



While there are many Trump Cabinet nominees who have yet to be confirmed, one major — and highly controversial — player has narrowly advanced through his confirmation hearings.

That would be RFK Jr., who has squeezed past the Senate Finance Committee with a 14-13 vote along party lines.

“So all of the Republicans fell in line, which is good. I don’t want to be negative Nancy here, that is good, but wow, too close: 14-13, so just barely. And now he is going to go before the full Senate Chamber in confirmation hearings to lead the Department of Health and Human Services,” Sara Gonzales of “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered” comments.

Among RFK Jr.’s strongest opposition in the Senate was Senator Bill Cassidy, who is also a physician. Cassidy ended up voting to confirm RFK Jr., which Gonzales believes might have been due in part to a social media post from Donald Trump.


“20 years ago, Autism in children was 1 in 10,000. NOW IT’S 1 in 34. WOW! Something’s really wrong. We need BOBBY!!! Thank You! DJT,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

Less than an hour after Trump’s post, Cassidy posted his own statement on social media platform X, writing, “I’ve had very intense conversations with Bobby and the White House over the weekend and even this morning. I want to thank VP JD specifically for his honest counsel.”

“With the serious commitments I’ve received from the administration and the opportunity to make progress on the issues we agree on like healthy foods and a pro-American agenda, I will vote yes,” he concluded.

However, another social media user on X raised concerns about why Cassidy really agreed to confirm RFK Jr.

“Cassidy says he got a commitment that if confirmed, he will meet with RFK Jr. multiple times per month. CDC won’t change vaccine advisory cmte or remove info from websites saying vaccines don’t cause autism,” Nathaniel Wexler posted on X.

“That one rubs me a little bit the wrong way,” Gonzales says. “Which, by the way, I want to be clear. RFK Jr. is not going to go in and immediately change the CDC website to say ‘vaccines cause autism.’ He’s not going to do that.”

“What he is going to do is try to replicate the studies that they claim that they did that prove that vaccines do not cause autism,” she adds.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

‘Just the tip of the iceberg’: Study uncovers DISTURBING vaccine side effects



Americans who spoke out against the COVID-19 vaccines were painted as conspiracy theorists for the better part of the last four years, but they’re finally being vindicated.

Dr. Peter McCullough, cardiologist and chief scientific officer of the Wellness Company, has been one of those “conspiracy theorists,” but now he has the proof. In a shocking peer-reviewed study that mainstream media outlets won’t touch, a high likelihood of correlation between the COVID-19 vaccine and death was found.

“What we know the vaccines cause, in terms of, you know, their safety warnings and what was determined is that about 74% of all the deaths that have occurred after vaccination that have come to autopsy, in fact, the vaccines caused the death,” McCullough tells Jill Savage and Matthew Peterson of “Blaze News Tonight.”

“The peer-reviewed literature has now about 4,000 papers on fatal and non-fatal vaccines, disabilities, and deaths. So no, it’s not a shock,” he adds.


“When we look at the mRNA vaccines, where do we go from here? Do they have a future? Do you think that they get shut down at this point?” Savage asks.

“There are multiple calls to shut it down, that the platform is not safe, that none of the COVID-19 vaccines are safe for human use. The World Council for Health in the U.K. was the first to call for that, now [from the] Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Doctors for COVID Ethics — there are now literally dozens of calls for the vaccines to be removed,” McCullough explains.

“I expect they will be taken off the market,” he continues. “Largely, the crisis is closed at this point in time. We can treat residual cases. The vaccines never were compelling.”

However, Peterson notes that studies like the one McCullough is citing are still being censored.

“The censorship in the medical literature is significant. It comes at the editorial reviewers and the publisher level. What’s unprecedented are papers being fully published, contracted, copyrighted, indexed in the National Library of Medicine, and then having them be retracted for no specific reason,” McCullough explains.

“I have been an editor of two major journals in the past, and I can tell you, it’s my estimate that only 1% of these papers are fully getting through and being published. Only 1%. So 4,000 papers describing all these concerning side effects, it’s just the tip of the iceberg,” he adds.

Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

FDA advisory committee considers risk of heart inflammation from Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine



The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's vaccine advisory committee heard testimony Tuesday that Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine may carry a higher risk of heart inflammation in young men than the vaccine produced by Pfizer/BioNTech.

A panel of outside experts met Tuesday to consider whether the emergency use authorization for Moderna's mRNA vaccine should be expanded to include children ages 6 to 17 years old. The advisory committee will consider expert testimony from FDA scientists and then vote on whether Moderna's shot should be approved for children alongside Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine.

Data presented to the committee by Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, a vaccine safety official at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, suggested that people ages 18 to 39 had a higher risk of myocarditis if they took the Moderna vaccine compared to those who had received the Pfizer shot.

But Shimabukuro cautioned that these findings were not consistent across U.S. databases, and he emphasized that heart inflammation remains a rare vaccine side effect.

According to the CDC, as of May 26, 2022, there have been 635 reports of myocarditis in children ages 5-17 who took the Pfizer vaccine. Putting that number in context, Shimabukuro said there have been nearly 55 million total Pfizer vaccine doses administered over the same period. Most of those that developed heart inflammation problems were adolescent boys who had received a second vaccine dose.

All children who reported having myocarditis recovered at least somewhat after it was diagnosed, and 80.1% of those diagnosed fully, or probably fully, recovered, according to a CDC survey of health care providers that treated them.

Comparing the Moderna vaccine to the Pfizer vaccine, Shimabukuro said there were slightly higher reporting rates of myocarditis for Moderna and that the reporting rate was higher in males.

Data from three U.S. vaccine safety databases showed the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in young males aged 18-39 was 1.1 to 1.5 times higher after the Moderna shot, he said.

More CDC data on 18- to 39-year-olds showed 4.41 excess heart inflammation cases per 100,000 who took the Pfizer vaccine compared to 6.27 excess cases per 100,000 for Moderna. The Moderna vaccine is administered in higher doses than the Pfizer vaccine.

The FDA also reviewed Moderna's studies showing the efficacy of the vaccine in children 6 to 17. Officials said the vaccine was 93% effective among adolescents 12-17 and 77% effective in younger children. While these results met the agency's criteria for success, FDA officials warned that a booster shot will likely be needed for children, just like adults, because the vaccine's effectiveness wanes over time.

If the advisory committee votes to approve Moderna's vaccine for children, the question will go back to the FDA which must decide whether to take the committee's recommendation.

The committee will meet again Wednesday to consider whether the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines should be approved for use in infants under 5.