It was one of the worst human rights violations of the COVID regime, and it’s still going on in most hospitals. Hospitals were de-listing people from organ transplant lists who would not get the COVID shots, no matter how much information came out on how the shots were unsafe and ineffective, particularly among the immunocompromised. From day one, the policy should have been the other way around – kidneys shouldn’t have been wasted on those who got the shots – and now we have the proof.

According to a study published by Japanese researchers last month in the Journal of Clinical Medicine, a number of patients receiving cornea transplants experienced rejections of the cornea tissue following the COVID vaccines. Cornea grafts are considered a much lower-risk transplant procedure than solid organ transplants and tend to have a much lower rejection rate. Which is why the researchers were surprised to find a total of 23 eyes from 21 patients who had undergone corneal graft procedures who experienced rejection anywhere from one day to six weeks following COVID vaccination. In some cases, the rejection occurred suddenly after being jabbed despite the cornea graft having held steady for many years.

Like so many other studies indicating concerning safety signals about the shot, don’t expect any follow-up to this analysis. If our government really cared about safety and science, it would immediately identify these cases of rejected corneal tissue and study them for spike protein and other tissue protein expression markers.

What this study demonstrates is that rather than accusing the unvaccinated recipients of potentially wasting a transplant, we should be studying whether vaccinated recipients might be at higher risk of wasting transplants and whether vaccinated donors run the risk of transferring to the recipients the spike protein through the grafted tissue or in solid organs.

Although the paper has not yet identified a likely mechanism of action causing rejections in eye tissue, Dr. Richard Urso, an ocular specialist, told me he is not surprised that the mRNA expressing the spike would be able to find and inflame tissue that is typically protected from the immune system. “We’re seeing inflammatory markers in tissues that usually don’t receive this protein because the lipid nanoparticles can spread it anywhere in the body. These particles are particularly adept at crossing tight junctions and can deliver the mRNA to parts of the body like the brain and eye. One thing about blood vessels around the eye is that they are covered by pericytes that are full of ACE2 receptors, which makes sense that it would trigger all the pathways for inflammation including natural killer cells.”

ACE2 is the primary receptor the spike protein uses to enter the cells. However, those infected with COVID naturally, although still at risk for ACE2 binding in many parts of the body, are still protected, for the most part, in places like the heart and brain that are hard to penetrate. “The eye and brain are typically protected from immune system overactions because of the tight junctions,” observes Urso, who worked with these tissues in scientific labs for years.

According to Urso, this is also why he suspects one is much more likely to suffer myocarditis from the spike protein expressed through the shots than through natural infection. It’s all about the lipid nanoparticles serving as lifeboats for the spike to interject itself into every tight junction of the body. “The critical piece of evidence in why myocarditis is so much worse among the vaccinated than those with infections is because the heart has tight junctions and they are loosened during exercise, which is why the LNPs can then pass through and attach to the lining of the heart. The LNPs allow the spike to get to places where the virus cannot go. That’s why you see such difference between the level of troponin between those affected by the wild-type disease and those who get the vaccine.”

Perhaps this is why elite athletes who engage in vigorous exercise are constantly on the hook for sudden heart problems, given that the loosening of the junctions allows the LNPs to pass with a greater load of mRNA-coded spike.

Now imagine tainting the entire pool of organ and tissue donors with this spike protein. And yet, the unvaccinated are the ones vilified and excluded from donations? A U.K. study found 13 solid organ donors who likely died from vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia stemming from the AstraZeneca shots just during two of the early months of vaccination in 2021. So what happened when 10 of their organs were given to recipients? "There were seven major thrombotic or hemorrhagic postoperative complications in six recipients resulting in the loss of three transplants.” One of the patients died within a day of cardiac arrest.

When this is all over and the dust settles, it will become clear that treating the unvaccinated as spreaders of disease was the greatest blood libel of all time in order to cover up the true threats of the vaccine itself.