Horowitz: Just 1 known unvaccinated person hospitalized last week in Australia’s largest state
When we started to see the negative efficacy of the shots late last summer, we thought that by now the vaccines would have been pulled from the market. Yet to this very day, they are still being mandated in the military and in other settings, and now the FDA is on the cusp of approving them for babies and toddlers. But one thing we don’t hear any more is the incessant posturing of the government-pharma complex about how all the unvaccinated are filling up the hospitals. You know why? Because just the opposite is true. Yet the policies do not change based on the facts on the ground.
Australia, like other countries, publishes a COVID surveillance report every week. But until now, we weren’t able to effectively use it to monitor hospitalization rates by vaccination status because the reports conflated the unvaxxed with the “unknown” category. Well, now the two have been decoupled, and we can see a crystal-clear picture of who is being hospitalized with COVID. Here is table 1 of the New South Wales COVID-19 Weekly Data Overview for the week ending May 28:
As you can see, just one out of the 353 new hospitalizations over the preceding 14 days in Australia’s largest state was unvaccinated, where the patient’s vaccination status was known. Shockingly, 72.5% of the hospitalizations were among those with three or more shots. Again, we’ve seen the negative efficacy for contracting COVID for months, but we were told the protection against serious illness was still robust. According to these numbers, there does not appear to be any benefit, especially for the elderly people who need that protection the most. Moreover, 64 of the 96 new COVID deaths where the vaccination status was known were among those with three or more shots. Without age-stratified rates, we cannot conclusively prove negative efficacy against serious illness just from this data alone, but what is clear is that vaccination does not offer much protection, if any, and that’s before factoring in all of the risks and side effects.
Also, remember, Omicron variants aren’t nearly as bad as Delta and some of the other more pathogenic versions that replicated aggressively in the lower respiratory system. The fact that Australia is experiencing more deaths post-boosters and with the least pathogenic version is very disturbing.
Something is not right about this picture. Australia is experiencing nearly all its deaths after endless boosters and Pfizer’s supposed wonder drug are available and with the least pathogenic variant. Roughly three-quarters of the country’s COVID deaths occurred since Omicron predominated in December and after boosters were in ubiquitous use, especially among the most vulnerable. Also, rather than a straight up-and-down curve, the deaths seam to be meandering endlessly and out of season. Why? Anyone interested in studying this?
Back here in the U.S., our government craftily ensured that we would not have uniform hospitalization data by vaccination status made public, but we continue to see woefully negative efficacy regarding case rates, which makes the military and health care mandates all the more immoral and illogical.
According to the latest Walgreens weekly COVID-19 Index, there continues to be a perfectly linear increase in positivity rates among the tests conducted during the week ending May 31 based on how many doses the patient received.
As you can see, the positivity rates get progressively worse over time based on the number of doses, with the triple-vaxxed faring the worst. Even for those who had their last dose more recently, the numbers are not better than those of the unvaxxed before the negative efficacy sets in. And this is not because the unvaxxed barely get tested. They actually have a lower share of positive cases relative to their share of tests, unlike the other groups.
How come this has piqued the interest of almost no members of either political party as they rush to jab babies with the same outdated and flawed shots? They have taken a “see no evil, hear no evil” approach.
The U.K. Health Security Agency data was showing negative efficacy on case rates for months, but the agency stopped publishing the data after March simply because we were using it. Their final report using this data for week 13, 2022, of the UKHSA vaccine surveillance report showed that triple-vaxxed individuals in the 40-49 age group had a change 4.1 times higher of testing positive during the preceding four weeks in March, and the trend seemed to get worse for the vaccine in every weekly report.
Yet our government continues to allow Pfizer to submit emergency authorization requests for new cohorts (even though the shot was supposedly fully approved, but somehow you still can’t get the approved version). They are now promising shots in the arms of babies in six months. Why is nobody curious about the fact that COVID seemed to get much worse after the shots and is still plaguing us unnaturally and even off-season?
This presentation from U.K. researcher Joe Smalley shows how the fatality rate went up in dozens of countries after they started with the vaccine. Cambodia, for example, didn’t have a single COVID death until the vaccines were available in March 2021.
Impact of COVID Vaccinations on Mortalitywww.youtube.com
We see this with overall all-cause mortality as well. In South Korea, which did pretty well until recently, the mortality rate was 6.1 per 1,000 last September. It rose to 10.2 per 1,000 in March 2022. The age-adjusted all-cause mortality in the U.S. was the highest in the first quarter of this year – again, after we had both of Pfizer’s magic therapeutics in place.
\u201cUS Age-Adjusted All-Cause Excess Mortality for Q1/'22 was almost +21% above baseline!\n\nHow can this be, if vaccines are supposedly working and 95%+ of seniors are vaxxed, and 86% of 18+ are vaxxed? It does not line up, unless..\n\n1/n \ud83e\uddf5\n#Covid #Covid19 #Corona #Coronavirus\u201d— Ben (@Ben) 1654134027
Whether it’s the vaccine making the virus worse for those who get the shot, deaths from side effects, or a mixture of the two is something that needs to be further studied, but the pattern is clear across the world that things got worse, not better, after the vaccine.
The trillion-dollar question is when will these observations be debated in public and when will answers to these questions be demanded by our politicians before we continue an outdated shot that has already caused so many other ailments? Inquiring minds would like to know.