"The effects of the COVID-19 vaccine on sperm, a pregnancy, a fetus, or a nursing child are not known." ~Pfizer’s informed consent document

There’s a reason why we don’t offer novel therapeutics, especially those with numerous side effects already confirmed, to pregnant women. To this day, there is no effort on the part of our government to study the consequences of the menstrual irregularities being experienced ubiquitously among women who took the COVID shots. Will the latest study, on a rare condition of uterine lining shedding self-reported by women who took the shot, finally convince the medical establishment to take a step back? Probably not.

Decidual cast shedding (DCS) is a rare gynecological disorder in which a woman secretes her entire uterine lining intact through the vaginal canal as if she were having menstrual bleeding. It is so rare that the authors of this paper could only find 40 documented cases in 109 years. Yet in their survey of 6,049 women from May 16, 2021, through December 31, 2021, right after most young women got the shot, 292, or 4.8%, of the respondents self-reported a case of DCS. The findings were published in the Gazette of Medical Sciences.

Tiffany Parotto, in conjunction with several obstetricians and scientists, conducted the MyCycleStory survey, which contained 91 questions, targeting all women 18 years and older who were experiencing menstrual anomalies. As the data was collected, much to the surprise of the researchers, who were mainly trying to study the scope of menstrual irregularities, “there was an abnormally high number of women who reported that they had experienced ‘Decidual Cast Shedding / release of a layer of uterine lining, a thick sack-like substance’, as presented in the survey.” They note, “Respondents who reported having experienced DCS in the past were excluded from the analysis data set.”

Among the 292 women who reported as having secreted a large, intact piece of tissue all in one piece at some point last year, nearly all of them (96.2%) reported experiencing menstrual irregularities. The median age of those who reported DCS was 35, but 22 of the women were post-menopausal.

Interestingly, they found that the temporal trends of two related Google search terms – “decidual cast” and “decidual cast covid vaccine” – increased 2000% in April 2021 and then again in June from the prior and subsequent months of these peaks. Although not scientific, it certainly is very revealing, given how rare this condition is and how few medical professionals, much less laymen, ever heard of it.

Whether and why the shots might cause these cast sheddings are beyond the scope of the findings, but the authors speculate as to a possible pathophysiology.

“One hypothesis is that the COVID-19 vaccine interrupts the complex balance of ovulation orchestrated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis and thus produces anovulatory bleeding disorders. It is known from COVID-19 mRNA vaccine documents that there is concentration of the nanolipid particles and the mRNA cargo in the ovaries. This produces significant inflammatory response in the ovaries and could contribute to menstrual abnormalities, although there are many other potential mechanisms that could be involved.”

The authors also wonder if what some women are reporting is not a classic decidual cast shedding, but rather some form of fibrin-like blood clot. They show pictures that some of the shedding women have shown them, and they do bear some resemblance to the fibrin-like clots some embalmers have reported pulling out of dead bodies beginning last year.

Given what we already know about the shots causing menstrual irregularities and that the pro-inflammatory lipid nanoparticles are deposited in the ovaries, it shouldn’t be our job to prove they definitively cause miscarriages and stillbirths. It should be the job of the manufacturers to disprove they are a problem before continuing with the mass vaccination. And it’s not like we aren’t seeing sudden spikes in stillbirths that are still unexplained.

Remember when Scotland reported levels of stillbirths last September not seen since the late 1980s? Well, the numbers are now creeping up again in the early part of 2022, and authorities don’t have an explanation. In September, Public Health Scotland announced that 21 newborns had died that month, triggering an investigation because the numbers rose above an upper control limit for the first time in four years. The neonatal death rate at the time was reported as 4.9 per 1,000 live births and was revised up to 5.1. That is more than double the five-year average of 2.2 per 1,000 live births.

At the time, the Herald Scotland and the BBC reported that COVID was initially ruled out as a culprit. As for the vaccine, the Herald Scotland reported that they have no plans to ever investigate it. “The vaccination status of the mothers of the infants who died is unknown and will not be released due to ‘patient confidentiality,’” reported the longest-running national newspaper in the world last December.

Now the BBC is reporting that, after receding for a few months, the neonatal death rate is back up to 4.6 per 1,000 births and is currently the subject of a Public Health Scotland investigation. They quote doctors again suggesting that it is unlikely to be COVID (after all, we didn’t see this in 2020), but what is the cause? Just as with the sudden pediatric hepatitis, there seem to be a lot of mystery ailments that began in 2021.

This comes on the heels of new data from Iceland that shows stillbirths and first-year infant deaths nearly doubled in 2021 over the previous year, roughly charting with the Scottish rates.

So, what is this mystery variable? While we can’t prove yet that it’s because of the gene therapy that was introduced to almost every adult, it would be insane not to investigate it. As of early May, there were 4,615 miscarriages reported to VAERS and 10,405 instances of vaginal/uterine hemorrhaging. Remember, miscarriages are extremely hard to pin on the vaccine, so the fact that so many felt they could report it demonstrates there is likely a woeful underreporting rate.

How this shot can be continued without detailed studies concluding the shots, and the accompanying menstrual irregularities, are not damaging the reproductive system is shocking beyond belief. Where is the sense of urgency?