Trump's $354M fraud verdict: Election play or justice?
Former President Donald Trump claims to be politically persecuted more than any other former president in America — and after the $354 million fraud verdict against him, it seems he’s probably right.
The penalty will exceed $450 million, and the New York attorney general keeps claiming she may seize Trump’s assets if he can’t pay the $354 million fine.
The mainstream media is having a field day with the verdict, even though there was no victim in the case levied against him.
“Now we know that there was no victim here, and that’s a key part of this story,” Stu Burguiere explains. “It’s not like a situation where he lied to the bank.”
Trump didn’t lie to the bank, and the bank wasn’t hurt in the process. Trump allegedly did, however, lie about how much his properties were valued at.
“Now, the banks themselves say, ‘Well, actually we do our own checking on that. We check to see if these values are right, we look at them ourselves. Everybody makes up values that, you know, we’re not comfortable with. But we gave him the loan because we thought he was a good risk,’” Stu says, breaking it down to the simplest terms.
Which is why Stu knows that New York AG Letitia James isn’t going after Donald Trump because it legally makes sense to go after Donald Trump but rather because she hates him.
“This was her campaign promise, to go after Donald Trump really with any means necessary. So that’s what she’s doing,” he says.
To learn more, watch the video below.
Want more from the Robertsons?
To enjoy more on God, guns, ducks, and inspiring stories of faith and family, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Unexpected warning: Glenn Beck's startling interview with Ken Paxton
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is well aware of the challenges facing America, and after an unexpected exchange, he’s left Glenn Beck with some concerning insights to chew on.
“He didn’t give me calming advice,” Glenn tells Stu Burguiere, relaying that Paxton told him, “If you don’t have a rule of law, if you have a court system or a country that says you cannot protect your own people, then you don’t have a constitutional republic any more.”
“And we’re back to the Declaration of Independence and requiring people to stand up for it,” Glenn says.
“I walked away from that interview feeling as though that was a historic comment.”
That comment being that Texans are being told they’ll have to stand up for the Declaration of Independence.
“That shows we are way down the road, way down the road in unsafe territories,” Glenn says.
While both Glenn and Stu don’t believe that Paxton was forewarning of civil war, they are concerned by his comments.
“I don’t think Ken Paxton is calling for something like that,” Stu tells Glenn.
“He mentioned just standing up and fighting. Look, we all stand up, stand up every day to argue on behalf of the Declaration of Independence in the Constitution.”
However, Stu says, it’s “just a couple of people really standing in the way now of losing our republic.”
“The Constitution is hanging by a thread, and we’re in a scissors factory. And the guy rushing to save it is Edward Scissorhands,” Glenn says.
“We’re not really in a stable place.”
To learn more, watch the clip below.
Want more from Stu?
To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.