Pelosi has 'deplorable' moment, implies many Republicans too racist, sexist to support Harris



Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, one of the most powerful and influential Democrats in America, has implied that nearly one-third of all Republicans are too racist, sexist, and homophobic to support Kamala Harris for president in 2024.

That remark came on Saturday, when Pelosi sat down with journalist Kara Swisher, host of the podcast "On with Kara Swisher," at the 2024 Texas Tribune Festival in Austin, Texas.

'You can put half of Trump's supporters into what I call a basket of deplorables.'

Pelosi and Swisher touched on a number of topics, including why former President Donald Trump is still doing so well against Harris in the 2024 presidential polls.

When Swisher asked Pelosi whether she was "worried" about Trump's possible re-election, Pelosi suggested that "30%" of Republican voters are just too bigoted to consider voting for Democrats.

"There are people who will never be, shall we say, inclined to support Democrats because of — they just have a different orientation toward women, people of color, LGBTQ, you know, they just are not ever going to be there," Pelosi replied. "So say that's about like 30% or something like that — of the Republicans."

As the Post Millennial noted, this response from Pelosi was remarkably similar to an infamous statement from Hillary Clinton that likely helped sink her presidential campaign against Trump in 2016. At the time, Clinton characterized "half" of Trump's supporters — in other words, a large segment of the American electorate — as "deplorable."

"You can put half of Trump's supporters into what I call a basket of deplorables," Clinton said. "They're racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, you name it. And unfortunately, there are people like that, and he has lifted them up."

Pelosi also indicated to Swisher that some Republicans are just "very rich people" who could not care less about "clean air or clean water." They just don't want to pay taxes, she claimed.

Perhaps to soften her remarks, Pelosi then quickly added that some of Trump's supporters have concerns about globalization and immigration. "I think we have to be as respectful and understanding as possible," Pelosi told Swisher.

Despite that call for comity, Pelosi also inexplicably stated that some Republicans feared "innovation."

"They saw the factory down the road move overseas," Pelosi explained. "They're fearful of innovation."

She then tried to give an example: "My father is a truck driver, and now they're going to have all of, you know ..."

As the 84-year-old congresswoman then appeared stuck, Swisher jumped in and added "autonomous truck." "Yeah, and so, so the innovation, globalization, and they include immigration in there," Pelosi continued.

She also insisted that "migration" is not actually a "big job-taker" and that it "fuels the economy."

Another moment from Pelosi and Swisher's hour-long conversation also went viral. At one point, Swisher asked Pelosi to give Trump advice for his debate against Harris on Tuesday night.

"You think he’s gonna show up?" Pelosi asked.

Swisher appeared surprised by the question. "I do. Do you know something that I don't know?" Swisher replied as the audience chuckled in amusement.

"I know cowardice when I see it," Pelosi answered.

In response to a request for comment from Fox News Digital, Steven Cheung of the Trump campaign called Pelosi a "liar and fraud" who "has no idea what she is talking about." Cheung also called the suggestion that Trump would not appear at the debate "fake news."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'Qualified' member of Gov. Hochul's reparations commission hates on Israel and blames 'White Folk' for the weather



New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) ratified legislation in December creating a reparations commission tasked with determining how to redistribute New Yorkers' money along racial lines in order to make amends for the actions of persons now long gone.

While the governor's office indicated at the outset that this commission — which may ultimately be funded to the tune of tens of millions of dollars — would "be composed of nine members who are especially qualified to serve by virtue of their expertise, education, training, or lived experience," two of the members have since been outed as radical identitarians.

Ron Daniels, a failed independent candidate for president and the head of the Institute of the Black World 21st Century, is a member of Hochul's reparation commission despite routinely dealing in ostensibly racist commentary online.

The New York Post highlighted how, for example, Daniels wrote in October 2021, "White Folks Messed Up the Weather = Black Folks Save the Planet."

In another post that month, Daniels clarified, "I Say White Folks Messed Up the Weather as a Way of Saying = Disrespect for Earth Mother by Materialistic, Greed and Profit Driven, Capitalist Systems of Europe and America = Killing the Planet and Danger to Humanity and All Forms of Life."

While keen to ascribe guilt to entire racial groups, Daniels has also invoked race when attacking lawmakers over matters of political disagreement. For instance, Daniels denigrated U.S. Sen. Tim Scott, calling the black Republican, "Uncle Tim" in a May 3, 2021, post.

"'Uncle Tim,' Scott that is, Who Picked Cotton On the Plantation, Is 'Still On the Plantation' = Picked to Be the 'Black Face' To Suppress/Black Power/Black Freedom On Behalf of White Supremacy/White Power and That's 'The Cotton Picking Truth' #BewareofUncleTim," wrote one of the radicals on Hochul's commission.

In addition to hurling racially-charged remarks, Daniels also lashed out at Israel just weeks after Hamas terrorists massacred thousands of Israeli civilians and dozens of Americans.

"With silence comes complacency. No Homeland. No Peace. No Justice, No Peace in Israel," Daniels wrote just months before his appointment to the reparations commission. "There will never be peace in Israel until the Palestinians have a home. Military force will quench the thirst of the Palestinian people for justice. No Homeland, No Peace!"

With silence, comes complacency.\nNo Homeland. No Peace. No Justice, No Peace in Israel.\n\nThere will never be peace in Israel until the Palestinians have a home. Military force will quench the thirst of the Palestinian people for justice.\n\nNo Homeland, No Peace!\n\n#FreePalestine
— (@)

While Daniels is greatly supportive of a Palestinian homeland, he does not appear to be as enthusiastic about his own.

Last July, he wrote that Independence Day "is mere shallow patriotism which is meaningless. In the spirit of Frederick Douglass, it is a day that should remind the oppressed that 'if there is no struggle, there is no progress. Therefore, on this Frederick Douglass Day, our task is clear."

Reparations apparently would not amount to total victory for Daniels. He also seeks the abolition the criminal justice system and for the "vast majority of MAGA subservient, terrified, cowardly Republicans" to be "vanquished."

Daniels is not the only radical on the commission who will ultimately be responsible for submitting recommendations for appropriate action to address "longstanding inequities" to the state senate, assembly, and to Hochul. There's also Lurie Daniel Favors, whom the post revealed to be another raving identitarian.

Favors, who serves as executive director at the Center for Law and Social Justice at CUNY's Medgar Evers College, has openly called for lawmakers to privilege one particular racial group or others when drafting policy and has also made clear her antipathy for racial harmony, writing, "F*** YOU & YOUR RACE APOLOGETICS. WE WILL NOT BE SILENT. WE WILL NOT MAKE YOU COMFORTABLE."

"We have given everything," continued Favors. "To make you comfortable about how evilly twisted your white supremacist sickness is and WE ARE DONNE with that as a political/education/housing policy. DONE."

— (@)

Favors was apparently also a champion of the ruinous defund-the-police movement.

"Police all across the country are literally proving *daily* why #DefundThePolice is necessary," Favors wrote in April 2021. "I'm old enough to remember summayall claiming activists were going too far."

Daniels and Favors were two of the three members appointed to the commission by Democratic state Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie. The appointments, including the three made by Hochul, were announced late last month.

New York Conservative Party Chairman Gerard Kassar said the "commission on reparations was ridiculous from the start. This proves it."

"These sound like people who have preconceived notions of what they view as white privilege. Unbelievable," continued Kassar. "There's no way these appointees should serve on the commission given their comments."

Republican state Sen. Robert Ortt blasted Hochul for paving the way for the creation of the commission, stating, "The reparations of slavery were paid with the blood and lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans who fought to end slavery during the Civil War."

"A divisive commission to consider reparations is unworkable," continued Ortt. "As we've seen in California, I am confident this commission's recommendations will be unrealistic, will come at an astronomical cost to all New Yorkers, and will only further divide our state."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

EEOC commissioner humiliates Mark Cuban over his failure to comprehend the Civil Rights Act: 'Dead wrong'



Race-obsessive billionaire Mark Cuban continues to publicly defend the organizational discrimination scheme known as DEI — a numbers game in which human beings' immutable characteristics and sexual preferences are factored into hiring and advancement decisions.

In his continued attack Sunday on color-blind meritocracy and what he previously termed "DEI-Phobi[a]," Cuban outed himself for apparently engaging in discriminatory practices. Although he may not have seen it that way, a commissioner from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission intervened to inform him the matter was clean-cut — and he was on the wrong side of it.

Cuban was arguing on X with the Rabbit Hole, a user who has previously hammered the billionaire for his "DEI Denialism."

In a Substack piece earlier this month, the Rabbit Hole discussed the mental gymnastics Cuban and other corporate bigwigs perform in their efforts to defend DEI. The critic suggested their routine comes down to a lack of familiarity with the issue, an inability to digest arguments, and apathy in the face of facts.

Cuban afforded the Rabbit Hole an opportunity to test this theory, engaging the critic in a debate Sunday on the question: "Should candidate selection, at any level, consider non-merit based criteria like race and sex?"

The debate began when Cuban shared a link on X to an NBC News article entitled, "How right-wing influencers turned airplanes and airports into culture war battlegrounds."

The Rabbit Hole wrote in reply, "When shown proof of how DEI discriminates, you wrote it off by stating private entities can do whatever they want. Since then the goalposts have repeatedly been shifted. Given the weak nature of your defenses of DEI, I suspect there is no real rebuttal to the criticisms myself and others have raised."

Cuban jumped into the fray, pushing back against the notion that "seeking out members of a certain demographic to fill [a] role" was reprehensible.

"You are a CEO of a successful company that has 30 employees that are all black women, and you think a different perspective will help you grow the firm," wrote Cuban. "So you decide you want to hire a white man? You would be against that right?"

The Rabbit Hole held firm and answered in the affirmative, stressing, "I believe in a colorblind meritocracy; this means I am against forms of hiring which undercut merit including forms of hiring which cut out merited individuals over their group association(s)."

Turning the tables, the Rabbit Hole asked the billionaire whether he has "hired people on the basis of demographics on the belief that doing so better positioned your companies to succeed?"

Cuban claimed that while he has "never hired anyone based exclusively on race, gender, religion," "race and gender can be part of the equation" if that would put his business in the best position to succeed.

In response to Cuban's damning answer and apparent admission of a race-factored hiring approach, the Rabbit Hole responded, "Thank you for your transparency."

@mcuban \u201cAnd yes, race and gender can be part of the equation.\u201d\n\nThank you for your transparency.\n\nTitle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.
— (@)

EEOC Commissioner Andrea L. Lucas ultimately weighed in, lending her expert insight on discrimination law and humiliating Cuban in front of millions of users.

"EEOC Commissioner here. Unfortunately you're dead wrong on black-letter Title VII law," wrote Lucas. "As a general rule, race/sex can't even be a 'motivating factor' — nor a plus factor, tie-breaker, or tipping point. It's important employers understand the ground rules here."

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 notes that "an unlawful employment practice is established when the complaining party demonstrates that race, color, religion, sex, or national origin was a motivating factor for any employment practice, even though other factors also motivated the practice."

— (@)

Lucas provided Cuban with a link to "further information about the relevant legal standards, and corresponding potential risks" pertaining to DEI practices should he "need a primer on the law."

Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt subsequently told Cuban, "Call your lawyer."

America First Legal noted, "This is the beauty of @X --here you have [Mark Cuban] openly admitting to violating black-letter employment law, and getting admonished/corrected in real-time by an EEOC Commissioner. ... For the entire world to see."

Cuban doubled down on his remarks Monday, stating, "Race is part of the equation never the deciding factor. As is diversity of background."

@FutureConfirmed Race is part of the equation never the deciding factor. As is diversity of background
— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

WHITLOCK: 'The white LIBERAL is the actual bigot'



In this clip, Steven Crowder interviewed Jason Whitlock and discussed Whitlock's take on racism in America. "The white liberal is the actual out-of-the-closet bigot ... they believe black is a special category of human beings who are only allowed to think one way," Whitlock said. He went on to tell Crowder that he refuses to fit into the white liberal-created category being black.

Watch this incredible interview below. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.




Want more from Steven Crowder?

To enjoy more of Steven's uncensored late-night comedy that's actually funny, join Mug Club — the only place for all of Crowder uncensored and on demand.