Bill and Hillary Clinton to testify under oath about Jeffrey Epstein this week



Former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are scheduled to be deposed by the House Oversight Committee this week regarding their ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

The Clintons, who had previously defied the committee’s subpoenas, agreed in early February to appear before lawmakers after months of back-and-forth and a vote that found the two in contempt of Congress.

'Our goal for this investigation is straightforward: We seek to deliver transparency and accountability for the American people and for survivors.'

Hillary Clinton is scheduled to testify under oath on Feb. 26 and Bill Clinton on Feb. 27. Both hearings will be closed-door.

Committee lawmakers have agreed to hold the depositions in the Clintons’ place of residence rather than in Washington, D.C.

“The Clintons’ depositions will be held in Chappaqua, New York, on February 26 and 27 as an accommodation for their schedules. The depositions are in accordance with House and Committee rules,” a House Oversight Committee spokesperson told Fox News Digital.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) has called the Clintons’ testimony “critical” to understanding Epstein's and Ghislaine Maxwell’s “sex trafficking network and the ways they sought to curry favor and influence to shield themselves from scrutiny.”

“Their testimony may also inform how Congress can strengthen laws to better combat human trafficking. Our goal for this investigation is straightforward: We seek to deliver transparency and accountability for the American people and for survivors,” Comer told Fox News Digital.

RELATED: Bill and Hillary Clinton agree to testify about Jeffrey Epstein after contempt of Congress threat from Republicans

Photo by the US Justice Department/Handout/Anadolu/Getty Images

After initially defying congressional subpoenas, the Clintons have since pressured the committee to hold public hearings.

“I have called for the full release of the Epstein files. I have provided a sworn statement of what I know. And just this week, I’ve agreed to appear in person before the committee. But it’s still not enough for Republicans on the House Oversight Committee,” Bill Clinton wrote on social media of Feb. 6. “Now, Chairman Comer says he wants cameras, but only behind closed doors. Who benefits from this arrangement? It’s not Epstein’s victims, who deserve justice. Not the public, who deserve the truth. It serves only partisan interests. This is not fact-finding, it’s pure politics.”

“I will not sit idly as they use me as a prop in a closed-door kangaroo court by a Republican Party running scared. If they want answers, let’s stop the games & do this the right way: in a public hearing, where the American people can see for themselves what this is really about,” the former president added.

RELATED: Bill Clinton accuses GOP of setting up 'kangaroo court' over Epstein testimony — and demands public hearing

James Comer. Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Comer has not ruled out public hearings, but has insisted on first holding depositions behind closed doors.

“The subpoena and the contempt was on a deposition. If we get to the deposition and there’s something meaningful to have a hearing, if they still want some more oversight, then I think the members of my committee would love to have them in for a public hearing,” Comer told reporters in early February.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Clintons defy Epstein subpoenas — but Glenn Beck says DON’T jail them. Here’s his shocking reason why.



Both Bill and Hillary Clinton refused to appear after the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed them for closed-door depositions regarding Jeffrey Epstein and the federal government's handling of his crimes. The slippery duo even sent letters to Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) in advance of their scheduled dates, calling the subpoenas invalid and nothing more than political retribution.

Now the committee is seeking to hold both Clintons in contempt of Congress, which could result in jail time if they’re found guilty.

Many conservatives are elated at the prospect of seeing Washington’s most scandal-laden couple behind bars, but Glenn Beck says jailing the Clintons for this particular crime would be a huge mistake.

He equates incarcerating the Clintons over contempt of Congress to giving an arsonist a book of matches.

“We now have all of these scandals, all of these NGOs making all kinds of money on your tax dollars, funding the destruction of America as we know it. We're all in bed with giant corporations and the WEF — the Clinton Foundation is all lined up in it,” he says.

This insidious network is behind all the violent anti-ICE protests, the death-to-America-style riots, and the push for socialism that is destroying the country from the inside. But all the while, these elites have been quietly building an elite-controlled system that will be implemented when the old system has been successfully burned to the ground.

The Clintons, Glenn explains, have their finger on the red button that could set off chaos like we have never seen before and usher in the Great Reset he has been warning about for years. To tempt them to push it — especially at a time when Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) is hinting at civil war — is insane.

It’s not that prosecuting and jailing the Clintons are completely off the table, but to use your ace card on the Epstein case, which Glenn insists will never go anywhere, is stupid.

“Are we going to find out what really happened with Epstein? I don't think so — ever. Why? Because all of the evidence has been in the hands of the Republicans and the Democrats and the Republicans and the Democrats over and over and over again for years. … [The evidence] has all been destroyed. It's all gone,” he says.

It’s no secret — even to the Democrats — that the Clintons “are very bad people. … They have spooked everybody because they're so good at being very bad people. Even the people in the press who used to be for them are now just so scared of them,” Glenn continues.

“You don't try to kill the king unless you can kill the king. You don't try to take out the Clintons and wound them, because they'll kill you. And I don't mean that literally. Or do I?” he winks.

If you really want to take out the Clinton empire, “you better come prepared with the goods,” and unfortunately, to the utter dismay of all, the Epstein case isn’t the “goods” we were told it was.

Even so, there are plenty of “goods” on the Clintons, says Glenn. “We have it all,” he says, referring to the long list of documented scandals the Clintons have been central in.

While Glenn would “love” to see Bill and Hillary perp-walked for committing the same crime that landed former Trump advisers Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro behind bars, he knows that it would only cause more chaos in America’s streets.

“Remember, they're the arsonist. You don't want to hand them matches. And it's not because they're above the law, not because they're untouchable, but because this specific path leads to nowhere good. You don't have anything on them. And they will use it for all that it is worth,” he warns.

To hear more of Glenn’s commentary, watch the video above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Glenn Beck exposes the REAL motive behind Clintons’ Epstein subpoena rejection



Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have refused to honor congressional subpoenas requiring them to testify about Jeffrey Epstein and the federal government’s handling of his crimes.

The former president and secretary of state responded with a sharply worded letter to House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) — also posted publicly on X — dismissing the probe as partisan politics designed to distract from the Trump administration’s failures, including aggressive ICE operations; January 6 pardons; threats to funding and free speech for universities, media companies, and law firms; the dismantling of national security agencies (such as USAID); and the weaponization of the Department of Justice.

“Every person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences. For us, now is that time,” the letter declares.

“Really? Now? ... Now, when you’re asked to testify in front of Congress under subpoena about Epstein? That’s the straw that broke the camel's back?” Glenn Beck retorts, calling the timing of their sudden “fight” for “principles” suspiciously convenient.

Their letter and refusal aren’t about justice or principle at all — they’re about what the Clintons have always prized most: self-preservation.

In the letter, Washington’s most scandal-ridden, slippery duo wrote, “You accepted the least from those who know the most but demand the most from those who know the least. To say that you can't complete your work without speaking to us is simply bizarre.”

Glenn finds this statement so absurd, it’s almost funny. “Is there anybody that was closer to Epstein than Bill and Hillary Clinton? I mean, maybe not Hillary, but Bill? I mean, he was there all the time,” he claps back. “In the stairway of the Epstein mansion was that weird-ass picture of Bill Clinton in the dress with his legs draped over wearing heels.”

The letter also addressed the potential for contempt of Congress charges. “We expect you will direct your committee to seek to hold us in contempt,” they wrote, denouncing such an act as a partisan move that will only halt Congress.

In 2022, however, Hillary Clinton publicly supported holding both Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro — former Trump advisers — in contempt of Congress for defying the Jan. 6 subpoenas.

But now that the same fate is staring them in the face, the Clintons are suddenly calling it “injustice.”

“You don’t get to suddenly sound like James Madison after you spent four straight years trying to put Donald Trump in prison by any means necessary,” Glenn says, recalling that “it was Hillary Clinton that started the whole Russiagate thing.”

“[The Clintons] did everything — Russian collusion, manufactured intelligence, leaked FISA warrants, media operation masquerading as journalism, all of that stuff,” he continues. “Now, we know that all of this stuff is based on lies, so when I hear warnings about the Justice Department being used as a cudgel, ... when I hear lectures about intimidation and subpoena and punishments of enemies, you know, I don’t dismiss them, but I also don’t forget who the people were that normalized it.”

The truth is, everyone who was tied to Epstein in any way — not excluding President Trump — should be questioned, Glenn says.

“Doesn’t mean they all go to jail. Doesn’t mean they all did something. But you should be questioned — all of them,” he says.

“I don’t want show trials. I don’t want immunity for friends or punishment for enemies. ... I want equal justice under the law — you know, the kind written in the Constitution and almost never practiced by anybody in power lately.”

But Glenn knows the odds of real justice ever catching up to the Clintons are slim to none.

“They’re above it all,” he acknowledges.

To hear more of Glenn’s commentary, watch the video above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Hillary Clinton defies Epstein subpoena: Time for Trump to lock her up — for real this time



After being subpoenaed by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee to provide closed-door deposition testimony related to their past associations with Jeffrey Epstein and the federal government's handling of investigations into his horrific crimes, both Bill and Hillary Clinton failed to appear on their scheduled testimonies.

The former president and Secretary of State sent letters in advance stating that they would not appear, condemning the subpoenas as legally invalid and politically motivated.

Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) has since announced that the committee will proceed with contempt of Congress proceedings against both Clintons, with a committee vote planned for next week, potentially leading to a full House vote and referral to the Justice Department.

BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler says that this is President Trump’s second chance to do what he should’ve done a long time ago: Arrest Hillary Clinton.

“Bill and Hillary Clinton think they’re above the law. Well, in a sense, nothing else is new. They’ve thought they were above the law for a long time because sadly, quite tragically, they have been,” Liz says. “They’ve virtually never been held accountable for anything wrong that they have done, and so in a sense, who can blame them for thinking that they can get away flouting the law once again?”

She recalls that back in 2022, former Trump advisers Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro were both hit with two counts of criminal contempt of Congress and spent four months in federal prison as a result.

In their joint letter, the Clintons claimed executive privilege — the implied power of the U.S. president and executive branch officials to withhold certain confidential communications from Congress, courts, and the public. While this might go unchallenged for the former president, there’s no chance it’ll work for Hillary, Liz says.

“Who does Hillary Clinton think she is? Well, I know she thinks that she’s the president of the United States, but she’s not. She was the Secretary of State. She was a senator. She was a first lady. She’s now a private citizen. She’s exempt from nothing,” she says.

The list of crimes that should’ve already landed crooked Hillary behind bars is long: “She abused her position of power, especially when she was Secretary of State, to enrich herself and her husband. She engaged in pay-to-play quid pro quos, where she sold access to herself and to the vice president, even to the president.”

“And when she was caught, what did she do?” Liz asks. “Well, she brought out BleachBit ... a computer program to essentially nuke every piece of information on a piece of technology so that there’s no possibility of any forensic analysis.”

“Lock her up.”

To hear more of Liz’s analysis, watch the episode above.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Did USAID really pay for Chelsea Clinton’s wedding? Here are the FACTS



Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency have been peeling back the false humanitarian veneer of the U.S. Agency for International Development and exposing the rot that lies beneath.

Billions of our taxpayer dollars have been funding hundreds of radical leftist, anti-American, and utterly ridiculous causes.

But as more and more corruption comes to light thanks to the Trump administration’s commitment to end wasteful government spending, we have to be mindful that the information we’re receiving and sharing is factual.

Glenn Beck brings up one story that’s currently garnering a lot of attention: the notion that USAID dollars paid for Chelsea Clinton’s wedding.

But is this true or just a rumor?

As of right now, the story has not been substantiated.

“There’s a lot of stuff coming out online, and you can't quote this stuff. You have to be really, really careful because we don't want to wreck our credibility,” says Glenn. If “we find out that it is absolutely true, that's when we can go and say, ‘Round them up, let's put them in court.”’

For now, “We know that the Clinton initiative did get $84 million,” but whether or not any of that went toward the wedding of the Clinton’s only child remains to be seen.

“I would be shocked if they were that bold,” admits Glenn.

Regardless of the veracity of the rumor, it’s still undeniably true that the government has been recklessly spending our hard-earned money on causes that do not advance American interests or even provide true aid to other countries.

“You work four months a year to pay your income tax. All of that has been wasted your entire life,” says Glenn.

Even though people have “gotten so used to corruption in our government ... the corruption that we're finding now is beyond imagination,” he says. And it’s not just Democrats who are the culprits. There are plenty of conservatives characterized by “graft and greed and cronyism.”

Every corrupt deed, regardless of which political party it’s tied to, needs to see the light.

To hear more of Glenn’s analysis, watch the clip above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

America’s Corrupt Political Class Should Be Prosecuted, Not Trump

The people telling you Trump is uniquely corrupt want you to ignore decades of worse crimes committed by politicians favored by the establishment.

'I'm a little concerned today': Kari Lake emphasizes she's not suicidal and her brakes work after Hillary Clinton states Lake should 'never' win



Hillary Clinton took aim at Kari Lake on a satellite radio show, noting that she doesn't want her "anywhere near power." Hours later, Lake humorously invoked the "Clinton Body Count" theory, publicly underscoring that she is in good mental and physical health.

Clinton wants women empowered, but only if they're Democrats

Former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton went on SiriusXM’s "Mornings with Zerlina" on Thursday to drum up resentment for Republicans and to motivate Democrats to vote in the midterm election.

Zerlina Maxwell, who previously worked for Clinton and had her MSNBC show canceled earlier this year, raised the issue of violent political rhetoric.

Maxwell echoed Chelsea Clinton's sentiment early in the show, telling Hillary Clinton that there was "always a whisper of violence around you and your family ever since the early days going back to Arkansas."

Maxwell was referring to alleged violent rhetoric pointed at the Clintons, not the numerous people in the family's orbit who, according to the Daily Mail, "died in suspicious circumstances since the early 1990s."

Clinton suggested that those whose free speech she perceives to be violent or unacceptable should not be allowed on social media platforms. According to Clinton, it is not just free speech that incites violence that is a problem, but free speech that is "indifferent" to how it could be received.

Besides the "marketplace of ideas" having ideas she doesn't like on display, Clinton also expressed frustration with there allegedly being too many male politicians at the local level.

Maxwell asked the 75-year-old, "Do you think we will have a woman president?"

Clinton's mind went to Arizona.

The twice-rejected presidential candidate said, "I just don't want some woman with whom I profoundly disagree on the other side of the aisle getting there first."

"That woman running for governor of Arizona ... I don't want her anywhere near power," said Clinton, refusing to identify Lake by name. The former presidential candidate cackled and then stressed, "Never!"

Clinton claimed that Lake had laughed at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband's alleged assault by an illegal alien.

Maxwell advanced the claim, saying "anybody who could laugh at a horrifying situation like that, that's not somebody I want in charge of the 7/11 ..."

Lake provides update on her well-being — just in case

On Fox News' "Hannity" Thursday night, Sean Hannity pressed Lake on her thoughts about high-profile Democrats like former President Barack Obama and Clinton campaigning against her.

Lake responded, "First it was Liz Cheney last week, and I just laughed that off. And now I'm living rent-free in Barack Obama's mind, and then Eric Holder today."

"But I was a little concerned today," said Lake. "I'm going to be honest ... I saw Hillary Clinton bad-mouthing me. And she looked angry and actually scared."

Laked added, "Completely unrelated, I want you to know, just in case you're wondering, I'm in perfect health, my brakes on my car are in good shape, and I'm not suicidal."

None
— James (@James) 1667527651

Hannity responded, "One of the things that has endeared you to the people of Arizona and around the country is you got a great sense of humor."

Lake's comical intimation that Clinton might pose a threat to her or have something to do with a brake malfunction is a reference to a decades-old theory alleging that some of the human obstacles to the Clinton family's assumption or maintenance of power died from less than natural causes.

'Clinton Body Count'

Vox reported that the "body count meme" started in 1993 after Indianapolis lawyer Linda Thompson compiled a list of 34 people connected to the Clintons who had died. Thompson titled the list, "The Clinton Body Count: Coincidence of the Kiss of Death?"

Newsweek reported that the Indianapolis lawyer had been enraged by the 1993 Waco, Texas, siege where federal agents under then-President Bill Clinton torched 76 Branch Davidians, including 25 children.

Former Rep. William Dannemeyer (R-Calif.) whittled the list down to 24 people and demanded hearings on the matter.

Snopes claimed the list to be "false," noting that "Clinton was acquainted with some people who died — that's about all one can make of this list."

Thompson had also reportedly admitted having "no direct evidence" of the Clintons killing anyone.

The list, which includes Hillary Clinton's colleague and former deputy White House counsel Vince Foster and various others from the Clintons' time in the White House, has grown over time.

A recent addition is the Clintons' former good friend Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted pedophile and child sex trafficker. The Clintons spent time at the pedophile's ranch. Bill Clinton flew on Epstein's private jet at least 26 times and visited the pedophile's island.

Epstein allegedly died by suicide in August 2019. The video cameras outside his cell allegedly malfunctioned, and potentially relevant CCTV footage was erased by "technical errors."

When The Left Tries To Control You With Fear, Conjure Up The Courage Of Kanye

In withstanding the public flogging, Kanye is inspiring people across the country to break free from their mental chains.

BOMBSHELL: Rose McGowan claims Gavin Newsom's wife tried to silence her on Harvey Weinstein scandal



On "The Rubin Report" Thursday, actress Rose McGowan, one of the first women to publicly accuse movie mogul Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault, told BlazeTV host Dave Rubin that she received a shocking phone call from Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom's wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, roughly six months before the Weinstein scandal exploded.

According to McGowan, Newsom tried to arrange a meeting between her and Weinstein's lawyer David Boies, who wanted to know "what it would take to make [McGowan] happy."

"She called me on behalf of a Theranos board member — the longtime lawyer of Hillary and Bill Clinton, and Weinstein — one David Boies. So this woman I don't know, some blonde lady with the last name Newsom, cold-calls me and is like, 'David Boies wants to know what it would take to make you happy,'" McGowan explained.

McGowan also detailed how the Democratic Party has protected various nefarious people like Harvey Weinstein and why she is voting for Larry Elder, the front-running candidate to replace Gov. Newsom in next Tuesday's recall election in California.

Watch the video below for more details:


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.