Can political dissent be classified as harassment? One Canadian city says yes.



A small city on the outskirts of Toronto has become an unlikely front line in the debate over free speech and government power — a debate increasingly familiar to Americans as well.

Pickering Councillor Lisa Robinson, one of Canada's most controversial municipal politicians, is seeking the mayor's office even as she faces fresh restrictions on her participation in council proceedings and yet another clash with the city's integrity commissioner.

'And it's kind of like a group-think mentality over there.'

Robinson has become a cause célèbre among conservative and libertarian activists after repeated clashes over free speech, Pride displays, government transparency, and municipal governance. Her critics say she has harassed city employees and spread misinformation; her supporters say she is being punished for asking uncomfortable questions and refusing to conform.

Reagan inspiration

The latest dispute marks another chapter in a political battle that has already cost Robinson nearly two years of pay and raises a larger question: Are public institutions increasingly treating dissent on politically sensitive topics as misconduct rather than disagreement to be answered through debate?

Asked what motivates her, Robinson reaches for one of Ronald Reagan's most famous observations.

"Well, you know, Ronald Reagan once said that government is not the solution to the problem; government is the problem, and I can honestly now say that I agree with that statement 100%," Robinson told Blaze Media.

"So I'm running for mayor to return City Hall back to the people. As you know, during my tenure [as] city councillor, I've witnessed so many things — I've witnessed firsthand extortion, corruption, lying, a ['rules for thee but not for me']attitude, a lot of wasteful spending [of] the taxpayers' dollars."

Outsider mentality

Robinson's latest controversy stems from a YouTube video in which she questioned the narrative surrounding the alleged discovery of "mass graves" at the former residential school in Kamloops, British Columbia. Robinson argued that politicians and media outlets transformed preliminary ground-penetrating radar findings into claims that hundreds of children's remains had been discovered.

Her remarks prompted another complaint to the city's integrity commissioner and renewed accusations that she was spreading misinformation and causing harm to indigenous communities. The dispute has become emblematic of a broader argument in Canada and the United States over where to draw the line between controversial political speech and conduct that public institutions deem harmful.

The controversy is only the latest in a long-running conflict between Robinson and Pickering's political establishment.

She says she first encountered that establishment mentality when a senior municipal official advised her that she should stop thinking of herself as an outsider.

"With all due respect, Councillor Robinson, you are no longer an outsider looking in," she recalls being told.

"That really stuck with me. I guess they just figured that I was going to just follow along with the status quo and just ... go along with everything that they said, no questions asked.

"And it's kind of like a group-think mentality over there, and the moment that you start asking questions, that you start going on your own ... any time that you start to push back against the establishment, then you know you're going to get the reception that I have received over the last four years of docking my pay."

RELATED: Will Alberta leave Canada? Either way, Premier Danielle Smith is feeling the heat

NurPhoto/Bloomberg/Getty Images

The price of speech

Robinson says she has effectively gone nearly two years without receiving a salary from the city because of repeated suspensions.

Her vision for Pickering, she says, is straightforward.

"When I'm mayor, I want to create a utopia here: Stop the rising taxes, protect the people, protect their properties, [and] give children the ability to thrive here in Pickering."

She says the city has allowed prime farmland to be gobbled up by "the greedy hands of developers" who have created a "senseless" urban sprawl.

"So it's my whole entire campaign: I'm basically running to return City Hall to the people."

Robinson says she once lost three months' pay after suggesting she would use strong mayoral powers to overhaul City Hall.

"[I said] I would go into City Hall; I'd get rid of the [chief administrative officer], the city solicitor, and a bunch of the directors, because corruption does start at the top. I would tear it down, build it back up from the bottom, and give it back to the people. And I lost three months' pay for that."

The city sees the matter differently. An independent workplace investigation commissioned by Pickering concluded that Robinson's statements and actions toward staff constituted workplace harassment and created a "poisoned work environment." Robinson disputes those findings, saying she has never threatened city employees and that criticizing government decisions and public officials is not harassment but democratic accountability.

'Standing my ground'

Despite the sanctions and controversies, Robinson says she has no regrets.

"I have done nothing illegal. All I have done is speak the truth and try to make people know what happens in your local politics."

Asked what she considers her proudest accomplishment as a city councillor, despite often serving without pay, Robinson's answer is simple.

"I guess it would have to be just standing my ground, staying with my morals and my integrity, fighting as hard as I can for the people. Even if I'm not successful, I know that I have done everything that I can thus far to help the people."

Whether Robinson is ultimately viewed as a victim of institutional overreach or an elected official who repeatedly crossed the line, her battles with Pickering have turned one municipal council chamber into a test case for a question increasingly confronting democracies on both sides of the border: When does dissent become misconduct?

Pro-Trump actress Kristy Swanson: If 'MY PRESIDENT' is deleted from 'Home Alone 2,' then cut me out of 'Pretty in Pink,' 'Ferris Bueller'



On the heels of the recent left-wing outcry to scrub President Donald Trump from his scene with Macaulay Culkin in "Home Alone 2: Lost in New York" — apparently since doing so would soothe triggered psyches across the fruited plain — conservative actress Kristy Swanson is calling the left's bluff:

If Cancel Culture is really going to have Donald J. Trump removed from the John Hughes movie “Home Alone,” then in… https://t.co/1iOPA1TMHN
— Kristy Swanson (@Kristy Swanson)1610754557.0

"If Cancel Culture is really going to have Donald J. Trump removed from the John Hughes movie 'Home Alone,' then in support of MY PRESIDENT, I'd like to have myself officially removed from the John Hughes' films, 'Pretty In Pink' and 'Ferris Buhler's [sic] Day Off,'" Swanson tweeted Friday.

Hughes — the iconic creative force behind numerous teen-oriented flicks of the 1980s — directed "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" and wrote "Pretty in Pink." He produced "Home Alone 2: Lost in New York."

In the latter movie, Trump makes a cameo and offers directions to Culkin's famous young character Kevin McCallister in the Plaza Hotel, which Trump owned in the early 1990s. Culkin has applauded calls for Trump getting deleted from the scene.

Left-wing Hollywood hits back

For sticking her neck out amid the current firestorm of left-wing rage at Trump supporters since the Jan. 6 rioting at the U.S. Capitol, emboldened Hollywood elites snapped back at Swanson on Twitter:

@KristySwansonXO I’m sorry. Who are you?
— Jane Lynch (@Jane Lynch)1610807039.0
@KristySwansonXO So would we.
— ✌🏼rosanna arquette (@✌🏼rosanna arquette)1610813036.0
This is weak, Kristy. I was removed from AS GOOD AS IT GETS and BAD SANTA years before Trump even THOUGHT of runnin… https://t.co/ORoSrhPfZd
— Patton Oswalt (@Patton Oswalt)1610816192.0
Retweet if you’re okay with @KristySwansonXO being removed from every movie she was ever in. https://t.co/L5z5aUDvcS
— ken olin (@ken olin)1610830789.0

Anything else?

Swanson hasn't been afraid to show her support for Trump supporter or her conservative politics. In 2019 she took issue with a teacher at her son's school who allegedly wouldn't stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.

The same year she starred with fellow conservative Dean Cain in a stage show featuring readings of anti-Trump text messages between former FBI agent Peter Strzok and former FBI lawyer Lisa Page. It will come as no surprise that there were death threats:

Death Threat. “and set the theater on fire.” Please Report 👇🏼 https://t.co/k4rTxnbVMC
— Kristy Swanson (@Kristy Swanson)1558558575.0

It would be a shame if Swanson's brief but hilarious scene from "Ferris Bueller" — during which she dialogues with another political conservative, Ben Stein — was cut. Here it is:

My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend...youtu.be

Horowitz: 7 ways conservatives can fight back at the state and local levels



Everyone is hoping and assuming 2021 will be a better year than 2020. But it will not happen on its own. We must get on the playing field and make it happen.

Assuming Joe Biden is sitting in the White House on January 20, there is little we can do to influence the direction of federal policy in the coming years. And given that too few Republicans in the Senate plan to stand against Biden's fraudulent election victory this week, we are out of options at the federal level to fight back against voter fraud. Many parts of the country are irrevocably lost, and certain federal policies, particularly foreign policy, are headed down a dark path. But does that mean that in conservative parts of the country, we must submit to unconstitutional tyranny, especially from an illegitimately elected president? Only if we allow it. Now is both the time and the opportunity to fight back.

Republicans control state legislatures in 31 states. They control the trifecta in 24 states plus Kentucky, where there is a Democrat governor but veto-proof GOP majorities in the legislature. Additionally, Trump won the vote in 83% of the counties, and a large portion of them have GOP elected officials or officials who can certainly be influenced and pressured into going along with local popular sentiment. With legislative bodies going back into session this January, now is the time for us to make a stand for freedom throughout the country.

Did New York and California ever cooperate with Trump? Not a chance. They became even more liberal under his tenure and even resisted federal enforcement of the law against foreign criminals who violated federal sovereignty. Why can't we do the same in the states and counties we supposedly control to at least return to constitutional governance?

To that end, here is a list of seven immediate agenda items for conservatives to focus on at the local and state levels to ensure that at least pockets of this country remain a sanctuary for ordered liberty and constitutional governance.

1) Constitutional sanctuaries against COVID fascism: Conservatives must immediately organize and push for the adoption of a declaration of rights and principles in the county and state legislative bodies over which they wield the most influence to make those jurisdiction sanctuaries against mask mandates, forced business closures, and draconian treatment of children in school. These declarations will affirm our rights to life, liberty, and property, terminate all emergency delegated authority to governors, and use the doctrine of lesser magistrates to fight unconstitutional suspensions of liberties from higher-ups in government.

2)Focus on local offices: Groups of patriots in each county need to assess, communicate with, pressure, and, if need be, recruit against the existing school board members, sheriffs, county judges, county prosecutors, county executives and commissioners. This is where all the power lies. There is no reason why in the 2,000+ counties Trump carried by easy margins that all of the aforementioned officials should not be on the same page to resist state or federal enforcement of unconstitutional lockdowns, mask tyranny, and abuse of our children at school. If not, we should immediately be working on candidates for those offices who share the values that reflect the presidential voting patterns of the county.

3) Immediately primary every lockdown governor: How is someone like Mike DeWine even able to stand for re-election this cycle, given that he has instituted the same lockdown policies as Andrew Cuomo in conservative Ohio? The answer is because we are not doing our job. Governors like DeWine in Ohio, Bill Lee in Tennessee, Brian Kemp in Georgia, Kay Ivey in Alabama, Brad Little in Idaho, Chris Sununu in New Hampshire, Greg Abbott in Texas, and Mark Gordon in Wyoming should easily attract a primary challenge. Trump should be recruited to support and rally for challengers. Why should we only have two anti-lockdown governors (DeSantis and Noem) of the 27 alleged Republican state executives in the country?

4) Vote on anti-crime/anti-riot and pro-self-defense legislation: While our governments took away our liberty with coronafascism in 2020, they also took away our safety by publicly blessing, rather than deterring, BLM and Antifa rioting. Additionally, they have released thousands of criminals, which has, in part, led to the sharpest increase in crime in a generation. Every Republican-controlled state legislature should immediately push legislation toughening sentencing on repeat violent offenders, clamping down on mob violence, and expanding self-defense laws. Ron DeSantis' anti-rioting bill he plans to propose to the Florida legislature should be a model for two dozen other states.

5) Strengthen election integrity: The first order of business in states Republicans control should be to ban mail-in voting and ballot harvesting. They must make sure all elections are secure. I've detailed a list of nine ideas that should be pursued at a minimum. What about the federal courts inevitably inserting themselves into these laws? That leads me to #6.

6) Tell the federal courts to pound sand: If states had the "right" to thwart federal immigration law under Trump, according to these courts, and if they had the right to ignore their own election laws in a presidential election that affects the entire country, then it's time for states to control areas of law that legitimately fall under their jurisdiction without judicial intervention. After turning down Trump's lawsuits, the federal courts have forfeited any ability to get involved in election law. Red states need to stand up to them once and for all and teach them that federalism is a two-way street.

7) Block refugee resettlement: If Joe Biden becomes president, he will immediately increase the number of refugees we admit and force them upon the states. Additionally, he will try to resettle more Central American teens who crash our border as refugees. Although states don't control the visa admission process, refugee resettlement requires state cooperation to place large numbers of refugees in local communities. While Americans are locked down, it makes no sense to admit more people from around the world. If states can welcome illegal aliens, then states can close their doors to the antiquated institution of refugee resettlement.

Notice a pattern? Most of the power on the relevant issues resides in the states where Republicans control a significant amount of power. They make it seem as if the world hinges on a razor-thin RINO majority in the Senate in Washington, yet they refuse to use the power in meaningful ways even when they control all of state government with supermajorities. The same legislatures that declined to challenge the election results refuse to fight on any other issue as well. That can all change if conservatives train their fire on local officials and candidates and fight national issues at the local level.

So, the next time Republicans give the excuse of "but Biden" and "but Pelosi" to justify their inaction on an issue, remember there are two dozen states that should look like a conservative version of California. They have their sanctuary states for tyranny and criminals. We should have ours for ordered liberty and the Constitution.