Former intelligence official tells Congress that the government is hiding ALIEN BODIES and CRASHED UFOs



Sara Gonzales, Larry Taunton, and Jason Buttrill join to unpack a recent congressional hearing in which a supposed whistleblower testified that the U.S. government is hiding evidence of extraterrestrial beings and UAPs (unidentified anomalous phenomena).

Sara plays a clip of David Grusch, United States Air Force officer and former intelligence official, claiming that officials (whom he never explicitly identifies) informed him that the federal government has a top-secret UFO “recovery program” and is in possession of “non-human entities” and “crashed crafts.”

“Biologics came with some of these recoveries,” he tells Rep. Nancy Mace.

“Were they … human or non-human biologics?” she asks.

“Non-human,” Grusch says, “and that was the assessment of people with direct knowledge of the program that I talked to that are currently still on the program.”

But when Mace asks about eyewitness accounts and other documentation, Grusch tells her that they will need to set up a SCIF hearing if she wants that information.

Grush also tells her that he has “multiple colleagues … that got physically injured” by these non-human entities and that what “I personally witnessed, myself and my wife, was very disturbing.”

“So ... any takers? Is there life out there?” Sara asks Larry and Jason.

Larry is highly skeptical and doesn’t buy Grusch’s testimony because “he can’t answer half the questions,” only “the million-dollar question – that these biologics were non-human.”

Sara agrees, saying, “It is weird that you're coming forward” as “a whistleblower … but 'I won’t tell you all the evidence and details.'”

Jason, on the other hand, is conflicted.

Recalling a documentary he once watched “about the government people that would … push a UFO narrative to hide actual military projects,” Jason can’t help but wonder if this is just another “giant psy-op…a distraction,” especially considering this hearing is occurring in tandem with the ongoing Hunter Biden scandal.

However, he also knows that “this whistleblower is legit,” as “he was high up in intelligence” at one point in his career.

“I think he’s being honest; I think he’s telling them exactly what he’s heard,” Jason says.

To hear their full conversation, watch the clip below.


Want more from The News & Why It Matters?

To enjoy more roundtable rundowns of the top stories of the day, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Republicans point out there is no coincidence in the timing of Dr. Fauci's retirement announcement



Republican lawmakers and conservative critics suggested there is no coincidence behind the timing of Dr. Anthony Fauci's retirement from government service.

Fauci, 81, announced Monday that he is stepping down from his role as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and as President Joe Biden's chief medical adviser in December to pursue other career goals.

What did Republicans say?

When the dust settles after the 2022 midterm elections, Republicans will almost certainly have control of the House.

If that happens, Republicans will control committees and be in charge of setting the policy agenda of the House. They will also be able to freely conduct oversight investigations and will have the power to create special investigative committees, like the Jan. 6. committee.

Fauci's critics thus argued that he is choosing to retire from government service in December — as opposed to the end of President Joe Biden's term as he originally indicated — because he will be the subject of congressional investigations.

  • "Dr. Fauci is conveniently resigning from his position in December before House Republicans have an opportunity to hold him accountable for destroying our country over these past three years. This guy is a coward," said Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.).
  • "Wow, Dr. Fauci says he'll resign just a few days before Republicans possibly retake Congress. What a coincidence. Hold the #hearings anyways," said conservative radio host Glenn Beck.
  • "Fauci isn’t getting off that easily!! When Republicans take the majority, Fauci should be ready to receive a SUBPOENA!" said Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Texas).
  • "It's no coincidence that Dr. Fauci just announced that he will resign from the government in December, which is right after Republicans will take back the House and immediately plan oversight into our pandemic response and his funding of gain of function research at the Wuhan Lab," said Mercedes Schlapp, a former top official in the Trump administration.
  • "Anthony Fauci has just announced he’s stepping aside in December — just before Republicans take the House & Senate back," said Eric Schmitt, a GOP nominee for the U.S. Senate.
  • "Dr. Fauci announces he’s stepping down in December. Fauci’s running scared with Republicans taking control of the House, at minimum, next year," said radio host Clay Travis.

But what did lawmakers promise?

Republican lawmakers vowed that, despite Fauci's retirement from government service, they will still investigate.

"Fauci’s resignation will not prevent a full-throated investigation into the origins of the pandemic. He will be asked to testify under oath regarding any discussions he participated in concerning the lab leak," Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) promised.

"So Dr. Fauci is stepping down in December. That won’t stop a Republican Congress from telling the truth about his disastrous tenure and holding him accountable for the mistakes he made and the lies he told," Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said.

How exactly those investigations will take shape remains to be seen.

FAN FICTION: The Left’s Sham Jan. 6 Hearings Hit Prime Time | Ep 515

FAN FICTION: The Left’s Sham Jan. 6 Hearings Hit Prime Time | Ep 515

Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Senate Dems seek delay in Amy Coney Barrett hearings citing coronavirus risk



Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) issued a joint statement Friday calling on Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to hold off on moving forward with hearings on U.S. Supreme Court justice nominee Amy Coney Barrett, citing risks of spreading COVID-19 in light of President Donald Trump and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) testing positive for the virus.

What are the details?

Schumer and Feinstein — who have both been adamantly opposed to President Trump nominating a replacement for recently-deceased Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ahead of the Nov. 3 election — wrote that it is "premature" for Graham "to commit to a hearing schedule when we do not know the full extent of potential exposure stemming from the president's infection and before the White House puts in place a contact tracing plan to prevent further spread of the disease."

The Democrats also stated that the "infection" of Lee, who also sits on the Judiciary Committee, "makes even more clear that health and safety must guide the schedule for all Senate activities, including hearings."

According to Schumer and Feinstein, virtual hearings on Barrett's nomination would not be "an acceptable substitute" given the magnitude of deciding "a lifetime appointment to the federal bench."

They argued that moving forward would turn "this already illegitimate process" into "a dangerous one."

A Republican aide called the Democrats' latest effort to stall Barrett's nomination hearings "a nakedly partisan ploy," telling Fox News, "Everyone is concerned about health right now and that comes first, but the business of the Senate and this Supreme Court confirmation process doesn't stop. That's why we've been at work."

The outlet reported that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R) argued that Senate hearings have already been conducted remotely since the COVID-19 pandemic hit, and suggested virtual proceedings would be the appropriate way to handle the process for Barrett.

McConnell told the "Hugh Hewitt Show," on Friday, "They've been careful already. Members, some of them, have done their interview in previous hearing remotely. This sort of underscores, I think, the need to do that. And I think every precaution needs to be taken because we don't anticipate any Democratic support at all, either in committee or in the full Senate, and therefore everybody needs to be in an all-hands-on-deck mindset."

However, the majority leader also signaled that Barrett's confirmation could come after Election Day, telling Fox News' Bret Baier, "This Republican Senate was elected for a term that ends in January of next year. The president was elected for a four-year term that ends Jan. 20 of next year."