COVER-UP: The phony Jan 6 committee deleted encrypted files



The truth about January 6 continues to be exposed.

Over 100 encrypted files relating to the January 6 Capitol riot probe were mysteriously deleted — and have now been recovered and password-protected.

The evidence is considered public information by Representative Barry Loudermilk of Georgia, who says it contains interviews and depositions that could prove crucial to making the case against the government.

Loudermilk believes that Bennie Thompson and Liz Cheney intentionally obstructed the subcommittee by failing to preserve critical information and videos as required by house rules.

“Now, this isn’t the first time they’ve been accused of this, because obviously, they did it,” Sara Gonzales comments.

Donald Trump made the same accusation in a January 2024 Truth Social post:

“Why did American Disaster Liz Cheney, who suffers from TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome), and was defeated for Congress by the largest margin for a sitting Congressman or Congresswoman in the history of our Country, ILLEGALLY DELETE & DESTROY most of the evidence, and related items, from the January 6th Committee of Political Thugs and Misfits,” Trump wrote.

Loudermilk also claimed that the FBI, Secret Service, and the Department of Defense had intelligence regarding the January 6 attack before it happened.

“That’s called a false flag,” Eric July explains.


Want more from 'The News & Why It Matters?'

To enjoy more rundowns of the top stories of the day, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Harry Dunn's history of 'mental health issues' was on 'full display' on January 6



Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn – the “hero,” the “martyr” who President Biden says “acted with remarkable courage and valor to defend both our institutions and our people” during the January 6 Capitol riots … well, frankly, his account of what happened has serious issues.

Dunn has been hailed by the media as a hero for his courage in the face of violence on January 6, for “the persistent emotional trauma” he suffered that day.

“Make no mistake about it – there were a lot of officers injured that day,” says investigative journalist Steve Baker, who has access to the J6 tapes. “I have reviewed hundreds and hundreds of hours of video, and there was violence. I saw violence there that day with my own eyes.”

The only thing is, Harry Dunn wasn’t impacted by any of it, although his copious testimonies, his interviews, and his lucrative new book, "Standing My Ground: A Capitol Police Officer’s Fight for Accountability and Good Trouble After January 6th," say otherwise.

“In his memoir published in October, Dunn described how he was the target of vicious racial abuse, claiming that ‘20, 30, 40, 50 people’ crowded around him and chanted the N-word during the chaos of the afternoon,” writes Baker.

And yet, in hundreds upon hundreds of hours of tapes, there is nothing showing anything of that nature happening to or even around Dunn.

The truth is, “Dunn spent most of the day avoiding direct conflict with protesters,” Baker explains, but unfortunately, the majority of the public doesn’t know this because the tapes have yet to be released.

As a result, the public has largely bought into Dunn’s faux sob story, but what’s worse is that his testimony has landed many people, including several of the Oath Keepers, behind bars.

So what do the tapes actually show of Dunn’s experience on January 6?

That’s exactly what Steve Baker explores in his latest report: “Harry Dunn’s account of January 6 does not add up. At all.”

He also dives into Dunn’s past, which includes a long history of “anger issues” and “struggles with mental health,” which, as the tapes show, were undoubtedly on “full display” during the riots.

To learn the truth about what Dunn actually encountered on January 6, check out Steve Baker’s in-depth article here and watch the video below.


Want more?

Subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Carlson: 'I know deception when I see it'



Tucker Carlson’s been under fire the past few days, and a lot of it has to do with his recent discovery.

What was it?

Well, he received never-before-seen tapes of the so-called violent insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th and joined Glenn Beck to talk about them.

One of the clips shows the infamous “shaman” from the tapes being led through the Capitol Building by police, calmly and alone.

He explains that he “can't even guess as to what motivated them, to what we’re looking at here — but what [he] can guess is that this is not an act of violent terrorism.”

When pressed on why we’ve been told the riots were something that they weren’t, he continues, “The main conclusion that I drew is that Chuck Schumer, and the horrible lieutenant minority leader, Mitch McConnell, filthy man, and Mitt Romney, and Thom Tillis, and Senator Cramer of North Dakota, like, they’re all lying. They’re all lying.”

He asks, “Why are they lying about what we can see plainly, and why didn’t they want us to see it?” He continues, “I know deception when I see it.”

It’s a fair question, and one that has to be on many Americans' minds as more evidence comes to the surface.

Carlson takes another shot and says, “It’s not enough to say, ‘Oh, it was the worst violent insurrection since Gettysburg’ or something. Stop with the overstatement, the hyperbole, and just explain to me what I’m looking at on the screen.”

Beck adds to it, asking, “Why aren’t they standing up and defending their own honor and integrity?”

It seems that honor and integrity are the last things on their minds.

Carlson doesn’t quite have an answer, saying, “If I allow you to lie to me, then I’m no longer a free man. I’m a slave.”

But he has a theory about their motivation. He explains, “This was a complex event in many facets. They simplified immediately into a good-vs-evil tale, as they do with everything, partly because they lack nuance and imagination, sophistication. But partly because this was a tool they were using for a purpose. It was a cudgel they were using to beat down their opponents and grab more power for themselves. And in effect, what it did was change the definition of terrorism.”

But what have they changed the definition of terrorism to?

Carlson says ominously, they’ve changed it to “Republican voters.”

A terrifying thought, but is he wrong?


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.