Now presenting 'misogynoir' — the Democrats' latest reason it’s never their fault
Democrats have never run out of ways to cast themselves as victims — and according to BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales, it's only getting worse.
“Democrats and liberals, they’re just always victims. They are just always the victims in life. Nothing is ever good enough. They always have to complain that they’re oppressed. Someone is oppressing them,” she says.
“And I’d like to introduce you at this point to Representative Maxwell Frost, a Democrat from Florida,” she adds, playing a clip of Frost from a Jubilee debate.
“I don’t have a ton of money in a bank account when I decided to run for office, so I had to hustle and make ends meet, which is the thing that you are all telling Gen Z,” Frost said, arguing that the American dream is out of reach.
“That’s the American dream,” his opponent, wearing a patriotic headband, interjected.
“You lived it,” he added, before clapping along with the rest of the Jubilee debaters.
Frost then denied that it was the “American dream.”
“The American dream isn’t driving Uber to barely make ends meet. The American dream is upward mobility and being able to have success,” he argued.
“You went from driving an Uber to being a politician,” his opponent said, dumbfounded. “Is that upward?”
“That sounds pretty upward to me. A lot of upward mobility in the change from driving Uber to a representative in Congress. But then again, I’m not a Democrat,” Gonzales comments.
But it gets worse, as the next clip Gonzales plays features MS NOW’s Eugene Daniels, who used a new leftist term to describe the racism and sexism Jasmine Crockett supposedly faced in her run, and loss, for the Texas Senate.
“I think what was really interesting about this primary in particular in Texas was that the nastiness online bled into the nastiness on the ground,” he began.
“Usually it’s like, you know, the internet is not real life, which I believe typically when it comes to politics, like a lot of people yelling about everything, but somehow in Texas it became a part of the actual campaign on the ground,” he continued.
“And so there was some racism online, a lot of racism, a lot of sexism, a lot of misogynoir, which is a connection of both of those things against her,” he added.
“What? ‘Misogynoir'? What are you? You just made that up, sir. That is not a term,” Gonzales says.
“That’s how bad it’s gotten. That is how bad the Democrat Party has gotten. There is no floor,” she adds.
Want more from Sara Gonzales?
To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Democrats will stop at nothing for the black vote: 'Apparently now he is African'
Democrats will do anything to get the black vote, and Senate candidate James Talarico is no exception.
“He’s trying to win over the black vote because the black people in Texas, the Democrats at least, are very, very upset that Jasmine Crockett didn’t win. They wanted ... Jasmine Crockett because she was black,” BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales explains.
“So I think now his tactic to try to win over the black Democrat vote is saying that he’s cool with a little murder as long as it’s a black person carrying out the crime, I guess,” she adds, before playing a clip of Talarico on "The Breakfast Club."
“From Texas, we seen what happened with Karmelo Anthony, and you said it was a tragedy. What did you mean by that?” Talarico was asked.
“Well, I’ve done a lot of work in the state House on justice reform, and right now we’ve got a system that doesn’t serve all Americans equally, and we know that black Texans have not gotten the justice they deserve in many cases,” he responded.
“And you know, I’m not an expert on this particular case, but I know that there were no black members of the jury. And to me, that’s the only evidence you need to really prove that this system is not working for black Texans,” he added.
Adam Johnson, who is well known as January 6th’s “lectern guy,” points out that he went to federal prison for “misdemeanor trespassing.”
“So if it’s about color, if it’s about these things that he’s bringing up, I don’t know. I think a lot of us went to jail and we were very much white when we were there,” he tells Gonzales.
But Talarico isn’t the only Democrat trying to court black voters.
“[Abdul El-Sayed is] actually taking a different approach than James Talarico,” Gonzales says.
“Apparently, now he is African,” she adds, noting that originally she just believed him to be Muslim.
“I am Arab. I’m also African. My family immigrated to this country from Egypt. I’m proud of my African heritage,” he said in a recent press conference.
“So obviously he is like, ‘Oh, well, technically I’m African,’” Gonzales says.
“He’s like, ‘I’m just a plain old black man like you,’” she adds.
Want more from Sara Gonzales?
To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Jasmine Crockett DUMPS on James Talarico's chances of winning US Senate seat in Texas — and brings the receipts
Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas gave a scathing assessment of James Talarico's chances of flipping one of the state's seats in the U.S. Senate.
The outspoken and often vulgar congresswoman pointed to evidence that the Democratic Party was not placing much faith in its candidate to win the seat.
'I look at where does the NRSC stand? Where does DSCC stand? ... It looks like status quo.'
Crockett told NBC News she did not trust polling for the general election because it had historically overstated Democrats' advantage.
"I watch money. When I look at the money, if Republicans start spending money in Texas, then I'll be convinced," she said.
"But right now, national Republicans decided they wanted to dump money into North Carolina, as well as Georgia," she added. "That's where they're fighting, and national Democrats have not decided to dump money into Texas either."
A report from the New York Times on the financial backing in the race supports Crockett's assessments, especially when it comes to Republicans spreading money to other Senate races believed to be not as competitive and costly as that in Texas.
"I look at where does the NRSC stand? Where does DSCC stand? Right now, neither one are investing, which tells me that their internals are saying the same thing," she continued. "So it looks like status quo. I won't get on the ground to really start to feel it until maybe end of September, October, as I start to dig into which races I'm going to help out in, the races that I really feel like we can win."
The Times report said national Democrats were less willing to dump millions into Texas to back Talarico after seeing that a cash advantage didn't help past candidates in the red state.
Talarico is also faring far better than Paxton in raising millions of donations by himself.
National Republican Senatorial Committee Communications Director Joanna Rodriguez released a statement to Blaze News about Crockett's comments.
"The fall of coordinated spending limits means the NRSC can discuss spending decisions directly with our candidates and their campaigns," Rodriguez said. "The era of raising the curtain on strategy for press and the Democrats we're looking to defeat is over."
Flipping Texas would be incredibly helpful for Democrats' hopes to retake the Senate in the midterm elections.
RELATED: Mike Lee SOUNDS the ALARM after stunning polls from Senate race in Texas
A Blaze News request for comment to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee was not immediately answered.
The Paxton campaign also disputed the financial characterization of the race by the Times.
"The trajectory is unmistakable: Support is accelerating, not softening. Everyone from grassroots Texans to large conservative donors are consolidating behind this campaign, and June was the clearest signal yet," campaign adviser Nick Maddux said.
He also noted that the campaign had raised $7 million across several Paxton committees.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!Ketanji Brown Jackson avoids bias ... by joining Michelle Obama’s podcast?
In a recent appearance on Michelle Obama’s podcast, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson explained that she refuses to do anything that might appear biased.
“When I get invitations to do things, I always have them screened by the legal office, the public information office, just to make sure that there are no ethical conflicts, that it’s not a fundraiser. You know, there are lots of limits on what judges can do,” Jackson told Obama.
“And I try to be very, very mindful and scrupulous with respect to that because, as you say, our obligation is to be unbiased in our approach. And so, you have to then navigate all the sources that could make for an appearance of partiality, which you want to avoid,” she continued.
“So, there are lots of things that I end up not accepting for that reason,” she added.
BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales can’t help but point out the glaring issue with her statement.
“It’s just that you’re on Michelle Obama’s podcast,” Gonzales comments.
“I’m just going to say, nothing says impartial and unbiased like appearing on Michelle Obama’s podcast. Like what?” Gonzales asks.
But Jackson isn’t the only one Gonzales is tired of hearing from, as Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) recently made a “wild claim about DEI.”
“When they decided to go after quote, unquote ‘DEI,’ black women, the most educated demographic in this country, somehow ended up the most unemployed out of everyone,” Crockett said.
“So, black women are the most educated demographic in this country,” Gonzales comments. “I think we need a fact check here.”
According to the Emerald Pages, 56.7% of Asian women hold bachelor’s degrees, making them the most educated in the country. Following closely behind them are white women at 52.9%.
Meanwhile, only 29.3% of black women have bachelor’s degrees.
“I don’t know where you’re getting your information,” Gonzales says. “Once again, I’m very uncomfortable with the way they keep passing out these law degrees like candy to all of these people who seem to be dumber than a box of rocks.”
Want more from Sara Gonzales?
To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
America’s two-tier economy is working exactly as planned
The left suddenly fears that artificial intelligence will replace American workers. It showed far less concern when illegal immigration undercut wages and jobs.
The double standard reveals a larger economic vision: protection for the credentialed class, cheap labor at the bottom, and little concern for the working Americans caught between them.
The left has built a bifurcated economy because it has bifurcated loyalties. Neither side of that arrangement puts America’s working class first.
Progressive warnings about AI often begin with the claim that employers will use new technology to replace costly labor or avoid training new employees. One progressive platform warns that AI could cause massive labor-market disruption. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) proposes taxing AI so that its gains do not flow only to the wealthy.
The concern isn’t inherently foolish. New technology can displace workers, at least temporarily, and policymakers should consider how people adapt. But the left’s labor solidarity becomes strangely selective when the competing worker entered the country illegally.
The Migration Policy Institute recently estimated that the illegal immigrant population may have reached 15.8 million. The Biden years also produced more than 10 million border encounters, although that figure includes repeat attempts and excludes people who evaded detection.
Meanwhile, the July Bureau of Labor Statistics report counted 7.1 million unemployed Americans. Those numbers do not prove that every illegal worker displaced a citizen. They do make it absurd to pretend that millions of additional workers have no effect on wages, bargaining power, or employment.
The standard answer is that illegal immigrants perform jobs Americans refuse to do. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) put the argument plainly: In a capitalist economy, someone will always do the work others do not want.
But jobs are not fixed objects with permanently assigned wages. When employers cannot attract workers, they must raise pay, improve conditions, invest in equipment, or change the way the work is performed. Labor scarcity gives workers leverage.
Progressives claim to understand that principle when they campaign for higher legal wage floors. The five states with the highest minimum wages are deep blue. Democratic lawmakers routinely demand “living wages” and stronger benefits.
RELATED: The bipartisan farm bill that also grows amnesty
Yet the same politicians short-circuit the market mechanism that might raise wages naturally. They permit a large supply of unauthorized labor, including an estimated 8.5 million people working off the books, to fill jobs at wages and under conditions many would never accept.
That arrangement is not compassionate to workers. It allows employers to avoid the higher pay, benefits, and taxes that legal labor would require. It also leaves illegal immigrants vulnerable to exploitation because their status limits their ability to challenge abuse.
The result is a two-tiered labor market.
At the top sit credentialed professionals whose jobs may be threatened by AI. Their anxieties receive white papers, Senate hearings, tax proposals, and sympathetic coverage. At the bottom sit unauthorized workers whom progressive politicians describe as indispensable because they perform society’s least desirable tasks.
Crockett’s own words and similar comments from other Democrats expose the hierarchy. The jobs at the top must be protected from technological competition. The jobs at the bottom must remain cheap enough that Americans supposedly will not take them.
The people excluded from both priorities are working-class citizens.
They are told that automation may eliminate their better-paying opportunities but that low-wage jobs cannot pay more because imported labor must fill them. They face high legal wage mandates and benefit requirements on one side, then competition from off-the-books labor on the other.
Government benefits without strong work requirements can compound the problem by creating a steep penalty for returning to employment. Sanctuary policies then protect the unauthorized labor supply that keeps wages down.
RELATED: Unaffordable housing is still ruining the party
This is not a coherent defense of workers. It is a coalition strategy.
The modern left protects the professional class that staffs its institutions and the immigrant constituencies it hopes to mobilize. The blue-collar Americans who once formed the Democratic base receive speeches about dignity while policy steadily erodes their bargaining power.
Long gone are the days when the left at least pretended to organize politics around the American worker.
AI may indeed disrupt employment. Illegal immigration can also depress wages and displace workers. A party genuinely committed to labor would confront both pressures honestly instead of treating one as a crisis and the other as a moral obligation.
The left has built a bifurcated economy because it has bifurcated loyalties. Neither side of that arrangement puts America’s working class first.
Jasmine Crockett suggests anyone who was rooting for Argentina at the World Cup is racist
A Democratic congresswoman turned to soccer on Tuesday to support her claim that white supremacy is alive and well in modern culture.
Toward the end of a congressional hearing on the Smithsonian exhibit, Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) was in full defense of changes that have been made at the historic museum.
'Welcome to the Republicans' white-pride rally.'
The hearing, titled Rewriting American History: Examining the Smithsonian's Efforts to Reshape the Past, was a back-and-forth between Republicans and Democrats about whether the museum has become woke and even anti-white.
When it was her turn, Crockett used her limited time to ask David Blight, a history professor from Yale University, a bizarre question about the recent World Cup.
"The World Cup that captured the imaginations of the entire world when they saw all of these people of color that was [sic] playing for all these teams, and ultimately, if you recall, the last two teams, it was Argentina and Spain," Crockett began.
The congresswoman then asked the professor, "It seemed like the vast majority of the world was rooting ... against Argentina, right? And why was that? Just give me an explanation. If you could guess."
The professor was not in the same mindset as Crockett with his response, though, saying, "Spain had the best team. Maybe that's why they were rooting for them?"
Crockett took a moment for a hard chuckle before suggesting what the real reason might be.
"There's also a racist history that exists as it relates to Argentina," she said.
RELATED: Whitlock: MLB can’t spend 'Pride Month' mocking America and then wave a flag
Crockett first introduced herself in the hearing by announcing, "Welcome to the Republicans' white-pride rally disguised as a congressional hearing."
This was followed by a series of rhetorical questions and comments surrounding the alleged threat of white supremacy in the United States. Crockett claimed that it must be hard for Republicans at the hearing to listen to the true history of America, while making other claims like black people are currently being denied their right to vote.
Republicans are trying to "ban books" and "attack museums," Crockett went on, before citing the Biden administration's 2021 claim that the biggest domestic threat to the United States is violent white supremacists.
Crockett also alleged that there were a lot of "white guys" with a "fetish" and "fragile egos" who are trying to feel "oppressed" over the alleged inner workings at the Smithsonian.
RELATED: Europe bans 'sexualization' of female athletes on camera, but viewers are stating the obvious
In another viral clip, Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) questioned museum officials about training materials and tool kits that listed certain traits as products of white supremacy.
A White House document on the issue said that the National Museum of American History was using a framework that "explicitly treats museums as engines for anti-oppression activism."
For example, the document said the museum frames ideas like "objectivity, individualism, [and] a sense of urgency" as oppressive character traits of "whiteness" and "white supremacy culture."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Jason Whitlock: The Nolan Wells case is being used to incite racial violence
As the investigation into the death of 18-year-old Nolan Wells continues, a growing number of public figures — who BlazeTV host Jason Whitlock believes are installed chaos agents — are claiming race must have played a role.
“All of these leaders — they’ve all been installed. They’ve all been installed to promote chaos. And there’s no bigger example than Ben Crump,” Whitlock says.
“This man being dressed up as some lawyer with zero command of the English language, someone that literally probably has an IQ hovering around 70. And he’s out here running around as the face of the civil rights movement and a respected civil rights attorney and being quoted in newspapers and media organizations all across the country,” he continues.
“And he’s been allowed to parachute in like a carpetbagger, to parachute into Mississippi, and just to stir racial animus. And he’s been joined by Jasmine Crockett and others to stir racial animosity,” he adds.
And a clip of Crockett speaking to TMZ only proves his point.
“Some people feel like it’s racially motivated. What do you think?" a reporter asked Crockett.
“I mean, I think that specifically as black Americans in the United States right now, we are always going to question whether or not there is a racial motivation,” Crockett responded.
“But also, if you know the history of Mississippi, I think that you’d have to be blind not to question potentially what is happening, especially in the case of an 18-year-old who ends up deceased without his cell phone, without any communication whatsoever with anybody prior to ending up deceased,” she continued.
“And he was out with his Caucasian friends. And then law enforcement tells everybody there’s no foul play to be suspected. Now, a blind man could see that there’s something to investigate,” she added.
“Well, it sounds like you think it is racially motivated,” the reporter answered.
“I absolutely think that I can tell you that we don’t have any answers, but if you think that race is not something to look at, then you are not really trying to investigate,” Crockett said.
When the reporter pressed further, Crockett pointed out that the “white kids deleted their social media accounts.”
“It looks like a racial thing to me, but hey, maybe we’ll find out that it wasn’t,” she added.
“That’s illogical thinking. That’s another reason why we need to repeal the 19th Amendment,” Whitlock comments.
“Out here running her mouth about something she knows virtually nothing about. … And oh, of course, it must be racist. Kids don’t drown in boating accidents during the summer, during Fourth of July weekends,” he continues.
“That never happens. It has to be racial,” he adds.
Want more from Jason Whitlock?
To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
www.theblaze.com
www.theblaze.com