Dems Have An Axe To Grind With Supreme Court After Getting Knocked Down In Multiple Cases, Alan Dershowitz Says
'They don’t care about the structure'
Liberal Law Prof Says Aileen Cannon’s Ruling To Toss Trump Docs Charges Creates ‘Opportunity’ To Yank Her From Case
'Judge Cannon just did the unthinkable'
Democrats’ Meltdown Over Trump Immunity Case Proves SCOTUS Is Right To Hear It
SCOTUS Ruling On Trump Ballot Access Destroys Credibility Of Media’s Legal ‘Experts’
‘Utterly Unjustified’: Conservative Legal Scholars Criticize GOP Effort To Impeach Alejandro Mayorkas
'[B]eing a bad person is not impeachable,' wrote Jonathan Turley
Here’s The Legal Question That Could Determine The 2024 Election
'Take a look at the appointments clause under Article II,' said Richard Epstein
THESE two 'knuckleheads' claim the 14th Amendment disqualifies Trump from running
On August 19, the Atlantic published a piece by — in Mark Levin’s words — “two knuckleheads,” titled, “The Constitution Prohibits Trump from Ever Being President Again.”
These “knuckleheads” are J. Michael Luttig and Laurence H. Tribe, who argue that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment provides that Donald Trump literally can be prevented from running for president.
“The former president’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election, and the resulting attack on the U.S. Capitol, place him squarely within the ambit of the disqualification clause, and he is therefore ineligible to serve as president ever again,” the article reads.
“Of course these guys used to hate each other's guts, but this is what they come together on,” Levin laughs.
When grilled on their article in a segment on CNN, Tribe explains the pair's thinking is that “secretaries of state or other officials” will have to “determine whether despite his obvious attempt to overturn the 2020 election and engage in insurrection, whether despite that, somehow Trump gets to run, the secretaries of state around the country are going to go both ways on that.”
“Whichever way they go, they’ll be challenged in court, and that’ll end up in the Supreme Court, and what it will have to decide is what this language means,” he adds.
Levin is not amused.
“Just so you understand folks, there are more scholars who say no to this than say yes, but the ones who say yes obviously are promoted by the Jim Acostas and the media,” he says.
Want more from Mark Levin?
To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Liberals Praising ‘False’ Elector Indictment Previously Called For Electoral College To Vote Against Trump In 2016
'Electors should not -- CANNOT -- choose [a] man who will violate oath!'
‘Impeachable’: Legal Experts, GOP Lawmakers Warn Biden Against Invoking 14th Amendment On Debt Ceiling
'Any debt he purported to issue would be worthless'
Get the Conservative Review delivered right to your inbox.
We’ll keep you informed with top stories for conservatives who want to become informed decision makers.
Today's top stories