USA Today takes aim at Caitlin Clark again — and gets humiliated AGAIN



USA Today tried once again to smear Indiana Fever star Caitlin Clark on Friday, and the outlet was humiliated once again.

The news outlet published an opinion piece suggesting that Clark's insistence on calling for a foul when she was assaulted on the court was placing lesbian black players in danger of getting lynched by white supremacists.

'What in the actual HELL? You utter, total, spite-filled brainless JERKS.'

An uproar followed, and the writer locked down her account and issued a bizarre statement admitting she had erred somewhat.

A day later, the outlet suggested that Clark had ignored a WNBA event for spurious and petty reasons.

"Caitlin Clark skipped the WNBA Orange Carpet on Thursday, opting to get her hair done in her hometown of Des Moines," the outlet's post on social media reads.

A community note on the X platform undermined the attempt to mischaracterize Clark's decision.

"Caitlin was hosting a charity dinner in her hometown," the note said.

The outlet was immediately excoriated by many on social media.

"How in the world is USA TODAY still existing with SEXIST headlines like this only aimed at Caitlin Clark?! They just keep doubling down on their ignorance and stupidity!" sportscaster Linda Cohn responded.

"For the love of god. What is the matter with you people. Maybe she needs the support of her family after all your bullying," Amy Siskind replied.

"What in the actual HELL? You utter, total, spite-filled brainless JERKS," another critic said.

The outlet issued a "clarification" about seven hours later.

RELATED: Caitlin Clark puts black lesbians at risk of death, USA Today writer suggests — and cites Emmett Till lynching

"Caitlin Clark was attending an event for the Caitlin Clark Foundation, which is why she missed the WNBA All-Star Weekend Orange Carpet," the outlet posted.

Some did not think the correction was enough.

"Wait, so the day after you publish a column claiming her actions evoke Emmitt [sic] Till and will get people lynched, you rush and post an unverified slanderous headline that turns out to be a lie? Do you wonder why you're a joke?" one detractor responded.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

NBC News is getting obliterated over this unbelievably BIASED post about Kyle Rittenhouse



A bizarre post from NBC News about Kyle Rittenhouse has led to the news outlet getting absolutely crushed by critics for blatant bias.

Rittenhouse became a hero on the right after he went to a violent anti-police protest in Wisconsin in 2020 and shot three men who were attacking him, killing two of them. A jury later acquitted him on charges related to the shooting.

'This tweet is objectively insane.'

While reporting on a recent development with Rittenhouse involving a spider bite, NBC News whitewashed the 2020 riot and insinuated that he may actually be guilty.

"Kyle Rittenhouse, who gained fame for opening fire at a 2020 civil rights rally in Wisconsin, was hospitalized after he was bitten by a venomous spider, the noted firearms enthusiast says," read the post from NBC.

Critics of the mainstream media pounced on the description as the latest manifestation of media bias.

"This post is a good example of liberal legacy media disinformation," responded journalist Andy Ngo.

"It is always a challenge to decide whether NBC employees are moronic or lying gutter scum. Maybe it’s just always both," replied media critic Dan Gainor.

"Wow how illiterate could you actually be? I have not seen a more ignorant take in a very long time. Even for NBC, this stands out," said another critic on the X platform.

"Look, people can have different views of Rittenhouse and his actions. But this tweet is objectively insane," read another popular post.

"The wordsmithing of this headline is exactly the reason people hate and distrust the MSM," said another user. "Leftist shills and hacks, virtually indistinguishable from Pravda. Zero journalistic objectivity or integrity."

The NBC News post went viral with more than 4.8 million views in less than 24 hours.

RELATED: Kyle Rittenhouse sued by estate of the convicted child molester he blew away in self-defense

Others used the occasion to register their animosity against Rittenhouse.

"Is the spider ok?" replied one user.

The NBC report also neglected to tell its readers that one of the people killed by Rittenhouse was a convicted child molester and the other had committed violence against family members and struggled with bipolar disorder.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

New Jersey just sent a media-manufactured radical to Congress



The "Squad" is about to pick up a new member with Analilia Mejia, and it's because the media won't stop lying. Some politicians rise by appealing to voters' sympathetic nature, making lofty promises of an easier life with less struggle. In doing so, they deliberately ignore the root causes of society's problems and discredit any fixes that would diminish their own power.

The modern-day Democratic Party embraced radical ideologies and extreme rhetoric that will ultimately harm the American people, all while disguising those policies as compassion. Just look at media darlings like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib.

Politicians who thrive on deception need gatekeepers to keep inconvenient truths from the public.

What's worse, their deception is amplified by the mainstream media. Information is presented in such a biased way that the ill-informed voter is left believing that if they don't vote the "correct" way, the United States will no longer exist.

This pattern is now so prevalent that political candidates who would never have been considered a legitimate threat 10 to 20 years ago are beginning to fill important political seats. These deceptions have helped far-left candidates like New Jersey Democrat Analilia Mejia rise to power.

Here are three key deceptions Mejia has exploited.

Iran, taqiya, and the pro-Palestine blind spot

Nowhere is the media's selective blindness more dangerous than in its coverage of Iran. The regime is an Islamic theocracy that has never hidden its ambitions. It has pursued nuclear capability, funded terrorist proxies such as Hamas and Hezbollah, and embraced an ideology openly hostile to both Israel and the United States.

For years, Iran's rulers have negotiated in bad faith while enriching uranium, arming proxies, and extending their influence across the region. Under those conditions, military options were no longer theoretical. Strikes on nuclear sites, missile infrastructure, and naval assets became necessary to prevent a far greater disaster.

Yet the same media that downplays Iran's "Death to America" chants and its direct funding of Hamas portrays the conflict as Israeli overreach or American aggression. Mejia, a vocal pro-Palestine activist who has worn the keffiyeh and accused Israel of genocide, has built her platform on this distorted framing.

She either ignores or downplays the fact that Hamas is an Iranian proxy whose actions serve Tehran's larger campaign against both Israel and the West. When politicians demand a ceasefire on terms that leave Iran and its proxies room to regroup, they do not move the region closer to peace. They shield the aggressor while pretending to restrain the war. The press helps them do it by burying Iran's long record of deceit, terror sponsorship, and open threats beneath soft phrases like "regional tensions."

Fraud, voter ID, and the 'rights' that protect the scam

The media's coverage of election integrity and government fraud follows the same dishonest script. When Republican-led investigations and the work of independent journalists exposed massive Medicare and Medicaid scams in deep-blue states (hospice fraud in California potentially costing billions and Minnesota providers suspended after hundreds of millions in questionable claims), the story barely registered.

These schemes only came to light under renewed scrutiny from the current administration; Democratic states had little incentive to police their own. Yet the same outlets that yawn at taxpayer rip-offs scream that Republicans' push for voter ID and stricter verification are "voter suppression."

New Jersey provides fresh proof that fraud is real and corrosive. In January 2026, two Bergen County non-citizens were federally indicted for illegally voting in a U.S. election and lying on citizenship applications. In August of 2024, an ex-Plainfield mayoral candidate was charged with attempting to submit nearly 1,00 fraudulent voter registrations.

In 2025, county officials reported that homeless residents in Atlantic County were being solicited for fake messenger ballots. In 2024, James Devine pled guilty to submitting nearly 2,000 fake signatures on nominating petitions for the 2021 New Jersey gubernatorial primary. In 2022, Frederick Gattuso was convicted of tampering with public records when he voted twice using the registration of two people with similar names. These are not isolated "myths"; these are documented crimes that erode trust in the integrity of the electoral process.

Censorship and the Elon Musk exception

Mejia's victory speech singled out Elon Musk as one of the "true radicals" subverting democracy. That line revealed a great deal. It showed exactly where she stands on speech, dissent, and who gets to control the public square.

During COVID, Democrats and allied Big Tech openly coordinated to suppress dissenting voices. The Hunter Biden laptop story was buried as "Russian disinformation" by 51 former intelligence officials, the lab leak theory was censored as a conspiracy, the Great Barrington Declaration on lockdowns was throttled, and vaccine skeptics were deplatformed. Government pressure on social media, revealed in the Twitter files, showed a clear pattern of state-backed censorship of conservative viewpoints.

Enter Elon Musk, who purchased Twitter (now X) precisely to restore free speech and end that collusion. Under his leadership, X became the only major platform where all sides could be heard. The media was complicit in the original censorship and now portrays Musk's commitment to open discourse as dangerous "chaos." Mejia's anti-Musk stance is no surprise; politicians who thrive on deception need gatekeepers to keep inconvenient truths from the public.

Voters must see through the wolf in sheep's clothing. Politicians like Analilia Mejia promise an easier life, compassion for the marginalized, and protection from "extremists," all while leaning on a media echo chamber that distorts threats, buries successes, and censors dissent. They ignore root causes — Islamic terrorism sponsored by Iran, rampant fraud that wastes taxpayers' dollars, politicized institutions that target reformers, and the slow erosion of open debate — because confronting those realities would shrink their power.

The result is not progress; it is a more divided, less secure, and less truthful America. New Jersey's newest congresswoman and her ideological allies offer lofty rhetoric wrapped in deception. Americans who value security, prosperity, and liberty must reject the easy promises and demand the harder truths. The future of the Republic depends on it.

'Subhuman ghouls': People, WaPo trash Scott Adams hours after his death



On Tuesday, Scott Adams, the creator of the beloved comic strip "Dilbert," died after a prolonged battle with metastatic prostate cancer. However, some of his opponents in media wasted no time before criticizing Adams and his accomplishments.

Hours after it was announced that Adams had died, People magazine published an article titled "Scott Adams, Disgraced Dilbert Creator, Dies at 68."

'You are the scum of the earth.'

The author then claimed in the very first paragraph that Adams "degraded Black people in a 2023 rant."

People updated the article at 12:33 p.m. ET, including changing the author of the piece. The updated version says it was written by "People Staff."

RELATED: Beloved 'Dilbert' creator Scott Adams dies at age 68

Photo by Bob Riha Jr./Getty Images

However, an earlier, archived version of the article timestamped at 10:47 a.m. ET shows that it was written by Victoria Edel, as many X users, including Eric Daugherty, made sure to emphasize.

Several prominent X users did not try to hide their disgust over the tasteless headline.

"Subhuman ghouls," BlazeTV host Auron MacIntyre said in a reply to People's post.

"You are the scum of the earth," Raw Egg Nationalist wrote.

People's original X post promoting the article also appears to have been deleted.

Other news outlets couldn't resist the opportunity to drag Adams through the mud either.

An archived article originally published from the Washington Post and apparently shared later by the Boston Globe bore the headline, "Scott Adams, ‘Dilbert’ creator who veered into racist, far-right commentary, dies."

Just like the People article, this article wasted no time attacking Adams' right-wing views. The first paragraph reads: "Scott Adams, who became a hero to millions of cubicle-dwelling office workers as the creator of the satirical comic strip 'Dilbert,' only to rebrand himself as a digital provocateur — at home in the Trump era’s right-wing mediasphere — with inflammatory comments about race, politics and identity, died Jan. 13."

For evidence, critics point to a February 22, 2023, stream of Adams' show, "Real Coffee with Scott Adams." The "rant" that they are referring to involves Adams' discussion of a Rasmussen poll of black Americans responding to the statement "it's okay to be white." Fifty-three percent agreed, 26% disagreed, and 21% were not sure about the statement.

Adams took issue with the fact that nearly half of black Americans did not agree with that statement. He said in part, "If nearly half of all blacks are not okay with white people … that's a hate group. I don't want to have anything to do with them. And I would say, based on the current way things are going, the best advice I would give to white people is to get the hell away from black people ... because there is no fixing this."

Adams' critics failed to mention that he went on to encourage his viewers to be "friendly" to everyone and that he was not trying to "start a war" with anyone.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The New York Times’ ‘trillionaire’ lie: The left is now outraged over pure fiction



The left is yet again up in arms about a non-issue, this time regarding the amount of trillionaires in America. Because what they don’t appear to know is that there are no trillionaires in America.

“We did it. They’ve been eradicated. There are no American trillionaires. We did it everybody. Yay. I guess that's a goal we all have now. In case you didn’t know,” BlazeTV host Stu Burguiere says on “Stu Does America.” “A lot of people on the left apparently don’t.”

And sadly, the New York Times has landed on the list of those who don’t know this, as a recent article is titled, “Musk Wins $1 Trillion Pay Package, Creating Split Screen on Wealth in America.”

“Again, no it doesn’t,” Burguiere comments.


“At Tesla, based in the Austin, Texas, area, shareholders have largely bought into a winner-takes-all version of capitalism, agreeing by a wide margin to give Mr. Musk shares worth almost a trillion dollars if the company under his management achieves ambitious financial and operational goals over the next decade,” the article reads.

“Now, the terms I would like you to look at in that particular quote are ‘shareholders.’ So, the people whose money is going to be paid to Elon Musk have bought in. So, why would they buy into a winner-takes-all philosophy of capitalism? Because that would bankrupt them, right?” Burguiere asks.

“Elon wins, they get nothing, right? Let’s think about it a little bit. Could it possibly be that they actually win too? Could it possibly be that they think that if Elon Musk becomes a trillionaire, they’re doing pretty darn well for themselves as well? Could it possibly be that the New York freaking Times, located in the financial capital of the world, have no idea what they’re talking about?” he continues.

“And you might say, ‘Well, yeah, that is what it means, Stu.’ No, it doesn’t. It means they’re lying. They know exactly what’s going on here. They know why they’re framing it this way. And they’re doing it completely intentionally,” he adds.

The article goes on to discuss mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s New York victory as a “reminder of the frustrations many Americans have with an economic system that has left them struggling to afford basics like food, housing, and child care.”

“I assure you, Elon Musk having a trillion dollars, which I will note he does not have, but if he did have it, that money would not have anything to do with someone in New York feeding themselves. It’s literally got nothing to do with them starving on the streets,” Burguiere says.

“It’s got nothing to do with Elon Musk. He’s not doing this to people,” he adds.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Veteran journalist gets hammered for continuing to deny Biden's decline despite damning new reports



A veteran journalist is getting mocked and ridiculed on social media after he continued to suggest that former President Joe Biden had not suffered mental deterioration at the end of his presidency.

The debate over Biden's mental diminishment was sparked by a new book from Jake Tapper documenting statements from close advisers and staffers who watched his decline firsthand.

'The poisoned mind of a biased status chasing cretin.'

John Harwood registered his skepticism against those reports on social media in a sarcastic missive.

"Oddly, the declining 81-year-old managed to win major climate, infrastructure, and chip investments, rally allies to defend Ukraine, and hand his successor the world's strongest post-pandemic economy," wrote the 68-year-old.

'Was it because, as the Original Sin authors write, 'Biden on a day-in, day-out basis could certainly make decisions and assert wisdom and act as President'?" he added, referring to Tapper's book co-written with Alex Thompson.

Many on social media lambasted Harwood for the bizarre claim.

"The best example of the absolute corruption behind legacy media. The poisoned mind of a biased status chasing cretin," responded Greg Gutfeld.

"You’re completely missing the point. He was likely not a relevant participant in the process," replied former DHS official Jonathan Fahey.

"I really hope he's getting paid well for this self-debasement and isn't just doing it for the exposure," joked Noam Blum.

"This is all you need to know about John Harwood. He sounds like a Soviet hack," said another critic.

"You forgot to mention very high inflation, supply chain shortages, 21 million illegals that taxpayers had to pay for, an embarrassing & disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal, war in Ukraine due to incompetence, graft & corruption … almost an endless list of failures and bad policies," read another post.

RELATED: Megyn Kelly forces Jake Tapper to face brutal facts about his complicity in Biden health debacle

Photo by ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images

Tapper has not escaped scrutiny over the book, however. Many on the right have harangued him for his part in berating Biden critics at the behest of the White House before Biden dropped out of his re-election campaign.

In a brutal interview with Megyn Kelly, Tapper faced up to much of the criticism and admitted that he fell short.

"I feel humility about my coverage," said Tapper. "It's not like I was asking him his favorite movie or his favorite color. We were talking about Putin. We were talking about other issues of national importance. But yeah, of course, I've said I look back on my coverage with humility. And I wish — I did cover the issues of age and mental acuity, but I wish I had covered them much more."

Harwood worked for CNN as White House correspondent until 2022, was the editor at large for CNBC, and was a contributor at the New York Times.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'The Office' star shoots down MSNBC host over media bias on the economy and immigration under Biden



Rainn Wilson of "The Office" shut down an MSNBC host decrying attacks on the mainstream media from the Trump administration and pushed back with the most damaging recent example of media bias.

Wilson was speaking with Stephanie Ruhle on his "Soul Boom" podcast when she went into a rant about criticism from President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk.

'Look, the economy is great, la la la, immigration’s not that much of a problem.'

Wilson pointed out to Ruhle that 40% of Americans polled said that they don't trust media and asked her to explain why they feel this way.

"Listen, we are seeing a huge loss of trust in all of our institutions," she replied.

"Losing that trust is not an accident. It's by design," Ruhle continued. "You had a bit of a perfect storm, right? President Trump won, and tons of people were shocked or angry or frustrated, and they're tuning out. And at the same time, you have the Elon Musk media machine, because they want you to leave traditional media, and they want you to go to X, which is a bastion of misinformation. There is no fact-checking."

"Right," Wilson said.

"So it's a perfect storm of people saying, 'I'm angry. I'm frustrated. I'm tuning out, disconnecting,' and then you have a force pushing it," she continued. "But even in the last two weeks, what we need to do is just cover what is happening in America."

Wilson responded by explaining that a lot of trust had been lost over the media's bias during the Biden administration.

"This is where I would push back, when I see this kind of insight and passion being directed at the current administration and the lack of this kind of insight and passion being directed at the previous administration," he said.

"Here again, I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about left-leaning news media organizations were kind of like, 'La la la la, everything's fine,'" Wilson said, mocking the media. "'Look, the economy is great, la la la, immigration’s not that much of a problem,' and really being Cleopatra, ‘queen of denial.’ Thank you. Boom!"

Wilson's criticism mirrored the attitudes of Americans in polling that showed the immigration crisis and the state of the economy were top worries going into the contentious 2024 election.

Video of the interaction was posted to social media, where it was widely circulated.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Wikipedia scandal exposed: Big Tech manipulates what you see



Wikipedia is no longer what it used to be, and co-founder Larry Sanger knows exactly why.

“Wikipedia can be used to advance a particular social and political agenda,” Sanger tells James Poulos on “Zero Hour.” “This becomes evident only if you know a lot about the topic. So sometimes the only people who are really qualified to tell whether a treatment of a topic is neutral are the people who know a lot about the topic.”

“It’s gotten really, really bad, though, in the Trump years, I mean really noticeably,” he continues, “and I think that is what sort of enlightened people about the problem. So while conservatives and Libertarian and anti-establishment types, they generally continue to despise Wikipedia, this seems to have had little impact on Wikipedia itself.”


“Why would it?” he adds. “This is a feature of the mainstream media. They’re not going to change, and Wikipedia now is essentially a summary of what the mainstream media thinks, at least when it comes to current events, politics, social issues, and so forth.”

However, it’s not just the twisting of the truth to fit a political agenda that’s bothered the co-founder, but the lack of care taken to stop others from spreading horrifying imagery on the website.

This became an issue to Sanger when he was enlightened to the existence of pedophile rings and “graphic representations of child rape on Wikipedia.” He reported it to the FBI in 2010.

“It didn’t do any good. They didn’t follow up. It’s still there. That did change my views insofar as I felt now it’s important to speak out about this, especially in this context,” he explains. “They’re not trying to hide their disdain at all any more, and from my point of view, it felt like simply speaking about such things as a moral imperative has emboldened me to say things that I have believed for many years.”

Want more from James Poulos?

To enjoy more of James's visionary commentary on politics, tech, ideas, and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Jim Acosta gets ruthlessly ridiculed over his defense of the media: 'We are the defenders of the people'



CNN anchor Jim Acosta was ridiculed on Thursday for trying to defend the media in a video he posted on Thursday.

Acosta rejected the characterization made by President-elect Donald Trump that the media was the "enemy of the people" just days before Trump will take office again.

'Your network spreads those lies. Your industry profits off those lies.'

"I want to take a moment to talk about something President Biden said during his farewell address," said Acosta.

"He warned the free press is crumbling in this country. I would add that's only if we the people let that happen. Journalists exist to seek the truth, to tell people's stories, to lift up voices that may not be heard otherwise. To shine a light on injustice and to hold the powerful accountable," he continued.

"We are not the enemy of the people, we are the defenders of the people," he claimed.

Many on social media excoriated Acosta for trying to claim the high-minded principles of journalism after so many examples of media malfeasance, incompetence, and bias.

"But the American press is not free. It is captured by its biases and bigotries against conservatives and its refusal to hold itself accountable for covering up the mental decline of the President of the United States," replied talk show host Erick Erickson.

"Jimmy, you're a liar. Your network spreads those lies. Your industry profits off those lies. You are the enemy of the people and I cannot wait until you are sued into bankruptcy for all the lies you spread," responded novelist Jacob Airey.

"Free press isn’t crumbling. Networks that employ partisan paid actors to spew narratives are dying. Look in the mirror sport," read one popular response.

"Just start delivering the news rather than your politics, Jim, and you'll be fine. But ... can you do that?" said another critic.

"You speaking about the free press while embracing the Left's censorship over the last few years is peak irony," responded another detractor.

Acosta has been lambasted many times by critics on social media over the bias in mainstream media.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!