Mark Levin sounds alarm: Stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions before it’s too late



If a nuclear missile were fired at the United States right now, would we have the power to stop it? Mark Levin says the answer is a chilling no.

“We do have the technology to knock [missiles] out of the sky, but are we literally set in place to knock them out of the sky? The answer is no,” he says.

Given Iran’s relentless pursuit of nuclear weapons, America’s alarming lack of a robust defense system like Israel’s Iron Dome, and rising tensions in the Middle East, Levin argues that the United States ought to have a much stronger opinion about preventing Iran from building nuclear muscle.

He explains how currently Iran lacks a strong air force, navy, and robust ground-to-air missile systems. The country's resources are stretched thanks to funding groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis.

The weak state of Iran's government, which lacks popular support and relies on a “very powerful police state” to stay in power, makes Iran even more unstable but also more dangerous, as it pushes for nuclear weapons to gain power and prestige. Iran’s Persian people are often educated and pro-America, yet their regime’s iron fist drives this reckless nuclear ambition.

“Can you imagine if these Islamo-Nazis have nuclear weapons, and once they get one, they'll have 101; they'll have 1,001. There's no stopping them at that point. Then you cannot pre-emptively attack them,” Levin warns.

Despite recent claims that he and Israel are warmongers, Levin insists that war is what everyone hopes to avoid. He argues that Israel, being in the region, would use its own troops in any conflict, not drag U.S. soldiers into war.

“I’ve got grandkids and kids. You think I want to drag anybody into a war?” he asks.

Levin doubts Iran’s leaders, after years of investment, would abandon their nuclear program through negotiations, making the need to act now even more urgent. To hear more of his commentary, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Mark Levin torches MSNBC for defending terrorist-supporter Mahmoud Khalil



There’s few things Mark Levin hates more than MSNBC, which he prefers to call MSLSD.

The liberal hacks who work there are specialists when it comes to “defense of the enemy,” he says. Their pearl clutching over the deportation of green card holder and Hamas-supporter Mahmoud Khalil is case and point.

Not only was Khalil a key leader in the pro-Hamas protests on Columbia’s campus, which involved vandalism and unrest, but he’s also a member of the group Columbia United Apartheid Divest — a vicious organization that supports terrorist events, including October 7, circulates Hamas propaganda, and calls for the total eradication of the West.

“They have direct communications in writing in a letter where the Iranian regime is thanking their group for their activities. They have information that was directly in the possession of Khalil and his group from Hamas,” says Levin.

Further, there’s evidence that CUAD changed its website language right before the October 7 attacks, leading many to believe that the group was privy to Hamas’ evil plans.

At this point, no one can deny that Khalil’s “connections to terrorism are real; they're substantive, they're recent, they're ongoing,” says Levin.

But that hasn’t stopped the radical left from painting him as a victim and using his case to “constitutionalize terrorism.”

On April 5, MSNBC legal analyst Melissa Murray argued that Khalil is “someone who is exercising First Amendment rights” and asked his lawyer, Baher Azmy, what his potential deportation means for “ordinary citizens.”

“When you're here on some immigration status, you're a guest in the United States of America,” says Levin. CUAD talks "about the overthrow of the United States and the West. Is that what ordinary citizens do?”

Azmy answered Murray's question by warning that “under the government's pretty chilling authoritarian logic, one could be arrested, detained, and deported if you're not a U.S. citizen simply because you disagree with the foreign policy objectives.”

“If you come here on a student visa and then all of a sudden you're a protester pushing and promoting riotous behavior on behalf of an enemy, I'm sorry, that's not protected,” Levin corrects.

“It's sickening beyond belief that American media ... allows this kind of propaganda to take place and, in fact, promotes this kind of propaganda.”

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

O’Leary calls China tariffs soft, but Mark Levin sees the hidden brilliance



On April 8, Kevin O’Leary, commonly known as Mr. Wonderful, appeared on CNN to give his two cents on President Trump's newly announced 104% tariffs on Chinese imports.

O’Leary was critical but not in the way most pundits are critical. On the contrary, O’Leary argued the tariffs weren’t even close to sufficient.

“104% tariffs in China are not enough. I'm advocating 400%. I do business in China. They don't play by the rules; they've been in the WTO for decades; they have never abided by any of the rules they agreed to when they came in for decades. They cheat; they steal; they steal IP. I can't litigate in their courts; they take product — technology, they steal it; they manufacture it and sell it back here,” he said.

When CNN host Laura Coates pushed back, O’Leary doubled down.

“I want Xi on an airplane to Washington to level the playing field. This is not about tariffs any more,” he said, noting that people can dislike Trump all they want but that standing up to China is simply the right thing to do.

Mark Levin says O’Leary’s “tough talking” is fine but that Trump’s tariff plan is already brilliant.

“What Trump is doing is he's ratcheting, and that's the right way to approach it,” he says, noting that the plan will cause some discomfort for Americans in the short term but ultimately will create fairer trade practices.

However, his tariff plan is much bigger than just trade.

“I think Trump is looking at — if not defeating the communist Chinese, severely damaging their economy and hence militarily, the way Reagan did the Soviet Union through economics,” says Levin.

“The truth is as big as the communist Chinese economy is, it's not as big as ours. It's two-thirds or so the size of the American economy. They cannot beat us economically, at least right now,” he explains.

These tariff plans are aimed at ensuring that it stays that way.

To hear more of Levin’s analysis, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Mark Levin reveals what liberals DON’T want you to know about slavery and the Constitution



The left is the party that spawned critical race theory — the fundamentally flawed ideology that claims our constitutional framers were influenced by the racist norms of their time and therefore all the systems they created are tainted by those biases.

Mark Levin says it’s a shameful lie.

The truth is many of the framers despised slavery, but they had to make a hard deal with the slave states in order to form the United States. Without that union, there would have been no Civil War and no Abraham Lincoln to bring slavery to an end.

At the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the delegates could not agree on the issue of slavery, so they left the issue to their children and grandchildren, Levin explains.

However, the framers knew that “a nation born out of the Declaration of Independence where all men were created equal” could not coexist with slavery.

Thomas Jefferson, who albeit owned slaves, tried to “put a provision in the Declaration of Independence about slavery,” but “it was withdrawn because they were in the middle of what started a revolutionary war for their own survival. ... They had to come together to fight the [British].”

Ultimately, the fight for independence from Britain and national unity took precedence over the issue of slavery until Abraham Lincoln was elected president and the Civil War thankfully put it to an end.

“[Abraham Lincoln] loved the Constitution of the United States, and he loved the Declaration, and he cited them repeatedly, especially the Declaration, as justification for fighting the [Civil] War to the end and abolishing slavery,” says Levin.

He wouldn’t have done that, though, if our founding documents were inherently pro-slavery and pro-white supremacy, as the left suggests they are.

To hear more of Levin’s analysis, including his take on the dangerous idea of nullification, a pre-Civil War movement that would have shattered the Republic, check out the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Mark Levin BLASTS '60 Minutes of Shame's' Lesley Stahl for pro-Hamas questioning



Once upon a time, CBS News’ “60 Minutes” was serious television. Mark Levin recalls how hosts used to track down hoodlums and crooks with cameras in their briefcases. The in-depth reporting and interviews were well worth a watch.

Fast-forward to today, and it’s a different story.

Thanks to hosts like "the clown" Lesley Stahl and her hardcore leftist bias, gone are the days of tough, gritty reporting. Now, we get “60 Minutes” episodes of freed Hamas hostages being subjected to the American media’s anti-Israel, anti-Trump bias.

On the show’s latest episode, Stahl interviewed Yarden Bibas and Keith Siegel, two recently freed hostages, who suffered starvation, severe psychological torment, and physical violence in Gaza. To say Stahl’s questioning was tone-deaf is an understatement.

When Siegel shared that he had been starved by his Hamas captors, Stahl responded with, “Do you think they starved you or they just didn’t have food?”

“There’s story after story after story of tons and tons of food being brought into Gaza and stolen by Hamas,” Levin rails. “Hamas steals it to feed themselves, and what they have left over, they sell to the other Palestinians in order to fund their war machine.”

Even though “eyewitnesses have reported this,” it didn’t stop Stahl from perpetuating mainstream media pro-Hamas lies.

In her conversation with Yarden Bibas, whose wife and two sons were taken hostage and brutally murdered by Hamas, Stahl asked what he would like to say to President Trump. When Bibas responded with, “Please stop this war and help bring all of the hostages back,” Stahl retorted, “And you think he can help?”

“I know he can help. I am here because of Trump. I’m here only because of him,” Bibas doubled down.

In the same episode, Stahl stated that “50,000 Gazans have been killed” since the October 7 attacks.

“Where did she get those numbers from?” Levin asks. “She got those numbers from Hamas! ... I've had statisticians on my radio show, on my Fox show, who've said that's not true; it's an absolute impossibility.”

“She knows it's not true; she knows she got the numbers from Hamas, but she uses them anyway,” he sighs.

To add insult to injury, Stahl also blamed Israel for the continuation of the war, claiming, “Netanyahu resumed the bombing of Gaza, breaking a fragile ceasefire that was exceedingly popular with Israelis.”

“There were conditions to the first phase” of the ceasefire deal, Levin explains, noting that it was Hamas who first violated the agreement.

“You're dealing with monsters; you're dealing with subhumans; you're dealing with terrorists, for crying out loud! What is with the American media? What is with [Lesley Stahl]?” he asks in disbelief.

“‘60 Minutes’ isn't worth one minute of your time.”

To see the footage of Stahl’s disgraceful interviews and reporting and hear more of Levin’s commentary, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Mark Levin exposes the TRUTH behind Columbia’s chaos-making activist



Mahmoud Khalil, a 30-year-old legal permanent resident and a Columbia University graduate student and pro-Palestinian activist, was arrested on March 8 by federal immigration authorities. The Department of Homeland Security planned to deport Khalil because his pro-Palestinian activism at Columbia University could cause problems for U.S. foreign policy and because he allegedly lied on his residency application by omitting certain jobs.

Two days after his arrest, however, Jesse Furman, a U.S. district judge in the Southern District of New York, issued an order blocking Khalil’s deportation and later moved the case to New Jersey. Khalil was then sent to a detention center in Louisiana, where immigration Judge Jamee Comans gave the government a deadline of April 9 to provide sufficient evidence that Khalil’s deportation is justified.

As of now, it's a waiting game.

Khalil is being treated by the left as a victim. Never mind the fact that he orchestrated some of the most chaotic and destructive protests on Columbia University’s campus. Never mind the fact that he belongs to the terrorist group Columbia University Apartheid Divest — an organization that has stated it seeks “the total eradication of Western civilization.”

Democrats have been crying over free speech and due process in their demands to free Khalil.

Mark Levin, however, knows the truth about what “rights” Khalil really has.

“Like it or not, aliens are treated differently,” he says. “There are certain levels of constitutional protection but not the same as a citizen.”

He explains that Khalil doesn’t get the same constitutional protections as citizens and that groups like the ACLU and lawyers tied to terrorist organizations, like CAIR, which is just “a Hamas front,” are defending Khalil to exploit the system.

To the judges and lawyers who argue that noncitizens like Khalil should get some kind of formal warning or notice before being deported, Levin asks, “What happens when you give them notice? They disappear.”

“This is the insanity we’re dealing with,” he sighs.

To hear more of his commentary, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Levin: The left wants to SMASH the Constitution — here’s the proof



The Democrats might claim they want to preserve the Constitution, but the radical leftists they platform clearly couldn’t be less interested.

One of those radical leftists is Elie Mystal, an American political commentator, who reveals his own rewriting of the Constitution in a recent segment on “The View.”

“When Democrats come into office, they come in with, like, super glue and tape, and so they try to put things back together. So I thought about writing 10 constitutional amendments that would be super cool if we had,” Mystal told the ladies on the panel.

“I was like, ‘No, no, no. We need to smash the things that they like. We need to smash the things that are holding this country back,’” Mystal continued. “And so I came up with 10 laws that we could just be rid of. Not reform, not update for the modern era. Ten things that we can smash if we ever are allowed to get power again that would make this country better tomorrow.”


“So this guy’s saying that we need to smash everything that you and I stand for,” Mark Levin of “LevinTV” says, disturbed. “It’s just this hate America stuff, it’s just incredible.”

In his segment on “The View,” Mystal claimed that everything put into law before the 1965 Voting Rights Act was passed should be ignored.

“Even the 1964 Civil Rights Act? We should ignore that, too?” Levin asks. “See, the 1964 Civil Rights Act preceded the 1965 Voting Rights Act, because that was actually called the 1965 Civil Rights Act, and they were subsequent to the 1866 Civil Rights Act. And they were also subsequent to the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.”

“The 13th Amendment officially abolishing slavery, the 14th Amendment ensuring that all freed slaves, black people, would be treated like citizens. The equal protection clause and due process clause of the Fifth Amendment applied to every single state through the 14th Amendment,” he continues.

“Should we ignore those, too? Well, who voted for them? Mostly white people and mostly white legislatures. You get my drift? In fact, who fought the Civil War? Obviously blacks fought, too. The overwhelming majority of the soldiers in the North were white. See, this race game doesn’t exactly play out like they hope, wish that it would.”

“Think about this idiot,” he continues, adding, “He thinks he’s clever. It’s because he doesn’t have anybody with an IQ over a pickle in order to respond to him.”

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Mark Levin reveals one of biggest threats facing our nation



One of the biggest threats currently facing our nation is judicial despotism, says Mark Levin.

Every time one of these district court judges issues a temporary restraining order or an injunction against the president of the United States, they spit on the Constitution.

“These lower-court judges, who are created by Congress, who are not in the Constitution … are supposed to operate within their district,” but instead they’re “operating nationally,” says Levin.

Our founders were concerned that this kind of judicial overreach would happen. They debated ferociously over liberty and rights and how to frame government around them, and they eventually came up with our brilliant republic — three equal branches of government held accountable by checks and balances.

But what we’re seeing today with these rogue district judges — all of whom are “ambulance-chasing Democrat lawyer[s]” — is a complete disregard for our Constitution.

Take the District of Columbia’s James Boasberg, who back in March had the audacity to verbally order Trump to turn around two planes carrying dangerous deportees.

Because the incident didn’t take place in D.C. where his jurisdiction lies, he had zero right to order anything, says Levin.

Not only did Boasberg violate separation of powers, but he also assumed a role that belongs to the president. President Trump has the constitutional authority under Article II to protect the United States as its commander in chief. It is his role alone to execute laws like the Alien Enemies Act, which Congress gave him to handle foreign threats.

If something isn’t done to stop these rogue district judges, that means “at the initial phase of litigation, a single federal judge has more power than a majority of the Supreme Court,” says Levin. “Everything's upside down and inside out.”

To hear more of his commentary, watch the clip above.”

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Mark Levin reveals the REAL reason Karl Marx is still influential today



When he died in 1883, Karl Marx was “relatively unknown,” says Mark Levin. Many knew about his predecessors Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who were considered great philosophers, but Marx himself “was not widely cited.”

It wasn’t until Woodrow Wilson and the birth of the progressive movement of “American Marxists” that Marx’s name began circulating in intellectual circles. Fast-forward to today, and he’s practically a household name — especially among conservatives, who see that his nefarious ideas form the bedrock of the progressive ideology that’s destroying this country.

How is it that someone who died nearly a century and half ago (and wasn’t even that popular) still has this much influence in the United States?

Levin has the answer.

“Marx has had the greatest influence of almost any philosopher in the entire world. Why? Because you're able to reduce Marxism to slogans,” he says.

“The oppressed and the oppressor; the victim and the victimizer; redistribution of wealth; unequal wealth; everybody has a right to eat” are some of the examples he gives of the Marxist-generated “sloganeering” that’s taken root in this country.

At his funeral, Marx’s notorious sidekick Friedrich Engels captured this concept when he said that Marx “reduced everything to its basics” — the most basic principle being “people need to eat.”

“That sounds like you’re dealing with animals,” says Levin, noting that humans, unlike animals, have the ability to reason.

And while these American Marxists may “say they’re for reason,” the truth is they “reject the Enlightenment” reasoning that birthed our Constitution and the rights protected in it. What they're really for is “scientific mechanicism,” says Levin.

Scientific mechanicism, he explains, is the idea that “we can reason to the point of creating this fantastic society.” “Forget about this talk about nature and eternal truths; it's a distraction. ... We can reason as human beings and create a society that's almost scientific in its exactitude.”

To create such a utopia, however, requires one thing: erasing human nature.

This is why Marxist, fascist, and other autocratic regimes control speech, language, and thought processes, says Levin.

To hear more of his commentary, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

THIS journalist's fierce Israel defense earns her a spot in Levin’s good books



You may recognize Erin Molan from her fiery pro-Israel segments on Sky News Australia – one of the most prominent conservative outlets in the country.

Although she parted ways with the network last December and now broadcasts for “69X Minutes” on X, Molan is still unapologetic in her support for Israel.

And that makes Mark Levin a fan of hers.

"She’s really good on Israel, really good on freedom, really good on the United States — just superb,” he says.

He then plays a recent clip from Molan during which she skewered the mainstream media for its pathetic reporting on the Israel-Hamas war.

“Could the mainstream media potentially ... maybe dig a little deeper into the sources they quote verbatim? Blindly republishing any information that you haven’t verified is unethical and lazy, but when that information comes directly from terrorists, well, it’s downright dangerous,” Molan began.

“War resumed in the Middle East this week, and yes, people will die — plenty of terrorists hopefully and good riddance — but also women and children, and that is utterly tragic, but it happens, particularly when you are dealing with Hamas, who either hide in tunnels or behind families. So when they, these same people who filmed themselves slaughtering over 1,200 innocent people on October 7 while simultaneously taking hostages, including two babies they then killed — when they release numbers of those killed in the demographic before it would be humanly possible to know, then maybe exercise a little skepticism,” she continued, referring to numerous reports from several different outlets that regurgitated a Hamas statistic that 400 Palestinians were killed in an Israeli airstrike.

“Maybe, just maybe, the same group of savages who burnt three children alive in a room and laughed don't necessarily value nor tell the truth,” she added.

She went on to explain that these same outlets are reporting that Israel’s attacks are what thwarted potential ceasefire when it was “the brutal terrorist organization [that] refused every proposal and deadline they've been presented with over the past weeks.”

“The blame for this entire sorry saga lies solely with Hamas,” Molan said frankly. “Can we all please stop pretending like there are two legitimate sides in this war?”

“She’s fantastic ... and she’s right — the media are the source of so much that is wrong in this world,” says Levin.

To hear more of Molan’s segment and Levin’s commentary, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.