Corporate Media Take Vow Of Silence On Biden 25th Amendment Talk

It’s amazing to think how radio silent the accomplice media have been on the subject of the 25th Amendment over the past few years.

Actress Fran Drescher wants to leverage movie productions to force 'diversity, inclusion,' calls her green initiative biggest effort since WWII



Actress Fran Drescher wants to leverage the influence and monetary investment of movie productions to encourage states to push toward "diversity" and "inclusion," as well push green energy initiatives.

As reported by NewsBusters' Stephanie Hamill, while speaking at the The 29th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards, Drescher took significant time on stage to talk about how movie studios can use financial influence on state legislators during an awards ceremony that was almost entirely void of political activism.

While most viewers were enjoying the sight of actress Jessica Chastain almost falling on stage or the exuberance of actor Brendan Fraser, Drescher spoke about activism from Hollywood's unions and the NFL.

"SAG-AFTRA and the NFLPA together forged Actors & Athletes for Democracy. We are the greatest influencers on the planet and must promote freedom for all," Drescher began.

"Our industry brings billions of production dollars to states across the nation, but if they want our business, let’s wield our financial influence to make governors act in the best interest of freedom, diversity, inclusion, and democracy. As my character Bobbi Flekman said in 'This Is Spinal Tap,' 'Money talks & bulls**t walks!'"

\u201cSAG-AFTRA president Fran Drescher \nwants Hollywood to use production dollars like a carrot on a stick to get governors to support their preferred policies.\u00a0\nIn other words, threaten Republican governors who don\u2019t cave to the liberal agenda with boycotts.\u00a0\nhttps://t.co/qnG7gcAPir\u201d
— Stephanie Hamill (@Stephanie Hamill) 1677518644

Drescher is the president of the the Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio Artists union, named in early 2022. The labor union represents approximately 160,000 professionals.

Drescher took more time to promote her Green Council initiative, which Deadline referred to as "an initiative she has been leading to encourage more environmentally-friendly practices in the industry," in 2022.

The actress pointed towards a single-use plastic initiative, remarking on the use of glass bottles at the ceremony, likening her efforts to World War II.

"I’m very proud to say SAG-AFTRA and MPA has forged Green Council, the biggest joint effort of Stars and Studios to save the planet since World War II," she said.

"Mission number one, an honor system to eliminate single use plastic on camera, behind the scenes and leverage star power to challenge audiences around the world to do the same. You may notice this year on your tables are glass bottles," she added.

\u201cFran Drescher boasts about\u00a0SAG-AFTRA & MPA's 'Green Council' \u2014their "biggest effort to save the planet since WWII" \u2013\u2013 which apparently is just an honor system to stop using disposable plastics during movie shoots.\u00a0\n\nhttps://t.co/qnG7gcAPir\n#SAGAwards2023 @theMRC @newsbusters\u201d
— Stephanie Hamill (@Stephanie Hamill) 1677518961

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

CNN's Chris Cuomo melts down, says pro-lifers hate science, only cater to the 'far-right white-fright vote'



In a bizarre and frenzied rant Monday evening, CNN anchor Chris Cuomo blasted pro-life Americans as racist haters of science over their attempts to challenge the legal precedents behind abortion rights established in the landmark case of Roe v. Wade.

Cuomo, obviously irked by the Supreme Court's decision to hear a Mississippi case this fall which could result in a major rollback of abortion rights, vented on his primetime show that conservative challenges to abortion laws are "not really about science" but are merely political tactics used to divide people and distract from real policy reform.

The case set for consideration is Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. It concerns a 2018 abortion law passed in Mississippi that bans abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, which critics say is before the fetus becomes viable, or is able to survive outside the womb.

In the state's petition to the court, Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch argued, "It is well past time for the Court to revisit the wisdom of the viability bright-line rule."

A legitimate question to be posed, one would think. But Cuomo saw it differently.

"You would think that we would have impaneled experts on a special commission by now to see what the science says, right, but we don't seem to have the intellectual curiosity about this issue," the progressive anchor said on his CNN show.

"Because it's not really about science — it has become a culture war. It's a political lever to use as a distraction from policy and solving problems, to allow people to get up in their religion and their righteousness," he continued.

CUOMO: Opposing abortion is "a political lever to use as a distraction from policy and solving problems."Abortion… https://t.co/YEikREQPEF

— NewsBusters (@newsbusters) 1621305525.0

"It's not about science or consensus," Cuomo went on. "It's about dividing lines, legislating to the far-right white-fright vote, flooding the zone with 536 bills that abridge a woman's right to control her own body, in 46 states."

"It's just like voting rights in one way," Cuomo strangely charged, comparing the effort to limit abortions to Republican state voting initiatives in places like Georgia characterized by progressives as racist and the "new Jim Crow."

During the rant, Cuomo even seemed to push back against his own perspective by arguing that science may be on the side of the pro-life movement.

He noted that modern "medical capabilities may be moving the point of viability well short of what it was assumed to be in 1973 with Roe v. Wade," a point which was in fact elucidated in Mississippi's petition to the Supreme Court.

Post-debate media roundup: The fly dominates the debate. Also, Mike Pence is sexist.



Wednesday night's vice presidential debate was a substantive, issue-driven, coherent political debate between Vice President Mike Pence and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), and a significant amount of the media discussion about and reaction to the debate focused on a fly.

During the debate at Kingsbury Hall, Salt Lake City, Utah, a fly landed on Pence's head and sat there for about two minutes.

A fly lands on Vice President Pence during #VPDebate. https://t.co/i0O2K6N9Yy
— CSPAN (@CSPAN)1602124116.0

And for a time, the fly dominated debate discussion.

I couldn’t take my eyes off the fly that perched on Mike Pence’s head during the debate. 🤪 https://t.co/PsY2FI12DL
— Jon Cooper 🇺🇸 (@Jon Cooper 🇺🇸)1602123806.0
Fly wins the night and probably the most memorable thing that happened.
— Chris Hayes (@Chris Hayes)1602123619.0
Forever more this debate will be known as “The Fly Debate “. I feel bad for Pence
— Mark Cuban (@Mark Cuban)1602123635.0
“The fly is the October Surprise.”~@JonLemire
— Joe Scarborough (@Joe Scarborough)1602123692.0
the fly has won this debate
— John Harwood (@John Harwood)1602123552.0
this fly on his head is distracting me!!!! #VPDebate https://t.co/gd6jfXv3yR
— philip lewis (@philip lewis)1602123547.0
Oh my God.He’s so full of crap, a fly has landed on his head. https://t.co/f61K9oIvKa
— Ana Navarro-Cárdenas (@Ana Navarro-Cárdenas)1602123621.0

Daily Caller reporter Andrew Kerr called out the media for its triviality.

Nobody gets to complain about civility in politics anymore.We just witnessed the only coherent debate of the pres… https://t.co/zxh9wlikye
— Andrew Kerr (@Andrew Kerr)1602126370.0

Aside from the fly, immediate media reaction to the debate focused on the performances of the two vice presidential candidates. MSNBC host Rachel Maddow remarked that the debate reminded her of what politics used to be like, before criticizing the Trump administration.

“It was like a visit to normal politics land,” @maddow says of #vpdebate, "which is fine and to be expected when it… https://t.co/nOT73aalVL
— MSNBC (@MSNBC)1602125396.0

Maddow led a panel with MSNBC contributors Nicole Wallace and Joy Reid.

Reid, after mentioning the fly, criticized Pence for interrupting Harris, accusing him of "doing a softer version of what Donald Trump did last week."

"He repeatedly interrupted her, he demanded, well, he also repeatedly interrupted the other woman in the room, which is the moderator who seemed to at some point lose control of him, and he also continually demanded that Kamala Harris answer his questions," Reid said. "She was not there to answer his questions."

After Reid noted how Pence apparently steamrolled the moderator and Harris, which she said will hurt Trump with women, Wallace said his performance was "flaccid and anemic," which she says will hurt Trump with men.

"Vice President Pence appeared flaccid," @NicolleDWallace says of VP Pence's #vpdebate performance. "The only time… https://t.co/cwF2wML5JB
— MSNBC (@MSNBC)1602125539.0

Former Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill later joined the MSNBC panel and called Pence "patronizing" and "boring."

"Let me start with Pence. He was patronizing, which drove all the women crazy. And he was boring, which lost most o… https://t.co/eqKLr10Cus
— MSNBC (@MSNBC)1602126717.0

Pence was criticized by other commentators for interrupting Harris. According to CNN chief media correspondent Brian Stelter, CBS anchor Norah Odonnell claimed that Pence interrupted Harris "twice as often" as Harris interrupted Pence.

>> @NorahODonnell on CBS: "Our team was following it very closely, and the VP Mike Pence interrupted Sen. Kamala Harris twice as often."
— Brian Stelter (@Brian Stelter)1602124731.0

MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski complained that Pence overran his time and was not controlled by moderator Susan Page.

Why cant Susan page control this debate. She is getting run over??? Why ..
— Mika Brzezinski (@Mika Brzezinski)1602123735.0

MSNBC's Chris Hayes made the interruptions a gender issue.

The gendered dynamics of interruption and the power to interrupt is always so in your face in these settings. My god.
— Chris Hayes (@Chris Hayes)1602122521.0

ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos brought sexism into his analysis, accusing Pence of "mansplaining" to Harris.

ABC's George Stephanopoulos:"A lot of people were noticing some mansplaining going on tonight." https://t.co/5FtQlyxL9p
— Daily Caller (@Daily Caller)1602125358.0


But two independent reviews of the speaking time reveals that Harris had equal time with Pence, if not more.

Pence and Harris had almost exactly the same amount of speaking time, per @CNN https://t.co/NQn43YRd1k
— Andrew Solender (@Andrew Solender)1602126237.0
unofficial speaking times -Pence: 35:22Harris: 38:48 via @Kjwalsh_news
— Rick Klein (@Rick Klein)1602124720.0

Ben Shapiro said that Pence's performance was "effective," which is why commentators assumed he spoke more.

But everybody thought Pence spoke more. Which demonstrates how effective he was. Harris' performance, which will be… https://t.co/7TZOZMhwo0
— Ben Shapiro (@Ben Shapiro)1602125252.0

Others said Pence performed well. CBS' Norah O'Donnell said Pence was "masterful."

"You may not agree with anything his administration does, but in terms of his debating style he repeatedly did not answer the question that was posed to him about the record of the Trump administration on a number of issues, he pivoted and used the time to deliver a direct attack against Joe Biden's long record in Washington. And I was stunned because I thought that Kamala Harris, the former prosecutor and skilled debater ... would be able to make sure it was the Trump record that was on defense."

"Many times it seemed like Kamala was on defense," she added.

CBS’s Norah O’Donnell says Vice President Pence’s debate performance was “masterful.”He “used the time to deliver… https://t.co/bTFlnLtLzl
— Trump War Room - Text TRUMP to 88022 (@Trump War Room - Text TRUMP to 88022)1602126453.0

ABC News newscaster Linsey Davis said Pence "really held [Harris'] feet to the fire" on the Supreme Court.

ABC News’ Linsey Davis: Vice President @Mike_Pence “really held her feet to the fire,” especially on the Supreme Co… https://t.co/QOlanXCFog
— Steve Guest (@Steve Guest)1602126591.0

ABC News contributor Sara Fagen said Pence "did a great job."

ABC News contributor Sara Fagen on Vice President @Mike_Pence: “he did a great job”https://t.co/UnPPEjg7Y6 https://t.co/NY6CKEm9Ds
— RNC Research (@RNC Research)1602126716.0

CNN contributor Van Jones said Harris was "run over" and said Pence was "masterful" and "made conservatism seem normal again."

CNN's Van Jones is big mad that Mike Pence "was masterful in normalizing conservative ideas." 😂😂😂😂#VPDebate https://t.co/6z5LdMB6ve
— Curtis Houck (@Curtis Houck)1602126492.0

Harris was criticized for missing opportunities to attack the Trump administration and for dodging some questions.

NBC's Lester Hold and Andrea Mitchell noted Harris "didn't score" on the issue of masks.

On NBC, Lester Holt and Andrea @MitchellReports regretted Harris “left on the table” anti-Trump points, “surprised… https://t.co/iV8ycYPT1O
— NewsBusters (@NewsBusters)1602125484.0

CNN's Jake Tapper criticized Harris for dodging a question on packing the Supreme Court.

CNN’s Jake Tapper: Sen. Kamala Harris didn’t answer questions about packing the Supreme Court, “that’s significant,… https://t.co/Sy0r22RVjd
— RNC Research (@RNC Research)1602125989.0

Conservatives, for the most part, say Pence won the debate. Progressives say Harris won. But if debates are won on memorability, we should all acknowledge the fly as the true winner.