The federal government and Big Pharma FUND the STERILIZATION of CHILDREN — the proof will make you sick



Allie Beth Stuckey invites Daily Wire field reporter Spencer Lindquist on the show to dissect some most disturbing information regarding studies in transgenderism.

Spencer, who recently published an article titled “NIH funds study on puberty blockers, hormones on youth despite risk of sterilization,” unpacks his extensive research.

What he says will leave you sick to your stomach.

“The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is funding research on the effects of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormone treatment on youth despite acknowledgment from the grantee that these medical interventions can result in sterility,” Spencer states in the article.

The parent/guardian consent form distributed at the Children's Hospital of L.A., which is where much of this research is being conducted, clearly states the risk of sterilization.

The form reads: “If your child starts puberty blockers in the earliest stages of puberty, and then goes on to gender affirming hormones, they will not develop sperm or eggs. This means that they will not be allowed to have biological children.”

According to two different studies, “98% of children who take puberty blockers go on to take cross-sex hormone therapy.”

If the math is correct, that means roughly 98% of children taking part in these studies will likely be sterilized in the process.

Guess what’s funding this research at the NIH?

The taxpayer dollars lining Joe Biden’s pockets, of course.

Further, “the NIH is funding a wide array of different studies focused on transgenderism, particularly transgenderism in youth,” Spencer says.

In fact, Spencer uncovered “a $3.26 million grant from the NIH to the Boston Children’s Hospital” that, according to the NIH, was intended to “[expand] access to ... gender-affirming care.”

The grant was specifically geared toward “what they call TDG youth,” Spencer says, “that’s transgender and gender-diverse youth,” which focuses on individuals “between the ages of 13 to 24.”

Some may wonder how the federal government and the NIH are justifying the type of research that results in the sterilization of children.

Simply put, they point to transgender suicide and the need to prevent it.

Allie quotes the U.S. Assistant Secretary for Health, Rachel Levine (a transgender woman), who is on record stating that the Biden administration gives its “highest support” to the transition of minors, claiming that it’s essential for their mental well-being.

“That’s exactly how these grants are justified,” Spencer says. “We keep hearing this claim that this is ... a medical necessity for these children.”

Allie is astounded by this claim because she has yet to see any legitimate evidence that justifies the federal government funding research that results in the sterilization of children.

It’s also worth noting that Dr. Stanley Goldfarb of the Do No Harm organization has gone on record stating that there is “no good evidence that children treated with gender-altering hormones or puberty blockers improved mental health assessments.”

So what’s the real motivation behind this research then?

Spencer points to “the actual profit that the pharmaceutical companies make.”

He goes on to explain the inner workings of the “Gender Cool Project,” an organization that is “all about making transgenderism cool,” he says.

The organization “[takes] young children who identify as transgender, and [it gets] them these very high profile media interviews” at “Teen Vogue, ABC, USA Today, The New York Times, Washington Post,” and even “at the White House,” Spencer explains.

It should come as no surprise then that Pfizer, the “pharmaceutical titan” Spencer calls it, is one of the biggest benefactors of the Gender Cool Project.

Now, why would Pfizer want to support the glorification of transgenderism?

“When you look into the products that Pfizer makes, we identified at least five different drugs that are used in these sex-change attempts,” he says.

Might the motivation behind Pfizer’s generous donations be because the more transgender people there are, the fatter its piggy bank gets?

“So Pfizer is supporting [the Gender Cool Project],” so “they can profit from the products that are being used to facilitate child transition?” Allie asks, visibly horrified.

Spencer tells her that it’s not just Pfizer though.

“[Pfizer] wasn’t the only Big Pharma company that was backing the Gender Cool Project,” he says. “There’s also ABV Pharmaceuticals” and “Bayer.”

What these Big Pharma companies are doing is “making lifelong patients dependent upon [them],” he concludes.

To learn more, watch the full clip below.


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Why I Can't Celebrate the Respect for Marriage Act | Guest: Pedro Gonzalez | Ep 716

Why I Can't Celebrate the Respect for Marriage Act | Guest: Pedro Gonzalez | Ep 716

Trans advocate warns ‘children will die’ as states consider banning 'gender-affirming care’ for kids



Transgender activist Willow Breshears claimed that states banning "gender-affirming care" for transgender kids will cause a surge in child deaths.

What are the details?

In a Monday report from USA Today, 18-year-old Breshears — who grew up a Baptist in rural Arkansas — said that legislators have no place in policing transgender children's bodies.

Breshears recently testified before state lawmakers to stop the passage of a newly proposed state law that bans health care providers form providing "gender-affirming care" to youth under the age of 18.

Such "gender-affirming care" includes puberty blockers and hormone therapy.

Last week, Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R) vetoed a bill that would have made the state the first to ban gender-affirming medical care for youth under the age of 18 — even with parental consent.

Hutchinson at the time said that the Save Adolescents from Experimentation Act, or SAFE Act, was "a vast government overreach."

A day later, the legislature overrode Hutchinson's veto. The House voted 71-24 and the Senate 25-8.

The SAFE Act, according to the outlet, "also prohibits physicians from referring patients to other providers and, in what some call a particularly heinous move, includes no grandfather clause for youth already under treatment."

"The only people who should have that say is that transgender person, their family, and their doctors," Breshears insisted. "This is not a place for legislators to step into."

Breshears, who began a transgender journey at the age of 13 with hormone therapy and came out as gay at 12, said that she believes she might not be alive today if she hadn't been allowed to transition at such a young age.

"I had heard the word 'transgender' a couple times before that, but never really in a positive way," said Breshears. "That's what really helped me flourish. I was a woman, but I never really knew the words to describe that."

What else?

Rodrigo Heng-Lehtinen, deputy executive director for the National Center for Transgender Equality, said that preventing transgender children from transitioning at their leisure raises the risk of serious mental health issues among that population.

"There's only so many people taking puberty blockers in Arkansas," he said. "But every single transgender person is feeling the effect of this attack. It's the government, pure and simple, saying 'You don't belong.' It's such an antagonistic and heartless message to send."

Arkansas Rep. Deborah Ferguson (D) has also spoken out against the bill, saying that at least four dozen Arkansas youth receiving hormone therapy have reportedly attempted to commit suicide.

"It is unfortunate that the makeup of our legislature has changed to the extent that we are weaponizing religion to discriminate agains this small minority," Fergon said.

According to the outlet, "Advocates say access to gender-affirming medical care is linked with better mental health, including a lower incidence of suicidal thoughts. Bills denying such care have been condemned by major medical groups around the country, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychiatric Association."

Christa and Jeff White, the parents of a 12-year-old transgender daughter, said that they worry for their daughter's mental health as a transgender youth.

"The idea that this could put my daughter in danger is not OK with me," said Christa White, a stay-at-home mom and women's rights activist. "This is potentially devastating, not just to our child, but to all transgender children undergoing these treatments. Children will die."

Anything else to know?

The American Civil Liberties Union has vowed to fight the Arkansas law, according to the report.

The Human Rights Campaign also blasted the law as a "cruel and shameful way for legislators to score political points by targeting transgender youth who are simply trying to navigate their adolescence."

Horowitz: Arkansas GOP governor stands on the hill of chemical castration for minors



It's a headline I never would have imagined writing just a few years ago. But in the year 2021, it's actually newsworthy when a completely red state has enough votes to block castration operations and hormone destruction therapy for minors. In most states, governments can regulate every aspect of doctors' right to practice, including prescribing cheap and effective FDA-approved drugs to treat COVID, yet they have a green light to perform castration on minors.

On Tuesday, the House voted 71-24, and the Senate 25-8, to override Governor Asa Hutchinson's veto of the "Save Adolescents from Experimentation (SAFE) Act" (HB 1570). The bill doesn't even ban such a barbaric practice for adults. It merely bars puberty blocking, hormone therapy, or castration of minors. Shockingly, it's the first state to do so, even though Republicans control government in 23 states.

Both chambers initially passed the bill in March by similar margins, but the governor vetoed it on Monday. In Arkansas, the legislature only needs a simple majority reaffirmation of the initial vote to override a veto, but in this case, legislators repudiated him by a mile.

In vetoing the bill, the governor charged, "You are starting to let lawmakers interfere with health care and set a standard for legislation overriding health care." He contended that "the state should not presume to jump into every ethical health decision."

So, what if a minor went to the doctor and said she feels like a mermaid and wants him to amputate her legs? Is that not the business of the state either? If anything, amputating legs is less systemically damaging to the body than castration or gender mutilation procedures and hormones.

Moreover, the sudden libertarian conversion is quite rich given Hutchinson's recent foray into COVID fascism. Hutchinson had no problem interfering with health care decisions by forcing people to wear experimental medical devices, aka masks, and fining businesses for not participating in his worthless health care restrictions. In fact, he just vetoed a bill to zero out COVID fines on businesses and managed to pressure a number of House members to flip their votes and sustain his veto.

Gov. Hutchinson widely received accolades from conservatives when he signed SB 354, the bill barring boys in girls' sports, after South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem vetoed a similar bill in her state. Idaho, Mississippi, and Tennessee have also passed similar legislation. However, it is baffling that he would veto this bill barring castration for minors, which is a much bigger slam dunk. Men playing female sports is absurd and unfair; castration of minors is sadistic. What's next – assisted suicide of minors? After all, Governor Hutchinson, we wouldn't want to interfere with health care decisions.

Hutchinson got a lot of pressure from the same people in the health care cartel who obsessively pushed COVID fascism. He claimed to be concerned "with those young people who are currently under hormone treatment." Isn't it interesting how the same health care cartel that sought to ban lifesaving COVID treatment using drugs, such as hydroxychloroquine, that have been safely dispensed billions of times somehow believes it's safe to destroy the hormone system of minors? Adults cannot get safe COVID treatment, but children can make decisions on castration.

This sort of diabolical worldview passes as science and medicine in this era, yet Hutchinson thinks that the GOP legislators are the extremists. "The Republican Party that I grew up with believed in a restrained government that did not jump in the middle of every issue," bemoaned the governor.

Actually, governor, the party you grew up in would have banned such behavior even for adults and would have locked up those promoting it in mental asylums. Hutchinson had the nerve to say on Tucker Carlson's show last night that he appealed to "limited government principles" in the mold of Buckley and Reagan by promoting chemical castration for minors. He suggested that it is conservatives who are interjecting themselves into cultural wars, as if the woke left – mask-wearing, transgenderism, illegal immigration, and all – is the normal default.

WATCH: Tucker Carlson and Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson debate the governor's decision to veto a bill banning gender… https://t.co/Yc5IalVjaJ
— Daily Caller (@Daily Caller)1617756276.0

That we have ceded the playing field to the left and allowed them to define normal in every aspect of our lives is exactly why we have lost the country. The fact that we have governors in nearly every state who think this way is why the red states are not much better. But if the state legislatures would man up, then perhaps the tide will turn.