Our Elites Are So Deluded By Moral Relativism They’re Excusing Mayan Human Sacrifice

An author of a study of a Mayan burial site says we should show tolerance for civilizations that murdered their own children to honor gods.

Study: Religious School Kids Are Way More Tolerant And Informed Than Public Schoolers

Is it any wonder Americans no longer share a hope for the future and a sense of the common good?

Naked Men Freely Expose Themselves To Kids At Pride Because The Right Bought The Left’s ‘Tolerance’ Lie

Our children are paying the price for prior generations’ passive acceptance of the LGBT agenda with their innocence.

Obama claims the country is now less tolerant of differing opinions than when he was in charge



Former President Barack Obama expressed concern in a CNN interview Thursday that the United States has become less tolerant since he left office, stressing that this is a problem shared by both Republicans and Democrats.

Obama told CNN's Christiane Amanpour that "democratic institutions are creaky." He made clear he wasn't necessarily referring to the indictment of the Democratic incumbent's top rival ahead of the 2024 presidential election, which he suggested serves as evidence that no one is above the law.

Rather, the former president indicated he is more concerned "with the fact that not just one particular individual is being accused of undermining existing laws, but that more broadly we’ve seen — whether it’s through the gerrymandering of districts, whether it’s trying to silence critics through changes in legislative process, whether it’s attempts to intimidate the press — a strand of anti-democratic sentiment that we’ve seen in the United States."

"It’s something that is right now most prominent in the Republican Party, but I don’t think it’s something that is unique to one party," said the former president. "I think there is less tolerance for ideas that don’t suit us."

Obama stressed that the "habits of a free and open exchange of ideas and the idea that we all agree to the rules of the same game ... even if the outcomes aren't always the ones we like" have "weakened since I left office, and we're gonna need to strengthen them again."

The former president attributed the breakdown of bipartisanship and tolerance, in part, to the isolation of information.

"If you're watching Fox News or following some right-wing radio host or getting Facebook feeds within that bubble, your reality is different than if you read the New York Times or watch [CNN]," he said. "When people are getting such fundamentally different facts, or what they think to be facts, and their worldviews are so skewed in one direction or another, and it's very hard for democracy to work."

Although Obama intimated in his CNN interview that intolerance, anti-democratic sentiment, and the silencing of critics are on the rise, these trends appear to have preceded his departure from office.

The Pew Research Center found that partisan polarization surged in the Obama years, which he led into with the suggestion that elements of the working class, frustrated with economic conditions, "cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

The Internal Revenue Service, under the Obama administration, discriminated against hundreds of conservative groups in their applications for tax-exempt status. On the basis of their names and politics, these groups' applications were singled out, delayed, and denied.

The Obama Justice Department determined in 2015 that no one at the IRS would be penalized in the scandal, and key proponents retired with full federal benefits, reported PBS.

Only after Obama left office did the IRS get around to expressing its "sincere apology."

While Obama indicated critics are now being silenced by elements of the state, at least more than they had been when he was in charge, Pulitzer-prize winning New York Times journalist Matt Apuzzo underscored at a Duke University event in 2017 that nothing in the years following Obama's tenure came close to the "chilling effect" the former president's crackdown on journalists and leaks had on the profession, reported the Duke Chronicle.

The New York Post indicated that Apuzzo, who like the Times' Adam Goldman had his phone records seized, called Obama "the most oppressive" for journalists since Richard Nixon.

Obama suggested to the New York Times in 2009 that Fox News, which had been critical of his policies and leadership, was not a legitimate news organization.

The Washington Post reported that the Obama Department of Justice obtained telephone records for then-Fox News journalist James Rosen, who was suspected of obtaining leaked information about North Korea. The Obama administration "used security badge access records to track the reporter's comings and goings," perused his personal emails, and traced the timing of his calls with the supposed leaker.

The Times editorial board wrote, "With the decision to label a Fox News television reporter a possible 'co-conspirator' in a criminal investigation of a news leak, the Obama administration has moved beyond protecting government secrets to threatening fundamental freedoms of the press to gather news."

The Obama DOJ also secretly subpoenaed phone records from Associated Press offices in Washington, Hartford, Connecticut, and New York, again trying to determine the nature of reporters' sources.

"The Obama administration has pursued more such cases than all previous administrations combined," reported the Washington Post.

Depreciated tolerance on racial matters was also a feature under Obama's presidency.

A 2016 Rasmussen Poll found that 60% of likely U.S. voters believed race relations had worsened since Obama's inauguration.

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Parents Push Back On The Rainbow Mafia’s Unmistakable Intolerance

Every time activists and educrats assure parents that the LGBT movement is about 'tolerance,' we find evidence of intolerance.

They Are Intolerant, Divisive, And Anti-Liberty — Call Them Leftists, Not Liberals

Freedom-loving Americans should not give leftists the power of being called ‘liberal.’ The term ‘leftist’ better describes their intolerance and desire to overthrow the established order.

Why ‘Amen And A Woman’ Is Far Worse Than It Might Seem

The prayer's true scandal was largely ignored -- and is indicative of a widespread societal shift toward a serious and dangerous misunderstanding of both Christianity and tolerance.

Netflix’s ‘The Prom’ Reinforces Celebrities’ Extreme Disconnect From Flyover America

Netflix's 'The Prom' raises small-town homophobia to such an extreme it undermines its own message of tolerance and inclusivity.

Bozell & Graham: Campus crusade against Christianity

A new survey of college students by the liberal-leaning Knight Foundation shows the future of the First Amendment doesn't look so bright in America. It found 41 percent said "hate speech" should not be protected by the Constitution. Only 58 percent thought it should.

In fact, a 2017 survey out of UCLA found that out of 1,500 college students who were asked whether "hate speech" is protected by the First Amendment, only 39 percent correctly said yes. On campus today, it can be defined as "unsafe" to hear an opinion you don't like. Unwelcome speech is compared to a physical attack.

Make no mistake. The Thought Police are gaining ground, dangerously.

The central question is what qualifies as "hate speech"? The standards can shift quickly. The Knight Foundation poll found that 68 percent of students believe the campus climate prevents students from expressing their opinions because of fears they might offend other classmates.

The irony is inescapable. So many of them support the censorship they claim to abhor.

We've all heard story after story about students protesting those horrible right-wing speakers like Henry Kissinger and Condoleezza Rice for daring to set foot on campus. These same radicals regularly try to end the careers of professors found to be extremists for things such as seeing no problem in little white girls dressing as a Disney character "of color," like Mulan or Tiana, for Halloween.

Yale University seems to be the new True North for political intolerance, and here comes yet another episode in an endless list of grievances from the $72,000-a-year-tuition oppressed. An LGBTQ advocacy group called the Outlaws is furious that Yale's Federalist Society invited a lawyer from a so-called "hate group," the Alliance Defending Freedom, to discuss the case of Colorado baker Jack Phillips's refusal to make a cake for a same-sex wedding. For the record, ADF is one of the most respected organizations in the conservative movement today, which is why it qualifies as a hate group. In a sympathetic response, Yale Law School is creating a policy to stop providing stipends or loan forgiveness to students who work for organizations that defend traditional Christian views on sexual ethics.

So if you work for the ACLU or Planned Parenthood after college, you can receive some loan forgiveness. You can defend abortionists or terrorist suspects and Yale will love you. But support traditional marriage? The right to life? That's beyond the pale.

Sen. Ted Cruz called the policy "transparently discriminatory" and is now investigating, noting that Yale receives lots of federal funding, and the Trump administration has made it clear it's willing to deny federal funding to universities that curb freedom of speech. It's about time.

"I think Yale law school is the canary in the coal mine," Sen. Cruz says. "If they get away with this, we'll see law school after law school after law school following the same pattern. And I'll tell you, what the LGBT group demanded of Yale not just that they discriminate against Christians and financial aid. They demanded that they discriminate against anyone who believes in traditional marriage in admissions, that they not even admit anyone who believes in a biblical definition of marriage. That is profoundly dangerous, and we've got to stand up and prevent it."

Yale officials told Sen. Cruz that its policy isn't based on excluding a religion or ideology, which is false on its face. The LGBTQ ideology will not abide the expression of a biblical view of sexuality and marriage. It wants the view punished as "hate speech," and it wants to begin blacklisting Christians for advocating their beliefs in public. To the libertine left, opposing "discrimination" means building an imposing border wall with barbed wire around the First Amendment. "Tolerance" demands no less.

COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

Keep reading...Show less