Chuck Todd suffers Trump derangement syndrome meltdown over glorious America 250 celebrations



Triple-degree heat and a severe thunderstorm weren't enough to dampen patriots' celebration of America's 250th anniversary in the national capital.

Hours after the National Mall was evacuated on account of severe weather warnings, perhaps as many as 150,000 soaked and resilient attendees returned to join President Donald Trump in celebrating the country, honoring its heroes, and enjoying the dazzling fireworks.

'I feel betrayed.'

Whereas his countrymen gathered at the National Mall couldn't contain their joy, Chuck Todd, the ex-host of "Meet the Press," evidently found himself unable to contain his anger and resentment over the America 250 celebrations.

The eponymous host of "The Chuck ToddCast" worked himself into a lather on Sunday, ranting about how "Donald Trump has ruined the American brand and the American birthday celebration" by supposedly making it "feel like an endorsement of one man or one political movement."

While short on specifics about how Trump ruined the celebrations, Todd was confident that the country would have been better off with "hokey and bland" ceremonies rather than memorable, high-production events such as the UFC 250 matches at the White House.

Todd rattled off a list of sights that make some Americans feel patriotic, including military power, memorials for the founders, and fireworks — then noted what really floats his boat is a naturalization ceremony. He argued that Trump's 250 celebrations were too narrowly tailored to certain types of patriotism and failed to "make room for other people's patriotism too."

RELATED: What are the odds? America's birthday is full of incredible coincidences

Amid FARAHI/AFP/Getty Images

Despite suggesting that patriotism takes different forms, Todd insinuated that liberal guilt was essential.

"Patriotism is not being afraid of history. It is not pretending the country was perfect in 1776. It is not acting as if the only way to love America is to sand off every rough edge and call the result pride," said the podcaster.

"I am so angry and feel betrayed," whined Todd.

"I feel betrayed as an American by him on this."

Closing out the July 4 events that caused Todd to gripe and tremble, Trump said, "We have thrived and flourished because our founders were great. Our cause was just. Our people are brave. Our culture is exceptional. And our destiny is written by God."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

FCC Chair Vows To Crack Down On Anti-Conservative Media’s ‘Free Monopoly’

The old, corrupt guard of broadcast media are being forced to come to terms with Equal Time. And it’s driving them insane.

Is it finally time to abandon my ultra-liberal hometown?



I’m looking at new apartments this week here in Portland, Oregon. It’s time for an upgrade.

This has triggered a debate I often have with myself: If I’m going to move, why not leave dysfunctional, far-left Portland altogether?

Had I become so comfortable with the bad vibes of Portland that I would stay here indefinitely, out of inertia or laziness or not wanting to start over?

This is my chance to move to a different city. Or another state. Somewhere with fewer drug addicts and criminals roaming the streets and fewer democratic socialists roaming city hall.

I grew up in Portland. I have lived here off and on throughout my life. During my most productive years as a writer, I lived in bigger, more media-oriented cities, mainly New York and Los Angeles.

But I’ve always loved coming back to Oregon and assumed I would settle here when I retire. Portland always felt like my place. I love the tall trees, the gentle rain, the misty Oregon coast.

Free radicals

Unfortunately, over the last 15 years, Portland has become a hotbed of radicalism and political intolerance. So much so that it has affected my daily life.

I’ve always socialized with creative types. But in Portland, the artistic community is often more hysterical than the violent protesters in the street.

Once it became known I was conservative, I lost about 80% of my writer friends. And maybe half of my other friends. This social exclusion was especially bad during the years around #MeToo, and then COVID, and of course the constant presence of Trump derangement syndrome.

Un-friendzoned

The result is that living here has been like living on a desert island. I feel unwelcome at art events. I avoid literary parties and gallery openings.

One egregious example: I didn’t attend the celebration of life for one of my most important literary mentors, a beloved Portland poet who encouraged me as a young writer and helped advance my career.

I owed so much to this man, and I couldn’t go to his funeral!

RELATED: WACK JOB: My adventures in the mental health industrial complex

Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images

Tiny bubbles

Recently, I saw a TikTok video by a woman whose family had moved from Seattle to Wyoming.

Her message was simple: “No matter how much you think you are aware of the bubble you live in, when you get out of these far-left cities, a whole new world opens up to you.”

This hit me hard. Had I become so comfortable with the bad vibes of Portland that I would stay here indefinitely, out of inertia or laziness or not wanting to start over?

My own private Idaho

One reason I’m reluctant to move to a red state is I’m not sure I would fit in.

Take for example, Boise, Idaho, the closest red city to Portland. I’ve visited there many times. It’s clean. There are no homeless. The people are super nice. It’s very “churchy” and family-oriented. There’s a large Mormon population.

But could I adapt to such a place? I’ve lived in liberal cities MY ENTIRE LIFE. I have never lived in a place like Boise. Would I find people who understand my sense of humor? People who like the obscure music I listen to? Or read the books I read?

Yes, the people of Boise would share my core values. But would they share my urban tastes?

Go east, young man

I had a Republican friend here in Portland who moved to Florida during Trump’s first term. At the time, that seemed like a drastic change.

For a couple of years, I emailed him every few months to ask how he was doing. He had settled right in. Florida was great. He loved it there.

As he grew more comfortable in Florida, I grew less comfortable in Portland. Now, in 2026, moving to Florida 10 years ago seems like a genius move. I am humbled by his foresight.

The great escape?

So what should I do? Be the latecomer, arriving in Tampa or Austin or Nashville a decade after all the smart people already moved there?

I guess it’s never too late. I could still escape.

But what about the tall trees, the gentle rain, and the misty coastline I love so much? What about my roots in the place where I grew up?

Robert E. Lee didn’t abandon his home state of Virginia in the face of a civil war. But Virginia was famous for its proud history and strong cultural heritage.

I’m from Portland, famous for people with orange hair who don’t know what gender they are.

Fall into the gap

I’ve always assumed Portland’s current political extremism would fade over time. Sooner or later, people would calm down and return to some form of normalcy.

But whenever I try to connect with my former liberal friends, I quickly learn that the derangement is stronger than ever.

So, should I stay or should I go?

These are the decisions we have to make during these difficult times — as we struggle to maintain our sense of ourselves and of where we came from.

WI Brewpub Owner Pledging Free Beer If Trump Dies Now Running For Governor

Meanwhile, an FBI spokeswoman says an investigation into Kirk Bangstad remains 'ongoing' as the brewer cashes in on his 15 minutes of infamy.

Chuck Todd Decries Violence Around Trump He Helped Create

The political clown has long been part of the corporate media 'resistance' movement, feeding the furnace of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

A ‘Bounty’ Of Beer Marks Another Dark Turn In Leftists’ Pursuit Of A Dead Donald Trump

Nasty Wisconsin brewery owner promised 'free beer, all day' the day Trump dies.

Pat Gray calls Cory Booker an ‘antichrist’ after shocking ‘what we need is not from on high’ speech



Last weekend during the Michigan Democratic Women's Caucus Legacy Luncheon, Democrat Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.) quite literally shouted a speech, in which he implored Democrats to become "foot soldiers for democracy" and warned of "darkness and wind" facing the nation ahead of the midterms.

At one point in his 25-minute fire-and-brimstone jeremiad, Booker, gesturing upward, bellowed, “What we need is not from on high!”

On a recent episode of “Pat Gray Unleashed,” Pat played the clip of the speech and concluded that Booker is an “antichrist” among us.

Pat translates Booker’s controversial line: “He is telling you we don't need God.”

“Well, that's an antichrist. ... Maybe not the Antichrist, but he's an antichrist,” he argues, calling it “frightening.”

The panel agrees that Booker and fellow Democrats’ wild antics are the result of Trump derangement syndrome.

“The infection has really spread,” says Jeffy.

“How do you come together with these people?” asks Pat. “There’s one way and it is from on high.”

“We got to turn to God on high to come together on this, and if you're screaming that that's not what we need, what does that tell Americans?” he asks. “That tells you he's not the guy to follow, that's for sure. That's not the party to follow.”

What is desperately needed, Pat explains, is for all politicians to “call for prayer for the nation to get together and have a common purpose and invoke the blessings of God.”

He compares Booker’s comment to President Trump’s request for national prayer in preparation for the nation’s 250th birthday.

“I'm serious about this being antichrist because [Booker] is telling people you don't need God,” Pat reiterates. “What we need are Democrats, I guess? So they're putting themselves in the position of God. ... It's despicable. It's anti-American. It's anti-Christian. It's anti-God.”

Keith Malinak argues Booker is just a "Democrat telling the truth about Democrats."

To see the clip of Booker’s speech and hear more of the panel’s commentary, watch the episode above.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Fetterman says Democrats are run by Trump derangement syndrome: 'Our party is governed by the TDS'



Senator John Fetterman (D-Pa.) threw gasoline on an already sensitive fire for Democrats and said that his party has no real leadership.

Fetterman is among the few Democrats who support Operation Epic Fury, a joint U.S.-Israeli military operation in Iran that has seen weeks of bombing and conflict.

'I think the TDS — I think that's the leader right now.'

During the episode of the "All-In Podcast" released Wednesday, Fetterman was discussing his popularity among Republican voters when he was asked to identify the leader of the modern Democratic Party.

"Oh, we don't have one," Fetterman told host David Friedberg.

"I think the TDS — I think that's the leader right now," he said, referring to Trump derangement syndrome, which typically refers to an inability to see any positives in what President Trump does.

Fetterman continued, "You know, right now our party is governed by the TDS. And now it's made it virtually impossible, without being punished as a Democrat, to agree something's good or [say] 'I agree with the other side.'"

RELATED: Only one Democrat joins GOP as Senate rejects effort to halt Trump’s Iran strikes

The Pennsylvania senator then directly cited his support for the Iranian operation, saying he thinks it is "entirely appropriate" to hold the now-former Iranian regime "accountable."

"What's strange to me [is] that every single Democrat that's run for president and anyone that I know in Congress says we must never allow them to acquire a nuclear bomb. When that happens, why not celebrate that or acknowledge that? ... Like, yeah, you don't have to agree on every single thing, but when a good thing happens, just because it comes from the different party — that tells me that you're choosing the demand of the base or the party over country or what's really, I think, appropriate, in that circumstance."

Fetterman, 56, said that his party has become so inflexible that "you are not allowed" to show solidarity with Israel but that "it's not a big deal if you have a Nazi tattoo on your chest."

The senator was likely referring to Graham Platner, a Democrat Senate candidate from Maine, who allegedly has a Nazi SS tattoo. Platner previously said he did not realize the tattoo resembled a Nazi symbol and that he planned to have it "removed."

"You have people in my party now who are trying to normalize that or to excuse that. I mean, that's kind of where we are," Fetterman added.

RELATED: Will Republicans fight for the SAVE Act — or fold again?

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

During the interview, Fetterman said he was not sure whether he is more popular with Republicans than Democrats, but suggested that if he is, it is because he does not label "MAGA" enthusiasts with pejoratives.

"They're not Nazis. They're not fascists. They're not trying to destroy our country."

According to Psychology Today, the term "Trump derangement syndrome" originates from late psychiatrist turned political commentator Charles Krauthammer, who is cited for coining the phrase "Bush derangement syndrome" in 2003, in reference to President George W. Bush.

Although Krauthammer was reportedly a harsh critic of Trump, he still defined TDS as a Trump-induced "general hysteria" that produces an "inability to distinguish between legitimate policy differences and signs of psychic pathology" in Trump's behavior.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!