'You can’t make this stuff up' – March Madness inspires Kamala Harris’ dumbest comment to date



Neither Joe Biden nor Kamala Harris is known for strong rhetoric. In fact, both continuously commit blunder after blunder. But at least Biden can blame the fact that he’s ancient for his long list of gaffes. Harris has no such excuse.

While the VP has said some incredibly stupid things throughout her term, her recent comment about women’s basketball tops the list of the most ignorant things she’s ever uttered.

Jason Whitlock plays a clip of Harris’ “history lesson” on the women’s NCAA tournament.

“A bit of a history lesson. Do you know that the women’s teams were not allowed to have brackets until 2022?” Harris said. “We love March Madness, and even just now allowing the women to have brackets and what that does to encourage people to talk more about the women's teams, to watch them.”

“Now, they're being covered, you know? And this is the reality: People used to say, ‘Oh, women's sports — who's interested?’ Well, if you can't see it, you won't be, but when you see it, you realize, ‘Oh, we're talking about star athletes who are incredibly gifted,'” she continued.

“You can't make this stuff up,” says Jason, who has a translation for Harris’ ignorant history lesson.

“I know the mistake she made here, and I’m being dead serious. What she wanted to say was ... 'Women weren’t allowed to have penises until just a couple of years ago. Lia Thomas, the Penn swimmer, was the first woman with a penis, and it wasn't allowed by the NCAA until 2022.' That's what she meant to say,” he tells Steve Kim.

“If this administration up top was a movie, it’d be ‘Dumb and Dumber,’” sighs Steve.

To see the footage of Kamala “history lesson,” watch the clip below.


Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Caitlin Clark triggers USA Today writer, inspiring racist article

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/image.jpg?id=51716298&width=1200&height=800&coordinates=0,0,300,0 crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//www.theblaze.com/media-library/image.jpg%3Fid%3D51716298%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26coordinates%3D0%2C0%2C300%2C0%22%7D" expand=1]

Iowa Hawkeyes record-breaking superstar Caitlin Clark has become all the rage in women’s basketball. The guard is the team’s leading scorer and is already considered one of the greats of women’s college basketball.

But what inevitably happens when a talented individual becomes wildly successful?

Haters happen. And Clark has no shortage of those; however, the spite she’s attracted seems to stem more from her being white than her unparalleled success.

First, women’s basketball legend Sheryl Swoopes trashed Clark and claimed she didn’t deserve some of her titles.

Now, a USA Today writer, who happens to be a white woman, is after Clark in her recent article titled, “Women’s basketball needs faces of future to be black. Enter JuJu Watkins and Hannah Hidalgo.”

“With Caitlin Clark headed to the 2024 WNBA draft where she's projected number one overall, Watkins, the nation's leading scorer this season behind Clark, is positioned to become the face of women's basketball. She'll be joined by Notre Dame point guard Hannah Hidalgo, the other favorite. Not lost on any power brokers in the game, both of these players are black, and in a game built by black women, it matters that the faces of the future look like the faces of the past,” Jason Whitlock reads from the article.

“What if someone argued, ‘Hey, given Jack Nicholas and Arnold Palmer and all the white men that built golf, it's important that Tiger Woods be replaced as the face of golf by a white person?’” he asks, pointing out the “blatant racism and stupidity” in the article.

“It’s not journalism; it’s pandering,” says Steve Kim, adding that this is just another example of “white guilt.”

“Number one it really shields [journalists] from any claims of racism, and number two, they get all the applause from all the people they think are going to help them move up the ladder in terms of the media field,” he continues.

To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip below.


Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.