The fall of the corporate press: A Thanksgiving reflection on the new media era



President-elect Donald Trump's overwhelming victory on November 5 appears to have marked the end of an era for the corporate press. And that is certainly something worthy of gratitude this Thanksgiving.

The outcome of the election revealed that the vast majority of voters were unswayed by the liberal media's relentless attacks against Trump and the Biden-Harris administration's persistent lawfare.

'We could all be fired a year from now.'

Instead, America largely rejected the barrage of propaganda and negative coverage directed toward the Republican nominee, including outlandish comparisons to Adolf Hitler and desperate warnings of fascism.

Even with the most prominent news networks behind it, the Democratic Party still failed in its mission to instill widespread fear among Americans about the prospect of a second Trump administration.

So while the lights may still be on — for now — at the once-powerful media giants, Trump's landslide victory undoubtedly marks the greatest decline in their influence to date. The election results even prompted Elon Musk, a now-Trump supporter who voted predominantly Democrat in the past, to declare to the public, "You are the media now."

Whether the reporters at the legacy media outlets will continue with their bogeyman narratives of Trump throughout his upcoming presidency remains to be seen. Though this scenario seems the most likely, at least for the moment, this holiday season provides a brief respite from the fearmongering as these wildly out-of-touch networks evaluate their missteps and strategize on how to bail out their collective sinking ship.

So far, fresh out of Trump's win, the reaction from the corporate press and far-left reporters has notably been varied, with some trying to regain favor with the American audience and others doubling down on their hatred for Trump.

Following the election results, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, the owner of the Los Angeles Times, announced that he planned to replace the editorial board to realign with voter sentiment.

Jeff Bezos, the owner of the Washington Post, made a similar move, vowing to incorporate more conservative editorial writers. The Post's senior politics editor was reportedly informed that he would soon be removed from that position.

Both newspapers faced significant pushback from their respective newsroom staffers when the owners declined to endorse a presidential candidate during this election cycle.

Over at MSNBC, there appears to be even more internal turmoil. Elon Musk floated the idea of purchasing the network after Comcast announced that it plans to spin off several cable channels, including MSNBC, CNBC, and USA Network. The upcoming reorganization prompted anchor Rachel Maddow's contract to be renegotiated down by $5 million, and other staffers are reportedly concerned about job security.

Last week, MSNBC host Joe Scarborough said, "We could all be fired a year from now."

His co-host and wife, Mika Brzezinski, replied, "Or tomorrow."

Scarborough and Brzezinski's show, "Morning Joe," suffered a steep decline in viewership after the two liberal co-hosts announced they had met with Trump at Mar-a-Lago to reportedly "restart communications."

While the two anchors give the impression of attempting to bridge the divide, other left-wing hosts, such as Joy Reid and much of "The View" panel, have opted to double down on their loathing of Trump, attributing his election win to what they perceive as a cloud of racism and sexism obscuring the judgment of most American voters.

During a podcast episode last week, Joe Rogan commented on the deteriorating viewership of liberal media.

Rogan said, "I was just reading something about CNN's ratings and MSNBC's ratings post-election — they've crashed."

"All these left-wing kooks on YouTube are hemorrhaging subscribers. Where people go, 'You guys are out of touch, you're not accurate, you're delusional,'" he added. "And people are speaking with their subscriptions, and they're speaking with their purchasing of the Washington Post and their purchasing of the New York Times."

This Thanksgiving, let us celebrate the nation seeing through the veil of misleading and biased reporting, inspiring hope among Americans that we might return to the values upon which our country was founded. And let us give thanks for what we stand to gain: a more independent media landscape that is held accountable to the people.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

CNN's Chris Wallace steps away from broadcast television to pursue new media venture



After three years with CNN, host Chris Wallace announced Monday evening that he will not renew his seven-figure contract with the network. Instead, he revealed his plans to step away from traditional broadcast television and pursue a new media venture.

Before working for CNN, Wallace spent 18 years at Fox News.

'Mainstays of old-fashioned outlets run for the exits.'

Wallace told the Daily Beast about his interest in following the path of Joe Rogan and Charlamagne tha God by launching a podcast or aligning with an independent streaming platform, which he described as "where the action seems to be."

"I don't flatter myself to think I will have that sort of reach," he added, referring to the two famous podcasters.

"This is the first time in 55 years I've been between jobs," Wallace said. "I am actually excited and liberated by that."

He noted that he has yet to determine the best streaming format for him.

"Not knowing is part of the challenge. I'm waiting to see what comes over the transom. It might be something that I haven't thought of at all," he told the Daily Beast.

Wallace's decision to leave CNN, announced just a week after the presidential election, appears to be yet another sign of the rapidly declining influence of corporate media outlets.

Wallace stated that he had "nothing but positive things to say" about CNN, which had wanted to renew his contract. Mark Thompson, the network's CEO and chairman, called Wallace "one of the most respected political journalists."

Many expressed skepticism about Wallace's ability to attract a sufficiently large audience for a successful podcasting career.

Even the Daily Beast noted that "most successful streamers or independent broadcasters to emerge from traditional television have so far been almost exclusively on the right."

The news outlet reported that former Fox News hosts Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly have found success in podcasting, whereas CNN's Don Lemon has struggled to gain traction with his independent show.

In response to Wallace's exit, Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk said, "Legacy news outlets are losing viewers, but even more important, they're losing their power to set narratives. Trump's 2024 landslide could very well be the death knell for the MSM [mainstream media] as mainstays of old-fashioned outlets run for the exits."

Conservative filmmaker Robby Starbuck also echoed the sentiment.

"Chris Wallace greatly overestimates the public interest in what he has to say. The old media dynamic was that you could choose between a few news channels. The new media allows you to choose who you find interesting. He's gonna find out the hard way that it's not Chris Wallace," Starbuck wrote.

Podcast host Shawn Farash also responded to Wallace's announcement.

"The issue is unlike Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson, Chris Wallace has the personality of stale bread and will not generate much of an audience or loyal following," Farash said.

Army veteran and political commentator Rob Smith had a similar take.

"At 77, Chris Wallace Leaves Fading CNN To Become…A Podcaster? You're Boring! Nobody Cares!" Smith wrote on X.

Smith said he thinks the move will end Wallace's career, noting that he should have stayed with CNN.

"New media does not work for everybody. You can see Don Lemon flailing in new media now because nobody really cares what he has to say, because he never really took the time to develop any kind of personality or worldview," Smith explained. "It just does not work in this era."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

6 ways the media is ABUSIVELY lying to America



The M3ND Project is an organization that provides resources for people who have been trapped in abusive relationships.

Glenn Beck can’t help but notice that much of what the group defines as abuse is actually exactly what the media is putting the American people through. Specifically, that the media can’t stop lying.

“Lying is one of the most common tactics an abuser uses to gain power and control over their victim,” Glenn reads from an article written by the M3ND Project. “Lying confuses the victim’s reality while helping the liar to shrink from their responsibility in the situation, often shifting the blame to the victim.”

According to the M3ND Project, lying increases the victims anxiety levels and causes “their thinking to become clouded.”

There are six different kinds of mentally abusive lies: black lies, white lies, half-truths, broken promises, forgetting, and denial.

Black lies are “bald-faced lies” that the abuser “uses to gain something for themselves at the cost of the one being deceived.”

White lies are smaller and described as “seeming dismissive obstructions of reality that are harder to disprove.” Because white lies are harder to catch, “They carry greater power to manipulate others.”

“Hard to know if that was an abuse site that you were reading from or an internal Democratic campaign strategy memo,” Stu tells Glenn, after Glenn finished reading the rest of the abusive lies: half-truths, broken promises, forgetting, and denial.

“Politicians have always lied, told half-truths, etcetera, etcetera,” Glenn says. “The difference here now is it’s not just a politician. It’s the entire system around that politician.”

The difference has been made much clearer after Donald Trump began his run for president nearly a decade ago.

“The media, I think in the Trump era in particular, has taken the mask off and said, ‘We no longer can be this subtle force leaning on the scale a little bit to push voters toward the thing we want,’” Stu says.

“It’s so in our faces, and yet, a good chunk of the American people don’t see it because they don’t want to see it,” he adds.


Mainstream media claims Trump called for a 'bloodbath' if he isn't elected, but FACTS get in the way



The mainstream media is no stranger to taking statements out of context — and former President Donald Trump is one of its favorite targets.

At a recent rally in Dayton, Ohio, Trump used the word “bloodbath” while discussing the economy and what would happen to the auto industry specifically if he weren’t elected, and the cherry-picking media is having a field day.

“China now is building a couple of massive plants where they're going to build the cars in Mexico and think they're going to sell those cars into the United States with no tax at the border. ... We're going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you're not going to be able to sell those if I get elected. Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for this country," Trump said.

Take a wild guess which of those lines the media jumped on.

Shortly after Trump's speech, the Biden campaign issued a statement claiming that Trump was pushing political violence and wants another January 6. Unsurprisingly, the mainstream media, including MSNBC, Politico, the Guardian, Vanity Fair, CNN, the New York Times, and "The View," among others, quickly followed suit, making claim after claim that Trump was calling for a "bloodbath" — a January 6 2.0 — if he isn't elected.

“So, China’s building cars, and then he says he’s going to put a tariff on if he’s elected," and suddenly "if he's not elected, then somehow or another there will be political violence everywhere, and his people will do a January 6 on the whole country," says Glenn, pointing out the obvious yellow journalism.

"What does the political violence have to do with China and the sales of cars?” he asks.

To hear more, watch the clip below.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

3 Nazi-like leftist trends the media should CONDEMN instead of Trump



While the mainstream media continues to paint former President Donald Trump as Hitler 2.0, It's also spewing Hamas talking points in the name of exposing Israeli “oppression.”

Most recently, MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace claimed that Trump has an “affinity for Hitler.”

“Jared Kushner should be alerted immediately,” Stu Burguiere jokes.

Pat Gray notes that the terrorist group being supported by a large portion of the left — Hamas — was just found to have copies of Mein Kampf at its terrorist headquarters, and they were all highlighted.

If that wasn’t enough, Hitler was also a huge fan of eugenics — which it seems is now being implemented in Britain.

Britain’s High Court essentially passed down a death sentence to an 8-month-old baby girl who had a rare disease. It refused to give her further treatment, so her parents tried to take her to Italy for treatment.

Britain’s High Court said no.

“I mean everything they’re doing, Hitler did,” Glenn Beck says, noting that global progressives also seem to love public-private partnerships, just like Hitler did.

“Outside the killing all the Jews thing, there’s a lot of similarities here between the modern left and the fascists of that day,” Stu says, adding. “You keep saying, like, ‘Oh I can’t believe Trump, he’s just like Hitler.’ Well, Why is that even an insult from you? You seem to like almost all of his policies.”

Meanwhile, conservatives have consistently been on the side of choosing life.

“We’re America, we choose life,” Glenn says, referencing abortion. “But look at every single thing that is being pushed is death.”

“The left is a death cult,” Gray agrees.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Does THIS prove the Left is DONE with Biden?



It took three years, but the mainstream media is finally catching up to just how much of a disappointment America’s commander in chief really is.

And at this point, it’d be almost impossible to ignore. According to a new poll, President Biden’s disapproval rating has just hit a record high of 56%. Not only that, but his support in essential voting blocks is slipping.

Biden’s approval rating is slipping to 46% with voters in the age group 18-24, while he also has only a 43% approval rating with Latinos and 36% with Independents.

Glenn Beck, while shocked that the media is reporting on it, is not shocked that Biden is doing poorly.

“Tell me what he has accomplished, honestly. And I mean this sincerely. Can you think of anything that is, you know, his voting base would say, 'Well, he did this'?" Glenn says.

“There’s nothing,” he answers himself.

“Not unless you’re a total moron, a real buffoon,” Pat Gray chimes in.

Meanwhile, Trump is doing great.

His lead in the GOP primary has surged, with the former president now leading by 43 points. He’s also the first choice among national Republican primary voters at 59%.

In addition, Newsweek just published an opinion piece titled “Mr. President: You're Going to Lose to Trump. We're Begging You to Step Down,” penned by the Young Turks' very own Cenk Uygur.

“The old rule about incumbents was that if they are under 50 points in approval, they're toast.” Uygur writes. “President Joe Biden is under 40. There's almost no chance he's going to win.”

“If you’re a Republican, Biden is a God send,” he adds.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Liberal media falsely claimed Florida school banned book from Biden inauguration poet. Now that the truth is out, dozens of large outlets still refuse to correct the record.



Liberal news outlets and leftist organizations joined poet Amanda Gorman in falsely claiming that a Florida school had banned her book.

The school and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis were roundly denounced. The Biden White House rolled out a declaration of solidarity with the poet. Gorman's book sales skyrocketed.

Only, as TheBlaze previously indicated, there was no ban. At no point has anyone come forward with any evidence that a single student attempted to access the book and was denied.

The school had in fact deemed the book valuable and historically significant. It has made clear that, while the book was moved from one shelf to another shelf in the library, it remains available to access for all students, regardless of grade level.

Furthermore, contrary to insinuations by the liberal media, Gov. Ron DeSantis had nothing to do with the relocation of the book, the complaint, or the school's decision — a fact that Snopes has acknowledged.

While the Bob Graham Education Center in Miami Lakes and representatives from Miami-Dade County Public Schools confirmed the initial reports were malicious fabrications earlier this week, many publications, including the Daily Beast, the Associated Press, Variety, the Guardian, Rolling Stone, and People magazine, have yet to issue corrections or account for their misleading claims.

What's the background?

TheBlaze previously reported that various liberal publications claimed that Amanda Gorman's book — "The Hill We Climb," which contains the poem she read at Biden's inauguration — was banned from a school library in Miami.

While Daily Salinas, a mother of two children at the school, had filed a complaint about "The Hill We Climb" and administrators had responded, the book was neither banned nor removed from the library, but instead moved to a different section of the school's media center.

"No literature (books or poem) has been banned or removed," said Miami-Dade County Public Schools spokesperson Elmo Lugo.

"It was determined at the school that ‘The Hill We Climb’ is better suited for middle school students and, it was shelved in the middle school section of the media center," he explained. "The book remains available in the media center."

\u201cIn order to ensure accurate information, @MDCPS is compelled to clarify that the book titled, \u201cThe Hill We Climb\u201d by @TheAmandaGorman was never banned or removed from one of our schools. The book is available in the media center as part of the middle grades collection.\u201d
— Miami-Dade Schools (@Miami-Dade Schools) 1684894666

According to the minutes of the School Materials Review Committee's April 5 meeting, the committee had determined that Gorman's book "has educational value because of its historical significance. The vocabulary used in the poem was determined to be of value for middle school students."

In case there was any doubt, the school district clarified further on Wednesday that access to the book is NOT restricted to middle grade students, but "remains accessible to all students."

Snopes stressed there was "no indication that an elementary-age child would meet resistance from a librarian should they want to walk over to the middle school section of the library to read the works."

Notwithstanding the facts of the matter, the liberal media rushed to claim that Gorman's book had been banned, with a number of outlets intimating DeSantis was responsible.

The poet similarly appeared keen to amplify this claim, saying in a statement that her book had been "banned."

"I'm gutted," she said in a statement. "Robbing children of the chance to find their voices in literature is a violation of their right to free thought and free speech."

Gorman still had her original false allegation pinned to her Twitter page at the time of publication.

As it became clear there was in fact no ban, Gorman engaged in more political wordplay, suggesting that a "school book ban is any action taken against a book that leaves access to a book restricted or diminished."

PEN America similarly decided to redefine what is meant by "ban," stating, "The book may remain available to middle-school students, but when you restrict or diminish access to a book, that’s a ban."

Stephana Ferrell, the director of research and insight at Florida Freedom to Read Project, performed some comparable mental gymnastics, telling the Miami Herald that the books weren't being banned from the district, "but they’re banned for the students they were intended for." Of course, even if Ferrell's point were valid, the underlying facts remain untrue; the book has not at any point been restricted to any grade level.

Committed to falsehoods

The Daily Beast still has an article by so-called reporter-researcher Decca Muldowney on its site entitled, "Florida Mom Behind Amanda Gorman Book Ban Has Proud Boy Links," which continues to bat around the term "ban."

ABC News, which featured an image of Gov. DeSantis, changed its headline from "Amanda Gorman's poem for Biden's inauguration banned by Florida school" to "Amanda Gorman's poem for Biden's inauguration barred for younger children by Florida school," but continues to peddle the claim that the book has been "placed on a restricted list," despite there being no evidence of such a list existing, and despite the school's clear statement that the book remains accessible to students of all grade levels.

Politico, the New York Times, and NPR continue to falsely claim access to the book is restricted, with the latter suggesting Gorman's poem is "the latest casualty in the fight over library books."

The Associated Press has changed its headline from "Amanda Gorman’s poem for Biden’s inauguration banned by Florida school" to "Amanda Gorman’s poem for Biden’s inauguration barred for younger children by Florida school," but peddles the same false "restricted list" claim as ABC News and the San Diego Tribune.

While the Associated Press has changed its headline, the many publications that recycle its content continue to house the falsehood on their sites along with its suggestion that the debunked ban had something to do with DeSantis. For instance, PBS News Hour still had Freida Frisaro's initial false report on its site with the original AP title as of Friday morning.

Variety hasn't budged on its original headline, "Amanda Gorman’s Books Sky Rocket in Sales Despite Florida Book Ban" and continues to falsely claim both that "A Florida school has banned its elementary students from reading Amanda Gorman's poem" and "The poem was one of several works banned at the Miami-Dade County school."

Variety did, however, provide an update to its piece — not to correct the record, but to announce the result of these and other false reports: "Thanks to this new round of press, Gorman's books are currently best sellers on Amazon."

The Guardian has kept its original headline, "Amanda Gorman ‘gutted’ after Florida school bans Biden inauguration poem," stating that the poem was "removed for reading by elementary school children" and suggesting even still that the book has indeed been banned.

Rolling Stone, which recently got caught smearing Michael Knowles of the Daily Wire and has paid out millions in the past for false reporting, changed its headline from "Florida School Bans Amanda Gorman’s Inaugural ‘The Hill We Climb’ Poem" to another false headline: "Florida School Restricts Amanda Gorman’s Inaugural ‘The Hill We Climb’ Poem."

Despite a correction note highlighting that the book was not banned, Rolling Stone's revised article still contains the false claim that Gorman's book was removed from circulation and opens with the false claim that that "elementary-aged students" have been restricted from reading Gorman's book.

Teen Vogue and Glamour are evidently unshaken by the truth. The article run by the two publications, entitled "Amanda Gorman Speaks Out After a Florida School Bans Her Poem," remains on both sites with Elizabeth Logan's original title and false claims.

People magazine, another bastion of journalistic integrity, has not amended its report entitled, "Amanda Gorman's Inauguration Poem Banned — Along with 3 Race-Related Books — at a Miami-Area School," which states, "A Florida school has banned four books for elementary students after one parent objected to the titles and argued they were inappropriate."

The article falsely claims Gorman's work was "removed from the library" and will no longer be available to students.

Ironically, the article in People attempts to cast doubt on Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' March claim that book bans are a "hoax."

Harper's Bazaar's article, "Amanda Gorman fundraises to protest against Florida book ban," has not been corrected. It claims the book was altogether removed from the school.

The Los Angeles Times framed the relocation of the book as a matter of restriction, but still suggests it was a ban in the title of its report, "Amanda Gorman on her inauguration poem being banned at Miami school: ‘I am gutted.'"

TheBlaze reached out to the following publications about their misleading or outright false reports: the Daily Beast; PBS; Variety; the Guardian; the Associated Press; Rolling Stone; NPR; the New York Times; Teen Vogue; Harper's Bazaar; Politico; the Los Angeles Times; and People magazine. At the time of publication, none have yet commented on their advancement of a false narrative or explained why they have refused to correct the record. None have responded to an inquiry regarding what evidence, if any, they uncovered to support the assertion that even a single student attempted to check out the book but was unable to do so.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!