Parkland survivor tries to delete CLUELESS tweet about SCOTUS justices — but the internet is forever



Today, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned its controversial 1973 Roe v. Wadeopinion, concluding that there is no constitutional right to an abortion.

"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives," the syllabus of the decision reads.

As expected, the leftist outrage erupted instantaneously, fueled largely by the misinformed idea that overturning Roe v. Wade means abortion will be banned nationwide. But, as stated in the above-mentioned Supreme Court syllabus, the authority has actually been returned to individual states and their duly elected lawmakers.

One such misinformed leftist, Parkland shooting survivor Cameron Kasky, was infuriated that those awful Supreme Court justices "just voted to kill women." So he took to Twitter to urge people to go to the homes of said Supreme Court justices to "let them know how you feel."

"Go to the home of every Supreme Court justice who just voted to kill women. Let them know how you feel," Kasky tweeted.

\u201c@cameron_kasky Might as well let everyone see your tweet\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721

The backlash was immediate:

\u201c@cameron_kasky I'm pro-choice. Understand that this is how you got to this ruling. Intimidating judges never ends well. Fight this by protesting at the Supreme Court. If you promote people going to a private home, you will lose more. \ud83e\udd14\u201d
— \ud83d\udfe5\u2b1c\ufe0fDISTRUMPTION2\u20e30\u20e32\u20e32\u20e3 (@\ud83d\udfe5\u2b1c\ufe0fDISTRUMPTION2\u20e30\u20e32\u20e32\u20e3) 1656082992
\u201cLol of course he deleted it.\u201d
— CLFitness (@CLFitness) 1656083472
\u201c@cameron_kasky @TwitterSupport This is an incitement to violence after there has already been an assassination attempt on an SC Justice. This is dangerous.\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721

Kasky decided to delete his original tweet because he is apparently "sick of republicans talking to [him]." But, unfortunately for Kasky, the internet is indeed forever:

\u201cI deleted my tweet about going to Supreme Court justices houses because I\u2019m sick of republicans talking to me but please let me be clear my opinion stands\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721
\u201c@DiablitoDeOro @neontaster @cameron_kasky Because reasons https://t.co/YefbtBYIHx\u201d
— Noam Blum (@Noam Blum) 1656084578
\u201c@cameron_kasky You mean THIS ONE? Inciting people to break the law?\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721
\u201c@cameron_kasky No, you deleted it because it was against Twitter safety rules. So, you were told to delete it and you obeyed.\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721
\u201c@neontaster @cameron_kasky It was grabbed in time.\u201d
— Noam Blum (@Noam Blum) 1656084578
\u201c@wadepearson @DiablitoDeOro @redsteeze @cameron_kasky @neontaster All of the Parkland kids like him that lectured everyone on "fight for our lives" will gleefully use their marxist ideals to silence and kill dissenters. Remember, its not about the gun, it's about the control.\u201d
— Noam Blum (@Noam Blum) 1656084578
\u201c@cameron_kasky Insurrectionist.\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721

Speaking from the White House, President Joe Biden dutifully helped spread the misinformation about the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, and took the opportunity to prompt voters to elect more Democrats in November so that Congress can write abortion protections into law. Did the president just let slip the real reason Congress hasn't made any effort to start writing such laws in the nearly two months since Justice Samuel Alito's draft opinion was "leaked" in early May?

Watch the video below:

“Joe Biden on Dobbs:"Today, the Supreme Court of the United States expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people that it had already recognized. They didn’t limit it. They simply took it away."”


\u201cJoe Biden on Dobbs:\n\n"Today, the Supreme Court of the United States expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people that it had already recognized. They didn\u2019t limit it. They simply took it away."\u201d
— TheBlaze (@TheBlaze) 1656089338

Actress dragged over ABSURD ode to Vladimir Putin: 'Forget Ukraine. Send ground troops to Hollywood'



AnnaLynne McCord‘s cringeworthy poem apologizing to Russian President Vladimir Putin for not being his mother — because if he had been lovingly raised by a Hollywood celeb he would never have invaded Ukraine, of course — is not getting quite the response the "90210" actress was probably expecting.

There's really no describing the awfulness of this video, so you'll just have to try to watch for yourself:


Dear Mister President Vladimir Putin\u2026pic.twitter.com/LbDFBHVWJf
— AnnaLynne McCord (@AnnaLynne McCord) 1645718391

Sorry about that, but it was the only way to explain the wrath of those who tweeted in response to McCord‘s utterly absurd performance:

This might be the worst tweet of all time. This alone should land you a spot in The Hague
— Rayyvana\ud83d\ude80 (@Rayyvana\ud83d\ude80) 1645725023
Jesus christ the self centeredness of this all is mind numbingpic.twitter.com/EQAJGGP4gz
— haer\ud83c\udf80\ud83e\udd42(Ukraine arc\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6) (@haer\ud83c\udf80\ud83e\udd42(Ukraine arc\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6)) 1645723545
yes more tummy time would have prevented this
— Jessica O\u2019Donnell (@Jessica O\u2019Donnell) 1645728393
pic.twitter.com/r0NBW6KrPP
— Caleb Hull (@Caleb Hull) 1645726531
This is the cringiest thing I think I've ever seen and I follow @SirajAHashmihttps://twitter.com/IAMannalynnemcc/status/1496877541772062727\u00a0\u2026
— RIP Terez Paylor \ud83d\ude4f (@RIP Terez Paylor \ud83d\ude4f) 1645725739
Forget Ukraine. Send ground troops to Hollywood.https://twitter.com/IAMannalynnemcc/status/1496877541772062727\u00a0\u2026
— Noam Blum (@Noam Blum) 1645726061

Post-debate media roundup: Poor boys, Abraham Lincoln and Hunter Biden



The final debate before the 2020 presidential election saw the two candidates punching hard at each other, but neither struck a knockout blow. Most commentators thought NBC News moderator Kristen Welker did a much better job and the muting of microphones seemed to aid in keeping the discussion civil and more intelligible.

Here are some of the more interesting reactions to the debate from social media.

Many people were glad that Hunter Biden was made an issue:

Hunter is a bigger story tomorrow because Biden preposterously claimed that the laptop was Russian disinformation.… https://t.co/5eJQFOmVwL
— Andy McCarthy (@Andy McCarthy)1603421594.0
Not heard from Biden: those emails are fake. The laptop isn’t Hunter’s.
— Megyn Kelly (@Megyn Kelly)1603417145.0
Biden is challenging Trump to bring up Hunter right now. Let ‘er rip, tater chip.
— Dana Loesch (@Dana Loesch)1603416491.0
Biden is rattled because you can use your next words are gonna be about his crimes and HUNTER.. Hit him with your best shot!
— Kirstie Alley (@Kirstie Alley)1603416513.0

While many thought it wasn't enough on the topic:

I’m sorry but 30 secs on the Hunter allegations is a joke.
— Megyn Kelly (@Megyn Kelly)1603417172.0

Biden sarcastically referred to the president as Abraham Lincoln and he didn't quite get it:

Thanks to this exchange, Abraham Lincoln was trending on Twitter briefly. But unfortunately for Biden, Twitter noticed he mistook the "poor boys" for what he meant, which was "Proud Boys," a far-right organization:

Who are the Poor Boys? #Debates2020
— Andy Ngô (@Andy Ngô)1603419557.0
Isn’t poor boys a sandwich?
— Dana Loesch (@Dana Loesch)1603419802.0
I'm naming my new band Abe Lincoln and the Poor Boys.
— Noam Blum (@Noam Blum)1603419716.0
i’m just a poor boys, nobody loves me
— Siraj Hashmi (@Siraj Hashmi)1603419626.0
Poor boys vs Proud Boys https://t.co/znLLHjY11t
— Matthew Yglesias (@Matthew Yglesias)1603419816.0

Even some of his critics admitted the president did better than in the first debate.

stylistically, Trump was much, much better tonightsubstantively, characteristically weak. high nonsense quotient
— John Harwood (@John Harwood)1603421428.0
Trump won this debate, handily. Biden wasn’t a force at all. Trump was substantive, on-point, well-tempered. Defini… https://t.co/pXx7hCsrmH
— Megyn Kelly (@Megyn Kelly)1603420545.0

And they had to admit that Biden issued an enormous lie during the debate:

CNN FACT CHECK: "So in this case, Trump is correct. Biden did make anti-fracking comments during the Democratic pri… https://t.co/fbNrF49q93
— Steven Cheung (@Steven Cheung)1603423898.0

According to Paula Reid of CBS, the president stuck to their plan with at least two points:

.@PaulaReidCBS explains how advisers say @realDonaldTrump succeeded on two key points in his #Debates2020 strategy:… https://t.co/LlwHWpKO5F
— Face The Nation (@Face The Nation)1603421284.0

ABC News' Jon Karl said Trump didn't do any damage, but didn't do enough to change the race either.

.@jonkarl says Trump allies were "relieved" with Pres. Trump's debate performance, but "did it do enough to change… https://t.co/f3ZKl1BTFo
— ABC News (@ABC News)1603422350.0

CNN host Jake Tapper complimented Trump, then called him a liar:

"It’s fair to say that Trump supporters and Republican office holders can relax for the night. They can exhale. He… https://t.co/ov7Sc4Rpbj
— Anderson Cooper 360° (@Anderson Cooper 360°)1603422862.0

And MSNBC was cheerleading for Biden:

And they were making excuses for Biden's past policies on imprisoning black males:

Van Jones was not impressed with the appeal to African Americans by Trump during the debate:

“I don’t think most African-Americans feel that we have a President that really understands the pain that we’re goi… https://t.co/1yRFZRXUv6
— Anderson Cooper 360° (@Anderson Cooper 360°)1603424033.0

Even Biden complimented the moderator after the debate:

Biden on the tarmac in TN just now on how he feels tonight's debate went: "Well that’s for the public to judge. I f… https://t.co/m4jdgeWSYc
— Johnny Verhovek (@Johnny Verhovek)1603423240.0

Norah O'Donnell of CBS said it was more substantive, and that the muting of the microphones worked:

.@norahodonnell on the second Trump-Biden debate: "It was as if the muting of the microphones worked, or each of th… https://t.co/ldZchGoKBX
— CBS News (@CBS News)1603421293.0

Here are the numbers for the debate:

Our @CBSNews count for tonight's debate:Candidate Speaking TimeDonald Trump: 40:24Joe Biden: 37:22 Questions… https://t.co/POVcAdgN1U
— Sarah Ewall-Wice (@Sarah Ewall-Wice)1603422947.0

And as always, there were jokes:

That’s it! I am not voting for Hunter Biden.
— Bill Maher (@Bill Maher)1603417173.0
CNN’s @ddale8 just a few mins ago: “For a fact checker, you’re kind of sitting there w/Biden. Occasionally you’re l… https://t.co/8oEQB3k2Hx
— Maegan Vazquez (@Maegan Vazquez)1603422685.0

Video flashback: Obama alum John Kerry proved dead wrong by President Trump's Israel peace deals



Former Secretary of State John Kerry once declared, "There will be no separate peace between Israel and the Arab world."

That emphatic statement — which the former Obama administration official and now Joe Biden surrogate called a "hard reality" at the time — appears to have been dead wrong.

The proof: Over the course of about a month, President Trump brokered two separate peace deals between Israel and the United Arab Emirates and Israel and Bahrain. On Tuesday, the president even added that "five or six" more Arab countries were ready to follow suit.

Kerry's backward comments came in 2016 while he was speaking at the Brookings Institution's annual Saban Forum.

In a resurfaced clip of the comments, first shared by Institute for Policy & Strategy senior fellow Udi Evental, Kerry can be heard amazingly prophesying the exact opposite of what would come to pass four years later.

John Kerry with a 2016 Middle East take that aged like milk in a sauna. https://t.co/2Vae6yDJFt
— Noam Blum (@Noam Blum)1600299754.0

"There will be no separate peace between Israel and the Arab world. I want to make that very clear to all of you," Kerry said. "I've heard several prominent politicians in Israel sometimes saying, 'Well, the Arab world's in a different place now. We just have to reach out to them and we can work some things with the Arab world, and we'll deal with the Palestinians.' No, no, no, and no."

"I can tell you that, reaffirmed even in the last week, as I have talked to leaders of the Arab community. There will be no advance and separate peace with the Arab world without the Palestinian process and Palestinian peace," he continued. "Everybody needs to understand that. That is a hard reality."

Kerry, who also once wrongly predicted that Trump's decision to move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem would be an unmitigated disaster, was widely panned for the cold take.

"John Kerry with a 2016 Middle East take that aged like milk in a sauna," Tablet Magazine associate editor Noam Blum said in the tweet above.

"Has anyone been more abjectly wrong about something?" National Review contributor Pradheep Shanker asked.

Hudson Institute senior fellow Rebeccah Heinrich wrote: "Exactly backwards. Remarkable."

Ed Morrissey, covering the news at Hot Air, wrote:

It's tough to choose what is the most embarrassing quality of this Kerry declaration from four years ago on the impossibility of what Trump has achieved. Is it his dead certainty of his own position? The way Kerry uses his cheaters to look down on the audience in his faux-professorial manner? The way he condescendingly dismisses politicians in Israel who actually turned out to be right, and to whom Kerry should have listened? It's an abundance of riches, my friends, an abundance of riches in 44 seconds.