Chrissy Teigen cries tears of joy over abortion; says it gives women ‘hope’ and ‘a future’



When Chrissy Teigen announced that she had suffered a miscarriage at 20 weeks pregnant, people around the world rallied in support.

However, Teigen then claimed that the miscarriage was actually an abortion.

“I told you all we had a miscarriage because I thought that’s what it was, but it was an abortion. We were heartbroken and grateful all at once. It just took me over a year to realize it,” Teigen wrote in a post on X.

Now, Teigen has doubled down on her abortion activism — and was even invited to the White House by Vice President Kamala Harris to be a part of an event on “abortion rights.”

“Hearing stories from your clinic, hearing that so many women come in there, and it’s not place of sadness all the time, it’s not a place where people are feeling at their darkest points or anything like the world wants you to think. People go in there with so much hope and so much —,” Teigen said, sitting down with Harris before beginning to cry.

“Sorry,” she continued through tears, “and so much excitement because they know that they have a future.”

Allie Beth Stuckey is horrified.

“You know what I thought about while she was talking? I thought about Jeremiah 29:11, when God says, ‘for I know the plans I have for you, plans to give you a hope and a future,'” Stuckey says.

“It is so like Satan to take the word of God and then to pervert it, to give it the exact opposite meaning. Here she is talking about the slaughter of innocent children as she is saying that murder gives these women a hope and a future,” she continues.

“First of all, what about the hope and the future of the babies that are about to be poisoned or dismembered?”


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

At The Heart Of Kate Cox’s Abortion Lawsuit Is A Disrespect For Texas Voters

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Screenshot-2023-12-19-at-6.37.42 AM-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Screenshot-2023-12-19-at-6.37.42%5Cu202fAM-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]Although her baby has a small chance at survival, the people of Texas voted to protect all children, even those with tragic diagnoses.

North Carolina Lawmakers Pass 12-Week Abortion Ban, $160 Million In Funding For Women And Children

The North Carolina House and Senate overrode Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper’s Mothers’ Day veto on the 12-week ban.

10 Years Later, Would Gosnell’s ‘House Of Horrors’ Be The Norm In Post-Roe America?

Ten years ago we accidentally walked into a Philadelphia courtroom and discovered the story of an abortionist who was also a serial killer.

The Pro-Abortion ‘Life Of The Mother’ Argument Is A False Flag Operation

Women face many possible illnesses during pregnancy, but intentional feticide is never necessary even in the worst-case scenarios.

By Accusing Pregnancy Centers Of False Advertising, Pro-Abortion Politicians Prove They Can’t Handle The Truth

It should be easy to recognize that those seeking new 'deceptive advertising' laws are trying to protect Big Abortion profits.

Since Dobbs, Pro-Life Laws Have Already Saved 10,000 Unborn Lives And Counting

Data indicate pro-life laws are saving thousands of lives across the country despite Democrats insisting they put women at risk.

Chrissy Teigen Misconstruing Son’s Death To Score Pro-Abortion Points Reminds Us She’s The Worst

Teigen is rewriting the facts of her 'miscarriage' so she can use her tragedy as a weaponized sob story to push abortion.

South Carolina lawmakers advance abortion ban



South Carolina lawmakers advanced a bill Wednesday that would criminalize abortion procedures in the state, with an exception for medical emergencies but not for rape or incest.

The state House Judiciary Committee voted 13-7 along party lines to move the South Carolina Human Life Protection Act out of committee, clearing the way for an eventual vote on the House floor, where Republicans hold the majority. All yes votes were from Republicans, and all no votes from Democrats. Three GOP committee members who did not attend the hearing also did not vote.

The bill bans abortions in all cases except certain medical emergencies that threaten the life of the mother. Republican lawmakers argued that the bill was written so that women would not lose access to health care, but would not be able to seek an elective abortions for unwanted children. It also does not criminalize women who have had abortions.

“The No. 1 thing that this bill does is to end the practice of abortion being used as birth control in our state,” state Rep. John McCravy (R) said in remarks at Tuesday's hearing.

“The No. 1 thing the bill does not do is to endanger the healthcare of women in any way,” he added. “In fact, this was the No. 1 misconception we found repeated in the public hearing, that somehow women's healthcare could be endangered by this proposed law. Nothing, and absolutely nothing could be further from the truth.”

McCravy said the bill does not restrict access to contraception, emergency contraception, or IVF. He emphasized that in order to be absolutely transparent, lawmakers included a list of medical conditions the bill does not criminalize, which was compiled in consultation with doctors and health care providers and is not exhaustive. Those conditions include ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages, severe preeclampsia, and more.

"It needs to be noted that some of these conditions do not involve a live, inter in-utero pre-born child, and therefore, really, the resulting procedures are not even considered abortion in this law," McCravy explained.

Current South Carolina law makes abortion illegal after a fetal heartbeat is detected, usually around six weeks of pregnancy. Abortion rights advocates oppose this restriction, arguing many women do not even know they are pregnant by this time.

Pro-life Republican lawmakers in South Carolina, as in other states, have sought to expand the abortion restrictions after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled states were permitted to regulate abortion in its landmark Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade.

Democrats have opposed the bill, framing it as an attack on women's rights and interference with their health care.

“Our ad hoc committee held a hearing where the only invited expert was a lawyer for National Right to Life. She likened abortion to organized crime and recommended that doctors face racketeering-style prosecution usually reserved for gang members, drug lords and criminal kingpins,” Rep. Spencer Wetmore (D) said in prepared remarks at an earlier subcommittee hearing, according to the State. “Republicans are passing a bill that will ban abortion, throw doctors in jail and kill women.”

During Tuesday's hearing, Rep. Justin Bamberg (D) accused Republicans of legislating conservative Christian beliefs about life beginning at conception and said, "[I]t is improper for religious believes to spill over into the political context."

"This legislation is forcing it on people, it's the very definition of anti-Christian, in my personal opinion, based on my personal Christian beliefs and understanding," he added.

Other Democrats complained that anti-abortion lawmakers claim they value life in the womb, but do little to support government programs that help poor and needy people after they've been born.

Answering these accusations, Rep. Sylleste Davis (R) said the legislature must continue to support mothers and babies in South Carolina after abortion is criminalized.

“I believe that there’s plenty more that we need to do," Davis said. "I believe that we need appropriate some additional funds to crisis pregnancy centers. I think we need to put emphasis and support with the prenatal care and with new mothers, as well. I believe that education is important. I believe that easy access to contraception is important. I believe that we must find a way to streamline adoption.”

McCravy said the state House will vote on the abortion ban in about two weeks. Then it will head to the state Senate, where Republicans also hold a majority, but many lawmakers support adding rape and incest exceptions to the bill.