matejmo/Getty Images

Horowitz: Why does nobody care about the pandemic of mystery deaths?

We have more governments and more media outlets focusing on public policy than at any point in human history. There is no greater public policy issue than the survival of the human race. Why, then, is there absolutely zero curiosity about finding the reason for shocking excess mortality skyrocketing concurrently with precipitous drops in birth rates? It’s only our survival that’s at stake.

Earlier this month, the Scottish government published vital statistics on mortality and birth covering the second quarter of 2023. The statistics compare birth and death rates relative to the same period over the previous six years — minus the pandemic year of 2020. The results are shocking and reveal the death of a civilization.

Among the report’s key points:

  • “There were 11,061 births registered in Scotland between 1 April and 30 June 2023. This is 9.1 percent lower than the quarter-two average of 12,164.”
  • 14,987 people died in Scotland in the second quarter of 2023 — 7.3% higher than the five-year, second-quarter average of 13,963.
  • Adjusting for age, the Scottish mortality rate for the second quarter of 2023 was 1,079 per 100,000 population — 1.4% higher than the five-year average for the second quarter. “This rate takes into account the growing and [aging] population and is therefore the best indicator of the direction of the mortality trend.”
  • There were 51 stillbirths, 8.6% above the quarter-two average of 43.
  • There were 50 infant deaths, 21.4% above the quarter-two average of 41.
  • 7,628 marriages were recorded in Scotland in the second quarter of 2023 — 0.5% lower than the recent average.
  • 261 same-sex marriages were recorded, compared with the five-year average of 247.
  • There were 38 same-sex “civil partnerships,” compared with the five-year average of 19.

In short, births are down, deaths are up, stillbirths are up, and infant deaths are up considerably. These numbers should be jarring in any country, especially such a small one, but I have not seen any media coverage on these statistics.

But fear not, gay marriages are increasing, so there is yet hope for the future of procreation in Scotland. Oh, wait!

Obviously, marriages and births have been waning for decades in Western countries, but the sudden, steep decline in birth rates from just a few years ago is a mystery. It’s a pattern we’re seeing all over the world, not just in Scotland.

And what explains the excess mortality and the shocking rise in stillbirths and neonatal deaths? As I reported last year, Scotland has already breached the warning level for the upper limit of neonatal deaths three times since 2021, which has triggered investigations. All we were told is that the culprit is not COVID and it’s not the COVID shots — even though investigators never checked the vaccination status of mothers, and we now know from Pfizer’s documents that it transfers “transplacentally.”

The only official statement we have about the new data came from Daniel Burns, a vital events statistician at the National Records of Scotland, who noted in a press release that the excess deaths came from “cancer, coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and respiratory disease.” He also cautioned: “While the number of deaths was up by 7% this doesn’t take into account the changing size and age profile of the population so the mortality rate is the more accurate measure to use.”

Sure, the population is getting older, but again, that doesn’t explain such a precipitous rise, especially as it coincides with the drop in births and surge in stillbirths and neonatal deaths. What could be causing more cancers, cardiovascular deaths, vascular disease, and respiratory disorders that also happens to affect reproductive health at the same time? I mean, it’s only all of civilization on the line here.

Last year, Public Health Scotland announced it had no intention of identifying vaccination status of mothers of dead babies because such an analysis “had the potential to be used to harm vaccine confidence at this critical time.” Since then, the warning level for neonatal deaths has been breached again, and stillbirths were 32% higher in April than even during lockdowns.

Obviously, none of us can affirmatively prove that the vaccine is responsible for all of the sudden deaths and sudden reproductive problems in every country. But a budding Sherlock Holmes might want to start his inquiry with a new bioproduct that was introduced right around the time these deaths and other troubling ailments began to appear.

The Scottish numbers cannot be analyzed in a vacuum. A recent analysis by former BlackRock executive Ed Dowd found that the U.K. at large experienced an excess death rate from cardiovascular diseases of 30% and 44% in 2021 and 2022, respectively, in people ages 15-44. It’s part of a broader trend of accelerated excess deaths, particularly among younger people, accelerating since 2021 with the rise of the vaccines — over and beyond the pandemic deaths of 2020.

The United States is experiencing similar trends. Life insurance claims from group employee plans rose 34% in the fourth quarter of 2022 for those ages 35-44. As SOA Research Institute actuaries note, “COVID-19 claims do not fully explain the increase in reported claim incidence over the baseline period.”

The chief executive of a large Indiana life insurance company was clearly troubled by what he said was a 40% increase in the third quarter of 2021 in people between the ages of 18 and 64.

“We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business — not just at OneAmerica,” warned Scott Davison, CEO of Indiana-based OneAmerica Life Insurance, in a news conference nearly two years before others in the industry noticed the same trend.

The U.K.-based Institute and Faculty of Actuaries issued a report in April with this shocking observation about the first quarter of 2023, long after the pandemic was over:

Cumulative mortality rates for the older age groups are relatively high compared to the other years shown. Mortality for the younger age groups is particularly high, with the 20-44 age group having similar levels of mortality as seen in the same period in 2021, the worst pandemic year for that age group.

So why the lack of panic? Since when have global governments and the media ever shied away from alarming people over trends much less menacing to our survival? This enigma would jar the imagination of any casual observer of current events even without the introduction of the shots. The fact that the European database EudraVigilance is now reporting 46,999 fatalities and 4,731,833 injuries following injections of five mRNA COVID vaccines makes the lack of curiosity all the more stupefying.

Perhaps more concerning than their dismissal of the known dangerous shots as the culprit is the fact that they are not even bothered by the trend itself we are all witnessing. They don’t seem to want to get to the bottom of it — almost as if they are not bothered by the outcomes of higher deaths and fewer births.

That should scare you. A lot.
FatCamera/Getty Images

Horowitz: The smoking gun of mRNA is spreading to breast milk

What’s worse than the likely deaths of millions of adults from the COVID shots? The increasing probability that the gene juice was passed on to the next generation of babies, including those who were never directly injected with the mRNA. That would mean the shocking body count of spike protein victims may continue for an entirely new generation long after the pandemic is over.

Consider the fact that the U.S. government is approving, recommending, and funding the dangerous vaccines for everyone — including pregnant and lactating women — even though we now know that officials knew from day one that the vaccine spreads everywhere in the body, including to the mammary glands of lactating women. Now, a brand-new study published in the Lancet, which is the Bible of the medical industry, concedes that the vaccine molecules percolate everywhere in the body and are present in the breast milk.

“Of 13 lactating women receiving the vaccine (20 exposures), trace mRNA amounts were detected in 10 exposures up to 45 [hours] post-vaccination,” observed the researchers from NYU Langone Hospital’s pediatrics department after examining breast milk samples from these women prior to and following vaccination.

The authors confirmed what those of us paying attention knew over two years ago, but many were gaslit into believing the opposite. “The COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is not confined to the injection site but spreads systemically,” they conceded as the logical conclusion of their broader experiment.

This study comes roughly a year after a research letter published in JAMA found traces of the mRNA shot in the breast milk of seven of 11 vaccinated nursing women researched.

So we now have two top medical journals confirming the presence of the vaccine in breast milk. Asserting this premise got me fact-checked and canceled from social media throughout 2021, even when I cited previous studies indicating exposure to the shot via lactation.

Of course, now that the authors of this study can no longer hide this disquieting fact, they adroitly get out ahead of the obvious implication by immediately asserting in the opening line, without evidence: “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines play a vital role in the fight against SARS-CoV-2 infection.” Additionally, after being forced to accept the obvious, they seek to downplay the effects on breast milk by noting that the traces of gene therapy found in the extracellular vesicles “neither expressed SARS-COV-2 spike protein nor induced its expression in the HT-29 cell line.” In other words, it’s innocuous and can’t affect the baby.

Problem solved? Not exactly.

As astute researcher Igor Chudov rightly observes, for some bizarre reason the samples from their control group never expressed spike protein to begin with! “However, positive control samples used in concentrations similar to those of BM EVs also failed to induce S protein expression,” acknowledge the authors as a confounding point to their implication about breast milk traces being biologically inactive.

So clearly the authors were using a cell line that was not expressing spike protein in any context, thereby rendering their secondary conclusion (traces found are inert) irrelevant. However, the primary conclusion of finding the mRNA in the breast milk is solid. The authors vividly explain how the breast milk is exposed to the vaccine: “The LNPs will release their mRNA content into the cytosol of the mammary gland cells, and a portion of this mRNA will be recruited, packaged, and released in the BM EVs (exosomes or microvesicles). This can be significant as the BM EVs act as natural LNPs, protecting the mRNA from degradation.”

This study cannot be examined in a vacuum, as if we have no other corroborating evidence of dangers to the baby from a vaccinated mother in lactation. Thanks to court documents, we now have an eight-page confidential document from Pfizer itself dated April 20, 2021 – before most pregnant women would have gotten the shot – acknowledging that the vaccine spreads transplacentally and via lactation. Furthermore, Pfizer was aware of and tracking adverse events in babies exposed to the mother’s vaccination. Clearly, the company suspected the mRNA was indeed biologically active.

While OB/GYNs all over the world were officiously and obnoxiously lecturing their patients to get the experimental shots, Pfizer was observing AEs in a whopping 20% of the 215 lactating women in its sample. The report chronicles 10 serious AEs, including facial paralysis, lymphadenopathy (swelling of lymph nodes that could be associated with cancer), and blurred vision, and six among the infants, including skin exfoliation, rashes, swollen skin, and unspecified sickness. That’s a high percentage of serious AEs for babies for any thereputic.

Let’s not forget that to this day, we still do not have a formal Pfizer study of the shot’s safety in lactating women, even as the CDC recommends more shots for all ages, despite the wealth of injuries across the board. The European database EudraVigilance is now reporting 46,999 fatalities and 4,731,833 injuries following injections of five mRNA COVID vaccines. Typically, we don’t allow pregnant and lactating women to take any experimental medication – even with no apparent signs of adverse events. In this case, we are well into the third year of observing widespread death and injury affecting every corner of the body – now buttressed by a litany of studies showing the lipid nano particles cross every blood barrier and can circulate in the body for at least six months. Yet the policies and recommendations fail to reflect any of this knowledge because the findings of these studies are suppressed.

In order for this lactation study to be published in the Lancet, the authors were forced to infer that the smoke they confirmed is absolutely no indication of a fire. Except we’ve already seen such adverse events in nursing mothers, including cases where it’s hard to dismiss the vaccine as the culprit. Here is one vivid VAERS entry:

There’s your fire to accompany the smoke of traces of mRNA present in the milk.

In addition to VAERs and Pfizer’s original documents, the European Union is publishing post-marketing pharmacovigilance of Pfizer’s own observations on serious adverse events, including in nursing babies. Investigative reporter Sonia Elijah has combed through the EU’s Periodic Safety Update reports and has discovered that Pfizer documented numerous cases of strokes, convulsions, and respiratory failure among nursing babies. Ironically, appallingly, and counterintuitively, Pfizer refused to investigate further because these AEs were automatically dismissed as unrelated to the vaccine. Why? Because Pfizer simply removed them from the analysis! In the words of the Pfizer investigator, these serious AEs were “determined to be non-contributory and were not included in the discussion since these cases involved exposures to the vaccine during the mother’s pregnancy or through breastfeeding.”

Nobody should be surprised that the presence of the vaccine, which itself caused tens of millions of adverse events in adults, would affect nursing babies. A study published a year ago in JAMA revealed that 3.5% of women reported a decrease in breast milk supply and 1.2% reported “issues with their breastmilk-fed infant after vaccination.” We see traces of mRNA, and we’ve seen a slew of undeniable anomalous injuries in nursing babies.

Does that incontrovertibly prove it as scientific law without further investigation? No. But is it tantamount to a Nuremberg Code violation to keep recommending the shots without first attempting to disprove the causation? No doubt.

Aside from the appalling revelation about breastfeeding exposure and how early on Pfizer knew about it, we are seeing a disturbing pattern of academic obfuscation emerge once again during this debate. Every time we find an ominous study, the high priests of the vaccine religion obdurately dismiss our concerns as “incomplete” findings or “speculative.” But we do have an entire array of concerning findings that cover the gambit of scientific research that, taken together, would be enough to convict the vaccines of murder if they were a human criminal defendant.

We are well beyond a simple rallying cry of “no mandates.” We need an immediate suspension of new vaccines, a commission to study the existing ones, and a new Nuremberg trial to convict those who knowingly pushed the shots, despite knowledge of widespread death and injury.

FG Trade/Getty Images

Horowitz: If this global study is right, then funding the shots is very wrong

I recently took a trip to my local Walgreens to pick up a prescription and was shocked to find a line at the pharmacy in middle of a workday. Two and a half years after the fraud and danger behind the COVID shots have been exposed, there are still endless unsuspecting seniors who are being convinced that the gene therapy is a key to their survival.

This got me thinking that those of us who believe in fighting abortion even though it is not mandated have a concomitant obligation to fight the existence of these death shots over and beyond the mandates.

And make no mistake, they are death shots.

A group of Canadian researchers collated all-cause mortality data over the past few years from most South American countries, along with South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and equatorial region countries, such as Thailand and Singapore. The countries span four continents and roughly mirror the global vaccination rate on average. Although we didn’t need this analysis to affirm what lived experience has taught us, they confirm that all 17 countries “have transitions to regimes of high ACM (all-cause mortality), which occur when the COVID-19 vaccines are deployed and administered [emphasis added].”

Most disturbingly, they found that in nine countries, there was virtually zero excess mortality for the period of the pandemic in 2020 preceding the rollout of the vaccines. As I chronicled throughout my coverage of the pandemic’s epidemiological trajectory, East Asian and Pacific Rim countries almost seemed immune to serious COVID for the first year of the pandemic. The negative efficacy (or safety signals) of the shots was most evident in this part of the world because these countries only began experiencing excess mortality after the vaccine rollout.

“Nine of the 17 countries have no detectable excess ACM in the period of approximately one year after a pandemic was declared on 11 March 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO), until the vaccines are rolled out (Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Paraguay, Philippines, Singapore, Suriname, Thailand, Uruguay),” observed the authors based on data readily available for anyone to see. The study is very thorough and spans 180 pages, including 178 references and dozens of tables and appendixes showing the sources and methodology.

What is particularly jarring is that most of these countries experienced their worst death curves in the third year of the pandemic, which was the year of Omicron in 2022. This variant was rarely considered to be thrombotic and was not known to cause widespread blood clotting or the cytokine storm that killed so many in 2020-2021 from lung damage. So what could be the culprit?

The authors continue: “Unprecedented peaks in ACM occur in the summer (January-February) of 2022 in the Southern Hemisphere, and in equatorial-latitude countries, which are synchronous with or immediately preceded by rapid COVID-19-vaccine-booster-dose rollouts (3rd or 4th doses). This phenomenon is present in every case with sufficient mortality data (15 countries).”

Remember, we have reams of evidence showing that the uptake of the vaccines was associated with a wider spread of COVID.

Thus, it’s easy to see that many people contracted COVID during that period, ultimately died of other ailments — possibly cardiac damage from the shots — but were counted as COVID deaths. This drove a self-fulfilling cycle of panic and vaccination drives, which constantly reinforced the cycle of illness and death while offering the illusion that the widespread detection of COVID in the population was the culprit for the mortality.

The study’s authors were further able to quantify the vaccine fatality rate by juxtaposing the vaccination rates and excess death rates by age bracket. They found that the vaccine was actually deadlier with advanced age.

“Our work, using extensive data for Australia and Israel, has also shown that vDFR (vaccine dose fatality rate) is exponential with age (doubling every 5 years of age), reaching approximately 1% for 80+ year olds.” The rate was 5% for 90-year-olds! The authors were able to calculate this because those two countries have the most extensive age-stratified data both for vaccination and mortality rates.

As you can see, Australia barely experienced excess mortality before the vaccine rollout. It then suffered extensive mortality following the rollout of the shots, then an even bigger wave of mortality following the boosters in late 2021, even as other countries reaped the benefits of the milder Omicron variant causing lower mortality in 2022.

In total, the authors estimate that the vaccines were responsible for 1.745 million excess deaths in these 17 countries, which have a total population of more than 800 million people who received more than 1.3 billion doses of the vaccine. Extrapolated for the global population and number of doses, this would equal 17 million vaccine deaths worldwide!

Here is the math of their extrapolated vaccine fatality estimate:

Previously, we estimated that a representative global value would be 0.1 %, and that this would represent approximately 13 million deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines, from 13.25 billion injections up to 24 January 2023 (Rancourt et al., 2023). This can be updated as follows: (0.1257 ± 0.0035) % x 13.50 billion injections (2 September 2023, OWID, 2023a) = (16.97 ± 0.47) million COVID-19 vaccine deaths worldwide, to date. This current estimate is based on: 10.3 % of worldwide COVID-19 injections, 9.10 % of worldwide population, and a vaccination rate of 1.91 injections per person (all ages), in 17 countries.
This implies that 17.0 ± 0.5 million COVID-19 vaccine deaths would have occurred globally, up to 2 September 2023. In other words, analysis of ACM by time in the 17 countries studied shows that the global COVID-19 vaccination campaign was in effect a mass iatrogenic event that killed (0.213 ± 0.006) % of the world population, and did not measurably prevent any deaths.

Even if their numbers are off, just a few million deaths would still be a holocaust. And that doesn’t factor in the suspected long-term effects, such as autoimmune disorders, neurological diseases, subclinical myocarditis, and cancers.

Even Moderna’s own booster trial estimated that “1 in 50 people who took [the booster] had a ‘medically attended adverse event,’” and the manufacturer refused to disclose the nature of the complication. If Moderna and the Biden administration had their way and administered this booster to the entire world, based on their own data, that would mean 160 million people worldwide would suffer a clinical-level injury, over 6.6 million in the U.S. alone.

How is this not the top pro-life issue in public policy?

What the Canadian analysis shows is that it’s no longer prudent to age-stratify COVID vaccines just because seniors were vulnerable to the earlier strains of the virus. Aside from the lack of evidence the shots work, seniors are possibly even more vulnerable to death from the shots. This is why Florida was prudent in becoming the only state to affirmatively recommend against the shots for those under 65. But even for seniors, Florida officials warn doctors to inform patients about the issues with subclinical myocarditis and potential damage from lingering spike protein.

Let’s not forget that within the first few months of the rollout in 2021, a study conducted by the Norwegian Medicines Agency, which examined the first 100 nursing home patients to subsequently die after having receiving the Pfizer shots, found a causal link between the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and death to be "likely" in 10 of the 100 cases, "possible" in 26 cases, and "unlikely" in in 59 of the cases. It is astounding that nobody ever followed up on that work and instead continued pounding seniors with endless doses for over two years.

Despite claims from top Republicans that the vaccines saved millions, no macro epidemiological data shows any evidence of a positive correlation between vaccination rates and lower all-cause mortality. The opposite is true — to the tune of millions of lives.

The old canard of “I oppose mandates, but the vaccines save lives” is no longer acceptable. Funding these vaccines in the federal budget is at least as bad as supporting Planned Parenthood. The voices of the blood of millions of victims cries out to all of us.

pavlo gonchar/Getty Images

Horowitz: The FDA is now willingly approving dangerous, ineffective shots even after pandemic

Some of us were concerned that the government would cover up the deaths from the COVID shots and try to move on to the next marketing opportunity (e.g. RSV shots) without any accountability or reckoning. In fact, the GOP opposition to the shots has been so muted and lame that not only has the FDA escaped punishment for approving them, but the agency has now approved new COVID shots in broad daylight … without any human clinical trials! In fact, the agency didn’t even conduct animal trials on eight blind mice, as they did with the Omicron booster!

The more you inject, the more you infect

Let’s forget the fact that the current iteration of COVID is nothing more than a cold and that all those who didn’t have their immune systems destroyed by endless boosters are now immune to serious illness from coronavirus. Thus there is no ethical rationale for even dabbling with an experimental shot, much less one that has already killed and injured millions. However, the shot that the FDA and CDC just approved makes it more likely that you will actually get COVID, and this is well known by our government, based on the last previous rounds of variant-chasing products from Pfizer and Moderna.

Anyone in the vaccinology and immunology business is well aware of the concept of immune imprinting, which creates original antigenic sin. When a therapeutic obsessively trains the body to respond to one version of a pathogen, it causes the body to respond inappropriately against different versions of it. We saw this throughout Omicron as the shots yielded negative efficacy against COVID throughout late 2021 and 2022, even for people who already had COVID.

In fact, a recent Qatari study published in top medical journal Lancet shows the negative efficacy in plain sight. Using a massive sample of testing and vaccination records covering the period from July 2020 through November 2022, the authors found that “effectiveness remained negligible in subsequent months and was notably negative during the BA.4/BA.5 wave in June and July 2022.”

Like Sherlock Holmes, they discover what we all have known about mismatched respiratory viral vaccines: “Some of the vaccine effectiveness measures post Omicron introduction, particularly for booster vaccination, were negative in value, perhaps suggesting negative immune imprinting. This effect was pronounced during the BA.4/BA.5 wave. This finding supports similar recent findings in this same population.10,52 Such imprinting effects have been observed for other infections such as influenza.”

As you can see, the vaccine achieved negative 40% “efficacy” at some points in 2022.

The beauty of “the more you inject, the more you infect” is that it is a stratagem to create even more vulnerability to both COVID and other seasonal respiratory viruses. This in turn sows more fear and, not surprisingly, creates a self-perpetuating market for even more boosters!

Thus, last year, the FDA approved the BA.4 and BA.5 “bivalent boosters” in an attempt to dig out of the original negative efficacy in Omicron. Guess what? Even the New York Times admits that last year’s booster didn’t work because it created immune imprinting.

Unlike the bivalent shots from last fall, the latest mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna are monovalent, meaning they are designed to protect against just one variant: XBB.1.5… Initial data from preprint studies has suggested that the bivalent formula from last year was no more effective against BA.4 and BA.5 than the original vaccine it replaced because of so-called “immune imprinting” bias.

“Our immune system, when we have seen something, is biased to seeing that again,” Dr. Ho said. “So if you include the original components, the immune system will react mostly to the original component and not to the new version of the virus.”

So here we are with round three of variant-chasing boosters promising a different result. The FDA is attempting to claim the this will rectify the problem by only using a monovalent booster for XBB.1.5. The problem with that is that the variant is almost completely extinct before the shots get out the door. So once again, the spike protein serum will train the body to respond improperly to new variants. The manufacturers claim that the antibodies work against the new “Eris” variant as well, but they said the same thing last time with BA.5 and got away with producing no human clinical trials. Now they don’t even have to produce animal trials, just lab testing of antibody titers in mice, a method that has long proven to be worthless in protection against infection, replication, or spread of this virus. The negative efficacy of the past two years stands as a testament to this insanity of repeating the same Pfizer/Moderna malfeasance.

The negative efficacy has gotten so bad that Walgreens stopped reporting positive tests by vaccination status because many of us were using the pharmacy’s data in 2021 and 2022.

Now, the FDA is giving full licensure for these new shots to those over 12 and emergency use for those over 6 months! There is nobody alive who could tell you with a straight face that:

  • These variants pose an emergency-level health danger to anyone.
  • The shots are effective.
  • The shots are fully tested.
  • The shots are safe.

What’s a little heart scarring and autoimmune disease between friends?

This violation of the Nuremberg and Helsinki protocols would be bad enough if the worst effect of the shots was to make you more vulnerable to COVID and respiratory viruses. But as we well know, they potentially harm every organ system in the body. Shockingly, the FDA printed on the label a callous admission of the risk of myocarditis but coldly dismissed the consequences. "Although some cases required intensive care support, available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had resolution of symptoms with conservative management. Information is not yet available about potential long-term sequelae."

In other words, now that they can no longer say myocarditis is “mild,” they contend that the serious damage it causes is only short-term. The reality is that no scarring on the heart can be assumed to be transient. In fact, a recent Hong Kong study published in the American Heart Association’s journal Circulation found, in a sample of 40 victims of vaccine-induced myocarditis, evidence of long-term heart damage 10-12 months later. The authors warn people with these long-term markers that “indicators of subclinical myocardial dysfunction and fibrosis” could induce “a long-term effect on exercise capacity and cardiac functional reserve during stress.”

We also know that at the time of the first variant booster push in 2022, Pfizer was aware of almost 127,000 case reports of cardiac disorders, running the gamut of about 270 categories of heart damage, including many rare disorders, in addition to myocarditis.

So, we are now at a point when the government can openly admit the shot causes ubiquitous injury, can eliminate all pharmacovigilance to monitor injury, but push even new shots that don’t work out of the gate for a simple cold. We are even at a point when the VA is now telling its union employees that they are eligible for compensation if they were injured by the shot and missed work time.

Remember all those worker shortages over the past two years in almost every industry? This is a clear admission that the government was aware of the epidemic of “sudden illness.” Indeed, a new German study published in Public Health monitored the rate of medical absence of health care workers who received the jabs. Among 1,704 health care workers enrolled, a whopping 35% had to take sick leave following at least one COVID-19 vaccination, leading to a total number of 1,550 sick days. “Both the absolute sick days and the rate of HCWs on sick leave significantly increased with each subsequent vaccination,” observed the authors. They also revealed that the Moderna shot “induced a significantly longer and more frequent sick leave” after the third dose, which is not surprising because it is a higher dose than Pfizer.

For the love of God and his prized creation, what it is going to take to pull these shots off the market? We used to yank approval for therapeutics after a few suspected deaths or one known serious side effect linked to the new product. Now we have roughly 62% of the 24,289 Preferred Term MedDRA codes, which essentially account for the realm of possible medical diagnoses, linked to the COVID shots in VAERS. What additional information must come to light before Republicans do the right thing and defund these shots?

Among all the lies the FDA has told about the shots, there is one kernel of truth expressed in its announcement: “Individuals who receive an updated mRNA COVID-19 vaccine may experience similar side effects as those reported by individuals who previously received mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.” It’s just that for some, the level of death and injury seen from the previous shots is just another day in medicine.
prostock studio/Getty Images

Horowitz: House GOP must pledge: Not one red cent for COVID shots

What greater illustration of the fraud of the COVID jabs than first lady Jill Biden contracting the virus for the second time after a litany of booster shots?

However, this is about a lot more than just fraud. It is no longer enough for Republicans to merely oppose mandates, which was yesterday’s issue. We have two and a half years of research demonstrating that these shots are downright dangerous to every corner of the human body. Yet our government is about to approve new versions of the shots, while Biden just allocated another $1.4 billion to promote the “next generation” of these needless and dangerous shots.

With COVID back in the news because the shots have ensured that the virus will constantly mutate around the suboptimal antibodies, Republicans in the House must promise not to fund one red cent for these shots ever again. This is the first budget deadline since Republicans took back control of Congress. This is the first time they’ve been in the driver’s seat of the budget since the plandemic, and as such, they have an obligation to all of humanity to force a reckoning for all the lives lost due to the dangerous mRNA gene therapy.

We’ve been warning about negative efficacy from the shots for over two years, constantly facing “fact-checks” and punitive strikes on social media. Yet here we are today, with the CDC admitting that the suboptimal antibodies of the COVID shots make it more likely that people will contract new variants of the virus. In its recent risk assessment for the new SARS-CoV-2 variant labeled BA.2.86, the CDC concedes in plain English, “BA.2.86 may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines” (emphasis added).

This is not just a fact that the CDC discovered this year. Officials were well aware of this before any mandate ever got off the ground. New FOIAed emails secured by ICAN found DOD contractor Humetrix already informed the top CDC and FDA officials that data in July 2021 showed waning efficacy, not just for getting the virus but even against hospitalization.

Humetrix was hired by the Pentagon to monitor Medicare claims data, something the CDC itself should have been doing. The company discovered that 63% of all hospitalizations among seniors in July – before the mandates – were from the vaccinated. Obviously, this only got worse as time elapsed and more viral-immune escape variants were created, very likely from the vaccine itself. The data showed that infection rates at 3-4 months post-vaccination doubled at 5-6 months post-vaccination, which was the ultimate harbinger for what we all saw from real-world experience and independent studies pointing to eventual negative efficacy at least two years ago.

One email sent by Peter Marks, the director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA, to other top FDA officials conceded that “the totality of the evidence” produced by Humetrix was “remarkably consistent.”

Remember, Marks was accused by FDA whistleblowers of pressuring them to violate protocols and truncate the timeline to approve the original Pfizer shot in August 2021, just one month prior to this email.

How can Republicans continue ignoring the actual shots while focusing just on the legal policies around mandating them?

But it’s a lot worse than just negative efficacy against COVID. After all, COVID at this point is just a cold for everyone. However, new evidence shows that the shots degrade our immune systems and make us more susceptible to other pathogens as well. According to a recent Australian study appearing in Frontiers in Immunology, blood samples of children who received the Pfizer shot seemed to develop lower levels of cytokines used by the innate immune system to combat infection.

The 29 blood samples of children ages 5-11 (median age 6.4) were taken before and after vaccination with the Pfizer shot in 2022. Researchers then “challenged” the blood samples with 13 different pathogens, including three COVID-19-related attacks and 10 other viruses and bacteria, including influenza virus, staphylococcus bacteria, and hepatitis B. The result? The levels of nearly all 27 cytokines tested fell, particularly around a month after vaccination. An additional eight samples were taken six months after vaccination and found a decrease in cytokine stimulation against viruses but not bacteria. As Igor Chudov points out, the charts in the study show that cytokine immune response was reduced tenfold for some pathogens.

Obviously, this is not a clinical study, but diffusers of vaccine propaganda, including the FDA, have no problem approving shots based on positive stimulation in blood cells, so negative stimulation should at least be grounds for concern. Also, this study shows the circumstantial evidence and possible pathophysiology of what is being observed in the real world and from pharmacovigilance data: namely, an increase in respiratory viruses following vaccination. Pfizer and Moderna’s own toddler trials showed an increase at the clinical level in RSV, flu, and general respiratory viruses after vaccination with the COVID shot. That lends a lot of credence to the theory that this finding in the blood samples is proof of some sort of damage to the innate immune system of those who got a number of jabs. So many people who got endless boosters seem to contract a commensurate number of COVID infections.

So how can we all be satisfied with merely fighting mandates but keeping shots on the market that could degrade our immune systems? Think about the fact that we have witnessed out-of-season RSV outbreaks since the advent of the COVID shot. This gives officials the perfect pretext to panic over the newly juiced-up pathogens created by the shots themselves so that they can promote more leaky, suboptimal shots. And indeed, that is what they just did with the approval of the RSV shots.

This is before we indulge all the latest news on vaccine injury, including a new study showing the spike protein can circulate in the body for at least six months.

Indeed, this is no longer a mandate issue, but a pro-life issue. Republicans wouldn’t fund billions in more funding or research and development for abortion. COVID gene juice should be no different.
Rory Doyle/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Horowitz: Mississippi Health Department aggressively promoting the dangerous COVID shots

After nearly three years of countless boosters resulting in millions of injuries and negative efficacy against various strains of COVID, one would think that promoters of COVID shots wouldn’t be able to hold their heads up in public. Instead, even red-state health departments continue to promote the shots, as if we’ve learned nothing from the thousands of studies and undeniable reality linking the shots to severe damage of every organ system.

Last week, the Mississippi Department of Health announced an offer of $1,000 for churches and businesses to join a program pimping the COVID shots to their communities.

The aim is to use this funding, much of it coming from the feds, to distribute promotional propaganda urging community members to get even more shots that didn’t work for the first 2.5 years. “The program will train representatives from barbershops, salons, churches and faith-based organizations as community health advocates to provide vaccination education and materials to their members and clients,” the announcement from the department says. In addition to training, participants will distribute COVID test kits and vaccination material and help with local vaccination events.

This is the sort of flyer you’d expect to find in San Francisco, not in Mississippi. Governors like Tate Reeves claim to have opposed Dr. Fauci, but in reality, nearly every red state has appointed a Fauci acolyte to run its health department. To this day, Florida, under the leadership of Dr. Joe Ladapo, is the only state where the health department is opposing the vaccines, masks, and the entire COVID charade.

In most red states, the health department is indistinguishable from the Biden administration in terms of its approach to “public health.” What is so vile about the MS announcement is that it shows a picture of masked children in the vaccine drive! This is three years after we should all have seen the truth about the ineffectiveness and harms of masking. Contrast this to Dr. Ladapo in Florida, who called on citizens to resist compliance with any mask mandates.

A new study from South Korea showed that prolonged N95 usage may expose wearers to dangerous levels of toxic compounds linked to seizures and cancer. The paper from Jeonbuk National University in South Korea, which was re-shared by the National Institutes of Health, found that the chemicals released by N95s had eight times the recommended safety limit of toxic volatile organic compounds.

Inhaling TVOCs has been linked to health issues like headaches and nausea, while prolonged and repeated exposure has been linked to organ damage and even cancer. Two examples of TVOCs are dimethylacetamide and dimethylformamide, which have been linked to liver damage and birth defects.

Yet just as with the vaccines, no matter how much information comes to light demonstrating the negative effects of masking, the policies of even red-state health bureaucrats do not change.

The health director, Dr. Daniel Edney, has made it a priority to focus on “health equity.” Obviously, health equity can never mean something good, but in this case it means spreading the misery equally.

How can Dr. Edney sleep at night knowing that VAERS reports 35,911 deaths, 208,190 hospitalizations, 20,623 heart attacks, and 27,414 myocarditis and pericarditis cases as of August 11, among hundreds of thousands of ailments affecting every organ system?

This push from the MS health department comes as the CDC has stopped collecting data in its V-SAFE program, the pharmacovigilance system in which users can report adverse events in real time. Former FDA official David Gortler reports that the CDC ended the program on June 30, even though officials are making a massive push for more vaccinations this fall, with the White House committing another $1.4 billion to fund the wealthiest companies in the world. Prior to its removal, V-SAFE indicated a 7.7% rate of clinical level of injury, which is beyond mind-boggling because it hints at millions of vaccine deaths worldwide. How can they continue promoting these shots while erasing the safety signals, and how can red states go along with this?

The time has come for every red-state legislature and red-county government to prohibit all funding for the promotion of COVID shots. All federal funds for the promotion of the injections should be returned. In February, the Collier County Commission in Florida voted to refund $167,000 in vaccine promotion funding and canceled the remaining $1.2 million coming from the CDC for the next four years. That needs to serve as the model for every red state.

Too many conservative influencers have walked away from the COVID issue while it is still going on. We have not implemented the requisite reforms in most red states to ensure that emergency powers cannot be abused, to guarantee nobody is ever forced to wear a mask, and to confirm that the state is not involved in promoting proven dangerous vaccines. We ignore reality at our own peril.

There’s been a lot of talk in conservative media recently about winning the black vote and deep blue districts. Someone should tell them we haven’t even reformed ruby red areas from their most harmful left-wing policies. The problem is within.
Andrew Harrer/Getty Images

Horowitz: The vanity of Fox and the GOP: UFOs but nothing about COVID fascism

It was the 800-pound gorilla not in the room at the debate. It was the elephant not in the room either at the debate or during the Tucker Carleson interview with Trump, although it has a lot to do with Trump. The Fox moderators did not utter the word COVID the entire night, nor did Tucker ask Trump about his doubling down on the vaccines and refusing to acknowledge any mistakes with the lockdowns, even as the biomedical fascists begin bringing back COVID fascism. A debate where UFOs were discussed more than the worst tyranny and genocide in American history is no debate at all.

It's the policy that led to the greatest loss of life and now permanent destruction of the economy. Nearly every policy vice we are dealing with today flows fully or partially from the decisions that created COVID and induced the tyrannical response to it. Yet because the leaders of both parties and their respective media mouthpieces – including the top GOP gun himself – were all in on it, nobody wants a reckoning. We have not had a reckoning on emergency powers, lockdowns, masks, blocking of treatment, or the deadly vaccines and remdesivir.

As Steve Deace and I warned in our book, “Those responsible are without remorse, so there must be a reckoning. Barring that reckoning, we promise you they will make us remorseful later for not holding them accountable now.”

Well, here we are with multiple colleges and businesses, including those in red states, pushing inhumane and illogical mask mandates again. Here we are with the FDA about to approve more dangerous COVID variant-chasing shots for the fall. And here we are with the FDA approving another dangerous Pfizer shot for RSV for pregnant women, despite terrible reproductive safety signals with the company’s COVID shots and now concerns of preterm birth with its RSV serum. Operation Warp Speed was not an anomaly but a new paradigm. Public health surveillance and restriction were not an aberration from life but a new way of life for these people.

Then there is the economy. Obviously, the economy chewed up a substantial portion of the presidential debate, as well as most of our daily political discussions. But nearly every economic ill that ails us today is the result of the COVID money-printing policies. The trillions of dollars of monetary and fiscal spending created the greatest wealth gap in American history, as well as a permanently elevated cost of living. DeSantis was the only one on the stage to trace the excrement sandwich we now call our economy back to its obvious source. Otherwise, the entire existence of the past three years from hell would never have been recalled, even as many of the policies are making a comeback, with a number of them – from rushed vaccines to inflation – never having left.

The coverage of the COVID abomination even from conservative media has been muted from day one – ever since “15 days to stop the spread” supplanted life, liberty, property, and economic prosperity until this very day. I’m not going to speculate as to the rationale for this obfuscation, but it is jarring that Tucker Carlson did not ask Trump a single question about it during his carefully timed pretaped interview aired at 9 p.m. Eastern Wednesday night.

For those who think COVID fascism is over, just keep in mind:

  • The FDA and CDC are still funding and promoting dangerous vaccines at an even quicker pace.
  • Remdesivir is still the treatment for COVID to this very day.
  • Governments are still tracking and surveilling vaccination status.
  • Masking is still the go-to policy in many settings whenever respiratory viruses spread.
  • Our government has not slowed its gain-of-function aka vaccine research one bit.

The Biden administration just announced another $1.4 billion to develop the “next generation” of COVID shots. Where is the outrage from the GOP or even the promise to defund these shots in the upcoming fiscal year budget just weeks away?

The lesson of the muted response to COVID from the so-called right is that clearly things have not gotten bad enough. The sad and terrifying thing is that whatever they must throw at us to elicit a righteous and unified policy response will now have to be so devastating that we will likely never have the political ability to fight it even if we wanted to. Meanwhile, the vanity and political circus will continue unabated.
Kristin Mitchell/Getty Images

Horowitz: 3 healthy pilots die suddenly on flights, 5 collapse

Either they will tell us this is normal or it’s due to “climate change.” But in reality it is neither. It has to do with sudden cardiac arrest that has been ubiquitous among young, healthy people from segments of the population that happened to have gotten a heart-inflaming gene serum beginning right around early 2021. We were hoping as the vaccines die down that the sudden deaths would abate, but now there are concerns that this is a long-term phenomenon.

The India Times reports that on Thursday, Manoj Subramanium, a perfectly health IndiGo pilot, suddenly dropped dead at the boarding gate on a scheduled flight he was to pilot from Nagpur to Pune. He was just 40 years old. According to the local hospital, the cause of death was “sudden cardiac arrest.”

The day before, another Indian pilot, who was flying off-duty from Delhi on Qatar Airways, fell ill and died in flight before the plane was diverted to Dubai. The man was just 51 years old, and according to his colleague, “He was very fit and his untimely demise has come as a big shock for everyone who knew him.” The pilot was something of a celebrity in the Indian aviation world, having spent 17 years at SpiceJet and piloted its inaugural flight in 2005.

A pair of sudden pilot deaths caused a stir in Indian media, but there is a total blackout in this part of the world. However, the blackout is even more bizarre given that a third pilot death this week occurred on a flight outbound from Miami on Monday. According to the NY Post, Iván Andaur, 56, was the pilot in the flight deck on a LATAM Airlines flight from Miami to Santiago, Chile, when several hours into the flight he went to the bathroom and collapsed in the locked stall. The crew broke into the bathroom and tried to revive Andaur after finding him unresponsive, but he was pronounced dead upon arrival in Panama after an emergency landing by his co-pilot.

This is simply not normal. The three deaths come on the heels of two non-fatal heart attacks among pilots last week. On August 9, a pilot suffered a heart attack on a United flight from Sarasota to Newark. On Aug. 7, a co-pilot for Tigerair flying from Japan to Tapai suffered a life-threatening sudden medical emergency as well. Details on both incidents are extremely thin.

This is part of a pattern of sudden cardiac arrests we’ve witnessed since 2021 and that are still continuing. Canadian cancer doctor William Makis has chronicled six more pilot deaths and 14 more incapacitations just since March.

Can we prove every single one is from the jab? Of course not. But this is not normal by any stretch of the imagination. We know that pilots are among the most jabbed population because of the ironclad mandate in most countries. They are a very healthy and constantly monitored population. As such, this sudden rash of sudden cardiac arrests is beyond suspicious at this point – on par with the “dropped suddenly” phenomenon among athletes.

It is simply astounding how pilots are not allowed to drink certain energy drinks or take common over-the-counter medications before flying, yet they were forced to take a brand-new serum whose primary mechanism of action inflames the heart to varying degrees.

A recent confidential pharmacovigilance document produced by Pfizer and posted by the European Medicines Agency showed that by July 2022, Pfizer was aware of almost 127,000 case reports of cardiac disorders, running the gamut of about 270 categories of heart damage, including many rare disorders, in addition to myocarditis. Numerous studies and surveys have found that between 7% and 13% of all recipients – depending on the dose or maker – experienced some form of chest pain, shortness of breath, or heart arrhythmia after taking the shot.

However, these problems are not limited to transient heart symptoms for a few days. A recent Swiss paper found a 1-in-35 rate of heart damage among local hospital workers with 1 in 19 presenting with elevated troponin levels, aside from 8% experiencing chest pain and 9% suffering palpitations. Also, disturbingly, 50% of those with markers for heart inflammation were not back to normal at the follow-up checkup.

The concern that subclinical myocarditis can possibly lurk around for a long period of time was further punctuated by a brand-new Italian case study of two young males who presented with myocarditis following the COVID shots. The authors found a recurrence of myocarditis with persistent lesions on the heart wall and greater levels of cardiac enzymes more than six months after it initially cleared up.

A Hong Kong study published last month in the American Heart Association’s journal Circulation found in a sample of 40 victims of vaccine-induced myocarditis with evidence of long-term heart damage 10-12 months later. The authors warn people with these long-term markers that “indicators of subclinical myocardial dysfunction and fibrosis” could induce “a long-term effect on exercise capacity and cardiac functional reserve during stress.” In other words, as we’ve been warning since 2021, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand why athletes have been the canary in the heart-inflamed coal mine, given the sudden surge in adrenaline constantly experienced by those playing sports, placing them at greater risk if they suffer undetected myocarditis.

And speaking of subclinical myocarditis, here we are almost three years after the Pfizer and Moderna clinical trials, yet the companies have still not coughed up the study on subclinical myocarditis required of them by the FDA. To accommodate their friends at Pfizer, the FDA extended the deadline for the report from Dec. 31, 2022, to June 30, 2023. Well, June 30 has come and no report to speak of! Either they quietly allowed them to delay it again, or they have the data and are not releasing the report.

Oh, and wouldn’t it make sense, given Pfizer’s endless lies, to actually have an independent auditor study subclinical myocarditis? Or perhaps it will take a plane of 200 people going down while the pilot suffers a bout of Pfizercarditis before we get to the bottom of it.
sshepard/Getty Images

Horowitz: CDC committee shockingly approves yet another RSV shot that had more fatalities in trial group than placebo

The RSV vaccine was the original poster child for negative efficacy of failed vaccines in the 1960s. Now officials want to take your newborn and, on top of the existing list of vaccines plunged into his body, administer a brand-new RSV shot that openly has safety concerns. Josef Mengele is smiling in hell.

What sort of government would rush RSV shots on newborn babies with numerous questions about the clinical trial data, especially after experiencing so much carnage from the rushed COVID shots? A country that values the biomedical security state and pharma grift more than the lives of children.

State of play with RSV shots

Despite Fauci himself warning that RSV shots were not ready for prime time, and despite no rationale to rush an RSV shot at pandemic speed, the FDA has already approved three versions. Officials have approved Pfizer’s shot both for seniors and for pregnant women and have approved GSK’s version for seniors. GSK’s shot for pregnant women was suspended because of safety concerns, but Pfizer’s was approved even though it has the same problems and is very similar.

According to FDA briefing documents, two people in the Pfizer RSV trial for those over 60 years old experienced the dangerous form of neuropathy known as Guillain-Barré syndrome. Also, in the Phase 1/2 trial for Pfizer’s RSV shot, among a younger cohort of 18- to 49-year-olds (which has not been approved yet), the trial reports one death among the 164 participants in the group getting 120 micrograms. As for GSK’s senior shot, members of the CDC’s advisory committee raised concerns that it “can overstimulate the immune system, which is why it is only used for the elderly or immunocompromised.” Gee, where have we seen that before? Autoimmune problems from a rushed vaccine?

Committee members also raised concerns about the efficacy and rationale because very few seniors get seriously ill from RSV, and as Dr. Steven Pergam observed, “These were very stable patients, very — selected to be healthy, that produce good immune responses but were really not the ones that have the efficacy endpoints that are so necessary for decision making.”

So the entire rationale for and safety profile of Pfizer’s and GSK’s RSV senior shots are built on a fallacy.

What about the pregnancy shot? GSK’s shot was pulled from the market after one woman died from acute disseminated encephalomyelitis 22 days after vaccination, which GSK conceded was likely from the shot. Testing also found a 6.8% rate of preterm births in the trial group compared to 4.9% in the placebo group. The rate of neonatal deaths was also double.

But Pfizer, which has more clout in the U.S. than British-based GSK, had its shot for pregnant women approved, even though it is a very similar formulation. As researchers in the British Medical Journal observed, Pfizer reported three out of 116 (2.6%) premature births in the placebo group and six out of 114 (5.3%) in the group that received the vaccine that was chosen as Pfizer’s final product.

Finally, within a few months, the FDA will likely approve Moderna’s mRNA version for seniors, which openly shows 200 adverse events and 10 serious ones per mild case avoided.

Monoclonal 'vaccine' for newborn babies

Which leads us to AstraZeneca and Senofi’s new monoclonal antibody shot, nirsevimab, for newborn babies. Without any understanding of the effect on babies from pregnant mothers already getting Pfizer’s dangerous RSV shot designed for the mother to convey immunity to the babies, the CDC just approved the antibody injection for newborns!

Although monoclonal antibodies have been given to treat an illness after it sets in, this is the first time they are proposed to be administered en masse as a preventive – and to newborns of all people! There have already been documented cases of antibody-resistant mutations forming within the RSV-F protein after prophylactic administration of nirsevimab, something observed in a previous attempt at RSV monoclonal treatments in 2010. Mass vaccination for a respiratory virus has always been associated with creating resistant mutations, as we painfully learned (or didn’t) with COVID.

But why are we even doing this in the first place? As Dr. Meryl Nass points out, although the rationale for fearing RSV in babies is not as unfounded as with seniors, there are about 25 babies who die on average every year from the virus. It is very treatable with a nebulizer. So it would be criminal to rush such a novel antibody, produced in hamster ovary cells, even if there were no problems with the trial.

But right off the bat, the company’s own trial shows more all-cause deaths during a 12-month observational period in the trial group than in the placebo group: 12 babies died in the trial group compared to four in the placebo! According to the FDA, the number of deaths in all the trials put together "exceeds what one would expect with the 2:1 randomization in Trials 03, 04, and 05." Relative to the size of each arm, there was roughly a 50% higher death rate in the trial arm.

Yet the manufacturer and government officials automatically are assuming that every one of them died of natural causes.

Four died from cardiac disease, two died from gastroenteritis, two died from unknown causes but were likely cases of sudden infant death syndrome, one died from a tumor, one died from COVID, one died from a skull fracture, and one died of pneumonia.

Gee, pneumonia, COVID, heart problems, “sudden infant death syndrome,” and “unknown causes,” yet we can conclude without autopsies that none of this is from a respiratory viral vaccine that has been known since the 1960s to result in negative efficacy? Sure, we can rule out the one who died from a skull fracture, but what about the others?

We are now living through a time when the government can continue producing vaccines long after they are conclusively unsafe. This is not even human experimentation. We already know these vaccines are extremely problematic.

Moreover, why is a monoclonal antibody, which is a therapeutic, being treated as a vaccine, even though it cannot stop infection? Well, of course, the companies treat it like a vaccine so they can place it on the child immunization schedule and enjoy the liability shield from all harm! At the same time, they are treating it like a drug in the sense that it will not be on VAERS reporting!

They are also planning to bomb all seniors and pregnant women with a triple whammy this fall – COVID, RSV, and flu shots – with no understanding of how all those pro-inflammatory antibodies interact with each other.

Also, remember that all respiratory viral vaccines are leaky and include waning antibodies. The CDC is sucking people into these dangerous shots on a promise of reduced severity of illness when few people get severely ill. However, even if one believes the manufacturer’s efficacy data, the partial protection likely only lasts for a few months and then, like the COVID shots, makes it more likely you will get the virus – something indicated by the Moderna and Pfizer COVID vaccine trial data for children. So, this will become a regular booster campaign every season.

The reckoning we need

At a minimum, Republicans must push to end the liability shield at least for all vaccines approved in recent years under this warp speed paradigm. Moreover, we must make approval of any of these shots contingent on the following:

  • No shot can be marketed as a vaccine in any way if it is not proven to stop infection.
  • No shot can be approved without a full placebo group that is kept permanently to study long-term differences with the trial group.
  • No shot can be approved unless it shows an all-cause mortality benefit over time and most certainly cannot show more deaths in the trial group.
Warp Speed was not an anomaly. It is a new framework that requires bold new leadership to reset the great reset on bodily autonomy and informed consent. What the RSV vaccine blitz shows us is that a candidate’s position on Warp Speed should be a make-or-break point in earning our support.
Toshe O/Getty Images

Horowitz: Chip Roy calls on House Republicans to use pandemic reauthorization bill for COVID reckoning

How many more 20-year-old basketball players do we need to see come down with myocarditis before there is a reckoning on the COVID shots? Rep. Chip Roy has taken up our call to use the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act to force a conversation, and hopefully policy changes, on this very point. Will GOP leaders embrace this opportunity?

Absent reauthorization at the end of this fiscal year, BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority) and the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response – two agencies instrumental in the biomedical surveillance, tyranny, and experimentation state – will cease to exist. This is why Chip Roy is calling on his colleagues to refuse to consider reauthorizing these offices without the following list of reforms:

  • Returning PAHPA-related funding to pre-COVID levels to stop public health bureaucrats from undermining liberty for Americans and to curtail corporate cronyism. This is an important recognition that the pandemic was supposed to be a “once-in-100-years event” and should not become a permanent industry. Oh, and if we believe it is now a permanent threat, then clearly it’s not natural, and what we need is more law enforcement than public health!
  • Reforming vaccine liability to secure proper compensation for those injured by vaccines to ensure that health care corporations are not given a free pass for any harms they may cause. This is probably the most important reform, because it is what ensures that vaccine makers actually have an incentive to make them safer. With the discovery process inherent in lawsuits, there is no way the vaccine companies and their supporters in government can continue obfuscating safety data needed for informed consent.
  • Establishing a commission to review vaccine liability and efficacy. Normally, commissions are a cop-out for doing something more substantial, such as the old congressional trick of creating a debt commission rather than actually cutting spending. But the debt is an open and known problem with nothing further to study. The problem with vaccines is that the public does not have the full background on rationale, safety, and efficacy data. Not all vaccines are equal, and we need a commission (with a diverse set of backgrounds and views) to sort this out. Just the creation of a committee itself implies that not all is imperviously utopian with vaccines, as the industry and the medical field want you to believe.
  • Auditing and making public information about “Operation Warp Speed,” including the role of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. There is now a lot of information showing that the manufacturers and the FDA/CDC knew during the clinical trial period, as well as the early days of the commercial use of the vaccine, that there were serious safety issues, but chose to cover them up. All that information needs to be made public.
  • Asserting American sovereignty over the World Health Organization and other international treaties and bodies. Part of what the left wants to do with reauthorizing PAHPA is to use the office of ASPR as a conduit to implement the pandemic agreement being crafted by the WHO. That agreement is going to be voted on next year and, if passed, will dramatically expand the powers of the WHO to declare more emergencies in perpetuity. Stopping the WHO is a bare minimum prerequisite to funding any pandemic-related agencies.
  • Imposing total data transparency on Health and Human Services, notably related to the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response’s COVID-19 response. Which data were used to promote lockdowns, masks, remdesivir, and the COVID shots? Because no real-world experience shows efficacy to any of the preferred countermeasures. If these agencies embody the science, then they must show us the science.
  • Auditing PAHPA-related procurement authority as it relates to COVID-19 to determine to what extent corporations exploited COVID-19 to make profits. This one is where we will uncover the pay-for-play. To what extent were decisions driven more by money and connections than data? How could something as toxic as remdesivir ever get approved? Where did Moderna come from, and how has it suddenly become a big player with a dozen more mRNAs in the pipeline?
  • Limiting or banning Chinese-manufactured goods from the Strategic National Stockpile.
  • Ending COVID-19 vaccine mandates and restricting federal powers to demand compulsory vaccination. Although most of the mandates have been canceled, there is shockingly nothing on the books to prevent vaccine and mask mandates from returning. These same agencies still believe in them as the go-to measures for flu outbreaks or any other endemic or pandemic virus. It goes without saying that no new pandemic funding can be appropriated without burying all mandates forever. I would add that no vaccine mandates of any genre can ever be legal.
  • Creating an independent Office of Inspector General for the National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Food and Drug Administration. Even though these agencies are in two different departments, they need unique scrutiny as one.
  • Immediately requiring Senate confirmation of the CDC director, including Dr. Mandy Cohen. We need to use her confirmation process as a conduit for a national reckoning, so naturally, no new funding should go to any public health agency without first embarking on this process.
  • Reforming congressional authority over public health emergency powers. It is shocking that we’ve gone three years since the world was remade by executive order and Congress has still not limited the president’s emergency powers to suspend the Constitution. No emergency declaration should be allowed to continue for more than 30 days without congressional approval.
  • Banning taxpayer dollars from funding gain-of-function research. This one also is obvious, although the language of gain-of-function needs to clearly prohibit any research that makes a pathogen more transmissible or pathogenic. Also, there must be a private cause of action for citizens or states to sue public and private actors engaged in such research – either at home or abroad.

It’s not a question of if but when another plandemic will be created. The Biden administration has just picked its replacement for Anthony Fauci as the new head of NIAID. Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo is just as fanatical and outspoken in support of lockdowns, masks, the WHO, and mRNA as Fauci. Nothing will change on its own, especially as officials continue to approve RSV shots with very concerning data.

“Failure to include these reforms risks not just the reauthorization of PAHPA altogether, but the support of our constituents who demand accountability,” the letter led by Rep. Roy continues. “We encourage House Republicans to come together to make further reforms to advance only a legislative package that protects the rights of all Americans, strengthens congressional oversight of the public health system, and ensures accountability for the failed COVID-19 response.”

The letter was signed by 19 members of Congress, mainly from the Freedom Caucus. It's about time an issue that affected civilization more than any other be addressed by more than a handful of backbenchers. GOP leaders need to lead or get out of the way.