Robert Cicchetti/Getty Images

Horowitz: No mask or mRNA? You’re not welcome in … Wyoming?!

There might only be five Democrats left in the Wyoming legislature, but they are the five most powerful Democrats in the country.

In many respects, Wyoming is the reddest state in America, given the sheer margin of victory Republicans consistently attain in presidential elections. Yet nearly three years into biomedical martial law, the 57-5 and 29-2 GOP majorities in the state legislature have failed to limit a single power of the health department to impose medical martial law on human beings, despite everything we know about the failure of the countermeasures and the vaccines.

After failing to limit the governor’s lockdown powers one iota during the past two sessions, Wyoming House members now killed the final chance this session to end biomedical mandates on our bodies. As I reported last week, HB66 is really a very moderate bill. It does not call for the state department of health to recommend against masks and shots, as Florida has done. It simply bans all mandates of vaccines, testing, and masks, which even a fool should realize by now have failed us.

Last week in committee, legislators watered down the bill to only apply to the COVID shots and stripped the bill of a criminal penalty as an enforcement mechanism. The bill’s sponsor, Jeanette Ward, added a civil penalty as a compromise when it was brought to the floor last week, and it initially passed the committee of the whole 31-29. But on Monday, Rep. Barry Crago added a poison amendment to the bill requiring the state to cover $847 million in Medicare and Medicaid funding that members were scared into believing the feds would yank if the bill passed.

Throughout the floor debate, the RINOs asserted that the bill would contradict the CMS mandate requiring masks and vaccines in medical facilities and that failure to comply would result in funding losses.

Mind you, Florida doesn’t seem to have this problem, and even the feds are winding down the mandate, so there is no credible threat of shutting off funds. However, all these members who had no problem spending billions on failed, tyrannical, and dangerous COVID measures suddenly became fiscal conservatives. The poison amendment adding that fake spending into the bill passed 36-25.

Then, with the new spending in the bill, suddenly a bill advocating for human life, freedom, and dignity became an issue of a spending bill, so Crago’s subterfuge worked in killing the bill. It failed 29-32-1. Speaker Albert Sommers voted on the side of medical tyranny.

Thus, even though there are only five Democrats in the entire chamber, they were able to work with a small minority of Republicans to constitute a majority against the most basic protection of our freedoms. The hearts, minds, and eyes of these legislators were closed throughout the entire debate to the harms of the shots that even federal officials concede at this point.

Heck, even Pfizer concedes that the shots are being used to create mutant variants in an endless circuitous cycle of gain-of-function pathogens and vaccine development.

Perhaps their hearts are so hardened because they are on the take from Big Pharma. A quick search of the Wyoming campaign finance website shows an almost perfect lineup of the members who opposed medical freedom with those who took checks from the medical cartel. During the 2022 election cycle, the following legislators received money from Wyoming Hospital Association PAC:

  • Allred, $500
  • Brown, $500
  • Chadwick, $500
  • Crago, $500
  • Harshman, $500
  • Larson, Lloyd, $500
  • Niemiec, $500
  • Newsome, $500
  • Nicholas, $500
  • Nothrup, $500
  • Washut, $500
  • Zwonitzer, Dan, $500
  • Zwonitzer, Dave, $500

The following Reps took money from Wyoming Medical PAC:

  • Allred, $1000
  • Berger, $500
  • Brown, $500
  • Crago, $1000 (remember, the one who brought the poison pill amendment)
  • Newsome, $1500
  • Niemiec, $1000
  • Sommers, $1000
  • Zwonitzer, Dan, $500

And these are the reps who took money from Pfizer PAC in 2020:

  • Brown, $400
  • Eklund, $150
  • Henderson, $150
  • Lloyd Larsen, $200
  • Newsome, $200
  • Olsen, $200
  • Walters, $200
  • Western, $400
  • Zwonitzer, Dan, $400

Largely, the loudest names in support of mandates, such as Zwonitzer and Crago, were the ones who took money from the medical cartel. Receiving money from Pfizer, especially after their admission of gain-of-function work, should be tantamount to taking money from Planned Parenthood in Republican circles.

Shockingly, Rep. Dan Zwonitzer, R-Cheyenne, the chairman of the committee, invoked pro-life rhetoric in defense of killing the bill. Describing his concern of losing federal funding as a game of chicken, he warned, “Is it fair or right? I don’t know, but you don’t risk people’s lives.”

“We can’t afford to be playing with this many people’s lives that are in hospitals, in critical health care facilities,” he added.

So, let’s get this straight. Mandating what is already proven to be a dangerous and infective shot on human beings is not playing chicken with their lives, but a theoretical and unlikely risk of losing federal funds is? You have a right to federal funds but not to bodily autonomy from Joseph Mengele-level experimentation and to breathe freely without covering your mouth and nose?

It’s also quite bizarre that they would be so scared of federal funding losses that they would fail to protect bedrock freedoms, even when then feds themselves are retreating. As Rep. John Bear, R-Gillette, chairman of the state freedom caucus, observed, “This reminds of an abused spouse. At some point we have to have the courage to do the right thing.”

To be fair, I don’t think they were really concerned about federal funds. They downright support tyranny because they are tied at the hip to Big Pharma. Why else would they refuse to even compromise? If they were truly scared of the CMS mandate, they would just have taken out the hospital provision from the bill and at least prohibited the mandates everywhere else, especially in schools. To this day, there is nothing prohibiting the barbaric and primitive practice of masking children in the state of Wyoming.

Let’s not forget that it was in Cheyenne where we witnessed the appalling arrest of 16-year old Grace Smith for not wearing a mask. This was in October 2021, a year and a half after we should have realized how wrong this policy was, yet it was still ubiquitous in a state like Wyoming. Even after this incident, the mask mandates were extended, and the RINO governor and legislature refused to act to overturn them. They could still come back at any moment.

During the debate after first reading, Rep. Jerry Obermuller, R-Casper, even invoked the smallpox shot, referencing a story from his father in which a pastor called the vaccine a “gift from God.” How that applies to a shot that is now a gift from hell and damages every organ system is beyond me, but either way, this bill is about mandates. Since when do we force our conception of gifts of God on other people?

This is what passes as conservatism in Wyoming. In reality, they are all addicted to federal funding and pharma funding, which is why they could win all 62 seats in that chamber and it won’t matter. There are no Republicans and Democrats; there are only Pfizercrats.

Wyoming is just one more item on the checkout counter we can add to “brought to you by Pfizer.”
Jacquelyn Martin/Getty Images

Horowitz: Did 7.5 million people die from COVID shots?

There is simply no macro epidemiological evidence that the COVID jabs saved any lives from the virus. To the contrary, there are numerous data points showing negative efficacy. Moreover, over 70% of the 6.75 million recorded COVID deaths occurred precisely after the shots were unleashed. In fact, many parts of the world that barely experienced COVID deaths during the first year, such as Scandinavia, Australia, and far East Asia, incurred almost all of their deaths after the shots were in the arms of every senior. So now that we established there was no mortality benefit, what was the cost? What if I told you it was 7.5 million – even more than the recorded number of COVID deaths?

A new peer-reviewed study from Michigan State University estimated that as of Dec. 18, 2021, the time of the survey, 278,000 Americans died of reactions to the jabs. The study, published last week in BMC Infectious Diseases, used Dynata, the world’s largest first-party data platform, to create a random sample of 2,840 Americans to report their experience with the shots: 15% of those surveyed indicated they had experienced a health issue after vaccination, and 13% of those indicated that a severe adverse event had occurred, in line with many other surveys.

Using extrapolations from the survey juxtaposed to state-by-state VAERS deaths, the researcher estimates that, as of Dec. 18, 2021, there were a total of 278,000 vaccine fatalities in the U.S. Further, “severe” adverse events are estimated to be about one million nationwide, and “less severe” adverse events are about 2.1 million. Estimated nationwide fatalities, “severe” injuries, and “less severe” injuries tally to 3.4 million.

This is just after the first year of the vaccine. The results should shock the conscience of the public.

So how many died in the world over two years of vaccination? Using the numbers from Our World in Data, 493 million doses of the vaccine were administered in the U.S. at the time of the Michigan State survey. So, if 493 million doses were enough to kill 278 thousand Americans, how many would have died at the same rate globally from the beginning until today? At 13.24 billion doses administered globally, that would result in 7.47 million vaccine fatalities, more than the Holocaust! That would be in addition to 27 million severe injuries globally!

What is shockingly eerie about this projection is that it’s almost identical to what I estimated in terms of the global death toll two months ago based on the CDC’s V-SAFE data demonstrating an underreporting factor in VAERS of 26. Using the URF of 26, and multiplying for the global doses administered, I estimated a back-of-the-envelope total of 7.855 million COVID shot deaths globally.

Using this extrapolation just for the U.S. based on the total current number of doses, it would work out to about 372,000 deaths in the U.S. Some estimate as many as 550,000 non-COVID excess deaths, which could demonstrate potentially an even higher death toll. Keep in mind that the Michigan State study was just of the first year of shots, which was composed mainly of the original doses. Many scientists critical of the jabs believe there is a strong dose dependence associated with fatalities. It’s thus reasonable to assume that the fatality rate per dose over the past year, which was composed mainly of boosters and even multiple booster doses per person, might have been higher. It’s also possible that with another year of data beyond this survey, we would begin actualizing long-term deaths associated with the shots.

But whether it’s 372K deaths in the U.S. or 500,000+, or 7.5 million globally or upwards of 10 million, this is nothing short of genocide. Even the FDA advisory committee admitted last Thursday that the shots pose many dangers, including long-term health effects. Yet they allowed Pfizer to wait another six months to release data on subclinical myocarditis! At a time when the shots should be banned, and the technology should be shelved, we are still struggling to even end the mandates. The feds are still mandating the shots in health care settings. Even in Wyoming, with a 55-5 GOP majority, we just barely passed a mandate ban by 31-29 on its first reading on the House floor.

Last week, upon hearing he was appointed chairman of the House Oversight subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic, Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) promised to “conduct a thorough after-action report of the COVID-19 pandemic.” However, it’s time Republicans realize this is not an after-action report. This is a live mass-casualty event in need of triage. This is not over by a long shot, and there are millions of ticking time bombs with a generation of broken hearts – literally and figuratively – from the vaccines and COVID fascism. Rather than just focusing on what went wrong with lockdowns, we need to start in the here and now to ban these shots from the face of the earth and hold those people promoting them accountable.
Robert Cicchetti/Getty Images

Horowitz: Struggling to pass medical freedom even in ruby-red Wyoming

The GOP controls half the state governments, most of them with supermajorities in the legislature. However, absent a plan for surgery by the conservative base, these red states will continue to operate as lobbyist havens for the woke corporations with just a pro-gun tinge to an otherwise left-of-center state government. We should have at least 20 states that are our equivalents of California, but with the absence of meaningful Democrat numbers in deep red states, many Republicans operate as proxy Democrats, thereby giving a governing majority to the left. Are we on the cusp of this finally changing?

With a 29-2 GOP majority in the Wyoming Senate and a 57-5 majority in the House, there aren’t even enough Democrats to populate the committees. It’s a reflection of the state voting for the Republican presidential candidate typically by 40+-point margins since 1996. Wyoming should easily be our version of California. Yet thanks to the fact that half the Republicans are really Democrats, it’s often more like their version of California, with the exception of legacy issues like guns and abortion.

The core of what it means to be a conservative is to conserve the most basic individual liberties. It should be clear that forcing an individual to cover his mouth or inject a substance that alters his immunological system is a non-starter in the Equality State, which supposedly exudes a sense of rugged individualism. Yet to this day, children are forced to get any shot pharma deems necessary in order to attend school. And to this day, there hasn’t even been a bill meaningfully limiting lockdowns and emergency powers, much less one banning COVID shots and masks, despite two years of data repudiating them.

Enter HB66 and the House Labor, Health, and Social Services Committee. It’s a very simple bill that should be the baseline law in every state. It prohibits any public or private institution from forcing a jab or a mask on any human being, including in schools and hospitals, where every state continues, to some degree, to push these immoral and inhumane policies.

Let’s put aside the safety issues with masks and the COVID shots specifically. What any of us should have learned from the past few years is that there is never a legal or moral justification to force another person to utilize even an effective medical procedure. If it’s so safe and effective to justify such a mandate, then the person who wants it has the prerogative to go and utilize it himself, regardless of the other person’s choice. If we are at the point where we can force another human being to take an action against his own body in order to function in society, there is quite literally no limit to government’s power and no contours of human liberty preserved. This is why even more accepted and established vaccines should never be forced on someone. If they work so well, that is the loss of the refuser.

Yet with an 8-1 GOP majority on the House Labor Committee, the one Democrat, Mike Yin, was able to work with the committee chair and other Republicans last week to gut the bill. The prohibition on mandates was limited to just COVID shots, and then the enforcement mechanism – criminal penalties with up to a year in prison – were removed from the bill. Even with the slimmed-down bill, it only passed 5-4, and one of the Republicans, Rep. Kevin O’Hearn, indicated he’d vote against it on the floor.

Rep. Ken Clouston, one of the GOP no votes, indicated that he supported the effort but was concerned about severe COVID variants arising in the future.

“We’ve lost the trust in the CDC; a lot of our personal rights were violated,” he said. “We haven’t controlled it, these vaccines haven’t worked. I just don’t want to handcuff us in the future that if something worse with COVID comes on that we’re not able to take precautions that we may need.”

What in the world does that have to do with anything? The shots and masks do not work and cannot work for any variant. Moreover, he is missing the entire point. Even if something does work, why should that be forced upon another person?

What is the core definition of a fundamental human right? During the floor debate over the 14th Amendment, Senator Jacob Howard described a fundamental right affecting an aspect of a citizen “lying at the basis of all society and without which a people cannot exist except as slaves, subject to a despotism.”

Very few things truly meet that definition. Most of what we consider as “muh rights” today don’t necessarily fit that description. But when it comes to biologically altering medical procedures on or in our bodies, we quite literally cannot live freely if any government has the right to force that upon us. The harm to liberty is irreparable, whereas any benefit to society from a potentially “safe and effective” mandate would only be lost by the individual who refuses to participate.

For example, a meta-analysis of 40 pooled studies found that vitamin D supplementation correlated with a 65% reduction of risk for ICU admission. Thus far, there have been 104 treatment and 144 sufficiency studies showing a positive association with COVID outcomes, many of them showing that a high vitamin D level reduces the chance of even contracting COVID, something even the most ardent supporters of the vaccine acknowledge it doesn’t do. So, should we mandate that every hospital worker and school child supplement with vitamin D and take a test to ensure his serum level is above 50 before entering?

Obviously, that should be a personal choice. People who believe in it so strongly that they are inclined to coerce others to join them have the ability to unilaterally seek that protection for themselves without drafting others into their medical choices. The same should apply to all vaccines and certainly the COVID therapies. The notion that your bodily autonomy should be subservient to “the greater good” of a genetic purity medical nationalism is a road that dead-ends in a dark place.

So here we have a shot that should have been taken off the market a long time ago, yet we are struggling to get a basic anti-mandate bill passed in the reddest state in America. This is because conservatives have failed to focus on legislative affairs in their own back yards for decades. This has allowed the lobbyists and special interests like the medical cartel to rule the roost.

There are signs that things are changing. The sponsor of HB66, Jeanette Ward, represents a new crop of legislators getting elected to be responsive to the people’s interests, not the corrupt and dangerous medical cartel. Wyoming, like ten other states, now has a state freedom caucus seeking to push back against special interests and expose the fraud of sleeper Democrats running as Republicans.

The question is whether the people who voted against Biden for president by a 43-point margin rise up and demand that the political representation reflect their values and not what they so resoundingly repudiated.
Gerardo Menoscal/Getty Images

Horowitz: 12 new safety signals showing devastating dangers from COVID shots

“During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.” ~Nuremberg Code #10

We’ve reached a critical mass of data points and safety signals on the COVID shots from a full two years of it circulating in 5.5 billion people. One must be worse than a conspiracy theorist to ignore them. One now has to be a “coincidence theorist” to chalk up this degree of human suffering that is in immediate need of redress to mere coincidence.

It’s time for Republicans in state legislatures and on the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic to pay attention to the daily barrage of shocking data points and safety signals. Here is just a sampling of 12 points from the past few weeks, out of many more. Each one alone should have been enough to suspend the shots, terminate the technology in the pipeline, and investigate the actors behind it. Time is of the essence:

1) 17% of children experienced some cardiac symptom after the Pfizer shot: Just how large is the universe of those roped into some risk of cardiac damage? A new peer-reviewed study from Taiwan published in the European Journal of Pediatrics found that 17% of high school children, mainly boys, experienced at least heart palpitations or chest pain from the second dose of Pfizer. These numbers work perfectly with many other surveys showing a significant number of people experiencing arrythmias, tightness in the chest, or shortness of breath. They are also particularly concerning given that a Swiss study and a Thai study showed the proportion of people afflicted with subclinical myocarditis (a ticking time bomb) was much larger than those diagnosed with myocarditis.

2) 20% spike in excess deaths in England and Wales:According to the latest figures from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics, deaths for the final two weeks of 2022 in England and Wales were 20% above the five-year average. That is greater than the pandemic itself. It makes no sense why there would be more deaths, long after the vaccines supposedly quelled COVID, than in 2020 and early 2021, at the peak of the pandemic. The U.K. Timesreports that “50,000 more people died last year than normal.” That is the equivalent of 250,000 excess deaths in the U.S. This cannot be COVID; it must be something else. (The data for those weeks: Data from week ending Dec 23, 2022; data from week ending Dec 30, 2022).

3) 0 of 1,1779 COVID hospitalizations in New South Wales were unvaccinated:According to NSW Health, which breaks down COVID hospitalizations and deaths by cohorts of various levels of vaccination, for the two weeks ending Dec. 31, 2022, not a single COVID hospitalization (or ICU admission) was among the fully unvaccinated.

The overwhelming majority were among the boosted. Although 84% of people in Australia have gotten at least one dose of the shot, it’s not 100%, so there is clearly a degree of negative efficacy, which is in itself a safety signal. And although 6% of the deaths were among the unvaccinated (still below their share of the population), it is suspicious how they all seemed to die at home, which makes you wonder if they are placing some of the “unknown” category into the unvaxxed pile by automatically assuming they didn’t get the shots. Dr. Syed has presented evidence in the past that makes it likely NSW Health has been doing that all along.

4) FDA admits massive elevated risk for heart attacks, blood clots, and pulmonary emboli: FDA researchers published the results of a massive observational study of 30.7 million Medicare patients in 2021 and found that people who took the shot found that the shots increase risk of pulmonary embolism by 54%, acute myocardial infarction by 42%, blood clotting by 91%, and platelet disorder by 44%. The claim this is only an early warning signal and downplay the results, but they harmonize with many other surveys, studies, reporting, and an understanding of the shot’s mechanism of action.

5) COVID vax was associated with 22%-74% greater all-cause mortality vs. being unvaccinated in U.K.: Prior to May 2022, the U.K. Health Security Agency published COVID case and death rates, age-stratified, by vaccination status. They terminated these weekly reports after we began using them against the system. El Gato Malo revisited the numbers and calculated somewhere between a 22% and 74% elevated risk of all-cause mortality associated with the vaccinated from September 2021 through April 2022.

As you can see, this portends either negative efficacy or risk outweighing reward even for seniors over 80 who are constantly bombarded with endless boosters. This should not come as a surprise given that Pfizer’s own all-cause mortality analysis in its six-month follow-up of its trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed 21 deaths in the trial group and 17 in the placebo group. The company failed to follow through the rest of 2021 and 2022, but it’s reasonable to presume based on what we know now that the negative efficacy became worse with other variants. It’s also likely that the long-term injuries of the vaccine, which were never followed because of the unblinding of trial participants, came home to roost increasingly over time.

6) New bivalent booster even worse: Remember the boosters that were approved with nothing but antibody tests and 8 blind mice? Well, now there are results of clinical trials for the bivalent booster approved last September, and members of the FDA advisory committee are expressing anger at not seeing this data. It turns out that 1.9% of the study participants who received the original booster became infected, while 3.2% of those with the new bivalent shot got COVID. This in itself demonstrates that not only does the detection of more antibodies not necessarily mean better clinical outcomes, but more antibodies of the wrong type can facilitate infection.

7) Two studies show mRNA shots create wrong antibody class: In yet another possible indication that the shots actually make you more vulnerable to coronavirus, a second study has been published showing the shots create a class switch from IgG1-3 neutralizing antibodies to IgG4 “tolerating” antibodies, which can make someone keep getting the virus and not fight it off. Last month, German researchers, in a groundbreaking study published in Science Immunology, found that some people reinfected with the virus after having had boosters had over 40% of their antibodies composed of IgG4. Now a second peer-reviewed German paper, this time published in Frontiers in Immunology, found this phenomenon even after the original two doses. The shocking thing is that a Pfizer scientist served as the study’s editor and one of Fauci's staffers at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases served as a peer reviewer

8) New bivalent shot caused reactions in large minority of children: Not only do the boosters not work, but according to the CDC’s own V-SAFE adverse reporting app, 49% of the 5- to 11-year-old children who took the bivalent booster shot experienced systemic reactions. These symptoms include fatigue, chills, nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting, joint pain, and diarrhea. In 22% of the children, they could not go to school or perform their daily functions after getting the shot. In other words, these children experienced upfront the upper bounds of what the virus would have done to them. And keep in mind that V-SAFE did not monitor lurking serious long-term side effects – all for a shot that doesn’t work.

9) 51% of Democrats believe vaccines behind sudden deaths: Whether the government and media are willing to acknowledge the extent of injuries, the dam is clearly breaking with the general public. Numerous surveys have been showing for months that most people know friends or family killed by the shots. But earlier this month, Rasmussen published a survey broken down by party affiliation. It found that 51% of Democrats nationally believe it is likely the vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths, and 33% believe someone they know personally died from the shot. That is more than the 26% of Republicans and Independents who said the same thing. The reason this is significant is because more Democrats than Republicans received the shot, so these results likely reflect reality.

Furthermore, 31% of Democrats attest to experiencing side effects, and 6% believe they experienced major side effects. This tracks closely with the 7.7% according to the CDC’s V-SAFE who had to seek medical attention (and 33% experienced at least minor side effects). And this is among Democrats who are naturally inclined to defend the shots, which means this is not some right-wing conspiracy but a reflection of widespread reality.

10) VAERS analysis shows 500 injuries with greater safety signals than myocarditis: By now, anyone not under a rock knows that the vaccines could cause myocarditis. But according to a FOIA document obtained by the Epoch Times, in turns out that the CDC conducted its own analysis of VAERS from December 2020 through July 2022 and found that there were over 500 categories of injuries with louder safety signals than even myocarditis. Specifically, as Hebrew University Professor Josh Guetzkow explains, there are 503 AEs with proportional reporting ratios larger than myocarditis and 552 with PRRs larger than pericarditis. Overall, in just a year and a half of Moderna’s and Pfizer’s COVID jabs, the safety signals were 5.5 times larger than all serious reports for vaccines given to adults in the US since 2009.

11) The CDC anticipated over 1,000 VAERS reports per day: The agency didn’t make a mistake. Bureaucrats knew from August 2020 that they expected major problems with the vaccine. Prof. Guetzkow, the prolific FOIA sleuth, posted details of documents showing that the CDC contracted with General Dynamics in August 2020 to run the VAERS database. The $9.45 million contract stated that officials expected 1,000 adverse event reports a day, with 40% of them being serious. Again in March 2021, they amended the contract to expand the capacity by another 25,000 a day and to clear a backlog of 115,000 reports just for the first ten or so weeks of the vaccination drive.

12) Disability numbers skyrocket in U.S. and U.K. coinciding perfectly with vaccine take-up: The U.K.’s Institute for Fiscal Studies published a report last month showing that the number of people on disability claims doubled in the U.K. from the summer of 2021 to July 2022.

While this alone doesn’t prove causation, in conjunction with the millions of reported debilitating injuries, the timing of this rise makes the shots the number-one suspect relative to any other possible factor. It is possible that lockdowns are a part of the problem, because the disabilities were heavily weighted toward mental health problems among younger people. However, the doubling of claims across all age groups, with physical ailments being the key cause among the middle-aged, makes it hard to pin this trend exclusively on lockdowns. They also note that this trend of doubling of disability payments “is consistent with the rise being driven by a general worsening of health across the population,” which in itself coincides perfectly with the “significant rise in the number of (non-COVID) working-age deaths from late 2021 through 2022, compared to pre-pandemic years."

It should be noted that a similar trend is evident in the United States. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, those in the labor force identifying as having a disability skyrocketed by more than 30% right after the vaccines were introduced to the public. This is unprecedented and did not begin in 2020 with COVID and the lockdowns.

The goal of the CDC and FDA at this point is to create a limited hangout in which they let the pressure mounting against the shots out of the balloon and channel it into a limited concession. For example, the CDC conceded some sort of safety signal for myocarditis, then briefly conceded a safety signal for strokes in seniors on the Friday afternoon headed into the MLK holiday weekend before concluding in a comprehensive study that took all of a few hours that it’s really not a problem.

In reality, there are over 14,000 categories of injuries reported to VAERS affecting every organ system and every inch of the body. If you just take the 1,400+ SERIOUS adverse events noted by Pfizer in its confidential document just 90 days into the vaccination campaign, it would take 10 minutes (reading at the rapid rate of 200 words per minute) to disclose them in a TV commercial. Yet Pfizer is exempt from such disclosures.

Consider the fact that in 1999, Dr. Fauci explained to Congress that you can have a vaccine that is totally fine at first, but then as late as 12 years later, “all hell breaks loose.”

Well, what do the next 12 years portend for a vaccine with which all hell broke loose immediately?

Prostock Studios/Getty Images

Horowitz: States must place a five-year moratorium on mRNA vaccines

There is nobody alive at this point who could possibly ignore the dangers of the mRNA COVID shots. Rather than taking them off the market and immediately investigating who knew what and when, the same companies are now filing with the FDA to immediately introduce more mRNA shots into the market. They will immediately be championed by every county and state health department and promoted by every pediatrician until they’re in the arms of every newborn baby. The mRNA flu and RSV shots are just around the corner, and if states do not place legal barriers to their release, they could possibly do even more damage than the COVID shots, if that is even possible.

Moderna is so brazen and shameless that even as millions are suffering from their first mRNA shot, the company is announcing that its new RSV mRNA shots are … you guessed it … 84% effective. Well, judging by the COVID shot that they said was 94% effective from day one but in fact is now suffering from a bout with negative efficacy, we can only imagine how “safe and effective” a jab that is advertised as “only” 84% effective might be. Pfizer’s Albert Bourla also announced the company will have an mRNA flu shot out in June or July and then another combo coronavirus/flu shot based on an mRNA platform sometime later in the year.

After Moderna leaked the top-line results of its own in-house study (no third-party studies needed, of course), Stephane Bancel, the company’s CEO, told CNBC at Davos that the company was able to complete all three phases of the RSV vaccine clinical trial in just one year (instead of six to eight years) and will now file for expedited approval with the FDA so that it’s on the market for this coming fall. A nice follow-up to his revelation that the company already worked on the COVID vaccine before the virus had a name!

Consider the fact that RSV was the poster child for a failed vaccine in the 1960s and the pharmaceutical industry has been unable to produce an effective shot for 55 years. Yet we are to believe that the company was somehow able to magically crack the code, and of course, it won’t replicate any of the problems the COVID shot induced. Has anyone ever wondered how a company that failed to bring a single product to market for eight years could abruptly become the star player in the biggest pandemic ever and then suddenly have more than a dozen mRNA products ready to go?

Well, after we solve the question of how Moderna seemed to have patented the sequence for the COVID virus in a cancer drug the company was developing in 2016, perhaps we can discover the secret to its success.

Incidentally, 11 months after Maria Bartiromo asked Bancel about Moderna having patented the sequence, he still has not gotten back to us about the reason behind the great coincidence. What we do know is that a company that seems to ascertain the future more than a Biblical prophet is now asserting that there will be more pandemics and is making it clear it now has mRNA production in every continent.

Even before discussing the RNA platform, we must realize that RSV is the worst candidate even for a traditional vaccine. One of the things we should all have observed from the COVID shots is that rapidly evolving RNA viruses are prone to mutation, and the antibody responses stimulated by shots don’t seem to be a good match for respiratory viruses. This is why even the CDC admits the flu shot was only 16% effective last year, which makes us wonder if the real number is in negative territory. Suboptimal antibodies or a mismatch of classes of antibodies can create immune imprinting and allow the body to either tolerate the virus more or serve as a Trojan horse to enhance the virus, which is what happened with the old failed RSV shot.

The RSV vaccine of 1967 was an utter disaster, resulting in the hospitalization of 80% of the infants and toddlers in the clinical trial. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, on its website, explains that the RSV shot was a textbook example of misfiring antibodies creating antibody-dependent disease enhancement, whereby the “antibodies act as a ‘Trojan horse,’ allowing the pathogen to get into cells and exacerbate the immune response.”

“In clinical trials, children who were given the vaccine were more likely to develop or die from pneumonia after infection with RSV,” states the website of the prominent children’s hospital. “As a result of this finding, the vaccine trials stopped, and the vaccine was never submitted for approval or released to the public.”

Are we really to believe that Moderna suddenly cracked the code on preventing ADE after its COVID shot likely caused some form of viral enhancement?

Now let’s get to the mRNA platform. While it’s true that many of the problems with the COVID shots stem from the spike protein, which is why every version of the shot out on the market is problematic, the mRNA itself is also dangerous. What should be self-evident to anyone at this point based on literature that was published pretty early on is that there is no shutoff or modulator of the mRNA coding your body. So even if it doesn’t code your body to produce something as harmful as a pathogenic spike, there is no ability to ensure the mRNA doesn’t go throughout your entire body producing that protein, tissue, or code for an unlimited period of time and in unknown quantities. Almost nothing is purely good in unlimited quantities and unlimited locations in your body for an unlimited period of time.

This is before we even focus on questions of the pro-inflammatory nature of the lipid nano particles delivering the mRNA, the polyethylene glycolcasing around it causing autoimmune and allergic reactions, and numerous other materials that have never been properly studied. Then of course there are a number of studies that indicate a substantial risk of the mRNA reverse transcribing into DNA:

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line | HTML

The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein induces long-term transcriptional perturbations of mitochondrial metabolic genes, causes cardiac fibrosis, and reduces myocardial contractile in obese mice | bioRxiv

(2010 Liver Study) Chromosomal integration of adenoviral vector DNA in vivo - PubMed

Adenoviral Vector DNA- and SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccines: Possible Integration into the Human Genome - Are Adenoviral Genes Expressed in Vector-based Vaccines? - PMC

SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome | bioRxiv

Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues | PNAS

Shouldn’t we conclusively rule out the concerns of DNA transcription raised in these papers before truncating the next mRNA development from eight years to one year?

Thus, aside from targeted therapies for terminally ill patients, clearly mRNA is not ready for prime time and must be banned, because clearly the system will not self-regulate. Vaccination has become a cult with no qualification, circumspection, modulation, or balanced rational thought. As Mike Ryan, an Irish doctor who serves as executive director of the World Health Organization's Health Emergencies Programme, recently said, “Vaccination is about protecting yourself, but it’s also an inherently altruistic act — you’re vaccinating yourself in order to be part of an immune group that will then protect those who can’t be vaccinated.” It’s therefore quite obvious they will target the RSV shots to children with even more cultish devotion than the COVID shots.

Everyone knows that babies are more vulnerable to RSV and the flu than to COVID. The companies will engage in full-court press to get this shot in the arms of every baby. Blocking mandates is not good enough. We have more than enough information to demonstrate that these shots are dangerous and are not ready for prime time. Every state must ban its own health department from purchasing, promoting, recommending, or marketing these shots. Furthermore, every state needs a commission of diverse voices to shadowbox the FDA and make its own recommendations, similar to what Governor Ron DeSantis established under the guidance of Dr. Joe Ladapo.

Most Republicans are willing to fight intrepidly against abortion, even when it’s politically unpopular. Yet mRNA shots are like a forced abortion because the minute they are permitted, even if they are not mandated, there is no enlightened consent. Unsuspecting parents, pregnant women, and seniors will be pressured into getting them. We still don’t know the extent to which they might shed on other people. Also, there is a robust effort from a $26 billion industry to inject them into the beef supply.

Most of all, while states create a backstop against federal-pharma experimentation, it’s incumbent upon Republicans in the House to repeal pharma’s legal immunity to liability. That is the best way to ensure that vaccines are safe and we can discover any malfeasance in court. Absent these reforms, they will continue to experiment upon our children. And what do they care if countless lives are lost or injured? They’ll just produce the mRNA to “fix it,” like they are planning with their much-anticipated mRNA cure for heart attacks!

Bill Oxford/Getty Images

Horowitz: DOD plans to embrace Operation Warped Speed as the new model — if Congress allows it

After releasing my agenda for medical freedom, I’m finding that even many conservatives are sort of done with COVID legislation and want to focus more on the problems of the deep state. But what they are missing is that the deep state is not done with biomedical tyranny. They must understand that Operation Warped Speed was the blueprint to achieve the deep state’s biomedical security and transhumanist human experimental utopia, and the same corrupt DOD defense/intel agencies behind the other atrocities against Americans are leading the push for even more dangerous vaccines. Thus, the development of COVID and the accompanying so-called vaccine wasn’t an anomaly from which we can move on; it was a paradigm shift that must be confronted and reversed.

Given the amount of information we now have on how dangerous the technology is behind these shots, it would be shocking to drop this issue, even if the deep state didn’t plan to build upon it. After all, we need a structure in place to prevent experimental shots that violate the Nuremberg Code, fully empower the citizenry with informed consent, and implementation of a safety net and check of legal liability against those public and private actors manufacturing, distributing, and endorsing these shots.

However, the COVID shots were just the opening act in this new era of biomedical experimentation on humanity. Humanists would look at Warped Speed as a genocide and prevent it from ever happening again. But the transhumanists running our HHS and DOD biomedical agencies look at Warped Speed and the destruction it caused as a successful model and plan to implement more of it at the “speed of science.”

We are all for the development of innovative technologies; however, absent exposure to liability, the government and pharma have now used the tools of COVID – the PREP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transactions Authority – to remove all regulatory safety nets for the public. The worst actor in this endeavor is not HHS per se, but the Pentagon, which is accorded unchecked power by the GOP’s unflinching support for anything slapped with the label “military.”

There are two stories in the news describing the ongoing development of vaccines that should send chills down your spine. According to a strategy document published by the DOD’s Chemical and Biological Defense Program, obtained by Politico, the military wants to harness the “rapid development and convergence of disparate branches of science and technology” born out of “lessons learned from the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic,” to create products to engineer service members’ immune systems with catch-all vaccines.

Per Politico:

DoD has concluded that a good offense is the best defense for many pharmaceutical-based threats. Instead of developing medical countermeasures against each toxin — such as Naloxone, an auto-injector designed to treat fentanyl intoxication — officials are looking at “modulating the immune system” through six metabolic routes to improve troops’ defenses, Watson said.

The Pentagon is also targeting naturally occurring viruses, which adversaries may now be able to manipulate. For example, officials are developing monoclonal antibodies — also used to treat Covid-19 — as treatment for three viral families: Nipah/Hendra, Rift Valley Fever and Pan-Orthopox.

As Gerald Parker, a former deputy assistant secretary for the CBDP, told the Daily Caller Foundation, this is all born out of Warped Speed.

The Pentagon’s massive expansion of its program to counter chemical and biological weapons grew in part out of the COVID-19 virus’ rapid spread around the globe, highlighting both the potential for non-weaponized agents to weaken the military at a large scale and DOD’s role in developing a countermeasure, the Pentagon said.

“DOD was essential to Operation Warp Speed’s success,” Parker said.

Let that last line sink in. Before COVID, this sort of information would have gone over my head. After all, it sounds laudatory for the DOD to want to protect our troops and national security. But what we learned from COVID is that national security is being used as the pretext to control not just the military, but the bodies, life, liberty, and property of all Americans through biomedical surveillance, security, experimentation, and eventually mandates. The DOD, not HHS was the lead player on pandemic response, development of the vaccines, skirting regulatory safety nets, and possibly the gain-of-function research.

So when we hear about the DOD planning catch-all vaccines tampering with the immune system built upon the “success” of something that likely committed a global genocide, we should be very afraid. We no longer need to speculate about the fine line between innovation and Joseph Mengele when government agencies are using the process that would make Mengele blush as the blueprint going forward.

Here are some important facts you must consider regarding the DOD’s involvement with coronavirus.

1) The most impactful vaccine contract Pfizer forged with the government was with the DOD, not HHS. When Brook Jackson, a clinical trial coordinator for the Pfizer COVID shots in Texas, sued Pfizer for committing fraud and violating FDA safety regulations, Pfizer, in its motion to dismiss, pointed to the company’s DOD contract that allowed it to skirt all the regulations. “Because of pandemic-related exigencies, the agreement was not a standard federal procurement contract, but rather a ‘prototype’ agreement executed pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2371b[.] … The [contract’s Statement of Work] describes a ‘large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration’ that imposes no requirements relating to Good Clinical Practices (‘GCP’) or related FDA regulations,” argued Pfizer in the background section of the motion filed in the U.S. Court for the Eastern District of Texas last April.

In other words, the DOD was able to enter into an agreement through what is known as “Other Transactions Authority” to procure “prototypes” of drugs that are not subject to “good clinical practices” and other regulations designed to protect the public. The authority is granted under 10 U.S.C. 2371 primarily to develop prototypes for research and development, obviously not to inject and even mandate on billions of people. Already in 2019, CRS noted that the number of OTAs used by the DOD rose from just 12 in fiscal year 2013 to 94 in FY 2017 and that “DOD lacks authoritative data that can be used to assess OT effectiveness and better understand broader trends associated with these agreements.”

As such, if we are going to face a torrent of germ warfare launched upon us, it will likely be coming more from the DOD than HHS, which means the DOD, especially CBDP and DARPA, should be the main target of the House Oversight Committee’s investigation on the response to coronavirus.

2) It’s not just that the DOD takes point in developing the tools of germ warfare both for the military and civilians; it plays point in the broader pandemic response and “countermeasures.” As you can see, thanks to a recent FOIA, a good number of the hundreds of COVID-related contracts were issued from the DOD. In March 2020, Newsweek got hold of Above Top Secret contingency plans code-named Octagon, Freejack, and Zodiac that would have placed Gen. Terrence J. O'Shaughnessy in charge of a martial law arrangement if the government had failed during the pandemic.

3) Deborah Birx, the infamous pandemic coordinator, was not from HHS but was brought in by the National Security Council. As Debbie Lerman reported at the Brownstone Institute, the National Security Council, not HHS, was responsible for the pandemic policies in March 2020.

Now with this in mind, let’s explore the second important news story of last week: Wired is reporting that a provision in the FDA Modernization Act 2.0, signed by Biden in December, allows the FDA to approve more therapeutics just based on “high tech alternatives” to animal testing. In a violation of the Nuremberg Code, officials plan on using things like computer models or measuring antibody levels (which have failed so miserably so far). “Previously, the US government required that all investigational drugs be tested on animals before they could progress to initial trials in humans,” reports Wired. “But the new law allows drug developers to submit safety and efficacy data from sources other than animals.”

Why do you think they are making these changes? For our health? No, it’s to make every vaccine like the COVID shots and the regulatory structure of all vaccines as experimental and harmful as Warped Speed.

There is an immediate need for House Republicans to repeal or seriously limit the PREP Act, OTA, and EUA and expand the ban on gain-of-function research throughout the DOD. Moreover, the entire vaccination empire throughout our government must be picked through with a fine-tooth comb by the House Oversight Committee to ensure that what is still ongoing from COVID fascism can never again happen in this country.
PhoThoughts/Getty Images

Horowitz: Local WV hospital suggests unjabbed workers don yellow stars on badges to identify need for mask

“You have no right not to be vaccinated, you have no right not to wear a mask … and if you refuse to be vaccinated, the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm.”

Those were the words spoken by one of America’s supposed preeminent constitutional attorneys, Alan Dershowitz. This statement would be abhorrent and dangerous even if masks and needles actually worked. First, it would mean that there is quite literally nothing a government cannot do to your body, even if you passively live your life without actively harming anyone. Second, it’s facially absurd, because if the interventions are important enough to violate human rights over, then it means they are indeed effective, which means that anyone who wants to avail themselves of that great protection is free to wear a mask and get a shot. How are other people in support of the shots and masks ever affected by those who opt out?

But we still have people believing in the “science” and morality behind this proposition even after everything we’ve learned about the negative efficacy and danger of the shots. Consider how even the New York City Department of Health conceded that the vaccinated are more likely to contract the current variant of the virus than the unvaccinated. Taking their sense of morality and law to its logical conclusion, that would mean the science should dictate we discriminate against those getting the shot even more.

To this day, hospitals, even in red states, are still continuing the immoral apartheid of the unvaccinated and the forcible covering of human breathing holes. Now, according to Huntington, West Virginia, talk show host Tom Roten, one West Virginia hospital has taken it to a new level by suggesting those workers without the jabs should place gold stars on their badges identifying themselves as a subhuman class who must cover their noses and mouths. Here is a memo circulated to the hospital’s leadership on Friday:

Say what you want about the Third Reich, but unlike in the Fourth Reich, the yellow star did not accompany a requirement to place the humiliating symbol on a breathing hole.

The letter, posted by Braden Roten, Tom’s son, was obtained from Amber Robinson, who worked at Cabell Huntington Hospital for nearly ten years, most recently as a pathology clerk in the lab. Robinson was on with Roten on WVHU Monday morning discussing this edict from the hospital, which began the same day. Since October, the workers were free to bare their God-given faces, but now they are back in bondage.

After going on Roten’s show around 7:35 a.m. Monday, Amber, who lives across the Ohio River in Ohio, went to work a half-hour later, but was told she was suspended for five days for refusing to follow the masking policy, according to an update she posted on her Facebook page.

It appears that there was enough blowback from the original leadership letter that the policy implemented on Monday did not ultimately include gold stars, because everyone is now required to wear a mask, per a Monday notice to the public. Thus, slightly less eerie symbolism, but the same illogical, immoral, and inhumane policy remains in place.

Even the most ardent supporters of the vaccine have conceded for months – safety concerns aside – that the shots absolutely don’t stop transmission and now, with the new variants, likely facilitate it. The denial of basic human rights and public accommodation on behalf of the biomedical security state must be extirpated from American culture, law, and medicine, not taken to a greater extreme than the germaphobe Nazis. Isn’t it interesting how the Anti-Defamation League defamed people like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene for comparing masks to gold stars, but when a hospital actually implements such a policy, the group has nothing to say? So you are able to implement Nazi policies, but can’t call them out.

Too many Americans, including conservative politicians, think COVID tyranny is over with, but in reality it is continuing for people in health care, even in red states. How are red state like West Virginia allowing this to continue? Where is the legislature?

We already know where the governor stands. Jim Justice, who is exploring a bid for Senate, was more supportive of masks and vaccines than even Joe Biden. After Biden slipped up last September and asserted that the emergency is over, Justice lambasted him for prematurely declaring it over because, in his estimation, we still needed more people to get the shots that didn’t work. Rather than demanding all of the mandates end, Justice called the suggestion the pandemic was over “crazyland.” Mind you, Justice got a substantial case of COVID after having been jabbed three times.

It’s shocking how in a state where Democrats have failed to carry a single county for president since 2008, Republicans have declined to curb COVID fascism. Delegate Moore Capito, son of RINO Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, has had a miserable tenure as Judiciary Committee chair and has refused to push back against Justice’s tyranny. Now he wants to be governor. With a 31-3 majority in the state Senate and an 88-12 majority in the House, there doesn’t appear to be an appetite to affirm medical freedom, bodily autonomy, and the Nuremberg Code against human experimentations.

Too many conservatives in legislatures and Congress think we can just move on from the past few years without any reaffirmation of the Nuremberg Code or any other human rights protections, public health reforms, or law changes. Yet not only are the biomedical tyrants planning the next phases of the biomedical security state, even the repudiated acts of the first tranche still persist in parts of society. Any requirement that a human being wear a mask or get a jab needs to be criminalized, and yes, that includes hospitals. Lawmakers in West Virginia and other states should also solidify the law change with a constitutional amendment affirming the right to refuse any medical procedure, treatment, injection, device, vaccine, or prophylactic, as well as prohibit any discrimination in the realm of public accommodation on account of exercising that right.

It is shocking how on this 75th anniversary of the Nuremberg doctors’ trials, we not only allow human experimentation, but continue mandating it, even when the evidence long shows it is harmful and not helpful. It is shocking how the GOP’s first act in the House wasn’t a bill to ban indefinite public health emergencies and the ability of the CDC to violate human rights – such as bodily autonomy and the right to breathe – during such a declaration. Have we learned nothing from both the Third Reich and having experienced the Fourth Reich for over two years? Absent a strong focus on learning the lessons of COVID fascism, it will continue indefinitely and get even worse with “the next time.”

We just commemorated the legacy of Martin Luther King with yesterday’s federal holiday – a man who exhorted the public that moral change only “comes through continuous struggle.” He observed that “a man can't ride you unless your back is bent." Who would have thought that back would still be bent three years into the most widespread form of tyranny in a state whose motto is “Mountaineers Are Always Free”?

FatCamera/Getty Images

Horowitz: Reconstituting the America we once loved in red states, part 1: Medical freedom

Medical freedom needs to become the new pro-life movement on the right. It quite literally affects even more human beings than abortion.

This week, all eyes in the political world will turn to Washington as the excitement builds over the transition of power in the House of Representatives. But what good is a narrow RINO majority in just one branch of the federal government when Republicans ceded the budget leverage they otherwise would have commanded this month? Why not focus on half the state governments where Republicans enjoy trifecta control, in most of them with supermajorities in the legislatures? Indeed, this year kicks off the most important legislative sessions of our lifetime. The intensity of grassroots pressure placed on these equivocating Republicans will determine whether red-state America is just a pro-gun, anti-abortion version of blue-state hell or whether we can fully reconstitute the America we once loved in portions of the country.

There’s no reason to focus on the presidential election and what might happen two years from now. We can’t wait two years for change, nor are we likely to actualize it on the federal level. The American Revolution was catalyzed by state legislatures organizing together. The reconstitution of that revolution will also have to unfold in the bodies of government closest to the people, at least in the states where a majority of the people haven’t already succumbed to the spirit of the age.

Throughout the next few weeks, I’ll be posting legislative goals for various issues, but for today, we will focus on the most important issue of our time: medical freedom. It is the ultimate pro-life issue of our time. There is no evidence that the genocide that has occurred over the past few years from COVID and COVID fascism is even being addressed at the federal level. Therefore, it is up to the red states to reconstitute the Nuremberg Code and learn the lessons from the travesty of Covidstan.

Here are the legislative ideas and objectives that must be pursued in red states this session. If not now, while the malfeasance of the government is fresh on the minds of the people, then it will never be accomplished. This is a checklist of ideas that activists should use to determine whether there is legislation in your respective states addressing the issue of our time – to ensure there are legal, structural, and political barriers in place so that what occurred the past few years is immediately halted and cannot happen again.

Permanently ban all COVID biomedical security mandates: Now is precisely the time not only to reverse the COVID policies, but to plow over the ground of tyranny and salt it with provisions permanently banning and even criminalizing its implementation. This means banning all public and “private” mask and vaccine mandates in any setting under any circumstance. This is no longer 2020 when we were merely playing defense. Now we have reams of data and studies showing these policies are not only ineffective but downright harmful.

Until now, some states agreed to a health care exemption from the prohibition on mandates, but that is precisely the setting where cancer patients, pain patients, and Alzheimer’s patients who are forced to use medical services regularly are still being coerced to cover their faces. This is unacceptable. Disability law mandates affirmative accommodations for people with health issues, yet somehow we are to believe hospitals can force patients to wear something hazardous? The bill must be backed by a stiff fine for any violator, and in the case of anyone caught forcing schoolchildren to wear a mask, there must be prison time.

Make health status a protected class under anti-discrimination law: One way of accomplishing the aforementioned goal is to codify health status into state anti-discrimination law, making it unlawful to discriminate in any way on account of opting against a particular medical intervention to one’s body. It might also be worthwhile codifying such rights into the state’s constitution along the lines of the following: “The right of a person to refuse any medical procedure, treatment, injection, device, vaccine, or prophylactic shall not be questioned or interfered with in any manner. Equality of rights under the law or in the realm of public accommodation shall not be denied or abridged to any person in this State because of the exercise of the right under this section.”

Preserving doctor-patient autonomy:

  • No doctor shall be penalized with loss of licensure or board certification on account of speaking out against vaccines and mask-wearing.
  • No doctor can be punished for using off-label FDA-approved drugs, and all pharmacists must fill such prescriptions absent a religious conscience concern. There should be a cause of action in court for patients to sue pharmacies that block valid prescriptions.
  • Also, any barriers to doctors themselves dispensing drugs they prescribe should be lifted. Some states allow doctors to dispense drugs in the office, but this power is generally limited and must be expanded.
  • Finally, the complaint process against doctors with the state’s medical board must be overhauled. Complaints can only be accepted from patients alleging injury, surviving family of injured patients who die, or from medical professionals with direct contact who allege patient harm. All complaints in absence of patient harm must be ignored.

Abolish the state’s immunization register: No good will come of the state holding onto a person’s vaccination status, and it will only be used to enforce the biomedical security state and should therefore be abolished. At a minimum, anyone administering a vaccine must obtain written consent from the patient prior to reporting the administration of a vaccine or immunization to the statewide immunization registry.

An immediate termination of mRNA vaccine promotion: We are long past the time when the shots should merely not be mandated. The jabs must be taken off the market. State legislatures must bar their respective departments of health from promoting or purchasing any mRNA vaccines, ban all marketing or advertising of the COVID shots, create a commission to study the effects of the COVID shots by researching all those who died within 30 days of vaccination, and force the departments of health to fund treatment and diagnostics for those injured by the shots. Also, depending on state law, legislatures should follow Florida’s lead and work to convene grand juries to investigate the willful misconduct of hospitals, the departments of health, and the pharma companies throughout the pandemic.

Suspend the childhood immunization schedule: All state indulgence and recognition of the CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule must be suspended pending the outcome of a commission to study the need, safety, and efficacy of every vaccine category and prototype on the market. Health departments could still support the other shots pending the commission’s recommendations, but all health care and school settings would be prohibited from discriminating against those who opt out of those shots.

Patient Bill of Rights for those in hospitals and senior care facilities: Some states have pursued a few of these ideas, but there must be strong criminal and civil penalties for violators. Every hospital or senior care facility must always:

  • allow one surrogate present in the hospital (or as a visitor in a nursing home);
  • permit patients to access FDA-approved drugs off label prescribed by a doctor at their own expense if they agree to assume liability;
  • accord every patient the right to refuse any hospital-prescribed treatment or the right to refuse to remain in the facility if they have the mental capacity to leave (a ban on medical kidnapping).

There must be a cause of action created to sue any hospital and possibly for the district attorney to bring criminal charges against hospitals that deny these rights. All hospitals violating the patient bill of rights should be on the hook to lose state tax-exempt status.

A complete ban on remdesevir: There is no sane doctor alive who can look you in the eye and declare remdesivir to be a safe and effective drug. Yet to this day, it remains the standard of care for inpatient COVID care. States must ban its use as they would any toxic and potentially lethal drug with zero benefit.

Ban on medical kidnapping via child protective services: There is a growing trend of hospitals or doctors working with the state’s child protective custody agency to steal children from parents who refuse to go along with their course of treatment or bio-medical goals. States must ban all investigations and agency decisions to suspend parental rights on account of a parent’s refusal of specific medical treatments, diagnostics, or devices unless there is proof that the parent acted with malicious intent. Idaho House Bill 821 is a good model. This includes refusal to engage in masking or vaccination of a child. Also, such actions, opinions, or beliefs shall not be used as a factor in family court in determining custody arrangements.

Hold pharma accountable: Although the federal government protects vaccine companies from liability, and this issue must be redressed at the federal level, states can still broaden their consumer protection and anti-fraud statutes to target pharma for blatant fraud. There is a wealth of material showing that the manufacturers knew the vaccines didn’t work and injured people, yet falsely marketed them. Also, state health departments, which assiduously pushed the vaccines in red states just as much as blue states, must use their remaining COVID funds to fund diagnostics, detection, and treatment of vaccine injury.

State legislatures should also form commissions to study the scope of injury through studies, death certificate and medical billing data, and investigating all deaths in the state within 30 days of taking the shots. Finally, they must create a state-based vaccine adverse events reporting system that is user-friendly and must use state resources to require and encourage medical professionals to report injuries to that system.

Ban endorsement of experimental shots: States must bar their respective health departments from endorsing or marketing any shot to the broad public that has not undergone a human clinical trial with a sustained and maintained placebo control group. That clinical trial must have some third party supporting its safety data, which is independent from the manufacturer. Any trial based on “immonobridging” – measuring antibody titers and comparing them to various study groups – does not qualify.

Criminalize gain-of-function research: There’s no need to wait for the feds to act. States should ban research institutions from engaging in gain-of-function research with a statute backed by criminal penalties. Individuals potentially harmed by such research should be granted a cause of action to sue those institutions.

Taxcredits for direct primary care: Some states are already doing this, but there is a need to even the tax playing field between “cartel” health care and direct primary care. The core problem we experienced during the pandemic was a lack of individual thinking among practitioners, much of which is connected to the fact that they are all controlled by systems, insurance companies, and networks. With so much tendentious governmental treatment for the current cartel, states need to find ways to even up the score to incentivize people to use more free market and free-thinking doctors. Offering direct primary care the same tax benefits – both on the employer side and individual side of the ledger – we offer to the insurance companies is a good start.

How many of these ideas have already been adopted by your governor? How many are represented by a piece of legislation pending in your legislative body? Now is the time to get to work. If not us, who? And if not now, when?
Fly View Productions/Getty Images

Horowitz: Possibly the most important study on COVID shots might explain why COVID never seems to end

Tolerance is a good thing in most aspects of life. But when it comes to the immune system, artificially juicing up the body to create antibodies with long-term tolerance to a pathogen is a recipe for disaster. Amid thousands of papers on COVID and the vaccines, a new German paper published in Science Immunology should be the headline story this week. Although the subject matter is very dense, the implication of it is that the Pfizer shots (and possibly other mRNA spike protein shots) caused the immune system to misfire, thereby creating an endless feedback loop of viral immune escape, perpetuating the pandemic in the macro, and creating immune suppression for the individuals who received them.

The vexing question of 2022 is why the virus is even still with us to this day. Why is it that so many countries in the Pacific Rim that did so well in 2020 and 2021 now have a bigger problem in 2022 with less virulent strains of COVID? Why does it appear the pandemic will never end and so many people continue to get the virus multiple times? None of this is normal.

Wherever you turn, the most vaccinated countries are not only experiencing rampant side effects from the shots, but worse outcomes from COVID itself following their endless booster campaigns.

But even more telling than an epidemiological comparison of one nation to another is a comparison of outcomes within nations themselves between pre- and post-vaccination/booster campaign. Prior to the mass vaccination, two parts of the world largely escaped excess deaths from the virus: continental Africa and the Pacific Rim nations. Yet whereas Africa flatlined in terms of COVID deaths throughout 2021-2022, countries like Japan only experienced meaningful numbers of deaths after the mass vaccination program.

Here is a chart of the daily COVID deaths per million in Japan, a country that is super vaccinated (and mask-obsessed).

Notice how Japan is experiencing progressively worse death curves, which only began after everyone (particularly seniors) was boosted, even though Omicron is less pathogenic than the earlier strains. Japan is also the current world leader in cases per million.

Australia is a similar story:

Now contrast these two countries to Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa.

One could assert that there are some unknown factors as to why Africans appear not to die from COVID, compared to the high death rates in North America, South America, and Europe. However, the Pacific Rim countries like Japan and Australia seemed to enjoy almost as low a death rate prior to the booster campaign. After that point, Nigeria (and the rest of Africa) seemed to flatline and be done with the virus, as we would typically expect by now, while the other countries incurred skyrocketing cases and a relatively massive spike in deaths. Obviously, Nigeria’s vaccination rate is much lower than these other countries, but its booster rate is almost nonexistent.

Even within Europe, Scandinavian countries like Norway largely escaped a massive death curve during the first two years of the pandemic. That all changed in 2022. Norway now has the highest COVID death rate per million in the world.

Adding these three Omicron waves together, we see that Norway is beginning to rival the U.S. in terms of death curves. However, America is a much unhealthier country, and America experienced the death curves with the more pathogenic Wuhan and Delta strains.

If you track the number of boosters given per 100 people in some of the aforementioned countries, you will see that the current death curves track almost perfectly in a positive correlation.

Indeed, Chile now has the most deaths per capita in South America, even though the country already suffered a substantial number of deaths and should be done with the pandemic. Nigeria and the rest of Africa indeed are done with the pandemic, and the U.S., which has an average booster rate, is somewhere in the middle in terms of current COVID rates.

So, this is about a lot more than “oh, the vaccines don’t stop transmission.” They appear to proliferate it and also to worsen clinical outcomes. But why?

A group of German researchers tested for which specific antibody levels spike at what time. Specifically, they tested the Pfizer shot against the AstraZeneca shot and discovered something very concerning. Increasingly over time, and particularly with three doses of Pfizer, the immune response switched from the more neutralizing IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies to the non-neutralizing “tolerating” IgG4 antibodies:

High levels of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2-antibodies are an important component of vaccine-induced immunity. Shortly after the initial two mRNA vaccine doses, the IgG response mainly consists of the pro-inflammatory subclasses IgG1 and IgG3. Here, we report that several months after the second vaccination, SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies were increasingly composed of non-inflammatory IgG4, which were further boosted by a third mRNA vaccination and/or SARS-CoV-2 variant breakthrough infections. IgG4 antibodies among all spike-specific IgG antibodies rose on average from 0.04% shortly after the second vaccination to 19.27% late after the third vaccination. This induction of IgG4 antibodies was not observed after homologous or heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with adenoviral vectors [emphasis added].

Why is this so important?

Importantly, this class switch was associated with a reduced capacity of the spike-specific antibodies to mediate antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis and complement deposition. Since Fc-mediated effector functions are critical for antiviral immunity, these findings may have consequences for the choice and timing of vaccination regimens using mRNA vaccines, including future booster immunizations against SARS-CoV-2 [emphasis added].

So not only do these shots fail to produce the first line of defense antibodies known as IgA in the mucosal, something we knew from day one, but even the blood-based antibodies are increasingly the wrong type. This problem seems to get worse over time and with more doses of the shot, which correlates perfectly with numerous studies showing negative efficacy increasing over time, with more doses, and how the vaccinated take longer to clear the virus.

This topic is both very dense and fascinating. You can find clear explanations of this study about IgG4 antibodies in layman’s terms here, here, and here. But the important outcome for us from a policy standpoint is understanding the deadly subterfuge that has been foisted upon 5.5 billion people of the world and how it will be used with many more novel vaccines coming down the pipeline. The medical establishment successfully convinced the world that a vaccine is nothing more than simply stimulating an antibody response and is something that can be done within days of discovering a virus. This is why they now seek to get vaccines approved not based on accurate clinical trials and clinical outcomes but on “immunobridging” – the measuring of antibody levels. Indeed, this is how they got the bivalent booster shots and the JYNNEOS monkeypox vaccine approved and how they plan to get future shots approved.

However, merely measuring antibody levels in the abstract is meaningless and potentially masks harms to the body. God designed our bodies to create the right sort of antibodies, in the right amount, at the right time, in the right place. Any fault in any of those factors can create auto-antibodies, Trojan horse antibodies (antibody dependent disease enhancement) or a misfiring of the immune system, which is some form of original antigenic sin or pathogenic priming that teaches the body to tolerate a specific strain of the virus or respond for a wrong strain. This is why vaccines take years to develop. And this is before we even discuss the fact that these shots are not even vaccines, but are gene therapies that code your body to produce a pathogenic spike that was the result of gain-of-function research and seems to potentially damage every organ system, particularly the cardiovascular system.

In the case of the COVID shots, what the German study discovered is that over time and with increased doses it actually trains your body to tolerate rather than fight the virus it was designed to destroy. The other class of blood-based antibodies are designed to neutralize pathogens; however, the IgG4 class was specifically designed to tolerate innocuous cells (that don’t reproduce) that it repeatedly contacts, such as pollen or peanut particles. They serve an important role and help ensure that people don’t respond with excessive inflammation to everyday encounters with pollen, but to see 20% of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 (it was as high as 42% in those experiencing infection after boosters) be something that tolerates it is astounding … and dangerous! In other words, whereas your IgG1 or IgG3 antibodies are like the SWAT team, your IgG4 antibodies are like social workers. You don’t want social workers responding to replicating pathogens like the SARS-CoV-2 spike.

The long-term implications of this study are still unclear, but like every earth-shattering finding, this one will not be studied by governments. If this shot is really upregulating an IgG4 response for most of the population, it could easily explain why herd immunity is out the window with SARS-CoV-2. It’s literally teaching the body to not only respond to the wrong pathogen but to tolerate its existence and not remember to fight it. Also, what does this mean long-term for people who don’t create pro-inflammatory antibodies to defend against pathogens? What sort of damage is being done by not having the virus sufficiently neutralized before it invades the system so deeply?

As Kilian Schober, one of the authors of the study, notes (after calling our interpretation of the study too “simplistic”),”Our findings do, however, raise some questions about how to proceed.” But in the past, we used to answer those questions before experimenting on humans, not begin to raise them (and then never answer them) after 5.5 billion people were already injected with the product.
kamisoka/Getty Images

Horowitz: After Christmas cold spell, time for red states to wake up from green energy scam

What’s the modus operandi of our dystopian government? Creating a needless deadly crisis, blocking the effective way for dealing with it thereafter, and foisting upon the world instead a dangerous and ineffective way of dealing with it. That might sound a lot like COVID, but it’s largely what officials have been planning for a long time with energy, and now that the population is primed for lockdowns, disruptions, and total authoritarian control as a result of COVID, that is what they plan to do with our energy grid. All for a lie.

This was the coldest Christmas in a half-century in much of the U.S., with many localities setting records, including those not accustomed to the cold like Tallahassee, Florida. Many of us are disgusted at those limiting our natural energy in favor of novel, ineffective energy, thereby causing a doubling or even tripling of home heating bills. But we must also realize that if they had their way, we’d have no heating in our homes at all.

Just like the supposed source of COVID and how to deal with it were lies, our energy crisis is wholly contrived and built upon the lie of global warming. Typically, you would have to make sure we are 100% correct about the “science” behind such irrevocable economic and societal changes before committing civilization suicide by destroying the only reliable sources of energy we have. But in a post-“Great Reset” world, this is par for the course. In fact, the science behind global warming is just as flimsy as the science behind lockdowns, masks, and mRNA shots.

During the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009, chief climate priest Al Gore asserted, "Some of the models suggest … that there is a 75 percent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years." Predictions like this upended our lives with more expensive and more decrepit vital products and services being produced for a generation under the false pretense of taming a crisis that never existed. It turns out that since 2012, the mass of Arctic sea ice is up 31% and Greenland is gaining, not losing, ice. Meanwhile, Antarctica, which was always gaining ice during the period when the Arctic was losing ice, subsequently lost ice last decade and is now regaining it. In other words, the science behind polar ice caps seems to be rooted in the same cherry-picked timing and data as the faux science behind global warming causing either fewer or more hurricanes.

Yet somehow, we are to believe the science is all figured out on how to tamper with global temperatures, just like it was with COVID. Rather than people being more primed to believe in government control after COVID, any thinking person should be even more suspect of official climate lies and the accompanying life-altering policy changes governments want to induce based on them. And boy, would these policy changes be life-altering.

When officials speak of “net zero” for carbon emissions, it means, many times of the year, you would have net zero energy for heating. Picture those nights this past week of below-zero temperatures for much of the nation. Would you want to rely on “renewable energy,” even after billions upon billions in subsidies failed to move the needle on its effectiveness?

Temperatures dropped to near zero in Amarillo, Texas, over the Christmas weekend, with wind chills well below zero. Even south Texas faced several nights of once-in-a-generation record cold. Yet even with all that wind blowing, when Texans needed energy most, it was natural gas that held the grid for Texans, while wind and solar collapsed, according to the grid tracking info from the Energy Information Administration.

God might have been sending those wind gusts of 50 mph, but Santa most certainly was not delivering wind energy through the chimney to Texans on Christmas. Now imagine how much better Texas would be doing if the state had invested a fraction of the $66 billion it used for wind and solar in energy sources that actually energize the world rather than in sources that need help from other energy to produce a fraction of the output at a higher cost? Imagine how much cheaper heating prices would be without the global warming mandates and green energy diversions.

If Republican states don’t start looking at how to expand natural God-given fuels and end the green energy scam, the next cold wave could be worse, and we will face energy rationing like the Europeans. For example, depending on the type of job, German regulators now set the thermostats in Germany’s workplaces anywhere between 54 and 66 Fahrenheit. France is preparing for rolling blackouts to close hospitals and schools in a shutdown scenario that could rival the COVID lockdowns used in 2020 to strategically acclimate the public to the new climate of scarcity, pain, and control. Keep in mind, Europe is facing this magnitude of an energy crisis after it has already spent over $1 trillion on “renewable” energy since 2004.

As much as Republicans appear united on energy policy, if you watch carefully, they drop buzz words like a “smarter transition” to “clean” energy and a “better” way of dealing with global warming. Half the Senate Republicans, including Mitch McConnell, just voted to expand an international treaty banning the key coolants in air conditioners, thereby agreeing to the false premise of global warming. Most GOP governors continue to promote tendentious treatment for wind, solar, electric cars, and biofuels that are enabling the dangerous globalist quest to phase out viable energy.

Republicans must end this mealy-mouthed agenda of pursuing a “smarter transition” to green energy, all built upon acceptance of the false premise of global warming. States must audit every regulation that accepts the premise of global warming and harms consumers and work to eliminate it from state policy – be it a law, mandate, subsidy, or regulation.

As we are seeing in Europe, there is no middle ground on this road to the hell of scarcity, which will lead to complete government control every aspect of our lives. In a post-COVID/Great Reset world, there is no longer an excuse to feign ignorance about the “science.” Anyone with working cells in their brain should realize the dark end to that path. The road to a transhumanist hell is paved with “the scienceTM”.