If Presidents Can’t Control Executive Agencies, Elections Are Fake
Former Trump Appointee Explains Why Trump Needs Elon Musk To Fire Thousands Of Bureaucrats
Trump's MAJOR Supreme Court VICTORY may set a new precedent for January 6 defendants
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Joseph Fischer, a January 6 Capitol riot participant, challenging his federal obstruction conviction.
The justices ruled 6-3 to overturn a lower court’s decision that had allowed a charge of corruptly obstructing an official proceeding — specifically, the congressional certification of President Biden’s victory.
Like Fischer, there are over 300 defendants charged with “obstruction of an official proceeding.” Now that a new precedent has been set, these defendants may be able to look forward to similar outcomes.
“Long story short, the Court today had a very sound ruling when it comes to statutory interpretation 101 first principles. They said that this is an incorrect reading of the statute and the practical fact is that a lot of the J6ers should have their sentences heavily reduced if not thrown out altogether,” legal expert Josh Hammer tells Sara Gonzales.
Not only does this ruling affect those who were at the Capitol on January 6 — but it also is great news for former President Donald Trump.
“I think two of the four counts against Donald Trump in the Washington, D.C., indictment are now in very, very serious jeopardy. Those will likely get tossed out as well,” Hammer explains.
While the Supreme Court ruled that the case needs to go back to the lower court to be reconsidered, it shouldn’t matter that the lower court is in D.C. itself.
“They’re going to have to apply this standard still,” Hammer says, adding that “they were pretty clear that this is just not an appropriate exercise of statutory interpretation, so I’m relatively confident that this is going to play out pretty well from here.”
While many are pleased with the outcome, there is one Trump-appointed justice who, shockingly, isn’t.
“Amy Coney Barrett did dissent with Sotomayor and Kagan,” Gonzales explains.
“Amy Coney Barrett is rapidly shaping up to be perhaps perhaps Trump’s single biggest disappointment, frankly, on that court,” Hammer says.
Want more from Sara Gonzales?
To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Arizona Mom Who Works With Refugee Kids Fights Due-Process Denial That Would Place Her On No-Hire List
Exclusive: Former White House Staffer Confirms Jan. 6 Committee Lied About DOJ Attorney
If You Want Something, Don’t Ask a Bureaucracy To Do It
The incentives bureaucrats face may cause them to act in a way that is rational for themselves and their bureaucracies, but is not optimal from a social perspective.
Get the Conservative Review delivered right to your inbox.
We’ll keep you informed with top stories for conservatives who want to become informed decision makers.
Today's top stories