Abraham Lincoln targeted for theatrical character assassination; filmmaker suggests he was a philandering homosexual



Activists' so-called "Pride Month" is over, but their campaign to queer America is clearly a perennial undertaking. While American youth are a popular target, long-dead American greats are apparently also fair game.

Shaun Peterson, a self-described "director/preditor" from California who has previously worked on multiple Disney projects, is set to debut a so-called documentary film in September that accuses Abraham Lincoln of having extramarital affairs with men.

"As told by preeminent Lincoln scholars, historical recreations and never before seen photographs and letters, the film details Lincoln's romantic relationships with men," says the website for the film. "Lover of Men widens its lens into the history of human sexual fluidity and focuses on the profound differences between sexual mores of the nineteenth century and those we hold today."

The filmmakers made sure there was no mistaking the agitprop nature of the film, stating, "Lover of Men is not only an exploration of gender roles and sexual identity, but also serves as an examination of American intolerance."

According to the trailer for the film, sexuality "through the mid-19th century was far more fluid, but for someone who wanted a political career, it was mandatory that you have a wife."

"If you can accept a queer Lincoln, you can accept queer people overall," says the trailer. "He should inspire us to achieve a true democracy for everyone."

Whereas the new Broadway show "Oh, Mary!" similarly accuses Lincoln of being gay, the LGBT publication Queerty indicated its transvestic playwright Cole Escola readily admits that his play is utterly baseless. The trailer for Peterson's film, on the other hand, adopts a pretense of seriousness about its projection of faddish contemporary notions about sex onto a revered 19th-century statesman.

'I've seen those letters, and they have no homoerotic overtones.'

Lincoln married Mary Anne Todd, a Kentucky woman, on Nov. 4, 1842. Together, they had four children, only one of whom — Robert Todd Lincoln — lived past the age of 18.

While there have been various efforts over the years to paint the American father and husband who issued the Emancipation Proclamation as gay or a "bisexual" — especially by the late gay activist Larry Kramer, who made no secret of his political aim to the New York Times — these appear to have consisted largely of projections, inventions, speculations, and misinterpretations.

One reason people have concluded Lincoln was gay was that he shared a bed with a man on more than one occasion. It's clear from the trailer for Peterson's film that it similarly will lean into the suggestion embraced by other revisionists that Lincoln had a romantic relationship with Joshua Speed, a man whose marriage to Fanny Henning lasted 40 years.

Michael Burlingame, the Naomi B. Lynn distinguished chair in Lincoln Studies at the University of Illinois Springfield, told the Hartford Courant in 2021 that the supposedly controversial aspects of Lincoln's relationship with Speed seized upon by the likes of Larry Kramer would "be a footnote" in his multi-volume biography of the Republican president.

"The evidence I've seen seems insignificant to justify its inclusion," said the Lincoln expert. "I've seen those letters, and they have no homoerotic overtones."

Burlingame suggested, instead, that he had found evidence that Lincoln was infatuated with women besides Todd prior to their marriage.

Charles Strozier, a psychoanalyst and history professor who addressed the false narrative in his 2016 book "Your Friends Forever, A. Lincoln: The Enduring Friendship of Abraham Lincoln and Joshua Speed," told the Daily Beast that it was very common for men to share a bed in Lincoln's time.

"Inns at the time were really just homes where they finished the loft. They weren't hotels like we have now. They were just hostels, where you have the men over here and the women over there," said Strozier.

According to the Daily Mail, Lincoln originally shared a bed with Speed because when he moved to Springfield, Illinois, in 1837, he didn't have enough money to acquire his own bed and bedding.

The Mail noted further that Lincoln would also sleep in the same bed as other lawyers — a common practice for the traveling "circuits" of his time, where up to 20 would share one room.

Doris Kearns Goodwin was another award-winning historian who reportedly poked holes in the gay Lincoln narrative in her biography on the Republican, noting, "Their intimacy is more an index to an era when close male friendships, accompanied by open expressions of affection and passion, were familiar and socially acceptable."

"Nor can sharing a bed be considered evidence of an erotic involvement. It was common practice in an era when private quarters were a rare luxury," continued Goodwin. "The attorneys of the Eighth Circuit in Illinois where Lincoln would travel regularly shared beds."

The late Harvard professor David Herbert Donald, long regarded to be the definitive biographer of Lincoln, also disputed the suggestion — by C.A. Tripp, a gay researcher for Alfred C. Kinsey — that the 16th president was gay. The New York Times indicated that no one at the time had ever suggested Lincoln and Speed were sexual partners — not even his enemies in the yellow press. Donald, like Strozier, emphasized that in frontier times, space was tight and men shared beds. It was not out preference but necessity.

In response to a similar effort — again by Kramer — to paint Alexander Hamilton as non-straight, Hamilton biographer Ron Chernow warned against "ransacking history in service of a political agenda."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Scholastic backtracks on giving elementary schools the option of not ​displaying race- and gender-focused collection at book fairs



Scholastic was poised to provide elementary schools with the option of whether or not to expose children to a special collection containing some works of identitarian and LGBT propaganda. Following weeks of pressure from activist groups keen on depriving schools across the nation of such a choice, the company has backtracked.

What's the background?

The Scholastic Corporation announced on Oct. 13 that in the face of various legislative efforts across the country to protect children from obscene and/or divisive content, it would be rolling out a special collection containing "mostly LGBTQIA+ titles and books that engage with the presence of racism in our country." Accordingly, schools would get the choice of whether or not to display the collection or specific books within it at elementary school fairs.

According to a list obtained by EdWeek, the special collection included:

  • "I Color Myself Different," Colin Kaepernick's book emphasizing race-based identity;
  • "Efrén Divided," Ernesto Cisneros' book about a boy whose parents, both of whom stole into the U.S. illegally, are sent packing to Mexico;
  • "The Secret Battle of Evan Pao," Wendy Wan-Long Shang's book in which the antagonists are racist white bullies aided by deferential cops;
  • "Speak Up!" Rebecca Burgess' book about an adolescent with a so-called nonbinary friend; and
  • "The Tryout," Christina Soontornvat's anti-racist tale.

A number of the other books appear to have been relatively innocuous.

"To continue offering these books, as well as even more high-interest titles, we created an additional collection called Share Every Story, Celebrate Every Voice for our U.S. elementary school fairs," the company said in a statement. "We cannot make a decision for our school partners around what risks they are willing to take, based on the state and local laws that apply to their district, so these topics and this collection have been part of many planning calls that happen in advance of shipping a fair."

The company, which reaches roughly 35 million children and hosts 120,000 events in the U.S. annually, noted that the solution wasn't perfect but stressed it was preferable to alternatively not offering the books at all.

Scholastic spokeswoman Anne Sparkman told the Daily Beast that in creating the collection, the company "began with titles we support even as they are the most likely to be restricted."

While supposedly optional, it appears the special collection would still have been accessible on-site.

"When local laws or policies create content restrictions, many fair hosts make the collection available during family hours, where parents accompany children to the event," added Sparkman.

Cailey Myers, a spokeswoman for the Florida Department of Education, intimated this was much ado about nothing, noting that various books in the special collection, such as the John Lewis biography, were more than welcome in the Sunshine State, reported the New York Times.

Myers further pointed out that one of the books on the list was, in fact, suggested reading by the state's English standards.

"This is a political stunt by a corporation prioritizing activism over the well-being of children," said Myers.

Regardless of whether it was a stunt or a possible gambit for earned media, the possibility that schools might be given even the illusion of a choice in the matter of what books to put before kids was too much to bear for various activist groups.

Leftist backlash

Hundreds of Scholastic authors signed a statement on Oct. 20 denouncing the move, noting they "cannot stand by while some of our books are offered to readers, while other works are separated and deemed as possibly dangerous to children."

"The books separated for optional exclusion are almost entirely written about or by people of color or the LGBTQIA+ community. Deciding that the subject matter of these books might go against a state's law capitulates to the idea that these books are not suitable for children. That is harmful, and wrong," continued the statement. "Putting diverse books in a separate, optional collection is a form of censorship that cannot be supported."

The children's authors' letter went onto equate this option with a book ban.

One non-straight Scholastic author, Democratic Socialists of America member Molly Knox Ostertag, suggested that the company's special catalog "doesn't come across as anything but an attempt to compromise with, frankly, fascist laws."

Pen America similarly lashed out, stating that it "shares the dismay we are hearing from authors over news that, at Scholastic Book Fairs, access to certain books by a diverse group of authors has been limited or partitioned because of content related to race, racism and LGBTQ+ identities.

"It will deny the opportunity for all students to encounter diverse stories that increase empathy, understanding, and reflect the range of human experiences and identities which are essential underpinnings of a pluralistic, democratic society," added the group.

Despite its invocation of democracy, Pen America once again underscored its loathing for the legislation passed by democratically elected lawmakers across the land.

Pen America and other outfits evidently applied sufficient pressure to force the company into submission.

Capitulation

The New York City-based company provided an update Wednesday, stating, "We offered a collection of books to supplement the diverse collection of titles already available at the Scholastic Book Fair. We understand now that the separate nature of the collection has caused confusion and feelings of exclusion."

On account of the backlash, the company will not be offering the "Share Every Story, Celebrate Every Voice" collection in January as planned.

Scholastic also took a thinly veiled shot at state Republicans, suggesting it was "unsettling that the current divisive landscape in the U.S. is creating an environment that could deny any child access to books, or that teachers could be penalized for creating access to all stories for their students."

Jonathan Friedman, an activist at Pen America, said of the company's about-face, "Scholastic recognized that, as difficult a bind as this pernicious legislation created, the right answer was not to become an accessory to censorship. ... Scholastic is an essential source of knowledge and a delight for countless children. We are glad to see them champion the freedom to read," reported Publishers Weekly.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Arkansas library director refused to remove obscene materials from children's sections. Now she's out of a job.



The director of the Saline County Library in central Arkansas refused to relocate LGBT propaganda and content critics called "pornographic" from children's sections to age-appropriate areas in the county public libraries, despite an April court resolution requesting that she do so. On Monday, Patricia Hector discovered she herself had been removed.

Although the termination of an individual who unilaterally insisted on exposing children to inappropriate materials is ostensibly a win for concerned parents in the county and the democratic process, leftists are beside themselves. The ACLU of Arkansas has even made a thinly veiled threat of legal action against Saline County officials.

What's the background?

The Saline County Quorum Court convened in April to take up concerns about the presence of inappropriate materials in the children's sections of the county's public libraries. Members of the conservative group Saline County Republican Women were among those advocating for the relocation of "X-rated" material.

The meeting, during which 53 members of the community were given an opportunity to provide input, lasted two hours, reported KATV-TV.

The court ultimately passed a resolution, which reportedly paralleled Arkansas Act 372 — a law Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders ratified on March 31, exposing librarians to criminal charges and possible jail time if they distribute content that is "harmful to minors."

The all-Republican Saline County Quorum Court's resolution ensured that inappropriate content would have no home in the library's children's sections.

The Arkansas Advocate indicated the court recommended that the library "relocate materials that are not subject-matter or age appropriate for children, due to their sexual content or imagery, to an area that is not accessible to children."

Hector, executive director since 2016, publicly refused to follow the court's recommendation, suggesting relocating books "is the same thing as banning" them. Additionally, she singled out SCRW, suggesting they wanted "to erase people of color and marginalize LGBTQ people."

SCRW, which had supported both the resolution and Hector's firing, subsequently shared images from one of the sexually graphic books Hector allegedly kept in the children's section of the Bob Herzfeld Memorial Library, which depicted various sex positions; promoted gender ideology and LGBT neologisms; had a chapter on masturbation; was full of images of cartoon genitals; and discussed various birth control implements.

On July 16, SCRW passed another resolution urging the county judge and quorum court to remove Hector "at the earliest possible time" and "that the county remove Director Hector and replace the three remaining Democrats on the library board."

The people come out on top

After months of Hector flouting its recommendation, the court approved an ordinance in August giving it broader control over the library system.

The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported that the justices of the peace voted 11-2 on Aug. 21 to strip library board members of their ability to hire or fire employees and regulate their salaries. Additionally, the ordinance subjected the library to an annual third-party audit and required that it have its budget approved by the Saline County Quorum Court.

"It's been turned into something complicated," said Clint Chism, a member of the court. "All along all of this was protecting children. If the books had been moved, we wouldn't be going through this tonight."

Jennifer Lancaster, president of SCRW, underscored she was not "in favor of banning any books" and that the effort was about "protecting children."

On Monday, several weeks after firing and hiring decisions were handed over to the court, Saline County Judge Matt Brumley met with Christy Peterson, the county human resources director, reported the Democrat-Gazette.

Brumley allegedly indicated Hector's services were no longer needed.

Trevor Villines, a spokesman for the county, confirmed Hector is out of a job and that "Leigh Espey has been named interim director."

Hector once again singled out SCRW, calling them "reprehensible," telling the Democrat-Gazette after her apparent termination, "They will eventually find that book banners are always on the wrong side of history."

The axed librarian told KATV, "What they did is terrible for this county. ... It's none of their business what books people read and since they challenged three of them, one of them was about race and two of them were about LGBTQ."

"You can't fire somebody for upholding the law," she added. "And I have an attorney."

David Gibson Sr., the chairman of the Saline County Republican Committee, told KARK-TV, "She was more committed to books than she was to children's safety. ... This move has everything to do with children. It has nothing to do with politics."

Defenders of obscene materials in kids' sections pipe up

Following Hector's replacement, the leftist Saline County Library Alliance said in a statement, "It's a dark day for the residents of Saline County."

The alliance added that it "has been hard at work on a ballot initiative to strip the Quorum Court and County Judge of the ill-gotten powers they have granted themselves."

American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas executive director Holly Dickson said in a statement obtained by the Arkansas Times, "These Saline county officials, who have proved themselves determined to ban books and target their librarian in order to do it, are likely to get an expensive education in the law they could have obtained for free by listening to their librarian and people in the community."

Billboard sparking controversy in Saline Countyyoutu.be

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Actors' union director expresses fear that strike is preventing LGBT propagandists from advancing their 'worldview-changing' agenda



Every day that the actors' and writers' unions remain on strike marks another day that LGBT activists in Hollywood are not producing "worldview-changing" propaganda for popular consumption, according to the national director of the Screen Actors Guild and American Federation of Television and Radio Artists.

This may come as good news to those Americans growing tired of the coordinated effort by various gatekeepers and cultural engineers in media to shoehorn unprecedented amounts of LGBT content into film and television for non-artistic reasons. However, for SAG-AFTRA director Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, the delays are unconscionable.

Crabtree-Ireland, a past co-president of the LGBTQ Bar Association of Los Angeles, spoke at a recent press conference announcing the LGBT activist outfit GLAAD's annual Studio Responsibility Index — an index that monitors how much non-straight content is being manufactured for film and television, always encouraging more.

The union executive noted that LGBT propaganda efforts might be set back in 2024 and beyond owing to the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers' alleged unwillingness to capitulate to strikers' demands.

"The studios' and streamers' insistence on keeping the industry shut down not only harms the economies of communities that rely on motion picture production, but it's also detrimental to the pipeline of future projects that feature LGBTQ+ representation," said Crabtree-Ireland. "Though some gains have been made in recent years, storytelling that reflects the full, true spectrum of the human experience is currently under attack."

According to GLAAD's latest index, 28.5% of the 350 films released by 10 major distributors — including A24, Amazon Studios, AppleTV+, Paramount Global, and the Walt Disney Company — contained a non-straight character, "the highest number and percentage recorded in the 11 years GLAAD has conducted this study."

Forty percent of the 292 non-straight characters across the 100 "LGBTQ-inclusive" films were nonwhites; 119 were women, and 10 were individuals who rejected their biological sex.

When judging studios on the basis of how much LGBT content they peddled in 2022, NBCUniversal and Disney both scored "good" ratings, Disney having made sure 41% of its output was "LGBTQ-inclusive."

These numbers may be hard to hit if the studios prove unable to generate any content this year.

Crabtree-Ireland suggested that AMPTP companies "are complicit in this regressive push if they continue preventing artists from getting back to work and making their worldview-changing stories."

"Everyone deserves to grow up seeing their identity authentically represented in film and media," continued Crabtree-Ireland. "The companies must come back to the negotiating table, make a fair deal, get writers and performers back to work, and help all of us use the profound power of the medium — along with empowering LGBTQ+ representation — to build a better, more welcoming future for generations to come."

SAG-AFTRA president Fran Drescher, the "anti-capitalist" multimillionaire who decades ago starred in the CBS sitcom, "The Nanny," similarly suggested that a failure to satisfy the actors' and writers' demands amounted to a setback to "inclusive representation."

"Right now, there's a very tiny but loud segment of our population that's hard at work spreading hate and fear while attempting to squash all storytelling that showcases the full, beautiful reality of the human experience," added the Democratic 65-year-old. "The longer the AMPTP companies keep the entertainment industry shut down by refusing to come back to the bargaining table, the more risk there is for disrupting the progress that's been made in terms of inclusive representation."

At the press conference, GLAAD president Sarah Kate Ellis joined her comrades in underscoring what is at stake for propagandists as it pertains to the strike: "LGBTQ stories told through film have a powerful and inextricable link to culture change. With more people than ever now empowered to live authentically and openly, the cost of lost progress in LGBTQ representation on screen means erasure."

Bounding Into Comics reported that Michele Mulroney, the vice president of the similarly striking Writers Guild of America, claimed, "The stalling of the AMPTP companies for the last 136 Days, and their refusal to engage in a basic negotiating process that gives writers a fair deal, threatens to impede the progress made by LGBTQ+ writers and deny our culture of powerful, authentic LGBTQ+ stories."

CNBC indicated that Hollywood studios and the WGA may be nearing an agreement to bring the strike to an end, with negotiations restarting Thursday.

If a deal is not reached, CNBC suggested that the WGA strike, which has already gone on for over 140 days, may continue through the end of the year. That would mean that production on properties at Netflix, Disney, and Paramount, may be delayed well into 2024.

Besides preventing recycled comic book properties from being produced and the LGBT agenda from being furthered to GLAAD's satisfaction, this strike is having a significant impact on production companies' bottom lines.

Warner Bros. Discovery, among the media giants impacted, noted in a recent securities filing that it expects the company's earnings before interest and taxes to suffer a $300-$500 million hit owing to the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

New children's history book claims Stonehenge was built by 'people with brown skin' back when England was a 'black country'



A new children's book published by Bloomsbury and promoted in the U.K. by a government-funded group claims that Stonehenge was built by "people with brown skin" back when England was supposedly "a black country."

Atinuke, the daughter of a Nigerian university professor and a white English author, claims in "Brilliant Black British History" that "Britain was a black country for more than 7,000 years before white people came, and during that time the most famous British monument was built, Stonehenge," reported the Telegraph.

Stonehenge is a monument that was erected on Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire, England, roughly 4,000 years ago during the late Neolithic period and early Bronze Age.

The Telegraph noted that recent genetic analysis indicates that the inhabitants of Britain around the time of the monument's construction were "pale-skinned early farmers whose ancestors had spread from Anatolia," which is modern Turkey.

A 2019 study published in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution indicated that around 6,000 B.C., there had been a massive expansion of such people out of Anatolia who then introduced farming to Europe.

The BBC reported that "DNA reveals that Neolithic Britons were largely descended from groups who took the Mediterranean route, either hugging the coast or hopping from island-to-island on boats."

These settlers are also believed to have introduced the practice of building monuments using large stones.

Millennia later, it was the pale Bell Beaker people from mainland Europe — who settled in Britain around 4,500 years ago and ultimately replaced 90% of the gene pool — who "were associated with the elaboration and refurbishment of Stonehenge around 2000 BC as a stone circle rather than an earth and timber monument," according to "The Oxford Illustrated History of Prehistoric Europe."

English Heritage, a charity that manages hundreds of the nation's historic monuments, noted that the "stone settings at Stonehenge were built at a time of great change in prehistory, just as new styles of 'Beaker' pottery and the knowledge of metalworking, together with a transition to the burial of individuals with grave goods, were arriving from the Continent."

While the ancient engineers behind the megaliths may not have been dark-skinned as Atinuke claims in her book, scientists have speculated that "Cheddar Man," the 10,000-year-old skeleton unearthed in Gough's Cave in Somerset, England, may have had "dark to black" skin and blue eyes, based on DNA analysis.

However, whereas Atinuke claimed with certainty that Cheddar Man had "skin as dark as dark can be," the Daily Mail reported that an expert involved in the project, geneticist Susan Walsh at Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, suggested that the dark skin claim was a "probable profile" contra a scientific certainty.

Atinuke's focus in the book is not just prehistoric. She also catalogues black populations throughout Britain's history, from the time of its Roman conquest through the Middle Ages and onward.

For instance, according to the author, during the period of the Tudors and Stuarts — which partially overlapped with the Barbary slave trade — Britain was enlightened by black Muslims who brought "new knowledge about textiles, medicine, maths and navigation."

While stressing in her introduction that "Britain has been a mostly white country for a lot less time than it has been a mostly black country" and underscoring nonwhite contributions, Atinuke reportedly noted on a page devoted to the identitarian, Marxist group Black Lives Matter that "race does not scientifically exist."

Historian and author Zareer Masani suggested that Atinuke's book "seems typical of the kind of wokedom that's been colonising our schools and universities," reported the Telegraph.

Masani added that the book, which was promoted by the BookTrust, a Arts Council-funded literacy charity, is "evidence of brainwashing children with outright lies, confusion and misinformation."

"The Nazis claimed that the cultural achievements of the north were the work of blond, fair-skinned folk," said David Abulafia, a historian and professor emeritus at Cambridge. "Making skin color a criterion for judging great achievements like Stonehenge is therefore not a new idea. It is also rubbish. It only gets interesting if their skins were blue or green."

British conservative commentator and Anglican deacon Calvin Robinson told GB News, "It's massively hyperbolic. It's actually insane, the revisionist history that takes place in there. ... You can say that we had a diverse culture to some extent, but it was so minuscule. Up until the 1950s, Britain was predominantly white and that's not a judgment call. That's not saying it's a good thing or a bad thing. That's a fact."

Robinson noted on X that the "book provides no sources, funnily enough."

— (@)

"Brilliant Black British History" appears to be the latest in a burgeoning genre of revisionist agitprop aimed at either distorting facts to paint Caucasians uniquely as history's villains or erasing them from history altogether as part of a broader leftist-identitarian agenda.

The BBC program "Horrible Histories" released a song in 2021 that has since gone viral called "Been Here From the Start," which advanced a similar alternate history to that favored by Atinuke, suggesting Roman Emperor Septimius Severus, the Aurelian Moors, and the early Britons were black. It was widely criticized by historians and those tiring of liberal identitarianism.

'Been Here From the Start' song | Horrible Histories: Black British History | CBBCyoutu.be

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Unhinged leftist Stephen King dares readers to give his new work of anti-conservative propaganda a 1-star review



Stephen King is a prolific writer who made hundreds of millions of dollars telling stories about ghosts, curses, and violence against children.

Extra to penning best-sellers like "The Green Mile," "Carrie," "It," and "The Shining," the geriatric author has also moonlighted online as an unhinged leftist, mocking conservatives, firing off identitarian missives, peddling political conspiracy theories, downplaying the crisis at the southern border, demanding that others wear masks, and calling for those with whom he disagrees to be silenced.

No longer willing to compartmentalize his passions, King has reportedly produced a work of anti-conservative, pro-COVID-vaccine propaganda.

In a recent interview with Rolling Stone, the the 75-year-old Democrat acknowledged that "a lot of people are not going to like" his new novel, "Holly," particularly not critics of COVID-19 vaccines and supporters of former President Donald Trump.

Rather than wait, King pre-emptively dared "people on the other side of the COVID issue and the Trump issue" to tank his new book's ratings, telling those who might be inclined to "give it one-star reviews on Amazon," "'Knock yourself out.'"

The titular character of King's new work of agitprop, recycled from his other works, "Mr. Mercedes" and "The Outsider," spends much of the book investigating the disappearance of a young woman. Along the way, she hypes the author's worldview.

Holly rejoices at Biden's 2020 electoral victory, weeps on Jan. 6, 2021, and makes sure to repeatedly advertise the fact of her mRNA vaccination and booster status, according to a review in the American Thinker.

The author made no secret of his intention to cram his political views into the novel, particular on the topic of COVID, telling Rolling Stone, "There's this constant story that thousands of people are dying of heart disease because of the vaccinations. It's not true, but it's gained a lot of credence. So there's a lot of that. And I tried to put that in the book."

King, who made a point of telling people to "get the damn vax" during the pandemic, kills off Holly's pro-life mother for having refused to get the mRNA vaccine after first attending an "anti-mask rally," where she waved around a "MY BODY MY CHOICE" sign.

The author further suggests in the book that nursing home deaths — which were especially bad under Democratic leadership in New York — were the result of vaccine hesitation, again on the part of his ideological foes.

Whereas the protagonists in "Holly" are reportedly all women, minorities, and/or homosexuals, the villains are pair of old racist white people who don't trust vaccines and eat people.

King makes his antipathies abundantly clear, going so far as to have a Christian family gang-rape a lesbian black vegan for the "sin" of not eating meat. The lesbian later kills her unborn baby.

NPR noted that "Covid-19 pandemic, racism and homophobia, the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, and Donald Trump's effect on the country's zeitgeist and political discourse are all very present in the narrative," adding, "Holly is one of his most political novels to date, and it'll surely anger all the right people."

The "right people" who might be keen on taking King up on his recommendation to give his book a one-star review on Amazon can also follow suit on Goodreads.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

World's second-largest coffee chain Costa Coffee faces boycott and anger over pro-transgender mural of mutilated woman: 'Time for a Budweiser moment?'



Costa Coffee, the world's second-largest coffee chain after Starbucks, is facing a boycott over its effort to normalize transsexuality and the elective mutilation of women. The hashtag #BoycottCostaCoffee is now trending on Twitter.

Costa Coffee, a subsidiary of Coca-Cola, recently rolled out a mobile store featuring a mural of a cartoon woman sporting double mastectomy scars.

Maya Forstater, co-founder and executive director of the British nonprofit Sex Matters, told the Telegraph, "The cartoon-like picture of a young woman who has had her breasts surgically removed is shocking and irresponsible."

"Young women are being sold a lie that if they have their breasts removed and take hormones they can become men, or at least avoid being women," added Forstater.

Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at Sex Matters, added, "It’s disgustingly irresponsible of Costa to suggest - sell - even glorify - mental distress, bodily dissociation and self-harm among teenage girls. ... Costa presumably thinks it’s being ‘inclusive’ with this messaging; in fact it’s helping to fuel a social contagion and medical scandal masquerading as a social justice movement."

James Esses, co-founder of Thoughtful Therapists, a U.K.-based advocacy group of counselors, clinical psychologists, and psychotherapists "with a shared concern about the impact of gender identity ideology on children and young people," similarly took the company to task over the graphic.

Esses wrote to Costa Coffee Monday, asking, "Could you kindly explain why you are glorifying irreversible surgery performed on healthy breasts of women for a mental health condition?"

— (@)

Women's rights activist Kellie-Jay Keen suggested that the company is making light of a traumatic procedure that women with breast cancer often undergo as a means to save their lives.

"For those women, it's extraordinarily painful," said Keen. "And to promote [cosmetic mastectomies] and celebrate it as if it's some sort of brave and courageous journey as opposed to a journey into never-ending self-loathing, I think, absolutely, it's a real insult to women who, through no fault of their own, have ended up having to have their breasts removed."

Laurence Fox, leader of the U.K.'s populist-right Reclaim Party, tweeted, "Coffee sellers and high priests in the celebration of child mutilation. Anyone I see with that blood red cup is encouraging children to irreversibly destroy their healthy bodies. Pure evil."

In another tweet, Fox wrote, "Voluntarily cutting off healthy breast tissue, or worse being manipulated into doing so, doesn’t make you a 'Trans man[.]' It makes you a permanently mutilated woman. The use of terms like 'trans man' is just social engineering. Language matters."

Canadian clinical psychologist Dr. Jordan Peterson wrote, "How now @CostaCoffee? Time for a @Budweiser moment?"

Peterson was referencing the successful boycott of Bud Light over its partnership with transvestite Dylan Mulvaney — a boycott that has led to corporate layoffs, an estimated market-value drop of over $10 billion at Anheuser-Busch, a decline in Bud Light sales exceeding 26%, and the brand's loss of top 10 beer status.

The Daily Mail reported that groups that seek to protect children from the irreversible mutilations, such as those promoted by LGBT activists, have similarly lashed out against the chain.

Stephanie Davies-Arai, director of Transgender Trend, suggested that "teenage girls are the target" of this particular work of corporate agitprop.

"It's caught up under the Pride flag, being inclusive and celebrating diversity, but actually, you are encouraging children to think they need to undergo unnecessary medical treatment affecting them for the rest of their lives," Davies-Arai told the Mail. "This is being pushed on children as if having a major operation is just the same as changing your clothes."

Tanya Carter, spokesman for the Safe Schools Alliance, told the Mail, "It's almost unbelievable that Costa would do something so crass and irresponsible as to use this image."

The company has confirmed the existence of the mural and stands by its choice, telling GB News in a statement, "At Costa Coffee we celebrate the diversity of our customers, team members and partners. ... We want everyone that interacts with us to experience the inclusive environment that we create, to encourage people to feel welcomed, free and unashamedly proud to be themselves."

Costa Coffee added, "The mural in its entirety, showcases and celebrates inclusivity."

Malcolm Richard Clark, documentarian and co-founder of the British advocacy group LGB Alliance, suggested that the coffee chain had jumped into the deep end of LGBT pandering to "try to deflect from previous bad publicity. Costa was recently accused of treating its staff so badly it had to agree to an independent audit."

Notwithstanding the company's rhetoric about generating a feeling of welcome, in 2019, workers complained of mistreatment, with one indicating they "were not treated like human beings," reported the Sunday Times.

Clark concluded, "One day maybe dysfunctional corporations will try not to tap into such pathological well-springs in search of profits. Instead they could encourage their young customers to accept themselves and their bodies as they already are. I'd drink to that."

Coca-Cola's coffee peddler is hardly alone in the promotion of female mutilation surgeries.

TheBlaze previously reported that footwear company Dr. Martens has similarly come under fire for advertising shoes featuring a gender-dysphoric woman with double mastectomy scars.

While Costa Coffee presently has a far greater presence in the U.K. than it does in the U.S., the company reportedly seeks to steadily expand in America. In addition to automatic Costa Coffee Smart Café machines and the beans it pushes in various locations, the chain began opening physical locations last year, starting in Atlanta.

Since the company has yet to blossom in the U.S., an American Bud Light-style boycott could prove consequential.

Costa Coffee trans mural featuring mastectomy 'an insult to women who have had breast cancer'youtu.be

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Obama takes heat for praising librarians who've peddled 'banned books'



Former President Barack Obama has caught heat over his declaration of support for librarians who have been working hard "on the front lines" to peddle and protect so-called banned books.

His letter of support comes amidst efforts by conservatives and parental groups to protect children from pornographic, racist, and propagandizing literature in school libraries and classrooms.

Obama shared the letter to social media Monday, noting that some of the books "being challenged" had "shaped" his life, adding "It's no coincidence that these 'banned books' are often written by or feature people of color, indigenous people, and members of the LGBTQ+ community."

Two of the "banned books" Obama may have been referencing, which now face restrictions in certain school districts around the country, are Maia Kobabe's "Gender Queer" and Susan Kuklin's "Beyond Magenta."

The former covers "the mortification and confusion of adolescent crushes, grappling with how to come out to family and society, bonding with friends over erotic gay fanfiction, and facing the trauma and fundamental violation of pap smears," and contains illustrations depicting and describing oral sex and masturbation.

The latter, "Beyond Magenta," describes teens' experiences undergoing sex-change mutilations and hormone therapies and reportedly features "descriptions of children performing sex acts with adults."

Obama characterized the efforts to restrict the circulation of certain books as driven by an impulse "to silence, rather than engage, rebut, learn from or seek to understand views that don't fit our own."

This appears to be an about-face for Obama, who just last April told an audience at Stanford University that more should be done by social media companies to clamp down on undesirable speech.

"Content moderation can limit the distribution of clearly dangerous content, it doesn’t go far enough," said Obama. "People are dying because of misinformation."

The former president, whose administration discriminated against hundreds of conservative groups and cracked down on journalists, suggested that prohibitions on books are "profoundly misguided" and that "not only is it important for young people from all walks of life to see themselves represented in the pages of books, but it's also important for all of us to engage with different ideas and points of view."

Intimating that the pressure is on because foreign nations are looking to America's leadership on cultural deregulation, Obama thanked librarians for their alleged "unwavering commitment to the freedom to read."

In a subsequent post, Obama directed people to the American Library Association's "Unite Against Book Bans" — a campaign to circumvent the will of parents and the broader demos as a means to ensure problematic literature remains on library and classroom bookshelves.

Libs of TikTok responded to Obama's glorification of librarians, writing, "When they accuse of 'banning books' they're referring to graphic books containing pornographic content offered to kids in schools across the country. For some reason, they never show examples from the books. ... Why does Obama want your kids to read porn like this in school?"

— (@)


Robby Starbuck posted pornographic images from a book that has been met with restrictions in recent months, writing, "Barack, If you'll sit down and read Gender Queer, then defend making it available to kids, I'll do you the favor of running ads all over the country to let people know. You'll never do it because you know it would disgust normal people that your party wants kids to read it."

Courage Is A Habit, a parent group focused on combating "indoctrination in K-12," similarly highlighted some of the "obscene" books, the removal of which from school libraries Obama might regard as "misguided."

— (@)

The Twitter account associated with the Being Libertarian Substack wrote, "Funny invoking the 1st Amendment now but not during the past 3 years when the government unprecedentedly censored anyone questioning the government line on COVID."

Conservative commentator Dinesh D'Souza asked the former president on Twitter whether his life "was shaped by books" about deviant acts, adding, "Do elaborate!"

Fox News Digital reported that Obama, whose administration set a record for censoring or refusing to release government records, has also kicked off a TikTok campaign defending so-called banned books and will feature in a series of videos promoting books in defiance of "profoundly misguided" restriction efforts.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Protests mounting and Pride flags underfoot after Ottawa teachers told to refer to all students with 'they/them pronouns' and prohibit opt-outs from '2SLGBTQ+ learnings'



In its latest effort to force staff and students to fully embrace LGBT activism and gender ideology, an Ottawa school board appears to have found Canadians' breaking point.

Upon learning that students will no longer be referred to as boys or girls, but will rather be addressed as sexless pluralities, protesters took to the streets, demanding that the leftist administrators "leave the kids alone."

How did it start?

A trio of Ottawa-Carleton District School Board superintendents reportedly sent a letter to staff May 31 entitled, "Supporting Inclusivity: Actions for Pride Month and Beyond." The letter, obtained by Chanel Pfahl, a school trustee candidate, clarified that nothing save for total submission to LGBT precepts would be acceptable in the district.

Mary Jane Farrish, the superintendent of equity instruction, Shannon Smith, superintendent of indigenous education instruction, and Brent Smith, acting superintendent of program and learning, stressed that "2SLGBTQ+" representation in the curriculum and classroom is a "fundamental human right."

Accordingly, staff must embed resources that "accurately reflect and honor 2SLGBTQ+ identities into curriculum subjects and the overall learning environment, from Kindergarten to Grade 12."

The superintendents noted that honoring non-straight "identities" and peddling LGBT propaganda in every grade were only partial measures.

Teachers were further instructed to use "they/them pronouns" when referring to all students, not just those with gender dysphoria.

Extra to asking teachers to apply a blanket denial of biological reality in their engagement with students, the superintendents underscored that "2SLGBTQ+ learnings should be offered to the school community without the option to opt out. It is essential to understand that human rights are not open to debate or selective participation."

The Counter Signal reported that last week there was a silent protest in the district: absenteeism skyrocketed on the first day of Pride, with absences reaching above 60% in two schools and over 40% in nine others.

Elsewhere in Canada, TheBlaze recently reported that Muslim students were told they "can't be Canadian" if they refused to participate in LGBT events.

Concerning the prohibitions on opt-outs, OCDSB spokesman Darcy Knoll told the Epoch Times said, "When providing learning experiences, we do not offer proactive exemptions or excuse students from the learning on the basis that we may be highlighting a particular group of people defined by their race, religion/creed, ability, sexual orientation or gender identity. This would result in sending a message that a group of people in our community is not valued and do not belong."

As for the letter itself, Knoll said the idea was "to suggest some actions that can be taken during Pride Month and beyond to promote inclusivity and belonging in our schools."

While the OCDSB presently officially celebrates Pride Month," it may soon follow suit with the Canadian government, which celebrates "Pride Season."

Not going to take it anymore

The Ottawa Sun reported that British Columbia-based Chris Elston, critic of gender ideology and father of two who goes by "Billboard Chris" online, joined other demonstrators outside of Notre Dame High School Friday for a rally called "Education over Indoctrination.

Elston forewarned Ottawa residences in April that he was coming, stating, "No more silence."

The OCDSB issued a statement ahead of the protest, noting, "This individual, as well as others associated with this demonstration, have a history of aligning with and promoting inflammatory, transphobic, and hateful content against members of the 2SLGBTQ+ community."

"There are many in the community who are deeply concerned about these protests and wondering how to respond," continued the statement. “We encourage you to keep your message positive, promote the inclusive nature of our community, and share your support for 2SLGBTQ+ students, staff and community members, but do not create additional risks outside of schools."

Masked leftists attacked Elston at the rally, though he did not appear to take the bait.

\u201cMasked antifa attacking @BillboardChris . He took it stoically and in his stride. The violence including violent language so far has been from the pro gender side.\u201d
— Rupa Subramanya (@Rupa Subramanya) 1686322273

Josh Alexander, the teen suspended from his high school in Renfrew, Ontario, after stating in class that God created only two genders, also attended the protest.

Parents, students, and other concerned citizens chanted, "Save our kids."

Just as various faith groups united in opposition to LGBT propaganda Tuesday in Rockville, Maryland, Muslim and Christian parents in Ottawa denounced the OCDSB's plan to force non-binary pronouns on kids, reported the Counter Signal.

During the protest, some protesters and their children stomped Pride flags.

\u201cYoung muslim kids STOMP the pride flag as their mothers cheer them on\u201d
— The Pleb \ud83c\udde8\ud83c\udde6 Reporter (@The Pleb \ud83c\udde8\ud83c\udde6 Reporter) 1686324836

Earlier in the day, one protester was filmed taking down Pride decor nearby the school.

\u201cBREAKING: A showdown is ramping up right now in Ottawa after the school board told all teachers to call all kids by "they/them" pronouns, permanently. Everyone student is now non-binary, and protesters are getting furious. Situation escalating.\u201d
— Keean Bexte (@Keean Bexte) 1686323281

Counterprotesters, some carting around signs that said, "Pride Not Prejudice," reported chanted, "Trans rights are human rights."

The black-clad militants among the pro-LGBT demonstrators also chanted, "Go home fascists."

\u201c\u201cGo home fascists!\u201d\n\nLarge crowd of antifa and far-left counter protesters in Ottawa today at the Education over Indoctrination rally.\u201d
— Harrison Faulkner (@Harrison Faulkner) 1686332830

CTV News indicated that five people were arrested at the rally.

LGBT activists are greatly troubled by the resistance they are now seeing by parents and students.

"We’re dealing with probably some of the scariest forms of pushback against LGBTQ2 rights, in particular to those who are transgender and non-binary," Debbie Owusu-Akyeeah, executive director of the Canadian Center for Gender and Sexual Diversity, told Global News. "We’re seeing a much more coordinated attack in areas that we’ve never seen before, including school board meetings, including Pride events, whether it’s drag story time – these are all new tactics that we’re seeing."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Kohl's faces potential 'Bud-lighting' over its LGBT agitprop targeting toddlers



Concerned parents and other conservatives, newly reminded of their capacity to hold businesses accountable, are prepared to once again wield the power of the purse. This time, the department store chain Kohl's is the business believed to be deserving of a chastening.

Kohl's is ostensibly in the business of selling clothing, bedding, appliances, and ephemera. Some shoppers have highlighted that the retail chain is also in the business of peddling LGBT propaganda.

The retailer, which has over 1,100 stores in 49 states, notes on its website, "We are committed to amplifying and affirming the voices of the LGBTQIA+ community, celebrating the joy that comes from living authentically and unapologetically not just this month, but all year long."

Kohl's catalogue makes clear its commitment to advancing the LGBT agenda.

Turning Point USA ambassador Alex Lorusso noted that among the company's activist apparel is a "Baby Sonoma Community Pride Bodysuit Set," fitted for newborns, 3-month-olds, and toddlers of various sizes.

"Celebrate the joy that comes from living authentically and unapologetically during Pride month and all year long," says the outfit description on Kohl's site.

\u201cIn case you need clothes for your Gay or Trans 3 month old, Kohl\u2019s has you covered\u201d
— ALX \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@ALX \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1685314649

Extra to selling LGBT activist baby bibs and kitsch, Kohl's also has a "gender-free fashion brand" and an activist underwear brand called TomboyX.

Like many other big companies, Kohl's activism appears to be driven, in part, by a desire to maintain its ESG score, which is based on its internal policies as well as on the degree to which it signals its ideological compliance in outward facing actions.

Forbes noted that Kohl's was ranked as a top 50 company last year on DiversityInc's Top Companies for LGBTQ Employees, "the standard metric in ESG reports on the internal policies of a company."

Target — which similarly faces a conservative boycott over its LGBT onesies for babies, "tuck-friendly" bathing suits," drag queen books for kids, and Satanic agitprop — happens to have been ranked #4 on that same ESG-linked list. Walmart was ranked #6.

Kohl's also has a perfect Corporate Equality Index score put out by the Human Rights Campaign, a powerful LGBT lobby group. This CEI score again reflects a company's subservience to the LGBT agenda.

According to Forbes, "A perfect CEI score requires donations to LGBTQ+ causes, refusal to donate to non-religious organizations that discriminate based on LGBTQ+ issues, and support of gender transition."

The company underscores in its 2022 ESG report that it is in the business of woke evangelization, stating, "We believe embedding DEI in everything we do requires an ongoing journey of listening, learning, and taking action."

The corporate leadership behind Kohl's is not interested in just selling swimwear and toasters, but "embracing opportunities to address racial, gender, sexual orientation, and economic disparities."

One of the company's stated goals is to commit $20 million "to diverse communities from 2022 to 2025," including members of the so-called "LGBTQIA+" community, noting it had already committed roughly $8 million of that goal last year.

While Kohl's is keen to push an agenda, conservatives appear keen to push back, proposing a Kohl's boycott or what some online are referring to as a "Bud-lighting," reported the New York Post.

TheBlaze previously reported that the conservative boycott of Bud Light over the beer's partnership with transvestite TikTok personality Dylan Mulvaney has been incredibly successful, as reflected by the $15.7 billion drop in Anheuser-Busch InBev's market value since April 1.

Target, another woke company caught participating in the left's cultural imperialism, has also been dealt a significant blow. Its market shares have slipped by roughly 12.6% — roughly $10 billion in market value — since conservatives began their boycott, reported Fox News Digital.

Twitter user End Wokeness wrote, "Looks like Kohl’s didn’t learn a thing from Bud Lite and Target."

One user responded, "We already know what to do. Kohl's bud light moment."

Conservative commentator Kyle Becker suggested that Kohl's, Target, and Bud Light are all "trash companies whose main customers are lower/middle class. All of them making the stupid marketing decision to Go Woke. All of them insulting Christians and normal working class parents. This will be a painful lesson for three brands that the majority of Americans don't really like anyway."

Morgonn McMichael of Turning Point USA wrote, "Kohls’s with the PRIDE BABY clothes… stop targeting children it’s gross. #BoycottTarget was the beginning here’s another to add to the list."

YouTuber "Twisted Luck Truth" was among those who first drew attention to Kohl's LGBT clothing for children:

Kohls joins Target in targeting kids youtu.be

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!