Provisions: Underwood Ranches



Underwood Ranches

Category: Farming, ranching, hot sauce production
Founder: Urban Daniel Underwood
Founded: 1913
Location: Ventura County, California
Current CEO: Craig Underwood
Representative products: Jalapenos, vegetables, herbs, fruit, cotton, Underwood Ranches Sriracha Sauce, chili garlic sauce, BBQ sauce, T-shirts inked with animated dragons

At a glance:

  • An iconic condiment and a great backstory: The Underwoods began farming on 300 acres in Ventura Country in 1867, making it one of the oldest family-owned, family-operated farms in California.
  • Today, the farm spreads across 3,000 acres.
  • For 28 years, the farm was the pepper supplier for Huy Fong Foods, the maker of sriracha sauce. The two companies had a falling out, which has worked in favor of Underwood Ranches.
  • Underwood uses a blend of modern and traditional farming techniques, including sustainable farming, a genuine commitment to preserving the land.
  • Today, Underwood makes its own brand of sriracha sauce using peppers grown on the farm.

In their own words: CEO Craig Underwood

“Farming teaches you to be resilient. Every year is different, every crop has its challenges, but you adapt, learn, and keep going. That’s the essence of what we do.”

“We believe in producing the highest-quality product possible, with integrity and care for our land and our community. It’s not just about growing food; it’s about growing it right.”

“We’re always looking for better ways to do things — more efficient, more sustainable, and more effective. Agriculture isn’t about staying the same; it’s about moving forward with every lesson learned.”

“Supporting local farmers isn’t just a trend; it’s vital for our communities, our economy, and our future. When you buy local, you’re investing in your neighbors and in a more sustainable food system.”

“We’re excited about what’s next for Underwood Ranches. The future is about expanding our reach, innovating our products, and staying true to our roots as growers committed to quality and sustainability.”

Michigan Dem running for Senate enjoys full property tax exemption on 'agricultural improvement' land with no agriculture



A Democrat congresswoman from Michigan without a farm or farming-related license saves thousands of dollars every year in taxes because of an agriculture-related exemption for her property, an exclusive report from the New York Post reveals.

Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), a three-term congresswoman vying for the U.S. Senate seat currently occupied by retiring Democrat Sen. Debbie Stabenow, lives in Holly, Michigan, a rural village about 55 miles northwest of Detroit.

The images 'show a single-family home, woods and fields — but no farming,' the Post said

The property where she lives also comes with a full tax exemption because of a classification regarding "agricultural improvements." Under Michigan law, such improvements include:

any improvements, buildings, structures, or fixtures suitable for use in farming which are located on agricultural land. Agricultural improvements includes a single-family dwelling located on agricultural land which is or will be occupied by the beginning farmer and structures attached to or incidental to the use of the dwelling.

Michigan law permits the "agricultural" classification on properties on which at least 50% of land is used for agricultural purposes.

Once a property has been granted the classification, it can keep it even if the property changes hands and even if the property is no longer used for farming, as appears to be the case with Slotkin.

Slotkin's grandfather purchased the property in 1956 and used it to raise cattle, according to previous reporting from the Lansing City Pulse.

When Slotkin's grandfather acquired the property, he reportedly had between 400 and 500 head of cattle that eventually became the beef used in hot dogs sold at the now-defunct Tiger Stadium.

Slotkin's grandfather slowly sold his beef company, and by the time Slotkin moved to the property as a child in 1980, the cattle were "gone," the Pulse said.

Slotkin's father, Curtis, gifted the family property to Slotkin and her brother in May 2023, the Post said.

Sometime before Slotkin received the property from her father, the property was granted the "agricultural" designation that remains attached to the property to this day, saving Slotkin about $2,700 a year in property taxes, the Post claimed.

Yet according to the Post, the property has no current agricultural licenses associated with it, and aerial images of the property captured by drones indicate that no agricultural-related activity is conducted there.

The images "show a single-family home, woods and fields — but no farming," the Post said.

Though Slotkin does not currently appear to be engaging in farming activity in any meaningful sense, Michigan Farm News reported as recently as April that Slotkin "resides on her family’s beef cattle farm in Holly."

Slotkin, a member of the House Agricultural Committee, has also claimed during previous campaigns that she grew soybeans on the Holly property.

Owners can petition to have the "agricultural" classification removed from their property by submitting a written request to the Michigan State Tax Commission, the Post said.

In response to a request for comment, Slotkin's campaign told the Post: "Rep. Slotkin’s farm has been in her family for three generations since 1956. It has been agricultural since then and Oakland County has confirmed on multiple occasions that the property qualifies for the agricultural exemption."

National Republican Senatorial Committee spokeswoman Maggie Abboud told the Post that the report about Slotkin was "not a surprise."

"Phony politician Elissa Slotkin is lying to Michigan voters and pretending she is a farmer," she said.

Blaze News reached out to Slotkin's Republican opponent in the Senate race, Rep. Mike Rogers. His spokesperson redirected us to Abboud, who gave Blaze News the same statement provided to the Post.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

20 Million Americans Want To Move. Here’s How They Could Change The Country.

Many conservative Americans want to reconnect with, and transmit to the next generation, a genuine American way of life.

Blaze News investigates: Illegal immigration impacts farmers and ranchers along the border — crop contamination, property damage



The increase in illegal crossings has had a profound impact in recent years on American farmers and ranchers who own land near the southern border.

Illegal immigrants crossing into the United States have trespassed through agricultural land, often contaminating crops or causing property damage. Law enforcement has reported incidents of human smugglers performing "bailouts," a term used to describe when traffickers transporting illegal aliens attempt to make a high-speed car escape to evade capture. In these situations, the smugglers intentionally crash their vehicles, and the unlawful occupants flee on foot in different directions.

Simon Hankinson, a senior research fellow in the Border Security and Immigration Center at the Heritage Foundation, told Blaze News, "The damage to federal and private land, agriculture, and wildlife caused by mass illegal border crossings by foot is one of the many types of preventable collateral damage caused by the Biden administration's opening of U.S. borders and neglect of law enforcement. Those who claim to care about the natural landscape seem to keep quiet on this issue."

Hankinson provided testimony before the House Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Federal Lands, in October, where he addressed the environmental costs caused by illegal aliens unlawfully traveling through Yuma, Arizona.

"Because of strict food safety regulations, each human trace requires farmers to destroy all the crops in a given radius from any perceived human contamination, from mere footprints to feces and menstrual pads, causing millions of dollars in uninsured losses," he told lawmakers. "The human waste and trash produced by the endless foot traffic not only pollutes crops but also harms wildlife, taints water, and damages delicate desert environments."

The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality previously estimated that each person crossing the border leaves behind roughly six to eight pounds of trash.

'None of these crops are insurable.'

Gary Joiner, Texas Farm Bureau spokesperson, told Blaze News that the increase in illegal crossings has adversely affected the state's local and regional agricultural communities.

"Those impacts, particularly on an individual basis, can be devastating financially after a complete loss of the property's usability," Joiner explained. "Fences are cut, damaged, or destroyed by people and/or vehicles. Livestock escape from damaged or destroyed fences and gates onto roadways and highways. Water sources on private property are damaged or destroyed. Clothes and trash are littered on property. Many ranchers have discovered deceased illegal migrants on their property."

Larry Reagan, president of the New Mexico Farm and Livestock Bureau, told Blaze News, "Our farmers and ranchers in our border communities and beyond need Congress to work together to develop solutions to the challenges they face. Together, we must ensure that foreign labor programs are usable and accessible for farmers and ranchers who rely heavily on foreign labor to fill the domestic worker shortage in food production while ensuring that our border communities are not left to deal with the increased pressures of immigration alone."

Yuma County battles illegal immigration

Yuma County, Arizona, is known as the nation's "winter salad bowl." From November through April, it produces more than 91% of North America's leafy greens, an industry worth over $4 billion. According to Yuma County Supervisor Jonathan Lines (R), the county began noticing a "significant increase" in unlawful crossings around January 2022.

The increase in illegal immigration under President Joe Biden has ignited concerns among the agricultural community, particularly regarding crop preservation.

Lines told Blaze News that the Biden administration had agreed to fill the gaps left in the border wall near crop production. The federal government purchased "new material, despite the fact that all of the material purchased under [former President Donald] Trump was sitting adjacent to where these walls needed to be completed," he stated.

"They had the Corps of Engineers design a new type of wall that could easily be removed, and they plugged those gaps," Lines explained.

Before the Biden administration closed the gaps in the border wall near the farmland in Yuma County, farmers were forced to take other preventive measures to protect their crops from illegal aliens, including "inspect[ing] their fields on a daily basis and look for unauthorized entry," according to Lines.

"If they found any type of unauthorized entry into their fields, they then had to conduct tests. But for the most part, they would immediately rope it off, or destroy the crop, or make a decision to allow the entire field to go to seed," he continued. "The problem with this narrative is that none of these crops are insurable."

Lines explained that farmers could not get tractors through the fields if they constructed walls or fences around their own land.

"Their easements and their ownership of those properties would have to be extended another 20 or 30 feet in order to put a barricade. So what they did do is hired additional people to observe the crops and basically stay there 24/7 in and around those growing areas," Lines told Blaze News. "It was expensive."

Last year, the county stationed roughly a dozen portable toilets near agricultural land along the border after farmers discovered human waste in their fields, which presented serious food safety concerns.

Some of the portable toilets were placed on the U.S. side of the border near Los Algodones, Mexico, he said.

"That's where we had everybody coming across. That's where we placed toilets. Six miles down the road, we still have an open border. And that is where the Trump wall ends and the reservation begins. That's where we placed the additional portalets to keep people out of those fields, and they have served their purpose," Lines told Blaze News.

He added that Border Patrol agents are in the area to pick up illegal aliens as they come across the southern border.

"It's kind of intriguing because they [the illegal immigrants] all know what to do. They all just walk across and get lined up. So they have not ventured out into any of the fields," Lines noted.

Regarding illegal aliens entering farmland and contaminating crops, Lines told Blaze News that the county has been able to "solve the majority of the issues around that." However, he noted that the open border wall on the nearby Native American reservation land is still an ongoing problem.

'Our youngest victim, a 10-year-old male.'

According to reports, the Federal Emergency Management Agency previously stated that it would reimburse Yuma County for the expense of placing and maintaining the portable toilets.

"The feds haven't reimbursed us for anything," Lines told Blaze News.

FEMA did not respond to a request for comment by the time of publication.

Since Biden took office, Lines estimated that Yuma County's crop damage loss was roughly $2.5-$3 million.

Lines told Blaze News, "The farmers have had to implement their own rules and regulations in order to preserve and protect that commodity. And they've done an amazing job stepping up and making sure their food safety procedures are robust and complete. Being out there almost on a daily basis, I am very much appreciative of their efforts to keep our food supply and our food chain safe and secure. We have not had any incidents arising out of the illegals coming across because of the steps that they've taken to make sure that none of that product reaches the supply chain. They simply destroy it."

He noted that Biden's border executive order, which the administration claimed would crack down on illegal crossings, coincided with the increase in summer temperatures. The White House has boasted that within the first three weeks of the executive action's implementation, southern border encounters dropped more than 40%.

"We always see a little bit of a downturn when summer starts," Lines remarked. "However, because of the rise of the crossing in the San Diego and Jacumba [Hot Springs] area, San Diego and Tucson actually transport people from those two areas to Yuma to be processed because of the massive processing center that Homeland Security set up in Yuma."

Lines detailed other issues impacting the Yuma County community as a result of the increase in unlawful crossings.

He noted that the county is only being reimbursed roughly 10 cents on the dollar for incarcerated illegal aliens who have committed state crimes.

"As a county supervisor, that's frustrating for me that we're still shouldering that burden," Lines stated.

Additionally, he outlined the effect the open-border crisis has had on the county's food bank and women and children's center.

Due to its seasonal agricultural industry, Yuma County has one of the highest unemployment rates in the country. Approximately 20%-25% of residents utilize the county's food bank.

"I was the chairman for the past three years of the food bank," Lines said. "The [nongovernmental organizations] that we distribute to, they saw an increased demand in need. And so we were taking product that was designed and designated for Yuma residents and distributing that to anybody that showed up to the NGOs looking for assistance."

"Our women's and children's center was impacted," he continued. "Our youngest victim, a 10-year-old male who had been raped somewhere on his journey to the United States. And we have jurisdictional issues. Of course, they attended to him, and they were able to collect the DNA, but you have a jurisdictional issue. What do you do with it? Where do you send it?"

Gaps in the border wall

Jim Chilton, a fifth-generation rancher, operates a 50,000-acre ranch in Arizona with five and a half miles of land along the southern border.

Chilton told Blaze News that former President Trump's border wall replaced five miles of what used to be a four-strand barbed-wire fence along his property. The last half-mile of the wall was halted when Biden took office and left incomplete.

"The traffic coming through is twofold, very distinct," Chilton explained, adding that his ranch has motion-activate cameras for every 10,000 acres of land.

"So the probability of catching an image of people coming through is very low. However, since Biden took office, I've gotten 3,500 images of people dressed totally in camouflage and wearing carpet shoes and similar backpacks coming through my ranch going north," he said.

'We had an agent shot five times on our ranch.'

Carpet shoes are typically sneakers with flooring material and fabric fixed to the bottom to cover the tread and reduce the appearance of footprints.

Chilton said some of the individuals crossing unlawfully into the U.S. and onto his ranch are those who know they do not qualify for asylum and, therefore, do not want to be processed by law enforcement officers at the border.

"Some of them — I'm told by the Border Patrol — are packing drugs. They estimate the others are people trying to get back into the United States after being deported. People who are criminals from around the world," Chilton told Blaze News. "These are really bad guys, and they're mostly all gotaways."

"The other type of people coming around the end of the wall are dressed in street clothes from all over the world. They come around the end of the wall, and they essentially say, 'Here we are, Border Patrol. Please take us to Tucson, process us, and release us into the United States,'" he continued. "They claim asylum, but they're mostly all economic-oriented asylum-seekers."

Chilton stated that he has not seen a Border Patrol agent on his ranch in months.

"Because of the policy of the president, they are exhausted processing people. I talked to one Border Patrol agent that told me he signed up to secure the border. Now all he is is a glorified taxi driver," he remarked.

Chilton told Blaze News that there have been numerous "serious incidents" on his ranch due to the increase in illegal crossings.

"We had an agent shot five times on our ranch, and he just barely survived. We have seen groups with what appears to be the leader with an AK-47 as they go through the country. One of the outrageous things is the cartel has scouts on our mountains, and they're really in control of everything. Their duty is to know where the Border Patrol is at all times and to give directions on how the drug cartel people come through the ranch. They have really expensive phones — satellite. Of course, encryption, and it has a radio function. In today's dollars they're probably around $3,000 phones," Chilton stated.

He noted that it seems as though the scouts are guiding the illegal immigrants through more remote areas of the ranch and avoiding the houses and barns.

"President Biden made a horrible mistake by stopping the construction of the border wall. We need a wall," Chilton told Blaze News. "We need the Border Patrol at the wall, and we need to apprehend anybody trying to climb over, or cut, or dig under the wall. We need to secure the border at the border. No one in this world has the right to come into our country except legally."

Texas moves to protect landowners

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) announced the online application process for the state's new Landowner Compensation Program in May. The program aims to protect the state's agricultural community from the consequences of illegal immigration.

The initiative provides monetary compensation for damages to farm and ranch land caused by illegal aliens. Landowners can be reimbursed up to $75,000 for repair costs.

The Texas Farm Bureau backed Senate Bill 1133 to create the program, which appropriated $18 million in state money for the 2024 and 2025 fund.

Joiner, a TFB spokesperson, told Blaze News, "Landowners of agricultural property along the Texas-Mexico border facing land and property damage from border-related crimes now have a compensation program available to them — the Landowner Compensation Program."

"Landowners have 90 days after an incident to file a claim and provide a written police report that documents the damage caused by migrants, smugglers, or drug traffickers. Landowners are also encouraged to maintain all documentation of proof that property damage was sustained and the proof and cost of repairs, if made," Joiner continued.

He added, "Property damage caused by migrants illegally crossing the border through private property has been an ongoing problem for decades, but the traffic and damage has only increased in recent years. This program allows farmers and ranchers in border and rural counties to receive relief from the damages caused by trafficking, smuggling, and bailouts that occur on their personal property."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

How Chinese Ownership Of U.S. Land Threatens National Security

As the specter of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan looms, the need to safeguard America’s interests has never been more pressing.

‘Clarkson’s Farm’ Piques Viewers’ Appreciation And Appetite For Good Old-Fashioned Agriculture

The result of Jeremy Clarkson's endeavor is some of the most entertaining, informative, and profound television to come out in a long time.

Taxpayer Watchdogs Rip GOP Farm Bill’s Billion-Dollar Subsidy Package

The farm bill unveiled by the House GOP is taking flak from taxpayer watchdogs as a corporate-sponsored boondoggle.
'I thought I was a good person': Actor Adrian Grenier explains why he left 'shady' Hollywood for his own farm in Texas

'I thought I was a good person': Actor Adrian Grenier explains why he left 'shady' Hollywood for his own farm in Texas



Actor Adrian Grenier revealed that he left Hollywood for a life in his own farming community in Texas after years of a "hedonistic" lifestyle.

The former "Entourage" star sat down with Jordan Peterson for an honest conversation about his life as a self-indulgent actor that eventually led him astray.

Grenier explained that from the outset, he wasn't too keen on reaching a high level of fame early in his career.

"I could be a lot more famous than I am today, but I just I always rejected — there's something that I just didn't trust in Hollywood. I was always like, it seems shady, it seemed shady, and so I resisted," he told Peterson in the interview.

The actor achieved success early in his career, starring in movies like "Drive Me Crazy" and "The Devil Wears Prada" that earned him "a little bit of clout in Hollywood," but he mostly rejected a launch into stardom.

Grenier said that he was spending time in Mexico when his agent gave him an ultimatum: He needed to return to Hollywood or find new representation. That warning caused him to come back to the U.S. to audition for "Entourage."

This was essentially replicated in the television series and was one of many ways in which Grenier's real life was reflected in his character.

"It was more fun to blur the lines, because you start to acquiesce to people's wanting you to be the character," the actor told Peterson.

Grenier admitted that his wife had left him once before because of his lifestyle.

"I really just wanted pleasure, I was hedonistic, I was seeking the next hit," the 47-year-old explained. "I was open and poly, and liberal, and I thought I was a good person. I really did."

"She dumped me," he said of his now-wife, Jordan Roemmele. "In no uncertain terms [she] said, 'You are the worst.' She gave me a list; she was thorough. She was nice enough to give me a list. ... 'Take a look at how you're drinking, about how you're using sex, take take a look at all these things, see ya, lose my number.'"

Grenier recalled feeling like there had been a "glitch in the matrix."

"For a second I was like what, there was something off. How is it that this girl, she was young, here I am the the powerful, rich, famous person, who is justified in everything I'm doing because I also do charity, and she's leaving me?"

"I could give her everything, access, we could fly, we do everything. Go around the world, anything. And she's leaving me? That was weird, but I was like, 'All right, I'll find another girl, not a problem.' But it stayed with me and because I loved her and respected her so much."

A strikingly similar scenario played out in the final season of "Entourage." In the eighth season, Grenier's character, Vincent Chase, is enamored by a journalist who interviews him and writes an article critical of his sexual escapades and lack of serious relationships.

The character then goes to extraordinary lengths to prove to the woman that he is a good person. The two eventually leave to get married in the finale of the series.

In real life, Grenier said he spent a year and a half reconnecting with the future mother of his child.

An Honest Conversation About Hollywood | @adriangrenier
— (@)

The actor said he spent most of his time split between his native New York City and Hollywood but has given up both lifestyles to live on his own land near Austin, Texas.

Grenier said he spent approximately a year living in a 50-square-foot camper on a small piece of land and created a community garden.

"I was just digging in the soil and planting and digging and working, meditating, and cooking in an open fire. I grew a beard, and then the pandemic hit, and I was like 'perfect,' I'm already solo in isolation; it didn't affect me at all."

From that point, Grenier later reconnected with the woman he referred to as the love of his life and decided buy a large plot of land. A YouTube channel called Earth Speed is secondary to the work he has done on his plot.

Farming, cultivating, and otherwise tending to his vast property, Grenier has invited others to live on the land while he continues to learn about how to create a self-sustaining environment.

This story is similarly reflected in the movie "Goodbye World," where the characters are forced to live off the grid in the countryside after a terror attack leaves society in the dark.

"I'm certainly definitely still an apprentice of the land," Grenier remarked. He noted that farmers and growers are eager to pass down their knowledge and encourages anyone interested in the topics to take them up.

"I'm just trying to keep things alive and learning about the snakes and how to wrangle them, and not try and kill everything that scares me, but try and move against it and be brave in those moments, and fail and still keep at it."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Blaze News investigates: The truth about raw milk the government doesn't want you to know: 'Close to a perfect food'



Lisa Bass is a raw milk evangelist.

"When you look at all of the data, and you look at what is a health-supporting decision to make, I think raw milk comes out on top," Bass told Blaze News.

Bass, a mother of eight who is known for her popular YouTube channel "Farmhouse on Boone" and blog about homemaking, is part of a growing movement of free thinkers eschewing processed milk and embracing the benefits of raw dairy.

"I think we are created by God, and there is a way everything was designed," Bass said. "And if you take certain aspects of the food away, of course there's going to be other ramifications and other ways it wouldn't be as healthful. It's close to a perfect food. It's whole and good."

Unfortunately, the potential benefits of raw dairy are a secret to most Americans. That’s because the federal government and dairy lobbyists warn that raw milk is inherently dangerous, and they claim that consuming raw milk and raw dairy products can lead to severe illness — or even death. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in fact, describes raw milk as “one of the riskiest foods."

But is that true?

As it turns out, the government, dairy lobby, and the so-called “experts” are not telling you the full story.

The anti-raw-milk narrative

According to the CDC and Food and Drug Administration, raw milk and raw dairy products are unsafe to consume no matter what.

The public health agencies warn that raw dairy contains "disease-causing pathogens" that, if consumed, can send you to the hospital with severe illnesses and, if you're pregnant, may cause miscarriage or lead to stillbirths. In the worst cases, people who consume raw dairy may die.

The CDC and FDA, moreover, claim there are zero health benefits associated with consuming raw dairy. The FDA has even published an extensive document to debunk what it claims are the the "myths" associated with consuming raw dairy, asserting that every purported benefit is false. The science is unequivocally on their side, these agencies claim.

The dairy lobby is no different.

The National Dairy Producers Federation, one of the oldest and most powerful dairy advocacy groups, strongly opposes raw dairy and efforts to legalize it. Earlier this year, the NDPF suggested the raw dairy movement is akin to the "anti-vaccination movement."

That narrative is tidy and convenient. And it's true, after all, that pasteurization — the process of rapidly heating and cooling a liquid to kill all bacteria in it — helped solve a serious problem a century ago: People who lived in cities wanted to share in the benefits of consuming dairy products. But problems with urban sanitation, commercial agriculture, and the inability to refrigerate dairy led to many outbreaks of foodborne illnesses. Pasteurization, then, proved to be the right solution for a unique problem in time.

"It's a 19th-century problem, and pasteurization is a 19th-century solution," Mark McAfee, owner of Raw Farms USA in California — the largest raw dairy farm in the world — told Blaze News.

What they aren't telling you

As a general rule, absolutes are (almost) never true, and that is the case with raw milk. To claim that raw dairy is only harmful and there are no benefits to consuming it is a clue the government, dairy lobby, and so-called "experts" are not being honest with you.

Dr. Paul Saladino, MD, is a health influencer best known for promoting a holistic understanding of medicine and an ancestrally consistent diet, and he believes raw milk is a superfood.

In his educational content, Saladino teaches that consuming raw milk improves gut health, allergies, and immune function, and he has the scientific literature to back his claims.

"Raw milk contains many naturally occurring bioactive components that are beneficial and protective and prevent it from becoming a pathogenic breeding ground, things like lactoperoxidase immune cells, like neutrophil macrophages and immunoglobulins, which are antibodies. All of these are contained in raw milk. It is a bioactive-alive fluid," Saladino explains in a YouTube video.

The problem with pasteurization, then, is obvious in Saladino's view: Not only does pasteurization kill the "bad" things in raw dairy, but it also kills, reduces, denatures, or inhibits the benefits of raw dairy.

In Saladino's view, raw dairy has received a "bad rap" because of outbreaks of foodborne illness involving raw dairy more a century ago. But that was a unique problem in time, he argues, because cows were being milked in "very unsanitary conditions" and were being fed "complete garbage."

Metabolically unhealthy animals and unsanitary conditions were the perfect recipe for bacteria growth.

But advances in sanitation, technology, and understanding of human health now render raw milk "inherently safe" for all humans, according to Saladino — as long as farmers harvesting it uphold high quality and sanitation standards.

McAfee says that's exactly what Raw Farms USA does. According to McAfee, his family-owned farm has perfected the art of safely harvesting raw dairy and making it a product for consumers.

Raw Farms USA's cows are happy and clean, and the farm abides by "extremely strict standards" that McAfee told Blaze News surpass the standards of pasteurized dairy.

It's important to consider four more important facts about raw dairy.

First, humans have been drinking mammalian milk for thousands of years, and we haven't been stingy about our sources, harvesting from cows, sheep, goats, camels, horses, deer, buffalo, and other mammals. And for the vast majority of human history, this milk was consumed unpasteurized without problem.

We should consider, then, whether raw milk itself is the problem — as the anti-raw-milk narrative argues — or if something humans do makes raw milk sometimes risky to consume.

Second, the government's narrative about human breast milk is completely different from its narrative about raw dairy. Not only does the government recommend that infants be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life, but officials acknowledge that breast milk has "unique properties" that protect young children.

Breast milk, obviously, is neither pasteurized nor sterile, nor are human breasts sterile.

Considering that breast milk is raw milk harvested in a non-sterile environment — just like other mammalian milk — the natural question arises: Why is raw breast milk best, but other raw dairy is unsafe under every circumstance?

"They talk out of both sides of their mouth," McAfee told Blaze News, citing scientists who have found that raw dairy milk and breast milk, while quantitatively different, are "practically identical" qualitatively.

"You compare cow's milk to breast milk — it's practically identical on kinds of proteins, the kinds of fats, but the amounts are different. That's why there's so much compatibility between humans and cows," he said.

"We're a match made in heaven in terms of being able to have a portable, whole food nutrition from cows to people," McAfee explained. "Breastfeeding is the tell."

Third, the government emphasizes the dangers of raw milk and points to foodborne illness outbreaks as evidence. What officials never include alongside data about alleged raw-milk outbreaks is data about outbreaks involving pasteurized dairy.

A recent systematic review analyzing dairy outbreaks in the U.S. and Canada between 2007 and 2020, indeed, had interesting results. It found:

Thirty-two disease outbreaks were linked to dairy consumption. Twenty outbreaks involving unpasteurized products resulted in 449 confirmed cases of illness, 124 hospitalizations, and five deaths. Twelve outbreaks involving pasteurized products resulted in 174 confirmed cases of illness, 134 hospitalizations, 17 deaths, and seven fetal losses.

That's right: More deaths associated with outbreaks connected to pasteurized dairy than to raw dairy.

Statistically speaking, the data can't be compared directly because most people in the U.S. and Canada consume pasteurized dairy, and thus deaths from unpasteurized dairy are a much smaller percentage of overall consumers.

But the point to remember is this: There is risk associated with consuming both raw dairy and pasteurized dairy — just as there is risk with almost everything in life.

"Every food has risks. There are outbreaks with greens, fruit — there is no food without risk. Even pasteurized milk," Bass told Blaze News. "We think that there is a way to live a risk-free life, but there's always risk.

"There's no risk-free choice," she said.

Unfortunately, the government and the "experts" only emphasize the risk and potential harmful consequences of raw dairy while ignoring altogether the potential risks of pasteurized dairy, which is why the FDA has officially prohibited the interstate commerce of raw dairy since 1987.

Finally, there is a difference between raw milk harvested specifically for human consumption and the pasteurized milk that ends up on most grocery store shelves.

"It's filthy milk, I wouldn't produce it ever, and guess what? You need to pasteurize it because it's going to make somebody sick," McAfee said of pasteurized milk.

"That's what the FDA, in their minds, in their reality, thinks is raw milk," he explained. "What you have is two paradigms that are true at the same time: My milk is safe without pathogens because I set up the conditions for that, I test for it, and I'm preparing for human consumption — not pasteurization. Their paradigm is correct because their definition of raw milk is that it's filthy.

"You have two different realities, two different structures, two different protocols, two different standards and practices," McAfee said. "They're rendering filthy milk 'safe,' but it's not really safe. It's highly allergenic and hard to digest. So what they've got is a filthy milk problem that they're fixing with pasteurization that's killing all of the bio-actives that consumers want."

In fact, McAfee said most dairy farms have no incentives to produce raw milk for human consumption.

"It's not their fault. Their milk design is to have pathogens, their [design] is to put as much milk as they can into the channel — they're being paid by the weight of the milk, not the bacterial standards," McAfee said.

Should you consider raw milk?

Bass told Blaze News that she transitioned her family to raw dairy when her first child was in the weaning process. She did her research, became confident about the benefits of raw dairy, and "never looked back."

Bass has a humble spirit. She doesn't want to push her view on others, and she doesn't want to engage in the politics of the issue.

But if you consider drinking raw dairy, Bass wants you to know that you're more than capable of understanding the issue — despite what "experts" may claim — and that you are the best advocate for yourself and your family.

"Get some hard facts, not just fearmongering; get some real data and statistics, and you're going to find there have been sicknesses and deaths from both [raw dairy and pasteurized dairy]," she said. "But, either way, it's extremely low."

That skill — questioning with boldness the narrative that is pushed on you — translates to many areas of life.

"When you take a look at the actual numbers and you look at the actual studies, you'll find that a lot of times the narrative can be questioned, and there are a lot of benefits to learning things yourself and not just trusting what is told to you," Bass said. "I encourage people to be that advocate for themselves."

"It's important to ask questions because we live in this culture where it [is] always whatever the experts say," she explained. "I see what the experts say — there's a lot of fearmongering with a lot of, 'This will happen to you. This is scary.' And then when you actually look at the statistics, you're like, 'Oh, that's not at all what I was expecting.'"

If you ask Saladino, he will tell you that you should considering drinking raw milk not only because it's beneficial for your health and is ancestrally consistent, but it's just plain tasty.

"Raw milk is delicious!" Saladino says.

McAfee agrees.

"If you poll people about why they drink raw milk, the No. 1 thing they're going to say: It's delicious! 'It tastes good. It settles in my belly. It feels good. It makes me feel good,'" McAfee explained.

No matter what choice you make, remember to question with boldness, seek the truth, and cultivate the health of your family.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

FACT CHECK: No, 80 Percent Of Texas’ ‘Cattle Grazing Land’ Was Not Destroyed By Recent Fires

Spokespeople for the Texas Farm Bureau and Texas Department of Agriculture said the claim is false in an email to Check Your Fact.