Military jets scrambled and Secret Service evacuated Biden to secure location after aircraft enters airspace near president's beach house



President Joe Biden was evacuated to a secure location on Saturday afternoon after an aircraft entered the restricted airspace near his beach house in Delaware.

President Biden was rushed to a fire station when a light aircraft violated the restricted airspace over the president's home in Rehoboth Beach, according to the Daily Mail.

CBS News White House reporter Bo Erickson wrote on Twitter, "At 12:52p, I saw @POTUS motorcade race into the Rehoboth Fire Station. I saw President Biden through the window of a SUV. Right before the motorcade, I saw 2 military jets flying low over the beach town. The press pool is not with the motorcade."

A neighbor said a small white plane flew near Biden's home around 12:45 p.m., then two military-style jets were scrambled and flew into the area.

The 79-year-old president was spotted in the back of an SUV as his motorcade raced away from the beach house.

\u201cUpdate: President @POTUS moved to secure location after airplane enters airspace. Rehoboth Ave shutdown in area of firehouse. Ironically GOP convention today at City Hall. H/T @HCBright10\u201d
— Alan Henney (@Alan Henney) 1654363871

Rehoboth Beach Fire Chief Chuck Snyder told Erickson that Secret Service informed him at 12:48 p.m. that the president and the first lady were being taken to the station "because of a threat."

Snyder said President Biden and Jill Biden remained in the SUV while it was parked inside the fire station garage. He added that the fire department has participated in drills with the Secret Service previously in case the president needed to be evacuated.

\u201cWhite House confirms a small plane entered the restricted airspace near the president\u2019s beach house\u2014->\u201d
— Bo Erickson CBS (@Bo Erickson CBS) 1654363691

A White House official told the White House press poll, "A small private plane entered restricted airspace, all indications are by mistake, and precautionary measures were taken. There was no threat to the President or his family," according to CBS News senior White House correspondent Ed O'Keefe.

The U.S. Secret Service issued a statement on the incident:

Shortly before 1 p.m. today a privately owned aircraft entered the restricted airspace over Rehoboth Delaware after mistakenly entering a secured area. The aircraft was immediately escorted out of the restricted airspace. Preliminary investigation reveals the pilot was not on the proper radio channel, was not following the NOTAMS (Notice to Airmen) that had been filed and was not following published flight guidance. The United States Secret Service will be interviewing the pilot.

The president's motorcade reportedly left the fire station at 1:29 p.m.

Joe Manchin says he would vote to codify Roe v. Wade, but opposes the bill Democrats want



Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) on Wednesday reaffirmed his opposition to a radical Democratic abortion bill that is going nowhere fast in the United States Senate.

Democrats have scheduled a vote on the Women's Health Protection Act later today, a bill that would codify the abortion rights established by Roe v. Wade and override state pro-life laws restricting abortion access or regulating abortions for health and safety. The bill needs 60 votes to overcome an expected filibuster by Republicans, though Democrats may struggle to find even 50 votes in favor.

Manchin, who claims to be a pro-life Democrat, told reporters he would not vote for the WHPA, arguing it was too broad.

“We’re going to be voting for a piece of legislation that I will not be voting for today,” Manchin said.

Manchin tells reporters he will vote against the Women\u2019s Health Protection Act this afternoonpic.twitter.com/sOvTIjxDwl
— Alan He (@Alan He) 1652283678

“But I would vote for a Roe v. Wade codification if it was today. I was hopeful for that, but I found out yesterday in caucus that that wasn’t going to be,” he added.

"To me, that would be the reasonable, rational thing to do. The bill we have today to vote on, Women's Health Protection Act ... make no mistake, it is not Roe v. Wade codification, it is an expansion. It wipes 500--500 state laws off the books. It expands abortion," he said.

Democrats have demanded federal action to protect abortion rights in the wake of a leaked draft Supreme Court majority opinion that indicates the court will soon overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights decision.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has insisted on a show vote for the WHPA even though everyone in the Senate understands that it will not pass. He has said that Republicans need to be put on the record opposing abortion rights, calling this vote "one of the most consequential we will take in decades."

"All of us will have to answer for this vote for the rest of our time in public office," Schumer said in a floor speech Wednesday morning. "Before the day is over, every member of this body will make a choice [to] stand with women to protect their freedoms or stand with MAGA Republicans to take our country into a dark and repressive future."

A bipartisan bill that would more narrowly codify Roe while permitting states to regulate abortions for health and safety and enact conscience protections for Catholic hospitals has been introduced by Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. Although Manchin is likely to support that bill and it could even get support from 52 senators, Schumer has declined to give it a vote.

Manchin said the Senate should not overreach on an issue that is "extremely political" and could alienate voters.

"We should not be dividing this country further than we're already divided," he said. "And it's really the politics of Congress that's dividing the country. It's not the people. They're telling us what they want. And it's just disappointing that we're going to be voting on a piece of legislation which I will not vote for today. But I would vote for Roe v. Wade codification if it was today, I was hopeful for that. But I found out yesterday in caucus that wasn't going to be."

Kamala Harris urges Dems to seize 'opportunity' on filibuster, but Manchin immediately extinguishes the idea



Vice President Kamala Harris urged Democrats on Tuesday to seize the “opportunity” to pass voting reform, disparaging the Senate filibuster and suggesting the mechanism should be eliminated. But Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) immediately threw cold water on the idea.

The Biden administration and Democratic Party leaders have been pressuring moderate Democrats — like Manchin and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) — to abolish the Senate filibuster, thereby allowing Democrats to ram through Biden's agenda unencumbered by the constraints of democracy.

But a massive problem, aside from recalcitrant Democrats, stands in their way: the 2022 midterm elections. Nearly all election forecasts predict that Democrats' control of Congress will evaporate when November hits. Harris recognized this reality during a speech in Atlanta on Tuesday.

What did Harris say?

Accusing Republicans of exploiting "arcane rules" — a trite reference to the Senate filibuster, a mechanism that Democrats and Republicans both have used as a means to block one-party rule — Harris urged lawmakers to act on voting reform.

"We do not know when we will have this opportunity again," she said. "Senate Republicans have exploited arcane rules to block these bills."

"And let us be clear: The Constitution of the United States gives the Congress the power to pass legislation. And nowhere — nowhere — does the Constitution give a minority the right to unilaterally block legislation," she added.

While Harris is correct in stating that the Constitution does not explicitly provide the minority party "the right to unilaterally block legislation," neither does the Constitution explicitly permit the majority party total control over the lawmaking process. In fact, the spirit behind a bicameral legislative body, in which one chamber is composed of proportional representation (House) and another is composed of equal representation (Senate), is to create a balance of power by distributing power.

What did Manchin say?

Speaking with reporters on Tuesday, Manchin reiterated support for the filibuster, yet another indication that he refuses to buckle under pressure from his Democratic colleagues.

"We need some good rules changes to make the place work better. But getting rid of the filibuster doesn’t make it work better," Manchin said.

"The filibuster is what makes the Senate hopefully work when it's suppose to work."

MANCHIN to @MacFarlaneNews\n\n\u201cWe need some good rule changes to make the place work better but getting rid of the filibuster doesn\u2019t make it work better.\u201dpic.twitter.com/s4y1HtS6WH
— Alan He (@Alan He) 1641914056

The media narrative would have you believe that Manchin and Sinema are the lone wolves blocking the Democratic Party's agenda, but Politico reported that other moderate Democrats do not outright support abolishing the filibuster, either.

In fact, Politico cited four other Democratic lawmakers — Sens. Mark Kelly (Ariz.), Chris Coons (Del.), Jon Tester (Mont.), and Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.) — as examples of the "range of views and Democratic hesitance" to fundamentally changing Senate rules.

Anything else?

While speaking in Atlanta on Tuesday, Biden said the quiet part out loud, so to speak.

As Biden urged lawmakers to pass voting reform, he declared, "Let the majority prevail." He then immediately advocated changing the rules of the Senate — i.e. abolishing the filibuster — if the majority that prevails is not the one he wants.

"Let the majority prevail," Biden said. "And if that bare minimum is blocked, we have no option but to change the Senate rules, including getting rid of the filibuster for this."

The truth of the matter is that a majority is prevailing. That majority — currently 50 Republican senators and some moderate Democrats — is responsible for blocking Biden's agenda. The senators who support passing Biden's agenda are the minority.

Even if the filibuster did not exist, because the Senate is currently split 50-50, Democrats would have to win the support of moderates like Manchin and Sinema to even have a chance at passing legislation. In an evenly split Senate, one Democratic dissenter immediately makes the Democratic Party the minority.

Do not let the media and Democrats fool you: Democracy is working as the framers of the Constitution designed.

Court's decision will allow Biden admin to impose controversial vaccination or testing mandate on large businesses



A panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a 2-1 ruling that will allow the Biden administration to implement a controversial COVID-19 vaccine or testing mandate on companies with 100 or more employees.

The mandate will require those employers to ascertain each worker's vaccination status and will require that unvaccinated workers get tested for COVID-19 at least once weekly. By Jan. 4, employers must comply with the requirement that they ensure unvaccinated workers get tested weekly.

The decision to dissolve a stay which had been issued by the Fifth Circuit marks a win for the Biden administration, at least for now.

The matter will likely come before the U.S. Supreme Court as opponents charge ahead in their quest to vanquish the rule.

South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, who is also the chair of the Republican Attorneys General Association, said that the battle against the mandate will continue.

"The Sixth Circuit has dissolved the stay of the OSHA vaccine mandate. While we are disappointed in the Court’s decision, we will continue to fight the illegal mandate in the Supreme Court. We are confident the mandate can be stopped," Wilson tweeted.

"We will go immediately to the Supreme Court- the highest court in the land- to fight this unconstitutional and illegal mandate. The law must be followed and federal abuse of power stopped," he declared.

We will go immediately to the Supreme Court- the highest court in the land- to fight this unconstitutional and illegal mandate. The law must be followed and federal abuse of power stopped.
— Alan Wilson (@Alan Wilson) 1639788980

Maxine Waters tells protesters to 'get more confrontational' and she is 'hopeful protests continue'



While speaking to protesters in Minnesota on Saturday night, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) hurled language that could be perceived as incendiary. Waters launched into a fiery rant during an appearance in Brooklyn Center, where she commanded protesters to "get more confrontational" if former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is not found guilty of murdering George Floyd.

"We're looking for a guilty verdict," Waters said of the Chauvin trial. "And we're looking to see if all of the talk that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd."

"If nothing does not happen, then we know, that we've got to not only stay in the street, but we've got to fight for justice," Waters continued. "But I am very hopeful, that I hope that we're going to get a verdict that will say, 'Guilty, guilty, guilty!' And if we don't, we cannot go away."

Waters ranted to angry demonstrators who had gathered to call for justice in the police shooting of 20-year-old Daunte Wright. The Democratic representative from California told the Minnesota crowd that "we are looking for a guilty verdict" in the trial of Derek Chauvin, who is charged with second and third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in the death of Floyd.

A reporter asked if Chauvin was guilty of manslaughter, Waters reacted by saying, "Oh no, not manslaughter, this is guilty for murder. I don't know whether it's in the first degree, but as far as I'm concerned it's first-degree murder."

Waters was also asked what protesters should do if Chauvin is not found guilty of murder.

"Well, we got to stay on the street," Waters told protesters. "And we've got to get more active. You've got to get more confrontational. You got to make sure that they know we mean business."

Maxine Waters is marching in Brooklyn Center tonight and told people to take to the streets if Chauvin is acquitted https://t.co/RemfvCCLAn
— Jack Posobiec (@Jack Posobiec)1618719293.0

Waters also said that she didn't comply with curfews implemented by law enforcement.

"I don't think anything about curfew. I don't know what curfew means," Waters stated. "Curfew means that I want you all to stop talking. I want you to stop meeting. I want you stop gathering. I don't agree with that."

When Waters was asked if she was going to stay out past curfew to demonstrate with protesters, she responded, "I'm not gonna stay out here. I came here from Washington just to be here to make sure that I let my voice be heard among all of those who have been putting so much time on the street. And so I am hopeful that the protests continue."

There was an 11 p.m. curfew in Brooklyn Center on Saturday night, which was the seventh night of protests against the police killing of Wright. There were 136 arrests made Friday night in connection with protests outside the Brooklyn Center Police Department, according to law enforcement.

Maxine Waters comes to the Brooklyn Center protests and makes bold to proclaim she's not afraid of the curfew. She… https://t.co/t41LJj7i5H
— Alan Bings (@Alan Bings)1618718934.0

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) slammed Waters for her dangerous rhetoric.

"Democrats actively encouraging riots & violence," Cruz wrote on Twitter. "They want to tear us apart."

Democrats actively encouraging riots & violence. They want to tear us apart.“'We gotta stay on the street,' Wat… https://t.co/SdJslGdKea
— Ted Cruz (@Ted Cruz)1618751756.0

Rep Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) asked, "Why is Maxine Waters traveling to a different state trying to incite a riot? What good can come from this?"

This isn't the first time that Waters has been accused of spewing rhetoric that could incite violence.

In June 2018, Waters delivered a fiery speech where she instructed members of the "Resistance" to harass staffers of the Trump administration.

"Let's make sure we show up wherever we have to show up and if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere," Waters commaned.

Maxine Waters calls for attacks on Trump administration: "If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in… https://t.co/z7vSo7lkcp
— Ryan Saavedra (@Ryan Saavedra)1529871853.0

RELATED: Twitter troll tricks Democrats into being outraged over Maxine Waters' 'dangerous' quote against Trump administration

Gulf of Mexico has never had two hurricanes at same time; history could be made as storms threaten Louisiana and Texas



The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicted that the 2020 hurricane season would be busy with the potential for "extreme activity." But there was no way they could forecast the possibility of double hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico at the same time because there have never been two hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico at the same time in documented history. There are currently two storms marching towards the Gulf Coast of the United States.

"Official records go back to 1851. Based on the WPC (Weather Prediction Center) analysis, there is no record of two hurricanes at the exact same time in the Gulf of Mexico," an NOAA staffer told WABC-TV.

Tropical Storms Laura and Marco are barreling towards the Gulf coasts of Louisiana and Texas. Tropical Storm Marco has a head start and is already in the Gulf of Mexico, and is expected to make landfall on Monday. Tropical Storm Laura is predicted to arrive in the U.S. by Wednesday, exactly three years after Category 4 Hurricane Harvey smashed into Texas and caused catastrophic flooding Louisiana.

As of 5 p.m. EST, Tropical Storm Laura has sustained winds of 50 mph while dumping heavy rains on Puerto Rico and is headed to the Dominican Republic, according to the NOAA. Tropical storm warnings were issued to Puerto Rico, the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, Haiti, the Bahamas, and the Florida Keys. A hurricane watch has been posted on the Louisiana coast.

As of 4 p.m. EST, Tropical Storm Marco is east of the Yucatan Peninsula with sustained winds of 65 mph and is expected to develop into a Category 1 hurricane by Monday.

The storms are currently forecast to make landfall as hurricanes, but upper-level shear ahead of the storms is expected to weaken them both before hitting Louisiana or Texas.

The latest forecast from the NOAA predicts that both storms will make landfall as Category 1 hurricanes near New Orleans. It's 2020, why would you expect anything less than double hurricanes.

There has been a significant change in the forecast from the NHC, now expecting #Marco to make landfall near the Ne… https://t.co/u1TfJZJDpg
— Hurricane Tracker App (@Hurricane Tracker App)1598130122.0


MAJOR SHIFT#Marco now expected to make landfall in #Louisiana and so is #Laura. https://t.co/XQe5lmjC87
— Alan Auglis (@Alan Auglis)1598129824.0


This animation depicts the forecast center of circulation proximity of Marco to Laura over the next five days. It d… https://t.co/QcMLuOfwhE
— NWS Lake Charles (@NWS Lake Charles)1598121710.0


Kind of a historical week coming up w/2 legitimate hurricane threats within 48hrs for S LA. Acadiana is in two cone… https://t.co/cgu2U5OufO
— Rob Perillo (@Rob Perillo)1598127737.0


#Marco: Small circulations can spin up quickly, and this one has within a burst in a portion of a strung-out band… https://t.co/2eyda6GCb2
— Stu Ostro (@Stu Ostro)1598110983.0

Despite the systems following similar paths and being in close proximity, experts say that they can not combine to become a "supercane."

"That's because each system has sinking air on its outskirts, which presses down on the other system," CBS News reported. "So, when two systems are that close, the larger one tends to weaken the smaller one. And in some cases they can even dance around one another in a phenomena called the 'Fujiwhara effect.'"

Tropical Storm Laura was the 12th named storm of the hurricane season, and Marco was the 13th. This hurricane season ties 2005 for the record of the highest number of tropical storms before September. The 2005 hurricane season was especially destructive with Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma.

Tropical Storm Laura is forecast to strengthen over the Gulf of Mexico & could bring surge rainfall & wind impacts… https://t.co/383L2LDcsq
— NWS Eastern Region (@NWS Eastern Region)1598133861.0