The Ukraine War Was Always Going To End This Way
From the very beginning it was clear that Ukraine’s borders, a relic of Soviet propaganda, would have to change.From the very beginning it was clear that Ukraine’s borders, a relic of Soviet propaganda, would have to change.Trump says he knows exactly why Putin wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if he was president
President Donald Trump said the reason Russia invaded Ukraine under President Biden instead of himself is obvious.
Trump had a historic meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday to discuss the possibility of peace with Ukraine. In a press conference after their discussion, Putin confirmed Trump's long-held claim that he would not have started a war with the Ukraine if Trump was in the Oval Office at the time, in early 2022.
Speaking with Fox News' Sean Hannity soon after, Trump said he knew exactly why that invasion happened under President Biden, and not under his watch.
'He said your election was rigged because you have mail-in voting.'
Hannity brought up Putin's statement, and asked if the Russian leader gave specific reasons as to why he made the remark.
"He did," Trump began. "I know the reason, it's gross incompetence. We have a border that is totally close now and people come in, but they come in legally."
Trump revealed that not only did Putin say that if he had won the 2020 presidential election "we wouldn't have had a war," but also that Trump was cheated out of an election victory, as well.
The POTUS said that Putin pinpointed mail-in voting as the apparatus Democrats used to rig the election.
"He said your election was rigged because you have mail-in voting. He said mail-in voting, every election, he said no country has mail-in voting. It is impossible to have mail-in voting and have honest elections," Trump recalled, claiming that Putin said he won the presidency "by so much."
The 47th president explained that Putin also complimented the quick turnaround the United States has had since Biden left office, and that the U.S. is "hot as a pistol."
"A year ago he thought [the country] was dead," Trump relayed.
Trump also referred to the 2020 election as a "tragedy" because Biden taking office actually produced "something that was unthinkable."
RELATED: VIDEO: LA Mayor Karen Bass has deranged meltdown over ICE operation near Newsom's anti-Trump presser
"He drove China and Russia together. That's not good," Trump continued. To counter this, the president said he wants to make sure America and Russia can work together.
Fox News White House correspondent Edward Lawrence reported that a significant chunk of the meeting was actually based on making business deals between Russia and the United States. This included talks about rare-Earth minerals that are in contested locations, and therefore could end up being shared by Russia and the U.S. in a future trade deal.
After rating the meeting with Putin a "10 out of 10," Trump said there were two "pretty significant items" that could be reached between the Russians and Ukrainians.
Hannity presented possible concessions that he felt Ukraine likely needed to make in order for Russia to accept peace, which included "land swaps," meaning "there will be more Russian territory than there had been," as well as "security measures" for Ukraine that will not rely on NATO.
Trump replied that those points were in fact negotiated, and were also "largely" agreed upon.
"Now it is really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done," Trump added, saying that he wanted to attend a meeting between the two foreign leaders out of necessity, not desire.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
'There's no deal until there's a deal': Trump says Alaska meeting with Putin was 'extremely productive'
President Donald Trump and Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin appeared in an amicable but short media briefing before reporters on Friday, where no deal was announced.
In the days leading up to the summit, Trump expressed optimism that the discussions would move toward a ceasefire and peace talks between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Trump had projected just a 25% chance of failure for the meeting.
'We have a very good chance of getting there. We didn't get there, but we have a good shot of getting there.'
Trump said there had been some progress and that the meeting was a beginning for negotiations, but he did not say whether he would follow through on a threat to sanction Russia if they did not reach a deal.
Trump arrived in Alaska's Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson around 3 p.m. Eastern for the scheduled meeting.
Trump greeted Putin on the tarmac, shaking his hand before walking together along a red carpet lined with four F-22 Raptor fighter jets. As they moved toward a stage with a sign that read "Alaska 2025," American military planes, including a B-2 stealth bomber, flew overhead.
RELATED: Trump 'bothered' after Zelenskyy shoots down compromises ahead of peace summit
— (@)
After posing for a brief photo-op, they entered the presidential limousine to head to their scheduled meeting.
Putin spoke first after the meeting and said in his comments that Trump was correct in saying there would have been no invasion of Ukraine had Trump been in office.
He said that he called Trump his "close neighbor" and talked about the historical ties between Russia and the U.S. He noted that there had been no summit between the two nations for four years and lamented that fact.
Putin also said he hoped Ukraine didn't participate in backroom dealings to undermine progress on a peace deal.
RELATED: Trump is optimistic ahead of Putin meeting — predicts 25% chance of failure
"We had an extremely productive meeting. Many points were agreed to," Trump said, speaking second.
"There are just a very few that are left," he added. "Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant. But we have a very good chance of getting there. We didn't get there, but we have a good shot of getting there."
Trump concluded the briefing by offering that there could be a follow-up summit after this meeting.
"Next time in Moscow," Putin joked in English.
"That's an interesting one. I don't know. I think I may get a little heat on that one. But I could see it possibly happening," Trump responded.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Trump is optimistic ahead of Putin meeting — predicts 25% chance of failure
U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are slated to meet Friday in Alaska. Trump has referred to the upcoming summit as a "feel-out meeting" to determine the likelihood of reaching a ceasefire agreement and ultimately an end to the conflict with Ukraine.
Trump stated in the days leading up to the summit that if the talks are successful, there is a chance they will remain in Alaska longer than initially planned to host a second meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
'Trump is not likely to suffer another Putin ploy to string him along, making this meeting more consequential and high-risk for Moscow, with secondary sanctions and tariffs already placing a cost on those still supporting or doing business with Russia.'
Trump is optimistic that Putin "wants to get it done," though he noted that there is a 25% chance the meeting will be a failure.
"I believe now he's convinced that he's going to make a deal," Trump said. "I'm going to know very quickly."
Secretary of State Marco Rubio made similar remarks ahead of Friday's summit, stating that the administration will know "very early" in the meeting "whether something is possible or not."
Trump has vowed to implement "very severe consequences," including sanctions, if Putin refuses to advance peace talks.
RELATED: Trump 'bothered' after Zelenskyy shoots down compromises ahead of peace summit
He indicated that negotiations between Putin and Zelenskyy would likely require some "land swapping" that would be "good" and "bad" for both countries.
"Russia has occupied a big portion of Ukraine," Trump stated. "They've occupied some very prime territory. We're going to try and get some of that territory back for Ukraine."
Zelenskyy rejected Trump's land swapping idea, stating that Ukraine "will not give land to the occupier."
On Thursday, Putin said that the Trump administration was "making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict."
Zelenskyy is less optimistic about the upcoming meeting, claiming that Russia has shown "no sign" that it is preparing to end the war.
"Our coordinated efforts and joint actions — of Ukraine, the United States, Europe, and all countries that seek peace — can definitely compel Russia to make peace," Zelenskyy said.
He has accused Russia of “dragging out the war,” insisting that “it deserves stronger global pressure.”
“Russia refuses to stop the killings, and therefore must not receive any rewards or benefits. And this is not just a moral position — it is a rational one. Concessions do not persuade a killer. But truly strong protection of life stops the killers,” he wrote in a post on social media.
RELATED: Vance makes one thing abundantly clear ahead of Trump's big ceasefire meeting with Putin
Regardless of the outcome of Friday's meeting with Putin, Trump intends to speak with the press afterward. However, it remains undecided whether the press conference will be addressed jointly.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt previously indicated that Trump and Putin would hold a press conference together, but Trump later appeared to walk back those plans.
"If it's negative, I'll have a press conference to say that the war is going to go on and these people are horribly going to continue to shoot each other and kill each other, and I think it's a disgrace, and I'll head back to Washington," Trump said. "Or I'll have a press conference that's positive."
Trump plans to call European leaders and Zelenskyy after his meeting with Putin to discuss next steps. He promised that the next meeting would involve both Putin and Zelenskyy.
"I will put the two of them in a room," he said. "I think it will get solved."
Trump is scheduled to meet with Putin at Alaska’s Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson around 3:00 p.m. Eastern.
Brent Sadler, a national security senior research fellow with the Heritage Foundation, told Blaze News, “The best outcome is Putin beginning to talk and giving up his maximalist approach to negotiations. Trump is not likely to suffer another Putin ploy to string him along, making this meeting more consequential and high-risk for Moscow, with secondary sanctions and tariffs already placing a cost on those still supporting or doing business with Russia.”
When contacted for a comment, the White House directed Blaze News to the statements made by Trump and Leavitt ahead of the summit.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Bombshell DNI Emails Expose Fraud That Sabotaged 2018 Trump-Putin Summit
The new release by Gabbard is a vindication for Trump, who stood alone in 2018, and strengthens his position ahead of the upcoming summit.Vance makes one thing abundantly clear ahead of Trump's big ceasefire meeting with Putin
President Donald Trump made good on yet another campaign promise last week, brokering a historic peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan — two nations that have been spilling blood for decades over territory in the Caucasus Mountains.
Trump pulled off this latest deal after securing peaceful resolutions between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Cambodia and Thailand, and India and Pakistan. Trump, now on a roll, appears poised to bring an end to the war in Ukraine.
'We're done with the funding of the Ukraine war business. We want to bring about a peaceful settlement to this thing.'
To this end, Trump announced on Friday that he will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Aug. 15. He told reporters the peace deal would likely involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both."
Hours after Trump's announcement, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shared a video suggesting Kyiv would not make territorial concessions — a possible obstacle to a settlement.
After stating, "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier," Zelenskyy said that "any decisions that are against us, any decisions that are made without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace. They will not achieve anything. These are unworkable decisions."
Vice President JD Vance, who has previously made his frustration with Zelenskyy known, told Maria Bartiromo in a "Sunday Morning Futures" interview recorded on Friday that neither side will be particularly happy about the settlement, and that one way or another, "we're done with the funding of the Ukraine war business. We want to bring about a peaceful settlement to this thing."
RELATED: Trump makes good on MAJOR campaign promise, brokering a 'historic peace'
The United States has committed hundreds of billions of dollars to Ukraine since its invasion by Russia in February 2022, outspending Europe on propping up Kyiv well into this year.
In addition to taxpayer dollars for the beleaguered nation's humanitarian and budget support, the U.S. has poured well over $70 billion worth of weapons, equipment, and other military support into Ukraine — including long-range Army Tactical Missile System missiles.
Trump announced in July that the U.S. would supply Ukraine with "various pieces of very sophisticated military" equipment, including Patriot air defense batteries; however, European nations would foot the bill.
"We're in for about $350 billion. Europe is in for $100 billion. That's a lot of money, 100, but they should be in actually for more than us," Trump said. "So as we send equipment, they are going to reimburse us for that equipment."
— (@)
While American military aid is becoming increasingly mediated by European nations, Vance hinted in his interview with Bartiromo that Washington retains sufficient economic leverage over Kyiv to compel it to negotiate, even if the terms are at first blush unacceptable to Zelenskyy.
"The reason that we reached this decisive moment, a real change in where we were, is because the president was willing to apply some significant pressure and actually say, 'If you don't come to the table, the American people — we're not going to get involved in this war directly, but we have a lot of economic points of leverage and we're willing to use those to bring about peace.'"
'Americans are sick of continuing to send their money, their tax dollars to this particular conflict.'
Trump has applied pressure in both directions.
In an effort to get Putin to the negotiating table, Trump threatened last week to apply a 25% tariff on goods from importers of Russian oil. After observing in March that Zelenskyy was "not ready for Peace if America is involved," Trump ordered a brief pause on all military aid being sent to Ukraine.
Both foreign leaders appear to have reacted to Trump's diplomatic spurring.
Vance emphasized that the peace deal is "not going to make anybody super happy. Both the Russians and the Ukrainians, probably, at the end of the day, are going to be unhappy with it."
While the Ukrainians and Russians won't be happy, Vance hinted that there will be at least one major cohort pleased to see the fighting end, noting, "Americans are sick of continuing to send their money, their tax dollars to this particular conflict."
The vice president indicated that a trilateral summit is now in the cards but that it would not be productive to have Zelenskyy attend the Friday summit in Alaska.
Blaze News has reached out to the White House and to the State Department for comment.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!Republican senator makes a stunning admission: 'I can't be somebody that I'm not'
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska signaled that she would be open to a major political shake-up, but on one condition.
Murkowski, who has a track record of bucking her party, admitted on a new episode of the "GD Politics" podcast that she would be open to caucusing with Democrats and even changing her party affiliation to independent if she felt it benefited her constituents. Although Murkowski has repeatedly refrained from voting alongside Republicans on key votes, she also acknowledged that there are certain aspects of the Democratic Party she simply disagrees with.
'There is some openness to exploring something different.'
"I have to figure out how I can be most effective for the people that I serve," Murkowski said. "That's why I'm going to continue to do a really hard job, because I want to try to help people."
"My problem with your hypothetical is that as challenged as I think we may be on the Republican side, I don't see the Democrats being much better," Murkowski said. "And they've got not only their share of problems, but quite honestly, they've got some policies that I just inherently disagree with."
RELATED: Vance casts tiebreaking Senate vote after Republicans join Democrats to tank Trump's tariffs
Murkowski managed to evade directly addressing whether she would change her party affiliation to independent, but she expressed an "openness" to it.
"There is some openness to exploring something different than the status quo."
RELATED: RFK secures support from key Republican ahead of confirmation
Murkowski noted that she has been pressured to change her party affiliation to Libertarian in the past in order to secure a political advantage. Even though it might have played in her favor, Murkowski rejected the idea.
"I can't be somebody that I'm not," Murkowski said. "I can't now say, 'I want this job so much that I'm going to pretend to be somebody that I'm not.' That's not who I am."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Gov. Morissey Mum On Whether He Will Sign Bill Protecting West Virginia Elections From Ranked-Choice Voting
A bill prohibiting the use of ranked-choice voting (RCV) in West Virginia elections is on its way to Gov. Patrick Morrisey’s desk for signature. But the Republican governor is remaining mum on whether he’ll sign it into law. Passed by the state House (87-9-4) on Friday, SB 490 stipulates that “[n]o state, county, or local […]Haaland Failed As Interior Secretary, Now She Wants To Run New Mexico Into The Ground
Using history as a guide, Gov. Deb Haaland will likely do to New Mexico what she did to America, and the state will suffer enormously as a result.Today's top stories
www.theblaze.com