Amazon's secret strategy to replace 600,000 American workers with robots



Internal documents have revealed that Amazon wants to avoid the costly human experience if it can.

A scathing report by the New York Times that compiled interviews, along with what was described as a cache of internal documents, showed that Amazon executives have aspirations of replacing approximately 600,000 U.S. jobs with robots.

'Leaked documents often paint an incomplete and misleading picture of our plans.'

The corporate decisions would allegedly pass on savings to the customer of upwards of 30 cents per item, while at the same time avoiding the hiring of about 160,000 new employees in the United States that would be needed by 2027.

In the internal documents, Amazon executives told their board members it was their hope to avoid making new hires by ramping up robotic automation, which would negate the need for more than 600,000 human jobs. This would come at the same time that Amazon expected to double its sales by 2033.

The alleged stated goal in the documents was to automate 75% of facility operations, while simultaneously executing good faith initiatives to avoid angering communities that are disparaged by the job losses. This included hosting parades and Toys for Tots programs that built upon an image of Amazon being a "good corporate citizen."

Disturbingly, the documents reportedly discussed the idea of avoiding words that remind people of robots, an approach that Amazon strictly denied adopting.

RELATED: CRASH: Amazon Web Services outage cripples apps, megacorps, and doorbells, shocking a fragile America

A robot prepares to pick up a tote containing product during the first public tour of the newest Amazon Robotics fulfillment center on April 12, 2019, in Orlando, Florida. (Photo by Paul Hennessy/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

The New York Times reported that Amazon contemplated avoiding terms such as "automation" and "A.I." in reference to robotics and would have rather used terms like "advanced technology."

Instead of "robot," the word "cobot" was discussed being used because it implies collaboration with humans.

Amazon told the NYT, however, that executives are not being told to avoid certain terms when referring to robotics and that its community relations plans had nothing to do with its automation plans. It said the documents were incomplete and did not represent Amazon's overall hiring strategy.

The Verge, which received a statement, quoted Amazon spokesperson Kelly Nantel to the effect that "leaked documents often paint an incomplete and misleading picture of our plans, and that's the case here. In our written narrative culture," Nantel continued, "thousands of documents circulate throughout the company at any given time, each with varying degrees of accuracy and timeliness. We're actively hiring at operations facilities across the country and recently announced plans to fill 250,000 positions for the holiday season."

RELATED: Microsoft rejects idea that company is replacing American workers with foreign labor after massive layoffs

Photo by Joan Cros/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Reporter Lewis Brackpool from Restore Britain told Return that while the numbers were troubling, the push for robotics could stand as a solution for the mass import of foreign workers.

"While in a perfect world citizens could thrive in their employment without the worry of being replaced by overseas workers, ditching foreign labor in exchange for robotics seems more preferable than our current situation," Brackpool theorized.

"A socialist-communist journalist by the name of Aaron Bastani once wrote a book called 'Fully Automated Luxury Communism,'" the commentator continued. "The book outlines a vision of a post-scarcity, post-capitalist society driven by technological advances such as automation, artificial intelligence, and synthetic biology. Even that is more preferable than to be replaced by the third world."

Amazon employs approximately 1.1 million in the United States, representing about 70% of its global workforce, according to Red Stag Fulfillment.

The company peaked at 1.61 million employees in 2021 and has a minimum wage of $18 per hour for all seasonable employees.

Average pay reportedly increases by 15% for those employed for over three years.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

CRASH: Amazon Web Services outage cripples apps, megacorps, and doorbells, shocking a fragile America



An outage on Amazon's web hosting service caused a sweep of app outages after the company faced issues at an east-coast operations center.

AWS hosts about 6.3% of all websites, but some of the biggest brands' communications platforms also rely on the service.

'I don't trust Signal anymore.'

When reports started rolling in around 3 a.m. Eastern Time, Amazon said it was dealing with an "operational issue" that was affecting 14 services at its northern Virginia center.

Snapchat, McDonald's, and even Ring doorbell cameras were among some of the applications affected. Even gaming platforms like Roblox and Fortnite were affected, as were messaging and communications programs like Zoom and Signal.

According to NBC News, about 6.5 million reports piled up that said over 1,000 sites and services had gone offline.

After 6:30 a.m., AWS said it had "fully mitigated" the issues; that was until 10:14 a.m., when it confirmed "significant API errors and connectivity issues across multiple services in the US-EAST-1 Region."

The widespread outage sparked conversations about the fragility and dependency of major companies and even institutions, as the blackout affected the U.K. government's HM Revenue and Customs department, which handles tax services.

With Signal affected, purporting to be an encrypted chat, X owner Elon Musk jumped on the opportunity to cast doubt on the app and direct readers to his own version, X chat.

RELATED: Amazon invests $500M in mini nuclear reactors to power AI operations


The messages are fully encrypted with no advertising hooks or strange “AWS dependencies” such that I can’t read your messages even if someone put a gun to my head.

You can also do file transfers and audio/video calls. https://t.co/l0GIIZYz6y
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025

"I don't trust Signal anymore," Musk wrote on X, responding to a user alarmed that Signal was not working.

Just over 20 minutes later, Musk started promoting his own messenger: "The messages are fully encrypted with no advertising hooks or strange 'AWS dependencies' such that I can't read your messages even if someone put a gun to my head."

This is a contrast from May 2024, when Musk openly praised AWS for developing generative AI that helps write website code.

"Impressive. My hat is off to what Amazon has accomplished with AWS," Musk wrote at the time.

RELATED: AI isn’t feeding you

— (@)

This is not the first time Signal has been accused of being insecure. In a 2023 interview with the popular online influencer group Nelk Boys, conservative host Tucker Carlson claimed the NSA had hacked his Signal account around the time he was attempting to interview Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Carlson said he got a call from someone in Washington, D.C., who sat down with him and had knowledge of his conversations about planning an interview with Putin because the NSA had allegedly read Carlson's messages.

An NGO called Article 19, which describes itself as a group "defending freedom of expression and information around the world," told NBC News that the organization felt the disruptions were "democratic failures."

"When a single provider goes dark, critical services go offline with it — media outlets become inaccessible, secure communication apps like Signal stop functioning, and the infrastructure that serves our digital society crumbles."

According to Wojciech Gawroński, who runs the website AWS Maniac, Amazon has suffered one to two major outages per year between 2011 and 2021.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Woman Finds 250 Ballots In Amazon Box As Maine Dems Fight Voter ID Law

Now is the time to put an end to mystery ballot deliveries in Amazon boxes by enacting voter ID in Maine. Real democracy requires trustworthy elections, and trustworthy elections require voter ID.

AI isn’t feeding you



Mason County, Kentucky, sits just an hour from Cincinnati but feels like another world. Its beautiful rolling hills, deep farming roots, and traditions make it a bastion of conservative culture. Trump carried the county by 44 points. Residents distrust globalism, Big Tech, and government collusion.

Yet Mason has become the latest target for one of the largest data centers in the world. The company behind it hides its name, cloaks officials in nondisclosure agreements, and dangles cash at landowners while refusing to reveal how it will feed the massive hunger for power and water.

The question now is whether Kentucky — and America — will heed the warning or allow ‘progress’ to consume the very land, food, water, and power that make progress possible.

The plan calls for a sprawling 5,000-acre “technology campus” near Big Pond and Tuckahoe roads. Local officials admit the buyer is a Fortune 20 giant, described only as a “global, top 10” company with “hundreds of thousands of employees.”

Residents say the tactics are familiar. A few landowners get offers — $35,000 an acre in this case — while the broader community is left to bear the burden: displaced farmland, strained resources, and declining property values. Good luck selling to anyone but the data-center developer once the deal is in motion.

Power drain

The proposed complex in Maysville would demand 2.2 gigawatts of power, starting at 110 megawatts by 2026 and hitting full capacity by 2028-2031. That’s the annual energy use of 1.8 million American homes. For a county of 17,000 people, the numbers are staggering. The project alone would nearly double the East Kentucky Power Cooperative’s yearly output.

And that’s before accounting for water. Data centers require enormous cooling systems that siphon off local supplies. Add in the direct loss of 5,000 acres of farmland and timberland — in a nation already facing record-low cattle herds and shrinking food security — and the price tag for “progress” keeps rising.

By comparison, the average coal plant sits on 585 acres; a natural gas plant, only 30. Those facilities power the nation. This one would devour power and water to feed servers.

A national trend

This isn’t just about Mason County. Hyperscale data centers are sprouting everywhere with the help of state and federal officials eager to rezone farmland. Twenty such facilities are already planned for Kentucky, 10 for Ohio, and 35 for Indiana. Each site removes productive farmland, stresses infrastructure, and hands more of the food and energy supply to giant corporations.

The sales pitch is always the same: jobs and economic development. Yet the real math looks different. The U.S. lost more than 100,000 beef-cow operations between 2017 and 2022. Farmers face higher feed costs, tighter margins, and competition from giant meat-packers. Now, Big Tech threatens to take what’s left.

Cronyism exposed

Mason County Judge-Executive Owen McNeill and other officials signed NDAs while promoting the deal. Residents see it for what it is: promises of prosperity in exchange for their land, heritage, and way of life. On Facebook, 1,500 locals in “We Are Mason County” compare it to a Nigerian prince scam — big promises, little proof, and huge risks.

The scam extends to Frankfort. House Bill 775 exempts data centers from Kentucky’s 6% sales and use tax for 50 years. Servers, networking equipment, cooling systems — all tax-free. Farmers pay sales tax on every tractor and plow, but Google and Meta lobbied for an endless free ride.

RELATED: Time to pump the brakes on Big Tech’s AI boondoggle

Photo by BlackJack3D via Getty Images

Land, food, water, power

At stake are the four essentials of civilization. Land grows food. Water sustains life. Power keeps the lights on. Once given away, none of these can be reclaimed. The boosters of artificial intelligence say America must have the infrastructure for it at any cost. But if AI can’t survive without tax breaks, secrecy, and the seizure of farmland, maybe it isn’t the inevitable juggernaut Silicon Valley claims.

Mason County itself bears the name of George Mason, the anti-Federalist who warned that monopolies in trade and commerce would mean “no Security for ... the People for their Rights.” He did not live to see global monopolies seizing farmland in Kentucky, but he predicted the danger.

The question now is whether Kentucky — and America — will heed the warning or allow “progress” to consume the very land, food, water, and power that make progress possible.

How Top Companies Bankrolled a Qatari Influence Op

In 2021, Pfizer and Amazon earned perfect scores on the Corporate Equality Index, a rating of how well companies treat their LGBT employees. Overseen by the Human Rights Campaign, which seeks to ensure that "LGBTQ+ people" are treated "as full and equal citizens … around the world," the index grades companies on their "workplace inclusion" and "support for LGTBQ equality under the law."

The post How Top Companies Bankrolled a Qatari Influence Op appeared first on .

Pizza at 100 mph? Pipedream is here to make it happen



Pizza delivered in five minutes through underground tunnels by 100mph robots. It sounds like bad science fiction. It’s not. It's happening in Austin this September.

Pipedream Labs just announced the city’s first “thing pipe” network — 24-inch underground tunnels filled with autonomous robots called "Otters" that carry 40-pound payloads at highway speeds for 25 cents per delivery. CEO Garrett Scott calls it “hyperlogistics.” The rest of us should call it inevitable.

If Pipedream delivers on its promises, Austin will become the first city where physical goods move at internet speeds.

A series of tubes

The system sounds deceptively simple. Rapid Fulfillment Centers connect to unmanned Portal kiosks through underground pneumatic networks. Customers order through an app. Robots grab items from inventory. Compressed air shoots them through tubes faster than most cars travel. Products arrive at neighborhood kiosks in minutes, not hours

The economics are brutal for traditional delivery. Uber Eats charges restaurants a commission of up to 30% plus delivery fees. Pipedream charges 25 cents total. A single human driver earning minimum wage costs more per hour than hundreds of robot deliveries. The math isn’t close.

Austin makes perfect sense as a testing ground. The city’s explosive growth has created permanent traffic gridlock. Delivery trucks clog narrow streets built for horses, not commerce. Construction projects multiply delays. Weather shuts down traditional delivery entirely. Underground networks bypass every surface-level problem.

The new pneumatic

The technology exists today. Pneumatic tube systems have moved documents through buildings for decades. Amazon’s fulfillment centers already use robots for inventory management. Compressed air propulsion powers factory automation worldwide. Pipedream isn't inventing new physics. It’s combining proven technologies in revolutionary ways.

The infrastructure requirements seem daunting until you examine the details. Twenty-four-inch pipes require smaller excavation than water mains or subway tunnels. Modern boring machines dig faster and cheaper than ever. Austin’s limestone geology simplifies construction compared to cities with bedrock or water table issues.

Forty miles of pipe and 100 Portal nodes represent a massive initial investment. But the payoff timeline is measured in months, not decades. Every successful delivery generates immediate revenue. The network becomes more valuable as it expands. Each new Portal increases utility for existing users.

Rental-based economies

The business model transcends simple delivery. Rental-based economies become practical when items arrive in minutes. Need a power drill for an hour? Order one, use it, return it to the same Portal. The economics shift from ownership to access. Physical goods behave like digital subscriptions.

RELATED: USPS celebrates 250 years as it hemorrhages billions — are taxpayers on the hook?

Paul Weaver/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Local businesses gain massive advantages. Small restaurants compete directly with chain delivery times. Neighborhood pharmacies match Amazon’s convenience. Independent retailers access instant fulfillment without warehouse investments. The network levels playing fields tilted toward corporate giants.

Delivery goes underground

The implications for urban planning are staggering. Delivery trucks disappear from residential streets. Parking requirements shrink when fewer people need cars for errands. Commercial real estate transforms when location matters less than network access. Zoning laws written for truck-based logistics become obsolete.

Residential architecture adapts accordingly. New homes include built-in delivery drawers connected to building-level Portal access. Apartment complexes install central receiving stations. The mailbox evolves into a two-way logistics portal. Physical goods flow in and out like email.

Underground networks operate regardless of weather. Reduced packaging needs less cardboard and plastic. Consolidated deliveries eliminate thousands of individual trips.

Swift and brutal

The social changes run deeper than convenience. Elderly residents access fresh groceries without leaving home. Disabled individuals gain independence through instant delivery. Rural areas connect to urban logistics networks. Geographic inequality diminishes when distance becomes irrelevant.

The competitive response will be swift and brutal. Amazon’s drone program suddenly looks outdated. FedEx and UPS face existential threats. Traditional retailers must adapt or die. The logistics industry transforms overnight when atoms move like bits.

Regulatory challenges loom large. City governments must approve underground construction. Safety regulations need updating for high-speed robot networks. Zoning laws require revision. But economic pressure overwhelms bureaucratic resistance. Cities that delay lose competitive advantage.

The scalability question remains open. Austin’s relatively flat terrain and cooperative local government provide ideal conditions. Dense urban areas with complex underground infrastructure face bigger challenges. But success in Austin proves the concept for nationwide expansion.

The security implications deserve consideration. Underground networks resist natural disasters and terrorist attacks better than surface infrastructure. But they create new vulnerabilities. Cyber attacks on automated systems could shut down entire cities. Physical access to tunnels enables sabotage.

Aggressive timeline

The labor displacement is undeniable. Thousands of delivery drivers lose their jobs immediately. Warehouse workers face increasing automation pressure. Trucking companies shrink. However, new jobs will likely arise in network maintenance, portal management, and robot programming. The transition creates both winners and losers.

I reached out to CEO Garrett Scott for comment on these implications. None was offered. Perhaps he's too busy building the future to explain it.

The timeline feels impossibly aggressive. September launch for a completely new infrastructure category? Most city projects take years to approve, let alone complete. But Austin’s tech-friendly culture and streamlined permitting process make rapid deployment possible.

The physics are sound. The economics are compelling. The technology exists. The only question is execution speed. If Pipedream delivers on its promises, Austin will become the first city where physical goods move at internet speeds.

Underground robot networks sound insane until you examine the alternatives. Traffic gridlock worsens daily. Delivery costs skyrocket. Traditional logistics systems break under growth pressure. Pipedream’s solution suddenly seems inevitable rather than impossible.

The future of logistics just went subterranean. The only surprise is that it took this long.

Bezos’ $56 Million Second Wedding Is A Monument To A Culture That Celebrates Divorce

Odds are against Bezos’ new marriage given his previous record, age, and relationship conduct.

After Pointlessly Villainizing Conservatives, Prime Video’s Ballet Dramedy ‘Étoile’ Is Canceled

Writer Amy Sherman-Palladino thinks ballet can only be saved through gimmicks. She’s wrong.

How Clarkson’s Farm Debunks Globalist Lies About England And Mass Migration

Jeremy Clarkson has become an icon of the farming world, a living rebuke to the artificial, technocratic, globalist, and humorless world order that prevails in the West.

Here's to 'Bosch' — the best TV show of the last 10 years



Late last April, one of the most consistently excellent and criminally underrated series on television ended its 11-year run.

In a sea of prestige dramas trying to out-slick each other with flashy cinematography and convoluted twists, "Bosch" and its immediate sequel, "Bosch: Legacy," stood apart — grounded, methodical, and unflinchingly real. The two shows were not only crime procedurals; they formed an ode to justice, to the city of Los Angeles, and to the people who live in its shadows.

In a world of shrinking attention spans and algorithm-driven content, "Bosch" is refreshingly analog. It trusts the viewer.

Moral gravity

At the heart of both shows is Titus Welliver’s performance as LAPD Detective Hieronymus "Harry" Bosch. Welliver doesn't just play Bosch, he inhabits him, bringing a weary moral gravity to a character guided by the principle that “everybody counts or nobody counts.”

It’s rare to see a protagonist stay so consistently true to his code without veering into caricature. In Welliver’s hands, Bosch is not a superhero — he is a deeply principled man operating in a world that has long since stopped rewarding principles.

What elevates "Bosch" even farther is its ensemble cast — seasoned, nuanced, and richly interconnected. And for fans of "The Wire," "Bosch" is like a reunion tour of greatness.

Through the 'Wire'

Jamie Hector, unforgettable on the legendary HBO series as ruthless, up-and-coming drug kingpin Marlo Stanfield, plays Bosch’s partner Jerry Edgar with quiet complexity and an evolving conscience. He brings a calm, inward energy that balances Welliver’s intensity.

The late Lance Reddick, always regal and sharp, reprises another authority figure as Chief Irving, a political operator whose arc turns increasingly poignant as the show progresses.

Even the great Chris Bauer (who anchored season two of "The Wire" as tragic union leader Frank Sobotka) is a key figure in the final case of the final season, delivering yet another command performance.

RELATED: Peter Falk's 'Columbo' returns us to a safer, saner America

NBC/Getty Images

These appearances aren’t just fan service — they reinforce the show's commitment to realism. These are actors who know how to play the long, quiet game of institutional drama, bringing an authenticity forged in the crucible of David Simon’s Baltimore to Michael Connelly’s Los Angeles.

The soul of the show

As both executive producer and the author of the "Bosch" novels (read them!), Connelly is the soul of the show, ensuring that it never loses the vivid and precise understanding of L.A.’s criminal ecosystem — from the politics of the LAPD to the ghosts of the Hollywood Hills — so evident in the books.

"Bosch" is also paced like a novel: patient, rich in detail, and unconcerned with the need to manufacture drama. Instead, tension arises naturally from the characters' decisions, regrets, and stubborn decency.

Unlike much of contemporary television, which seems obsessed with style over substance, "Bosch" is anti-glamour. Its color palette is sun-bleached and realistic, its villains often mundane and terrifyingly human. Its cops aren’t action heroes, but working-stiff detectives who make phone calls, pore over reports, and follow leads with grit and intelligence. There are no melodramatic shoot-outs without consequence — just slow justice, often paid in pain.

An 'earned' sequel

After "Bosch" ended after seven seasons in 2021, Welliver reprised the character in the 2022 sequel "Bosch: Legacy." Now retired from the LAPD, Bosch is a private investigator who often finds himself working with his one-time professional nemesis, defense attorney Honey "Money" Chandler (Mimi Rogers).

"Bosch: Legacy" avoids the common pitfalls of spin-offs. Its elevation of Bosch's daughter Maddie Bosch (Madison Lintz) to a central figure is earned rather than forced. The show evolves naturally, expanding the "Bosch" world without abandoning its roots. Connelly and his team know their audience isn’t looking for reinvention but rather continuity, truth, and character. And they deliver.

Refreshingly analog

In a world of shrinking attention spans and algorithm-driven content, "Bosch" is refreshingly analog. It trusts the viewer. It tells hard stories about justice, loss, race, and power in L.A. without shouting. It makes you care, then makes you wait. And when it finally hits its emotional beats, it hits like a freight train.

So here’s to "Bosch" — a show that never chased trends, never insulted its audience, and never wavered in its dedication to storytelling.

With a dream cast that bridged generations of great television ("The Wire" alumni among them) and the steady hand of Michael Connelly guiding the ship, "Bosch" was the best show on TV for a decade.

"Bosch" will live on, of course, available on the usual sites to be revisited by longtime fans and discovered by new ones. As "Bosch" inevitably cedes its place in the culture to newer, shinier entertainments, we can appraise its achievement as a whole and call it something else: a classic.