EXCLUSIVE: Family Policy Org Targets Swing State Hispanic Voters With Ads Highlighting Harris’ Transgender Policies
'Insane policies that Democrats promote'
The policy director for a pro-family advocacy group received a temporary Twitter ban after he called for South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem (R) to support legislation that would prohibit the medical castration of children.
"Now we hope that governors will likewise be emboldened to continue the fight against the evil gender ideology being forced on America's children by joining Arkansas and Tennessee in banning the chemical castration and surgical mutilation of minors suffering from gender dysphoria," Jon Schweppe, the policy director for the American Principles Project, tweeted Tuesday.
Schweppe's tweet came in response to Noem's push for the state legislature to pass a bill that would prevent transgender women from competing in women's sports on both the K-12 and collegiate levels, according to a press release from the APP.
Earlier this year, Arkansas passed legislation that would outlaw the use of experimental genital mutilation procedures and hormone treatment for individuals under the age of 18, the Federalist reported.
The APP announced Schweppe's Twitter suspension Wednesday, taking screenshots of the platform's announcement that Schweppe's tweet had violated the platform's rules of use.
"BREAKING: APP Director of Policy and Government Affairs @JonSchweppe had his Twitter account temporarily suspended. For what exactly? Calling on governors to ban the chemical castration and surgical mutilation of children," APP tweeted.
BREAKING: APP Director of Policy and Government Affairs @JonSchweppe had his Twitter account temporarily suspended.\n\nFor what exactly?\n\nCalling on governors to ban the chemical castration and surgical mutilation of children.pic.twitter.com/oLHid9H5e1— American Principles \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@American Principles \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1639605233
Twitter claimed that Schweppe violated the rules regarding "hateful conduct."
The rules state that an individual on Twitter may not "promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease."
Schweppe appealed his suspension; however, Twitter denied his request, determining that he had committed a violation of the platform's rules.
The APP posted a screenshot of Twitter's denial of Schweppe's appeal to restore his account and asked if Twitter supported the chemical castration of children in response to the platform's refusal to restore his account.
UPDATE:@JonSchweppe appealed his suspension, saying that he is \u201cadvocating for protecting children from violence.\u201d\n\nTwitter rejected him.\n\nDoes Twitter officially support the chemical castration of children?pic.twitter.com/m61B2PXWdR— American Principles \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@American Principles \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1639608488
Schweppe has voiced his support for a legislative solution to Big Tech censorship issues, outlining what he believes is a small-government solution to an assault on free speech.
Schweppe wrote an op-ed published in February in which he advocated for clearly defining the difference between an online publisher and a platform. He articulated that once these lines have been clearly defined, only publishers should be granted "special immunity from civil liability."
"The open forum is presenting itself as a digital version of the public square. The publisher is not, and therefore it is reasonable for it to assume some legal responsibility for its content," he wrote.
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem (R) has released the draft text of a new version of the "Fairness in Women's Sports" legislation she rejected earlier this year. The new bill, which was sent to reporters Tuesday, would prohibit any student at a state school from joining a sports team that does not match his or her biological sex.
“This is about fairness. Every young woman deserves an equal playing field where she can achieve success, but common sense tells us that males have an unfair physical advantage over females in athletic competition. It is for those reasons that only girls should be competing in girls’ sports,” Noem said. “Women have fought long and hard for equal athletic opportunities, and South Dakota will defend them, but we have to do it in a smart way.”
Controversy erupted last March when Noem opposed a previous version of this legislation, H.B. 1217, on the grounds that the way the state House bill was written was "unrealistic in the context of collegiate sports." At the time, the governor argued that flaws in the bill's design would make South Dakota vulnerable to litigation from out of state organizations like the NCAA.
Social conservative groups that backed H.B. 1217 accused Noem of betrayal and of gutting the bill when she issued a "style and form" revision of the legislation and sent it back to the state legislature with changes. The legislature ultimately rejected Noem's changes, and she vetoed the bill.
In its place, Noem issued two executive orders on Mar. 29 designed to keep gender dysphoric males from competing against girls at the K-12 and collegiate level. The new legislation proposed by Noem would codify her executive orders.
“Only female athletes, based on their biological sex, shall participate in any team, sport, or athletic event designated as being for females, women, or girls,” the draft text says. Noem's proposal defines “biological sex” as “the sex listed on the student's official birth certificate issued at or near the time of the athlete’s birth.”
The bill would also give any athlete that "suffers direct or indirect harm" as a result of a school that violates the law the right to take legal action for relief.
“This legislation does not have the problematic provisions that were included in last year’s House Bill 1217,” the governor said. "Those flawed provisions would have led to litigation for our state, as well as for the families of young South Dakota athletes – male and female alike.”
The new transgender sports bill appears to be winning over at least some of Noem's conservative critics.
"No exaggeration: It's probably the strongest bill I've seen to date. Especially with the birth certificate stuff and the private causes of action," Jon Schweppe, the director of Policy and Government Affairs for the American Principles Project, said.
In a statement, APP President Terry Schilling, who had sharply criticized Noem for opposing H.B. 1217, praised her new proposal as well.
"We're pleased that Gov. Noem is finally taking action in South Dakota to adequately protect female athletes. Our initial impression of her proposed legislation is that it is a strong measure to defend the integrity of women's sports from K-12 to college. We encourage state lawmakers to support it and officially make South Dakota the tenth state to enshrine protections for women's sports into law," Schilling said.
He added that it was "unfortunate" Noem waited nine months after the issue first came up in the South Dakota legislature to release this proposal, criticizing her executive orders as "toothless."
"Although it's good to see her correcting her mistake, she missed a golden opportunity to show leadership on this issue. We hope she will learn from this experience and choose to stand up to woke business interests and leftist institutions the next time a similar fight arises. She still has much work to do to gain back conservatives' trust," Schilling said.